1
|
Kim M, Tadros AB, Boe LA, Vingan P, Allen RJ, Mehrara BJ, Morrow M, Nelson JA. Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15294-w. [PMID: 39075246 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15294-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although studies have compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after breast conserving-therapy (BCT) and postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR), they often have been confounded by treatment or other factors that complicate a direct comparison. This study aimed to compare PROs after BCT and PMBR by using propensity score-matching analysis. METHODS Patients who underwent BCT or PMBR between 2010 and 2022 and completed the BREAST-Q were identified. Each BCT patient was matched to a PMBR patient using nearest-neighbor 1:1 matching with replacement for each BREAST-Q time point. Outcomes included all prospectively collected BREAST-Q domains preoperatively, at 6 months, and at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively. A 4-point difference was considered clinically meaningful. RESULTS For this study, 6215 patients (2501 BCT [40.2%] and 3714 PMBR [59.8%] patients) were eligible, and 2616 unique patients were matched. Preoperatively, 463 BCT and 463 PMBR patients were matched for analysis (6 months [443 matched pairs], 1 year [639 matched pairs], 2 years [421 matched pairs], 3 years [254 matched pairs]). At 6 months postoperatively, the BCT patients scored higher on all BREAST-Q domains than the PMBR patients (p < 0.05; differences > 4 points). At 1, 2, and 3 years, the patients who underwent BCT consistently had superior Satisfaction With Breasts, Psychosocial Well-Being, and Sexual Well-Being (p < 0.05), and the differences were clinically meaningful. CONCLUSION In this statistically powered study, the BCT patients reported higher quality of life than the PMBR patients in early assessment and also through 3 years of follow-up evaluation. Given the equivalency in survival and recurrence outcomes between BCT and PMBR, patients eligible for either surgery should be counseled regarding the superiority of BCT in terms of PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minji Kim
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Audree B Tadros
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lillian A Boe
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Perri Vingan
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Allen
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Babak J Mehrara
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim M, Ali B, Graziano FD, Colvin K, Boe LA, Allen RJ, Nelson JA, Disa J. Analyzing mastectomy and reconstruction weight in immediate autologous breast reconstruction: A preliminary study. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:1466-1474. [PMID: 38637992 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to explore the ideal breast size by assessing the relationship between mastectomy to free flap weight ratio and complications as well as patient-reported outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction (ABR). METHOD A retrospective review of patients undergoing bilateral immediate ABR with mastectomy and flap weights available was completed. Patients were divided into three groups based on the ratio of mastectomy to flap weights. The patients were grouped as "maintained" if the flap weight was within 10% of the mastectomy weight. Patients with a weight difference greater than 10% were used to declare "downsized" or "upsized." Outcomes included complications and four domains of the BREAST-Q at 1-year postoperatively. RESULTS Three hundred and fifty-nine patients were included in the analysis, of which 112 were downsized, 91 maintained, and 156 upsized, respectively. Presence of complications did not significantly differ among the groups. At 1-year postoperatively, Sexual Well-being significantly differed (p = 0.033). Between preoperative and 1 year, patients who upsized experienced an improvement in Satisfaction with Breasts by 16 points (p < 0.001), while patients who downsized experienced a decline in Physical Well-being of the Chest by 7 points (p = 0.016). Multivariable linear regression model showed that Sexual Well-being was 13 points lower in the downsized cohort than in the maintained cohort (β = -13, 95% confidence interval: -21 to -5.4; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Although complication rates do not significantly differ between the three cohorts, patients who downsize may have lower Sexual Well-being postoperatively. Surgeons should consider our preliminary findings to counsel patients preoperatively about the predicted breast size and the impact of downsizing on sexual health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minji Kim
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Barkat Ali
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Francis D Graziano
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kate Colvin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lillian A Boe
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert J Allen
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joseph Disa
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Asal MF, Barakat KE, Elsayed AAR, Awad AT, Basson MD. Outcomes of Implant Exchange and Latissimus Dorsi Flap Replacement After Breast Implant Complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024:10.1007/s00266-024-04107-w. [PMID: 38740623 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04107-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immediate action is required to address some complications of implant-based reconstruction after mastectomy to prevent reconstruction failure. Implant exchange may be simple but poses the risk of further complications while autologous flap reconstruction seems more complex but may pose less subsequent risk. Which of these is preferable remains unclear. METHODS We reviewed thirty-two female breast cancer patients who had serious complications with their breast implants after post-mastectomy reconstruction. Latissimus dorsi flap (LDF) patients underwent explantation and immediate reconstruction with an LDF, while implant exchange (IE) patients underwent immediate implant removal and exchange with an expander followed by delayed reconstruction with silicon or immediately with a smaller size silicone implant. RESULTS LDF patients underwent a single operation with an average duration of care of 31 days compared to an average 1.8 procedures (p= 0.005) with an average duration of care of 129.9 days (p < 0.001) among IE patients. Seven IE (50%) had serious complications that required subsequent revision while no LDF patients required additional procedures. Patient overall satisfaction and esthetics results were also superior in the LDF group at six months. CONCLUSION In patients who want to reconstructively rescue and salvage their severely infected or exposed breast implant, the LDF offers an entirely autologous solution. LDF reconstruction in this setting allows patients to avoid an extended duration of care, reduces their risk of complications, and preserves the reconstructive process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III The journal asks authors to assign a level of evidence to each article. For a complete description of Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, see the Table of Contents or the online Instructions for Authors at www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed F Asal
- Surgical Oncology and Breast Reconstruction Unit, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt
| | - Khaled E Barakat
- Surgical Oncology and Breast Reconstruction Unit, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Adham R Elsayed
- Department of Surgery, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 State Route 44, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA
| | - Ahmed T Awad
- Surgical Oncology and Breast Reconstruction Unit, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt
| | - Marc D Basson
- Department of Surgery, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 State Route 44, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA.
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA.
- University Hospitals NEOMED Faculty Scholar, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clausen-Oreamuno C, Perez-Rodrigo S, Stillaert FBJL, Tejerina A, Tejerina A, Shellock FG. Benefits of Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging During Breast Tissue Expansion: Literature Review and Case Series. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 44:50-59. [PMID: 37577837 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer results in up to 1.6 million new candidates for yearly breast reconstruction (BR) surgery. Two-stage breast reconstruction surgery with the use of a tissue expander (TE) is a common approach to reconstructing the breast after mastectomy. However, a common disadvantage encountered with the traditional breast TE is the magnetic injection port, which has been reported to cause injuries in patients undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Therefore this type of breast TE is labeled "MR unsafe." Recent technological advances have incorporated radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology in the TE to allow for the location of the injection port without magnetic components, resulting in an MR-conditional TE. This paper aims to review the information regarding the safety profile of TEs with magnetic ports and to gather distinct clinical scenarios in which an MR-conditional TE benefits the patient during the BR process. A literature review ranging from 2018 to 2022 was performed with the search terms: "tissue expander" OR "breast tissue expander" AND "magnetic resonance imaging" OR "MRI." Additionally, a case series was collected from each of the authors' practices. The literature search yielded 13 recent peer-reviewed papers, and 6 distinct clinical scenarios were compiled and discussed. Most clinicians find MRI examinations to be the state-of-art diagnostic imaging modality. However, due to the preexisting risks associated with TEs with magnetic ports, the MRI labeling classification should be considered when deciding which TE is the most appropriate for the patient requiring MRI examinations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
|
5
|
van Bekkum S, Clarijs ME, van der Veen FJC, van Rosmalen J, Koppert LB, Menke-Pluijmers MBE. What affects women's decision-making on breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer? Breast Cancer 2023; 30:772-784. [PMID: 37303033 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-023-01471-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To establish the breast reconstruction rate in a large Dutch teaching hospital, and to gain insight into the motives of women to opt for or reject post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. METHODS In a retrospective, cross-sectional study, all consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy for invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were identified and categorized into two groups based on subsequent breast reconstruction or not. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed with the validated Breast-Q and a short survey about the decision-making process in breast reconstruction. These outcomes were compared between the two groups using univariable analyses, multivariable logistic regression, and multiple linear regression analyses. The Breast-Q scores were also compared to Dutch normative values. RESULTS A total of 319 patients were identified of whom 68% had no breast reconstruction. Of the 102 patients with breast reconstruction, the majority (93%) received immediate, instead of delayed breast reconstruction. The survey was completed by 155 (49%) patients. The non-reconstruction group, on average, reported significantly poorer psychosocial well-being, compared to the reconstruction group as well as compared to the normative data. However, the majority of the non-reconstruction group (83%) stated that they had no desire for breast reconstruction. In both groups, most patients stated that the provided information was sufficient. CONCLUSION Patients have personal motives to opt for or reject breast reconstruction. It seemed that patients differ in their rating of values that affect their decision since the same arguments were used to opt for or reject reconstruction. Notably, patients were well-informed in their decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara van Bekkum
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, P.O. Box 444, 3300 AK, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes E Clarijs
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joost van Rosmalen
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pili N, Pasteris A, Serra PL, Sini G, Pinna M, Trignano E, Rubino C. Comparative evaluation using PRO of an algorithm of one-stage immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction versus two-stage reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 84:487-495. [PMID: 37418847 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction has proven to be an oncologically safe technique, but there are some conditions that do not allow its performance. The introduction of new surgical techniques and the recent COVID-19 pandemic have pushed us to introduce a breast reconstruction algorithm in our clinical practice. This allows a one-stage immediate reconstruction for all patients, regardless of their anatomical characteristics, the type of implants used, and the need for postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS A total of 40 patients were recruited and divided into two cohorts, 20 patients underwent immediate one-stage breast reconstruction in the period between October 2019 and January 2021, and 20 patients completed the two-stage reconstructive process in the period prior to October 2019. During the follow-up at 6 months, all patients who had completed the reconstructive process filled out the Breast-Q Reconstruction Module Pre and Postoperative scales questionnaire. The outcomes of the questionnaires were compared between the two cohorts, and statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS Statistics 20 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS The analysis of patient-reported outcomes showed that patients from the one-stage group reported better outcomes in all items evaluated. We did not find statistically significant differences concerning the rate of complications and length of hospital stay between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The analysis of the results shows that the outcomes reported by patients who completed breast reconstruction according to our algorithm are statistically better than those with the two-stage technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Pili
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy.
| | - Andrea Pasteris
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - Pietro L Serra
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - Germana Sini
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - Michela Pinna
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - Emilio Trignano
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - Corrado Rubino
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Manrique OJ, Escandón JM. Breast reconstruction in the era of evidence-based medicine. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2023; 11:341. [PMID: 37675303 PMCID: PMC10477617 DOI: 10.21037/atm-2022-79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar J Manrique
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Joseph M Escandón
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
ZHAO W, CHONG YY, CHIEN WT. Effectiveness of cognitive-based interventions for improving body image of breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2023; 10:100213. [PMID: 37089782 PMCID: PMC10120298 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Breast cancer patients often suffer from body image disturbance due to impairment of their body/appearance resulting from surgeries, other cancer treatments, and/or their complications. Cognitive-based interventions (CBIs) have recently been adopted for patients having breast cancer but their effects on improving body image are uncertain. This systematic review aimed to examine the effects of CBIs on body image in these patients, identify the optimal dose, characteristics, and/or component(s) of an effective intervention for these patients to inform future research and practice. Methods According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, ten online databases and five search engines were used to search for eligible studies. Quality appraisal of included studies and meta-analysis results were conducted using Rob 2 and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation profiler Guideline Development Tool, respectively. RevMan and comprehensive meta-analysis software were used to perform data analysis and synthesis. Results Eleven eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of cognitive behavioral, acceptance and commitment, mindfulness, and self-compassion therapies were reviewed. Results of the meta-analysis showed that CBIs significantly reduced negative body image perception (Standardised Mean Difference, SMD = -0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI], [-0.87, -0.11], I 2 = 81%, 6 RCTs, 758 participants), when compared to the control groups (mainly usual care) at immediately post-intervention; in which, CBT-based (SMD = -0.37, 95% CI (-0.60, -0.13), I 2 = 0%) and group-based (SMD = -0.38, 95% CI (-0.62, -0.13), I 2 = 0%) programs had more consistent and significant effects. Conclusions In view of the highly heterogeneous and limited RCTs identified, high-quality controlled trials of CBIs for improving the body image of patients having breast cancer are suggested. Systematic review registration PROSPERO, CRD42021259173.
Collapse
|
9
|
Augustin A, Pülzl P, Morandi EM, Winkelmann S, Schoberleitner I, Brunner C, Ritter M, Bauer T, Wachter T, Wolfram D. Donor-Site Morbidity and Quality of Life after Autologous Breast Reconstruction with PAP versus TMG Flap. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5682-5697. [PMID: 36005186 PMCID: PMC9406532 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
The transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) and the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap are both safe choices for autologous breast reconstruction originating from the same donor region in the upper thigh. We aimed to compare the post-operative outcome regarding donor-site morbidity and quality of life. We included 18 patients who had undergone autologous breast reconstruction with a PAP flap (n = 27 flaps). Prospective evaluation of donor-site morbidity was performed by applying the same questionnaire that had already been established in a previous study evaluating TMG flap (n = 25 flaps) outcome, and results were compared. Comparison of the two patient groups showed equivalent results concerning patient-reported visibility of the donor-site scar and thigh symmetry. Still, the TMG group was significantly more satisfied with the scar (p = 0.015) and its position (p = 0.001). No difference was found regarding the ability to sit for prolonged periods. Donor-site wound complications were seen more frequently in the PAP group (29.6%) than in the TMG group (4.0%). Both groups expressed rather high satisfaction with their quality of life. Both flaps show minimal functional donor-site morbidity and high patient satisfaction. To minimize wound healing problems in PAP patients, thorough planning of the skin paddle is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Augustin
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Petra Pülzl
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Evi M. Morandi
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Selina Winkelmann
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ines Schoberleitner
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christine Brunner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Magdalena Ritter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Thomas Bauer
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tanja Wachter
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Dolores Wolfram
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-(0)-512-504-22731
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dsouza R, Gaikwad P, Samuel VM, Thomas C. Breast reconstruction following mastectomy in Indian women: a neglected entity. BMJ Case Rep 2022; 15:e248322. [PMID: 35863860 PMCID: PMC9310151 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-248322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Phyllodes tumour is a rapidly growing neoplasm with a propensity to involve the entire breast tissue. In large tumours, the treatment comprises a wide local excision or a mastectomy. A woman in her 20s from rural India presented with complaints of a recurrent left breast lump. The lump progressed to a large size, limiting her social activities and causing depression. On examination, she had a mass occupying almost the entire left breast, with stretched skin, dilated veins and pressure necrosis. There were no palpable axillary nodes. She was offered a wide local excision and reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi pedicled flap. After much discussion and clarification of some misconceptions around breast reconstruction, she underwent the planned surgery. This was followed by adjuvant radiation therapy as the histopathology was consistent with a complex phyllodes tumour with close margins. She was well at 1-year follow-up and led a good family and social life. Breast conservation and reconstruction are seldom offered as part of cancer treatment in India. All women should be offered surgical options that are oncologically safe while preserving body image, and hence healthcare providers must work towards breaking the barriers that prevent breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Royson Dsouza
- General Surgery, ASHWINI Gudalur Adivasi Hospital, Vellore, India
| | - Pranay Gaikwad
- Department of General Surgery Unit 1, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India
| | - Vasanth Mark Samuel
- Department of General Surgery Unit 1, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India
| | - Cecil Thomas
- Department of General Surgery Unit 1, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Psychological and Aesthetic Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3679. [PMID: 34277318 PMCID: PMC8277256 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: Patients who undergo breast cancer treatment require psychosocial and aesthetic rehabilitation. Advantages of breast reconstruction in-patient rehabilitation are well known. Oncoplastic organ-preserving surgery offers aesthetically better results, yet is often considered less safe than more radical procedures. We compared the aesthetic and psychological outcomes in patients undergoing breast reconstruction and oncoplastic breast cancer treatment. Methods: In total, 1130 patients who received either breast reconstruction or oncoplastic breast cancer surgery were included in the study. Patients were classified into two groups. Group 1 included 510 patients who received breast reconstruction surgery. Group 2 included 620 patients who received oncoplastic surgery. The following aspects were compared between the two groups: demographics, tumor progression, and immunohistochemical aspects, complications, hospitalization stay, and psychological and aesthetic outcomes. Results: Patients in the oncoplastic group showed statistically significant higher psychosocial and aesthetic outcomes, as well as lower incidence of complications, revision rate, disease progression, and recurrence. The majority of oncoplastic patients were treated in early stages of breast cancer. Conclusion: Offering superior treatment results, oncoplastic organ-preserving surgery should be favored in patients with earlier stages of cancer progression.
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang J, Yang C, Zhang Y, Ji F, Gao H, Zhuang X, Li W, Pan W, Shen B, Zhang T, Chen Y, Wang K. Effects of Surgery on Prognosis of Young Women With Operable Breast Cancer in Different Marital Statuses: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:666316. [PMID: 34249703 PMCID: PMC8261040 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.666316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of surgical approaches [including mastectomy, breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) on prognosis of young women (<40 years old) with operable breast cancer has not been determined yet, and this might vary in patients with different marital statuses. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of surgery on survival outcomes for young women with operable breast cancer in different marital statuses. METHODS We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify young women with operable breast cancer between 2004 and 2016, who underwent mastectomy, BCT or PMBR. We assessed overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard ratios using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS Compared to mastectomy, both of BCT and PMBR conferred better OS (BCT: HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.69-0.90, p <0.001; PMBR: HR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.63-0.78, p <0.001) and BCSS (BCT: HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.69-0.91, p = 0.001; PMBR: HR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.65-0.81, p <0.001), but there was no significant difference of survival between BCT and PMBR group. The survival benefit of BCT compared to mastectomy remained significant in unmarried young women (OS: HR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.55-0.83, p <0.001; BCSS: HR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.56-0.86, p = 0.001) but not in the married (OS: HR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.75-1.05, p = 0.177; BCSS: HR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.75-1.05, p = 0.161), while no matter married or not, PMBR group had better OS and BCSS than mastectomy group but not BCT group. CONCLUSION Both of BCT and PMBR had improved survival compared to mastectomy for young women with operable breast cancer. The survival benefit of BCT compared to mastectomy remained significant in unmarried patients but not in married patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junsheng Zhang
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Ciqiu Yang
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fei Ji
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongfei Gao
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaosheng Zhuang
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Weiping Li
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weijun Pan
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bo Shen
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Tingfeng Zhang
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuanqi Chen
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kun Wang
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- *Correspondence: Kun Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Radtke C. Standards in Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction. Breast Care (Basel) 2019; 14:269-270. [PMID: 31798385 PMCID: PMC6883455 DOI: 10.1159/000503680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Radtke
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|