1
|
Dang VT, Péricart S, Manceau C, Aziza R, Portalez D, Lagarde S, Soulié M, Gamé X, Malavaud B, Thoulouzan M, Doumerc N, Prudhomme T, Ploussard G, Roumiguié M. Significant prostate cancer risk after MRI-guided biopsy showing benign findings: Results from a cohort of 381 men. THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102547. [PMID: 37858376 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2023.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND MRI-guided biopsy (MGB) contributes to the diagnosis of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa). However, there are no clear recommendations for the management of men after a negative MGB. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of csPCa after a first negative MGB. METHODS Between 2014 and 2020, we selected men with a PI-RADS score ≥ 3 on MRI and a negative MGB (showing benign findings) performed for suspected prostate cancer. MGB (targeted and systematic biopsies) was performed using fully integrated mobile fusion imaging (KOELIS). The primary endpoint was the rate of csPCa (defined as an ISUP grade ≥ 2) diagnosed after a first negative MGB. RESULTS A total of 381 men with a negative MGB and a median age of 65 (IQR: 59-69, range: 46-85) years were included. During the median follow-up of 31 months, 124 men (32.5%) had a new MRI, and 76 (19.9%) were referred for a new MGB, which revealed csPCa in 16 (4.2%) of them. We found no statistical difference in the characteristics of men diagnosed with csPCa compared with men with no csPCa after the second MGB. CONCLUSION We observed a risk of significant prostate cancer in 4% of men two years after a negative MRI-guided biopsy. Performing a repeat MRI could improve the selection of men who will benefit from a repeat MRI-guided biopsy, but a clear protocol is needed to follow these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V T Dang
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
| | - S Péricart
- Department of Anatomopathological, Toulouse Cancer University Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - C Manceau
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - R Aziza
- Department of Radiology, Toulouse Cancer University Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - D Portalez
- Department of Radiology, Toulouse Cancer University Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - S Lagarde
- Department of Radiology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - M Soulié
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - X Gamé
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - B Malavaud
- Department of Urology, Toulouse Cancer University Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - M Thoulouzan
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - N Doumerc
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - T Prudhomme
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - G Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lan H, Zhou Y, Lin G, Zhao H, Wu G. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Prostate Biopsy in Patients with ≥ One Negative Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancer Invest 2022; 40:789-798. [PMID: 36062985 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2022.2121965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) detection sensitivity between magnetic resonance imaging guided-biopsy (MRI-GB) and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB) in patients with ≥ 1 negative TRUS-GB, and to explore the additive value of TRUS-GB to MRI-GB. The meta-analysis of 18 studies demonstrated that MRI-GB had a similar sensitivity for PCa detection but a higher sensitivity for csPCa than TRUS-GB. In conclusion, there was limited value in combining TRUS-GB with MRI-GB compared with MRI-GB alone for csPCa detection in patients with one or more negative TRUS-GBs that were suspicious of having PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailong Lan
- Department of Radiology, Wuchuan People's Hospital, Wuchuan, China
| | - Yanling Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Xiaolan Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Guisen Lin
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Hua Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Wuchuan People's Hospital, Wuchuan, China
| | - Guantu Wu
- Department of Urology, Wuchuan People's Hospital, Wuchuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brunner C, Schreiber SJ, Bokemeyer M, Ransmayr G, Struhal W, Olbert ED, Alhani N, Vosko MR. Value of ultrasound fusion imaging in detecting vascular cerebral white matter pathology. Ultrasound J 2022; 14:25. [PMID: 35713746 PMCID: PMC9206046 DOI: 10.1186/s13089-022-00275-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial sonography is beside magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography, a well-established imaging method for evaluation of brain parenchyma and already implicated in various neurological disorders as bed-side investigation possibility in clinical routine. The aim of this study was the qualitative assessment detecting vascular white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), with ultrasound fusion-imaging technique (UFI) and to find the optimal location for their visualization in accordance to the grade of WMHs and to possibly providing a standardized protocol for clinical use. RESULTS 29 patients with WMHs of variable degree quantified according to Fazekas grading scale (n = 13 I; n = 9 II; n = 7 III) and 11 subjects with normal findings on MRI were identified for further analysis. Ultrasound images were analyzed to a standardized protocol and predefined anatomical landmarks. UFI could visualize the MRI-verified WMHs in 147 of 161 localizations (91%). The overall ultrasound detection rate of WMHs increased with higher degree of WMHs burden (I:85%, II:94%, III:97%). The highest sensitivity was achieved at the contralateral central part (CPc) (97%) of the lateral ventricle. The inter-rater analysis between 2 independent raters, who were blinded to the patient's diagnosis and assessed only the B-mode ultrasound images, indicated an 86% agreement with an overall moderate strength of agreement (κ: 0.489, p < 0.0005) for all localizations. The highest accordance within raters was shown at the CPc; 92% (κ: 0.645, p < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS This explorative study describes prospectively the ultrasound detection of periventricular vascular WMHs based on MRI lesions using UFI. Transcranial ultrasound (TCS) could serve as an additional screening opportunity for the detection of incidental WMLs during routine TCS investigations to initiate early vascular risk factor modification in primary prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Brunner
- Department of Neurology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital Tulln, Alter Ziegelweg 10, 3430, Tulln, Austria
- Department of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital, 2, Krankenhausstraße 09, 4020, Linz, Austria
- Department of Neurology, Asklepios Clinic Brandenburg, Anton-Saefkow-Allee 2, 14772, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
| | - Stephan Joachim Schreiber
- Department of Neurology, Asklepios Clinic Brandenburg, Anton-Saefkow-Allee 2, 14772, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Oberhavel Kliniken, Clinic Hennigsdorf, Marwitzer Straße 91, 16761, Hennigsdorf, Germany
| | - Martin Bokemeyer
- Department of Neurology, Asklepios Clinic Brandenburg, Anton-Saefkow-Allee 2, 14772, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
| | - Gerhard Ransmayr
- Department of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital, 2, Krankenhausstraße 09, 4020, Linz, Austria
| | - Walter Struhal
- Department of Neurology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital Tulln, Alter Ziegelweg 10, 3430, Tulln, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Daniela Olbert
- Department of Neurology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital Tulln, Alter Ziegelweg 10, 3430, Tulln, Austria
| | - Naela Alhani
- Department of Neurology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital Tulln, Alter Ziegelweg 10, 3430, Tulln, Austria
| | - Milan Rastislav Vosko
- Department of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital, 2, Krankenhausstraße 09, 4020, Linz, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Häggman M, Dahlman P, Ahlberg M, Liss P, Cantera Ahlman R, Dragomir A, Ladjevardi S. Bi-parametric MRI/TRUS fusion targeted repeat biopsy after systematic 10-12 core TRUS-guided biopsy reveals more significant prostate cancer especially in anteriorly located tumors. Acta Radiol Open 2022; 11:20584601221085520. [PMID: 35392628 PMCID: PMC8980410 DOI: 10.1177/20584601221085520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background MRI and fusion guided biopsy have an increased role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Purpose To demonstrate the possible advantages with Bi-parametric MRI fusion-guided repeat biopsy over systematic 10-12-core biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Material and Methods Four hundred and twenty-three consecutive men, with previous systematic 10-12-core TRUS-guided biopsy, and with suspicion of, or diagnosis of, low-risk prostate cancer underwent fusion-guided prostate biopsy between February 2015 and February 2017. The material was retrospectively assessed. In 220 cases no previous cancer was diagnosed, and in 203 cases confirmatory fusion guided biopsy was performed prior to active monitoring. MRI was classified according to PI-RADS. Systematic biopsy was compared to fusion guided biopsy for the detection of cancer, and PI-RADS was compared to the Gleason score. Results Fusion guided biopsy detected significantly more cancers than systematic (p < .001). Gleason scores were higher in the fusion biopsy group (p < .001). Anterior tumors were present in 54% of patients. Fusion biopsy from these lesions showed cancer in 53% with previously negative biopsy in systematic biopsies and 66% of them were upgraded from low risk to intermediate or high-risk cancers. Conclusion These results show superior detection rate and grading of bi-parametric MRI/TRUS fusion targeted repeat biopsy over systematic 10-12 core biopsies. Fusion guided biopsy detects more significant cancers despite using fewer cores. The risk group was changed for many patients initially selected for active surveillance due to upgrading of tumors. Bi-parametric MRI shows promising results in detecting anterior tumors in patients with suspected prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Häggman
- Department of Urology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Pär Dahlman
- Department of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mats Ahlberg
- Department of Urology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Per Liss
- Department of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Anca Dragomir
- Department of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Pathology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sam Ladjevardi
- Department of Urology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|