1
|
Porcaro AB, Bianchi A, Panunzio A, Gallina S, Serafin E, Tafuri A, Trabacchin N, Orlando R, Ornaghi PI, Mazzucato G, Vidiri S, D'Aietti D, Montanaro F, Brusa D, Patuzzo GM, Artoni F, Baielli A, Migliorini F, De Marco V, Veccia A, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. Tumor upgrading among very favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: how can it impact the clinical course? Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:2597-2605. [PMID: 38553619 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04019-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to investigate predictors of unfavorable tumor upgrading in very favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, in addition to evaluate how it may affect the risk of disease progression. METHODS A very favorable subset of IR PCa patients presenting with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/mL, percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC) < 50%, and either International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 1 and clinical stage T2b or ISUP grade group 2 and clinical stage T1c-2b was identified. Unfavorable pathology at radical prostatectomy was defined as the presence of ISUP grade group > 2 (unfavorable tumor upgrading), extracapsular extension (ECE), and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). Disease progression was defined as the event of biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases. Associations were evaluated by Cox regression and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Overall, 210 patients were identified between January 2013 and October 2020. Unfavorable tumor upgrading was detected in 71 (33.8%) cases, and adverse tumor stage, including ECE or SVI in 18 (8.6%) and 11 (5.2%) patients, respectively. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 38.5 (16-61) months. PCa progression occurred in 24 (11.4%) patients. Very favorable IR PCa patients with unfavorable tumor upgrading at final pathology showed a persistent risk of disease progression, which hold significance after adjustment for all factors (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 5.95, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.97-17.92, p = 0.002) of which PSA was an independent predictor (HR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-2.08, p = 0.008). Moreover, these subjects were more likely to belong to the biopsy ISUP grade group 2. CONCLUSIONS Very favorable IR PCa patients hiding unfavorable tumor upgrading were more likely to experience disease progression. Unfavorable tumor upgrading involved about one-third of cases and was less likely to occur in patients presenting with biopsy ISUP grade group 1. Tumor misclassification is an issue to discuss, when counseling this subset of patients for active surveillance because of the risk of delayed active treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Nicolò Trabacchin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Irene Ornaghi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano D'Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Brusa
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Marafioti Patuzzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Porcaro AB, Panunzio A, Orlando R, Tafuri A, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Serafin E, Mazzucato G, Montanaro F, Baielli A, Artoni F, Ditonno F, Roggero L, Franceschini A, Boldini M, Treccani LP, Veccia A, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, De Marco V, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Bertolo R, Antonelli A. The 2012 Briganti nomogram predicts disease progression after surgery in high-risk prostate cancer patients. Arab J Urol 2024; 22:227-234. [PMID: 39355796 PMCID: PMC11441050 DOI: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2339062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives We tested whether the 2012 Briganti nomogram for the risk of pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI) may represent a predictor of disease progression after surgical management in high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients according to the European Association of Urology. Methods Between January 2013 and December 2021, HR PCa patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) were identified. The 2012 Briganti nomogram was evaluated as a continuous and categorical variable, which was dichotomized using the median. The risk of disease progression, defined as the event of biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence/distant metastases was assessed by Cox regression models. Results Overall, 204 patients were identified. The median 2012 Briganti nomogram score resulted 12.0% (IQR: 6.0-22.0%). PLNI was detected in 57 (27.9%) cases. Compared to patients who had preoperatively a 2012 Briganti nomogram score ≤12%, those with a score >12% were more likely to present with higher percentage of biopsy positive cores, palpable tumors at digital rectal examination, high-grade cancers at prostate biopsies, and unfavorable pathology in the surgical specimen. At multivariable Cox regression analyses, disease progression, which occurred in 85 (41.7%) patients, was predicted by the 2012 Briganti nomogram score (HR: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.00-1.03; p = 0.012), independently by tumors presenting as palpable (HR: 1.78; 95%CI: 1.10.2.88; p = 0.020) or the presence of PLNI in the surgical specimen (HR: 3.73; 95%CI: 2.10-5.13; p = 0.012). Conclusions The 2012 Briganti nomogram represented an independent predictor of adverse prognosis in HR PCa patients treated with RARP and ePLND. As the score increased, so patients were more likely to experience disease progression, independently by the occurrence of PLNI. The association between the nomogram, unfavorable pathology and tumor behavior might turn out to be useful for selecting a subset of patients needing different treatment paradigms in HR disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Roggero
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Franceschini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Boldini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Olivero A, Tappero S, Chierigo F, Maltzman O, Secco S, Palagonia E, Piccione A, Bocciardi AM, Galfano A, Dell’Oglio P. A Comprehensive Overview of Intraoperative Complications during Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Single Series from High-Volume Center. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1385. [PMID: 38611063 PMCID: PMC11010834 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative complications (ICs) are invariably underreported in urological surgery despite the recent endorsement of new classification systems. We aimed to provide a detailed overview of ICs during Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP). METHODS We prospectively collected data from 1891 patients who underwent RS-RARP at a single high-volume European center from January 2010 to December 2022. ICs were collected based on surgery reports and categorized according to the Intraoperative Adverse Incident Classification (EAUiaiC). The quality criteria for accurate and comprehensive reporting of intraoperative adverse events proposed by the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration Project were fulfilled. To better classify the role of the RS-RARP approach, ICs were classified into anesthesiologic and surgical ICs. Surgical ICs were further divided according to the timing of the complication in RARP-related ICs and ePNLD-related ICs. RESULTS Overall, 40 ICs were reported in 40 patients (2.1%). Ten out of thirteen ICARUS criteria were satisfied. According to EAUiaiC grading of ICs, 27 (67.5%), 7 (17.5%), 2 (5%), 2 (5%), and 2 (5%) patients experienced Grade 1, 2, 3, 4A, and 4B, respectively. When we classified the ICs, two cases (5%) were classified as anesthesiologic ICs. Among the 38 surgical ICs, 16 (42%) were ePNLD-related, and 22 (58%) were RARP-related. ICs led to seven (0.37%) post-operative sequelae (four non-permanent and three permanent). Patients who suffered ICs were significantly older (67 years vs. 65 years, p = 0.02) and had a higher median BMI (27.0 vs. 26.1, p = 0.01), but did not differ in terms of comorbidities or tumor characteristics (all p values ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative complications during RS-RARP are relatively infrequent, but should not be underestimated. Patients suffering from ICs are older, have a higher body mass index, a higher rate of intraoperative blood transfusion, and a longer length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Olivero
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy; (A.O.); (S.T.); (F.C.); (O.M.); (S.S.); (E.P.); (A.P.); (A.M.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy; (A.O.); (S.T.); (F.C.); (O.M.); (S.S.); (E.P.); (A.P.); (A.M.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy
| | - Francesco Chierigo
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy; (A.O.); (S.T.); (F.C.); (O.M.); (S.S.); (E.P.); (A.P.); (A.M.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy
| | - Ofir Maltzman
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy; (A.O.); (S.T.); (F.C.); (O.M.); (S.S.); (E.P.); (A.P.); (A.M.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Silvia Secco
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy; (A.O.); (S.T.); (F.C.); (O.M.); (S.S.); (E.P.); (A.P.); (A.M.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Erika Palagonia
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy; (A.O.); (S.T.); (F.C.); (O.M.); (S.S.); (E.P.); (A.P.); (A.M.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Antonio Piccione
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy; (A.O.); (S.T.); (F.C.); (O.M.); (S.S.); (E.P.); (A.P.); (A.M.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy
| | - Aldo Massimo Bocciardi
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy; (A.O.); (S.T.); (F.C.); (O.M.); (S.S.); (E.P.); (A.P.); (A.M.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy; (A.O.); (S.T.); (F.C.); (O.M.); (S.S.); (E.P.); (A.P.); (A.M.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Paolo Dell’Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy; (A.O.); (S.T.); (F.C.); (O.M.); (S.S.); (E.P.); (A.P.); (A.M.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Porcaro AB, Orlando R, Panunzio A, Tafuri A, Baielli A, Artoni F, Montanaro F, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Mazzucato G, Serafin E, Veccia A, Boldini M, Treccani LP, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Bertolo R, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. The 2012 Briganti nomogram predicts disease progression in surgically treated intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with favorable tumor grade group eventually associated with some adverse factors. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:134. [PMID: 38520651 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01886-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
To evaluate the prognostic potential of the 2012 Briganti nomogram for pelvic lymph node invasion on disease progression after surgery in intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients with favorable tumor grade (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 1 or 2), eventually associated with adverse clinical features as PSA between 10 and 20 ng/mL and/or clinical stage T2b. All IR PCa patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and eventually extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the Department of Urology of the Integrated University Hospital of Verona between 2013 and 2021, with the abovementioned features, and available follow-up were considered. The 2012 Briganti nomogram score was assessed both as a continuous and dichotomous variable, where a mean risk score of 4% was used a threshold. The independent predictor status of the nomogram score on disease progression defined as the occurrence of biochemical recurrence and/or metastatic progression was evaluated using the Cox regression analysis. Overall, 348 patients were enrolled in the study. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 98 (83.5-112.4) months. At multivariable Cox regression analysis, PCa progression, which occurred in 65 (18.7%) cases, was independently predicted only by the 2012 Briganti nomogram score evaluated as a continuous variable, among all considered clinical features (HR 1.16; 95%CI 1.08-1.24; p < 0.001). In addition, patients presenting with a nomogram score ≥ 4% were more likely to experience disease progression even after adjustment for clinical (HR 2.22, 95%CI 1.02-4.79; p = 0.043) and pathological (HR 1.80; 95%CI 1.06-3.05; p = 0.031) factors. In the examined patient population, the 2012 Briganti nomogram predicted PCa progression after surgery. Accordingly, as the risk score increased, patients were more likely to progress, independently by the occurrence of adverse pathology in the surgical specimen. The 2012 Briganti nomogram score categorized according to the mean value allowed to identify prognostic subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Boldini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Pierangelo Treccani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhu W, Wu L, Xie W, Zhang G, Gu Y, Hou Y, He Y. Wound infection in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostate surgery: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2023; 20:3550-3557. [PMID: 37675805 PMCID: PMC10588328 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
A meta-analysis investigation was executed to measure the wound infection (WI) in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RRP) compared with retropubic radical prostate surgery (RRPS). A comprehensive literature investigation till February 2023 was applied, and 1197 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 19 chosen investigations enclosed 107 153 individuals with prostate cancer (PC) at the starting point. 72 008 of them were utilising RRP, and 35 145 were utilising RRPS. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was utilised to compute the value of the WI in RRP compared with RRPS by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. RRP had significantly lower surgical site wound infection (SSWI) (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.21-0.52, P < .001) and infected lymphoceles (ILs) (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.92, P = .03) compared with RRPS in individuals with PC. RRP had significantly lower SSWI and ILs compared with RRPS in individuals with PC. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta-analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhu
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Lingfeng Wu
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Wenhua Xie
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Gaoyue Zhang
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Yanqin Gu
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Yansong Hou
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Yi He
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Porcaro AB, Panunzio A, Serafin E, Bianchi A, Gallina S, Mazzucato G, Vidiri S, D'Aietti D, Orlando R, Ditonno F, Montanaro F, Marafioti Patuzzo G, Bailelli A, Artoni F, Zecchini Antoniolli S, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Tafuri A, Antonelli A. Preoperative endogenous total testosterone predicts prostate cancer progression: results in 580 consecutive patients treated with robot assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized disease. Int Urol Nephrol 2023; 55:1139-1148. [PMID: 36943597 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03563-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To test the role of endogenous total testosterone (ETT) as a predictor of prostate cancer (PCa) progression in patients treated with robot assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized disease. METHODS Between November 2014 and December 2019, 580 consecutive patients were evaluated. Preoperative ETT levels were classified as ≤ 350 ng/dL vs. > 350 ng/dL. The associations between ETT levels and the risk of PCa progression, defined as any event of biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases, or other clinical and pathological factors were evaluated by regression analyses. RESULTS Preoperative ETT levels resulted ≤ 350 ng/dL in 173 (29.8%) patients. Disease progression occurred in 101 (17.1%) cases. Progressing patients were more likely to present with PSA levels > 10 ng/mL, as well as with unfavorable tumor grade (ISUP 4-5) and stage (pT3b) at final pathology, but less likely to have ETT levels ≤ 350 ng/mL. On clinical multivariable Cox regression models, ETT ≤ 350 ng/mL exhibited a statistically significant protective effect on tumor progression (hazard ratio: 0.57, p = 0.013). Subjects presenting with ETT levels ≤ 350 ng/mL were less likely to harbor ISUP 4-5 tumor grade either at biopsy (odds ratio [OR]: 0.46, p = 0.028) or final pathology (OR: 0.45, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS At PCa diagnosis, ETT, which associates with ISUP tumor grade, is an independent predictor of disease progression. Accordingly, as ETT decreases to levels ≤ 350 ng/dL, the risk of unfavorable tumor grade decreases, and a more favorable prognosis is expected. Preoperative ETT levels may allow further patient stratification along prognostic risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano D'Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Marafioti Patuzzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bailelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Radical prostatectomy readmissions: Causes, risk factors, national rates, & costs. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:106.e1-106.e8. [PMID: 36402714 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Readmissions have substantial clinical and financial impacts on the healthcare system. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is considered a standard treatment in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. Yet, there is a paucity of research evaluating readmissions for RP in a national dataset. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer managed with RP were identified within the 2016 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patient factors, facility factors, and surgical characteristics were evaluated for associations with readmission using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS A total of 133,727 patients receiving RP were identified. Early (30-day) and late (31-90-day) readmission rates were 4.2% and 1.8% respectively. The most common cause of early readmission was postoperative digestive system complication (10%) and the most common cause of late readmission was septicemia (13%). On multivariable logistic regression, factors associated with both early and late readmission include nonroutine discharge at index (early: OR 1.877, 95% CI 1.667-2.113; late: OR 1.801, 95% CI 1.490-2.183), and circulatory system comorbidity (early: OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.082-1.538); late: OR 1.515, 95% CI 1.157-1.984). CONCLUSIONS Our findings regarding factors associated with readmission provide insight for RP counseling and may inform postoperative care pathways. Elucidation of readmission trends may allow the identification and proactive management of patients at higher risk for readmission.
Collapse
|
8
|
Porcaro AB, Cerrato C, Rizzetto R, Tafuri A, Panunzio A, Amigoni N, Bianchi A, Gallina S, Orlando R, Gozzo A, DI Filippo G, Migliorini F, Zecchini Antoniolli S, Monaco C, DE Marco V, Pagliarulo V, Brunelli M, Cerruto MA, Polati E, Antonelli A. Severe systemic disease of the American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status system classification associated with delayed length of hospital stay in 1329 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinical prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:714-721. [PMID: 35708533 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04755-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The investigate the associations of the ASA physical status system with clinical, pathological, and perioperative features of prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) that eventually associated with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from January 2013 to October 2020, including1329 patients. The ASA system was preoperatively assessed for each patient. Evaluated clinical factors were grouped as preoperative, perioperative, and pathological and were statistically associated with the ASA system. Continuous variables were represented as medians with relative interquartile ranges (IQR) and categorical factors were assessed as frequencies (percentages). Associations and risk of each ASA Class with population features were assessed by the multinomial logistic regression model (univariate and multivariate analysis). All tests were two-sided with P<0.05 considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS Postoperative complications at discharge occurred in 27.2%. The distribution of the ASA physical status system was as follows: ASA I 108 patients (8.1%), ASA II 1081 subjects (81.3%) and ASA III 140 cases (10.5%). Median length of hospital state (LOHS) was the same for ASA groups I and II (4 days), but longer (5 days) for the ASA group III. On MVA, the risk of delayed hospital stay was associated only with ASA III patients and was independent from age and BMI. Clavien-Dindo complications greater than 2 did not show any independent association with the ASA system. CONCLUSIONS The ASA preoperative physical status system predicted the likelihood of longer LOHS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy -
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.,Department of Urology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.,Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Giacomo DI Filippo
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Carmelo Monaco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo DE Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria A Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Enrico Polati
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Porcaro AB, Amigoni N, Tafuri A, Rizzetto R, Shakir A, Tiso L, Cerrato C, Lacola V, Antoniolli SZ, Gozzo A, Odorizzi K, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Artibani W, Cerruto MA, Siracusano S, Antonelli A. Endogenous testosterone as a predictor of prostate growing disorders in the aging male. Int Urol Nephrol 2021; 53:843-854. [PMID: 33389506 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02747-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the associations of endogenous testosterone with prostate growing disorders (PGD) including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCA). METHODS The study population was composed by 1176 cases including 371 BPH subjects (31.5%) without cancer who underwent prostate transurethral resection from January 2017 to November 2019 and 805 patients (68.5%) with PCA who underwent surgery from November 2014 to December 2019. The association of endogenous testosterone, which was measured before surgery, with the risk of PGD was evaluated by statistical methods. RESULTS In the study population, endogenous testosterone levels were significantly lower in PCA cases compared to BPH patients who were older with larger prostates but lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. On multivariate analysis, the risk of PCA decreased by endogenous testosterone (odds ratio, OR = 0.957; 95% CI 0.930-0.984; p = 0.002) as by age (OR = 0.955; 95% CI 0.933-0.984; p < 0,0001) and prostate volume (OR = 0.930; 95% CI 0.919-0.940; p < 0.0001) but increased by PSA (OR = 1.652; 95% CI 1.542-1.769; p < 0.0001). On multivariate linear regression analysis, endogenous testosterone inversely associated with body mass index (BMI) (regression coefficient, b = - 0.279; p = 0.002) and PCA (b = - 2.935; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In the aging male, endogenous testosterone independently predicted malignant prostate disorders, which associated with decreased hormone levels along BMI categories. Endogenous testosterone is a further marker for evaluating prostate growing disorders in clinical practice; however, controlled studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.,Departement of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC, University of Southern California (USC), Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Leone Tiso
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Lacola
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Katia Odorizzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tafuri A, Amigoni N, Rizzetto R, Sebben M, Shakir A, Gozzo A, Odorizzi K, De Michele M, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Ornaghi P, Brunelli M, De Marco V, Verratti V, Migliorini F, Cerruto MA, Artibani W, Antonelli A, Porcaro AB. Obesity strongly predicts clinically undetected multiple lymph node metastases in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent robot assisted radical prostatectomy and extended lymph node dissection. Int Urol Nephrol 2020; 52:2097-2105. [PMID: 32607958 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02554-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between obesity and risk of multiple lymph node metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with clinically localized EAU intermediate and high-risk classes staged by extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND) during robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIALS AND METHODS 373 consecutive PCa intermediate or high-risk patients were treated by RARP and ePLND. According to pathology results, extension of LNI was classified as absent (pN0 status) or present (pN1 status); pN1 was further categorized as one or more than one (multiple LNI) lymph node metastases. A logistic regression model (univariate and multivariate analysis) was used to evaluate the association between significant categorized clinical factors and the risk of multiple lymph nodes metastases. RESULTS Overall, after surgery lymph node metastases were detected in 51 patients (13.7%) of whom 22 (5.9%) with more than one metastatic lymph node and 29 (7.8%) with only one positive node. Comparing patients with one positive node to those without, EAU high-risk class only predicted risk of single LNI (OR = 2.872; p = 0.008). The risk of multiple lymph node metastases, when compared to cases without LNI, was independently predicted by BMI ≥ 30 (OR = 6.950; p = 0.002) together with BPC ≥ 50% (OR = 3.910; p = 0.004) and EAU high-risk class (OR = 6.187; p < 0.0001). Among metastatic patients, BMI ≥ 30 was the only factor associated with the risk of multiple LNI (OR = 5.250; p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS In patients with clinically localized EAU intermediate and high-risk classes PCa who underwent RARP and ePLND, obesity was a risk factor of multiple LNI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.,Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, ‟G. D'Annunzio″ University, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.,USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Katia Odorizzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Mario De Michele
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Ornaghi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vittore Verratti
- Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|