Microvascular Decompression Alone without Rhizotomy Is an Effective Way of Treating Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: Clinical Analysis of 46 Cases

Glossopharyngeal and vagoglossopharyngeal neuralgia: Long-term surgical outcomes in a single institution

BACKGROUND

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) and vagoglossopharyngeal neuralgia (VGPN) are infrequent syndromes that can have great negative impact on a patient's quality of life. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics and long-term results of patients with GPN-VGPN who are treated surgically with microvascular decompression (MVD) in one institution.

METHODS

This is a retrospective series of 20 patients with the diagnosis of GPN-VGPN who underwent MVD. Demographic characteristics, surgical results, complications, and long-term follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of symptom onset was 51.25 years and the majority of patients were women (60%). The posterior inferior cerebellar artery was the main offending vessel (75%). The immediate MVD success rate was 100%, but during follow-up, two patients (10%) were diagnosed with VGPN and both cases presented pain recurrence. The mean follow-up was 120.4 (25-333) months. VGPN (P = 0.005) and a ≥5 day hospital stay (P = 0.032) were associated with unsuccessful outcomes. Two complications were documented, which resolved without sequelae. There was no surgical mortality.

CONCLUSION

MVD is an effective and safe treatment for long-term pain relief of GPN-VGPN. VGPN and a prolonged hospital stay were associated with poor outcomes. More studies are required to confirm these findings.

Comparative analysis of MVD and RHZ in the treatment of primary glossopharyngeal neuralgia: A clinical report on 61 cases

Objective

Clinical data on 61 patients (grouped by their treatment with MVD or RHZ) with glossopharyngeal neuralgia were analyzed retrospectively. A summary analysis of the effective rate and surgical complications of MVD and RHZ in the treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia was performed to observe the new surgical options for GN.

Method

From March 2013 to March 2020, 63 patients with GN were admitted to our hospital by the professional group of cranial nerve diseases. Two patients diagnosed with tongue and pharynx pain secondary to tongue cancer and upper esophageal cancer, respectively were excluded from the group. The remaining patients all met the diagnosis of GN, some of them were treated with MVD and others were treated with RHZ. The pain relief rate, long-term results, and complications of the patients in the two groups were well-organized and analyzed.

Result

Of the 61 patients, 39 were treated with MVD and 22 were treated with RHZ. In the early-stage patients (the first 23 patients), all of them were operated on with the MVD procedure except one patient without vascular compression. In the later-stage patients, MVD was performed for evident single arterial compression according to the intraoperative situation. And for compression of arteries with greater tension or PICA + VA complex compression, RHZ was performed. It was also performed in cases where vessels with tight adhesions to the arachnoid and nerves could not be easily separated, or where it was easy to damage the perforating arteries after separating the blood vessels, causing vasospasm, which affects the blood supply to the brainstem and cerebellum. RHZ was also performed if there was no clear vascular compression. The efficiency of both groups was 100%. In the MVD group, one case recurred 4 years after the initial operation, and RHZ was performed for reoperation. Complications related to the operation included one case of swallowing and coughing in the MVD group, and three cases in the RHZ group; two cases of uvula not centering in the MVD group, and five cases in the RHZ group. There was 2 patients in RHZ group lost taste in 2/3 of the backing of the tongue, though these symptoms mostly disappeared or decreased after follow-up. One patient in the RHZ group had developed tachycardia by the time of the long-term follow-up, but whether it was related to the surgery is still uncertain. In terms of serious complications, there were two cases of postoperative bleeding in the MVD group. Based on the clinical characteristics of the patients' bleeding, it was judged that the cause of the bleeding was ischemia and was related to an intraoperative injury to the penetrating artery of the PICA artery and vasospasm.

Conclusion

MVD and RHZ are effective methods for the treatment of primary glossopharyngeal neuralgia. MVD is recommended for cases where vascular compression is clear and easy to handle. However, for cases with complex vascular compression, tight vascular adhesions, difficult separation, and without clear vascular compression, RHZ could be performed. Its efficiency is equivalent to MVD, and there is no significant increase in complications such as cranial nerve disorders. There are few cranial nerve complications that seriously affect the quality of life of patients. RHZ helps to reduce the risk of ischemia and bleeding during surgery by reducing the risk of arterial spasms and injury to the penetrating arteries by separating the vessels due to separation of vessels during MVD. At the same time, it may reduce the postoperative recurrence rate.

Current advances in the surgical treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is a neurological condition characterized by paroxysmal, stabbing-like pain along the distribution of the glossopharyngeal nerve that lasts from a couple of seconds to minutes. Pharmacological treatment with anticonvulsants is the first line of treatment; however, about 25% of patients remain symptomatic and require surgical intervention, which is usually done via microvascular decompression (MVD) with or without rhizotomy. More recently, the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been utilized as an alternative treatment method to relieve patient symptoms by causing nerve ablation. We conducted a systematic review to analyze whether MVD without rhizotomy is an equally effective treatment for GPN as MVD with the use of concurrent rhizotomy. Moreover, we sought to explore if SRS, a minimally invasive alternative surgical option, achieves comparable outcomes. We included retrospective studies and case reports in our search. We consulted PubMed and Medline, including articles from the year 2000 onwards. A total of 36 articles were included for review. Of all included patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia, the most common offending artery compressing the glossopharyngeal nerve was the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). MVD alone was successful achieving pain relief immediately postoperatively in about 85% of patients, and also long term in 65-90% of patients. The most common complication found on MVD surgery was found to be transient hoarseness and transient dysphagia. Rhizotomy alone shows an instant pain relief in 85-100% of the patients, but rate of long-term pain relief was lower compared to MVD. The most common adverse effects observed after a rhizotomy were dysphagia and dysesthesia along the distribution of the glossopharyngeal nerve. SRS had promising results in pain reduction when using 75 Gy radiation or higher; however, long-term rates of pain relief were lower. MVD, rhizotomy, and SRS are effective methods to treat GPN as they help achieve instant pain relief and the decrease use of medication. Patients with MVD alone presented with less adverse effects than the group that underwent MVD plus rhizotomy. Although SRS may be a viable alternative treatment for GPN, further studies must be done to evaluate long-term treatment efficacy.

Case report: Fully endoscopic microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia

With the advances in endoscopic technology, endoscopy is widely used in many neurosurgical procedures, such as microvascular decompression, which is an effective method to treat glossopharyngeal neuralgia, trigeminal neuralgia, and facial spasm. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of fully endoscopic microvascular decompression in the treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia. We managed a patient with glossopharyngeal neuralgia in our department, whose main clinical manifestation was recurrent left ear and facial pain for 3 years. The patient underwent a fully endoscopic microvascular decompression. The pain in the left ear and face was significantly relieved postoperatively, and there was no recurrence at the 6-month follow-up evaluation. We describe a case of glossopharyngeal neuralgia that was successfully treated by fully endoscopic microvascular decompression, which showed that endoscopy has advantages in microvascular decompression, and fully endoscopic microvascular decompression is an effective method for glossopharyngeal neuralgia.

Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: Epidemiology, Risk factors, Pathophysiology, Differential diagnosis, and Treatment Options

Purpose of Review

This is a comprehensive review of the most recent literature on glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN), a relatively rare form of neuropathic facial pain. It covers the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, and differential diagnosis given that glossopharyngeal neuralgia can often be confused with other facial pain syndromes. Finally, we extensively review recent findings regarding medical or conservative measures, minimally invasive, and surgical options for potentially treating and managing glossopharyngeal neuralgia.

Recent Findings

An in-depth analysis of the recent literature indicates that glossopharyngeal neuralgia is not only rare but its etiology and pathophysiology are complex and are often secondary to other disease processes. Regardless, current management options are shown to be effective in controlling pain. Conservatively, first-line management of GPN is carbamazepine, but gabapentin and eslicarbazepine acetate are suitable alternatives. In terms of current minimally invasive pain management techniques, pulsed radiofrequency ablation, nerve blocks, or percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation are effective. Finally, surgical management involves microvascular decompression and rhizotomy.

Summary

While there are currently many viable options for addressing glossopharyngeal neuralgia pain ranging from conservative to surgical management, the complex nature of GPN etiology, pathophysiology, and involved anatomical structures prompts further research for more effective ways to treat the disease.