Evaluation of Parametrial Status in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Invasive Cancer of the Cervix: 2023 Update

Cervical cancer is a common gynecological malignancy worldwide. Cervical cancer is staged based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification system, which was revised in 2018 to incorporate radiologic and pathologic data. Imaging plays an important role in pretreatment assessment including initial staging and treatment response assessment of cervical cancer. Accurate determination of tumor size, local extension, and nodal and distant metastases is important for treatment selection and for prognostication. Although local recurrence can be diagnosed by physical examination, imaging plays a critical role in detection and follow-up of local and distant recurrence and subsequent treatment selection. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Comparison Between 360° 3-D Transvaginal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Vaginal Invasion in Cervical Cancer: A Preliminary Report

Our goal was to estimate the agreement between 360° 3-D transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the vaginal invasion in cervical cancer and to discuss the clinical value of 360° 3-D TVUS. A total of 72 patients with untreated cervical cancer were included in the work. The percentage agreement between 2-D TVUS and MRI in assessing vaginal invasion (yes or no) was 77.8% (kappa, 0.400) and that between 360° 3-D TVUS and MRI was 97.2% (kappa, 0.873). The results of 2-D TVUS demonstrated the following agreement with those of MRI: 77.8% for the upper two-thirds of the vagina (kappa, 0.538), 83.3% for the lower third of the vagina (kappa, 0.471). The results of 360° 3-D TVUS demonstrated the following agreement with those of MRI: 95.8% for the upper two-thirds of the vagina (kappa, 0.907), 98.6% for the lower third of the vagina (kappa, 0.961). The results of 360° 3-D TVUS demonstrated good agreement with MRI, which is less costly and more readily available than MRI and should be considered in the pre-treatment work-up for cervical cancer.