Neonatal Umbilical Arterial Catheter Removal Is Accompanied by a Marked Decline in Phlebotomy Blood Loss

Effect of Minimization of Early Blood Sampling Losses Among Extremely Premature Neonates: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of blood sampling stewardship on transfusion requirements among infants born extremely preterm.

STUDY DESIGN

In this single-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT), infants born at <28 weeks of gestation and birth weight of <1000 g were randomized at 24 hours of age to two different blood sampling approaches: restricted sampling (RS) vs conventional sampling (CS). The stewardship intervention in the RS group included targeted reduction in blood sampling volume and frequency and point of care testing methods in the first 6 weeks after birth. Both groups received early recombinant erythropoietin from day three of age. Primary outcome was the rate of early red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in the first six postnatal weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 102 infants (mean gestational age: 26 weeks; birth weight: 756 g) were enrolled. Fidelity to the sampling protocol was achieved in 95% of the infants. Sampling losses in the first 6 weeks were significantly lower in the RS group (16.8 ml/kg vs 23.6 ml/kg, P < .001). The RS group had a significantly lower rate of early postnatal RBC transfusions (41% vs 73%, RR: 0.56 [0.39-0.81], P = .001). The hazard of needing a transfusion during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay was reduced by 55% by RS. Mortality and neonatal morbidities were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Minimization of blood sampling losses by approximately one-third in the first 6 weeks after birth leads to substantial reduction in the early red blood cell transfusion rate in infants born extremely preterm and weighing <1000 g at birth.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2020/01/022  964).

Thresholds for blood transfusion in extremely preterm infants: A review of the latest evidence from two large clinical trials

There are two recently completed large randomized clinical trials of blood transfusions in the preterm infants most at risk of requiring them. Liberal and restrictive strategies were compared with composite primary outcome measures of death and neurodevelopmental impairment. Infants managed under restrictive guidelines fared no worse in regard to mortality and neurodevelopment in early life. The studies had remarkably similar demographics and used similar transfusion guidelines. In both, there were fewer transfusions in the restrictive arm. Nevertheless, there were large differences between the studies in regard to transfusion exposure with almost 3 times the number of transfusions per participant in the transfusion of prematures (TOP) study. Associated with this, there were differences between the studies in various outcomes. For example, the combined primary outcome of death or neurodevelopmental impairment was more likely to occur in the TOP study and the mortality rate itself was considerably higher. Whilst the reasons for these differences are likely multifactorial, it does raise the question as to whether they could be related to the transfusions themselves? Clearly, every effort should be made to reduce exposure to transfusions and this was more successful in the Effects of Transfusion Thresholds on Neurocognitive Outcomes (ETTNO) study. In this review, we look at factors which may explain these transfusion differences and the differences in outcomes, in particular neurodevelopment at age 2 years. In choosing which guidelines to follow, centers using liberal guidelines should be encouraged to adopt more restrictive ones. However, should centers with more restrictive guidelines change to ones similar to those in the studies? The evidence for this is less compelling, particularly given the wide range of transfusion exposure between studies. Individual centers already using restrictive guidelines should assess the validity of the findings in light of their own transfusion experience. In addition, it should be remembered that the study guidelines were pragmatic and acceptable to a large number of centers. The major focus in these guidelines was on hemoglobin levels which do not necessarily reflect tissue oxygenation. Other factors such as the level of erythropoiesis should also be taken into account before deciding whether to transfuse.

Iatrogenic Blood Loss in Very Low Birth Weight Infants and Transfusion of Packed Red Blood Cells in a Tertiary Care Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

An adequate blood volume is important for neonatal adaptation. The study objective was to quantify the cumulative iatrogenic blood loss in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants by blood sampling and the necessity of packed red cell transfusions from birth to discharge from the hospital. In total, 132 consecutive VLBW infants were treated in 2019 and 2020 with a median birth weight of 1180 g (range 370–1495 g) and a median length of stay of 54 days (range 0–154 days) were included. During the initial four weeks of life, the median absolute amount of blood sampling was 16.5 mL (IQR 12.3–21.1 mL), sampling volume was different with 14.0 mL (IQR 12.1–16.2 mL) for non-transfused infants and 21.6 mL (IQR 17.5–29.4 mL) for transfused infants. During the entire length of stay, 31.8% of the patients had at least one transfusion. In a generalized logistic regression model, the cumulative amount of blood sampling (p < 0.01) and lower hematocrit at birth (p = 0.02) were independent predictors for the necessity of blood transfusion. Therefore, optimized patient blood management in VLBW neonates should include sparse blood sampling to avoid iatrogenic blood loss.