Small Molecules and Biologics in the Treatment of Nail Psoriasis

Small Molecules in the Management of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriasis is a common chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease associated with various comorbidities. Managing psoriasis is often challenging as the therapy is decided based on the area of the disease, associated comorbidities and impairment in quality of life, besides the patient's preference. Making progress in the development of new molecules that can be used topically or orally, effectively controlling the disease with minimal side effects and providing long-lasting remissions are the needs of the hour. Recent developments in understanding the complexities of the pathogenesis of psoriasis have resulted in the reinforcement of treatment modalities, leading to the evolution of various biologics and small-molecule inhibitors. In comparison with biologics, both patients and treating physicians prefer small molecules for various reasons such as avoiding injections and side effects that are associated with biologics biologics. Moreover small molecules are economical than biologics. Newer small molecules, both topical and oral, are promising additions to the therapeutic arsenal in the management of psoriasis in the future.

Nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus: Updates on diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory diseases of the nail, including nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus, are associated with significant disease burden and have a negative impact on quality of life. Diagnosis is often delayed, especially when patients present without cutaneous findings. Therefore, recognizing clinical signs and symptoms of inflammatory nail diseases, and initiating timely and appropriate treatment, is of utmost importance.

OBJECTIVE

We review recent studies on diagnostic techniques, discuss severity grading and scoring systems, and describe consensus treatment recommendations for nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus.

METHODS

An updated literature review was performed using the PubMed database on studies assessing diagnostic techniques or treatment modalities for nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus.

RESULTS

Recent studies on diagnostic techniques for inflammatory nail disease have focused on use of dermoscopy, capillaroscopy, and ultrasound modalities. Treatment of these conditions is dichotomized into involvement of few (≤3) or many (>3) nails. Recent psoriatic therapeutics studied for nail outcomes include brodalumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab, deucravacitinib, and bimekizumab, while emerging treatments for nail lichen planus include JAK inhibitors and intralesional platelet rich plasma injections.

CONCLUSIONS

We emphasize the need for increased awareness and expanded management strategies for inflammatory nail diseases to improve patient outcomes.

Network meta-analyses comparing the efficacy of biologic treatments for achieving complete resolution of nail psoriasis at 24-28 and 48-52 weeks

BACKGROUND

Available network meta-analyses (NMAs) comparing the efficacy of biologics in nail psoriasis (NP) have not included recently approved biologics such as bimekizumab nor have they provided comparisons up to 1 year.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted two NMAs that update and extend results from a previous NMA comparing biologics for achieving complete resolution of NP.

METHODS

Bayesian NMAs were performed using a generalized linear model with a logit link to model the binary outcome of nail clearance at weeks 24-28 and 48-52.

RESULTS

For the NMA at weeks 24-28, which included seven biologics and placebo, the absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP was highest for ixekizumab (46.4%; 95% credibility interval [CrI] 35.2-58.0), followed by brodalumab (37.1%; 95% CrI 17.1-62.2) and bimekizumab (30.3%; 95% CrI 12.7-53.9). For the NMA at weeks 48-52, which included six biologics, the absolute probability was highest for ixekizumab (77.2%; 95% CrI 51.1-93.4), followed by adalimumab (75.6%; 95% CrI 61.5-87.3) and brodalumab (71.9%; 95% CrI 38.4-93.2).

CONCLUSION

Among biologics included in these two NMAs, ixekizumab has the highest absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP. Results may help to inform treatment decisions for patients with NP.

Bayesian network meta-analysis of head-to-head trials for complete resolution of nail psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Almost 50% of patients with skin psoriasis have concomitant nail involvement. The comparative effectiveness of the available biologics for nail psoriasis (NP) is still an area of contention because of limited data on nails.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of biologics in achieving complete resolution of NP.

METHODS

We identified studies in PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus. The eligibility criteria included randomized controlled trial (RCTs) or cohort studies for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis with at least two arms of active comparator of biologic reporting at least one efficacy outcome of interest: that is the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), the modified NAPSI or the Physician's Global Assessment of Fingernail Psoriasis with a score of 0.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies comprising seven treatments met the inclusion criteria, and were included in the NMA. The NMA showed the odds of complete NP resolution were superior with ixekizumab [risk ratio (RR) 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-3.10] compared with the treatment of reference (adalimumab). Brodalumab (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.14-7.40), guselkumab (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.40-1.80), infliximab (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.19-4.60) and ustekinumab (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.08-1.60) demonstrated worse therapeutic effect compared with adalimumab. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, ixekizumab 80 mg every 4 weeks had the highest probability of being the best treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The interleukin-17A inhibitor ixekizumab has the highest rate of complete nail clearance and it can be considered the best-ranked therapy from the present evidence. This study is relevant to daily practice as it facilitates the decision when choosing between the wide variety of available biologics in patients for whom clearance of nail symptoms is the first concern.

Place in therapy of anti-IL-17 and 23 in psoriasis according to the severity of comorbidities: a focus on cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is an inflammatory disease nowadays considered not only as a cutaneous but as a systemic disease. Among the numerous comorbidities, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), depression, obesity, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are considered the most frequent. In addition, metabolic syndrome (MetS), which involves hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and atherosclerosis, has presented a higher prevalence in recent years, especially in psoriatic patients.

AREAS COVERED

The mechanism linking anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) to MetS and CVD has been widely explained, while there are unknowns about inhibitors of interleukin (IL)-17 and -23. Considering the growing incidence of CVD in the world's population and in particular the strict correlation in patients with psoriasis, it is important to identify therapeutic options able to avoid a negative impact on patients with both conditions. The aim of this paper is to perform a review of the scientific literature with a focus on the pathogenetic mechanism linking psoriasis to CVD and MetS.

EXPERT OPINION

The scientific evidence currently available allows us to consider and support the use of anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 as a first-line therapy choice in psoriatic patients with high risk of CVDs or MetS.

Narrative Review of the Emerging Therapeutic Role of Brodalumab in Difficult-to-Treat Psoriasis

Psoriatic involvement in areas of the body such as nails, palms and soles (palmoplantar), and scalp is associated with dramatically negative effects on quality of life relative to involvement elsewhere in the body. Although numerous evidence-based studies demonstrate the efficacy of biologics for overall skin clearance in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (including tumor necrosis factor α [TNFα] inhibitors and interleukin [IL]-17A, IL-12/IL-23, IL-23, IL-17F, and IL-17A/F inhibitors), large, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies of psoriasis with nail, palmoplantar, and scalp involvement are needed to better inform decision-making in clinical practice. Moreover, biologic failure caused by drug ineffectiveness is a common occurrence in patients who do not respond, lose response, or are intolerant to treatment. Brodalumab is a fully human IL-17 receptor A antagonist that demonstrates high rates of skin clearance among the latest generation of biologic therapies for treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. This review summarizes current literature on the efficacy of brodalumab and other therapies in difficult-to-treat psoriasis including psoriasis in difficult-to-treat locations (such as psoriasis with nail, palmoplantar, or scalp involvement) and psoriasis in patients whose disease did not respond to other biologics.

Anti-IL23for nail psoriasis in real life: Results of efficacy and safety during a 52-week period

Nail psoriasis (NP) is often considered disfiguring for patients with a relevant impact on quality of life (QoL). It is also difficult to treat for dermatologists who are often frustrated by the scarcity of effective therapeutic alternatives in this particular location. Topical therapies are often used as the first-line treatment for mild NP, but efficacy is the modest. Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) (e.g., cyclosporine, methotrexate, acitretin, and dimethyl fumarate) are generally avoided in NP without general cutaneous involvement. Biologics represent, to date, a concrete possibility for the management of these patients. The data from the clinical trials are encouraging, although there are still few data in real-life. Here, we report a study conducted at Siena University Hospital on 20 patients with NP on both hands and feet treated with anti-IL23 for 52 weeks. No differences were evaluated from baseline to week 4 of anti-IL-23 treatment. NAPSI greatly improved at week 24 with almost 60% of patients reaching NAPSI75 and 40% NAPSI50. At week 52, almost 75% of patients reached NAPSI90. No adverse effects were reported in the patients in the study. The clinical response observed in these patients suggests that treatments that target interleukin-23 may be an effective option for NP, especially when refractory to conventional therapies.

Network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of biologic treatments for achieving complete resolution of nail psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Nail psoriasis (NP) is common and of high importance in patients with psoriasis. Complete resolution of NP at week 24‒26 is an unambiguous nail outcome accessible for indirect treatment comparison of biologics.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the comparative efficacy of approved biologics in achieving complete resolution of NP at week 24‒26.

METHODS

A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to indirectly compare the efficacy of six biologics in achieving complete resolution of NP at week 24‒26 in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and concomitant NP. Complete resolution of NP was defined as a score of zero on the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), modified NAPSI (mNAPSI) or Physician's Global Assessment of Fingernails (PGA-F).

RESULTS

The probability of achieving complete resolution of NP was highest for ixekizumab (46.5%; 95% credibility interval [CrI] 35.1‒58.0; Surface Under the Cumulative RAnking curve [SUCRA] 97%), followed by brodalumab (37.0%; 17.0‒61.0; 79%), adalimumab (28.3%; 24.4‒32.4; 62%), guselkumab (27.7%; 21.1‒35.1; 58%), ustekinumab (20.8%; 10.2‒35.2; 37%), and infliximab (0.8%; 0.0‒8.9; 17%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and concomitant NP, ixekizumab has the greatest likelihood among approved biologics of achieving complete resolution of NP at week 24‒26. Findings should be interpreted carefully because of inherent study limitations.