Triggers and Clinical Presentations of Functional Neurological Disorders: Lessons from World War 1

[Conclusion instead of exclusion-The clinical diagnosis of functional movement disorders]

Functional neurological movement disorders are common in neurological practice and lead to a high degree of impairment and chronification. Affected patients usually receive a diagnosis with considerable delay and often do not get disease-specific treatment. The reasons for this delay are related to extensive diagnostic measures to exclude other nonfunctional neurological diseases. As a consequence, functional movement disorders are typically communicated as diagnoses of exclusion, which makes it difficult for patients to understand and accept the diagnosis. This is particularly unfortunate, because in the majority of patients the diagnosis can be made with confidence based on clinical features, i.e., inconsistency and incongruence. The clarification of the symptoms and the resulting treatment options should be supplemented by patient-friendly explanations of the pathophysiological basis of the disease. In this way, patients are enabled to understand and accept the diagnosis. Moreover, it can put an end to the search for a diagnosis, which can sometimes take decades, and paves the way for treatment. Thus, the diagnosis by exclusion itself becomes the starting point for treatment and can itself have a therapeutic effect.

Pain and functional neurological disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Functional neurological disorder (FND) is characterised by neurological symptoms, such as seizures and abnormal movements. Despite its significance to patients, the clinical features of chronic pain in people with FND, and of FND in people with chronic pain, have not been comprehensively studied.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO for studies of chronic pain in adults with FND and FND in patients with chronic pain. We described the proportions of patients reporting pain, pain rating and timing, pain-related diagnoses and responsiveness to treatment. We performed random effects meta-analyses of the proportions of patients with FND who reported pain or were diagnosed with pain-related disorders.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and fifteen articles were screened and 64 were included in the analysis. Eight case-control studies of 3476 patients described pain symptoms in a higher proportion of patients with FND than controls with other neurological disorders. A random effects model of 30 cohorts found that an estimated 55% (95% CI 46% to 64%) of 4272 patients with FND reported pain. Random effects models estimated diagnoses of complex regional pain syndrome in 22% (95% CI 6% to 39%) of patients, irritable bowel syndrome in 16% (95% CI 9% to 24%) and fibromyalgia in 10% (95% CI 8% to 13%). Five studies of FND diagnoses among 361 patients with chronic pain were identified. Most interventions for FND did not ameliorate pain, even when other symptoms improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain symptoms and pain-related diagnoses are common in FND. Classification systems and treatments should routinely consider pain as a comorbidity in patients with FND.

Functional neurological disorder is a feminist issue

Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common and disabling disorder, often misunderstood by clinicians. Although viewed sceptically by some, FND is a diagnosis that can be made accurately, based on positive clinical signs, with clinical features that have remained stable for over 100 years. Despite some progress in the last decade, people with FND continue to suffer subtle and overt forms of discrimination by clinicians, researchers and the public. There is abundant evidence that disorders perceived as primarily affecting women are neglected in healthcare and medical research, and the course of FND mirrors this neglect. We outline the reasons why FND is a feminist issue, incorporating historical and contemporary clinical, research and social perspectives. We call for parity for FND in medical education, research and clinical service development so that people affected by FND can receive the care they need.

Triggers in functional motor disorder: a clinical feature distinct from precipitating factors

Background and objective

People with functional motor disorder (FMD) report triggers—sensory or motor-induced stimuli that exacerbate or initiate paroxysmal occurrences of their movement disorder. These are a distinct phenomenon from precipitating factors occurring at the initial onset of the disorder. We aimed to assess triggers in FMD and understand their relevance to paroxysmal variability often seen in FMD.

Methods

We enrolled consecutive outpatients with a definite diagnosis of FMD. Each patient underwent a detailed clinical evaluation also including the presence of trigger factors and video-recordings both during neurological examination and physiotherapy treatment. Patients were classified as having “triggers” (T-FMD) or “not having triggers” (NoT-FMD) as well as “paroxysmal” compared to “persistent with paroxysmal variability”.

Results

The study sample was 100 patients (82% female) with FMD; the mean age at onset was 41 years. Triggers were observed in 88% of patients and in 65 of these the FMD was pure paroxysmal. The most common triggers were movement or physical exercise, followed by emotional, visual, touch, and auditory stimuli; 39 (44%) were isolated and 49 (56%) were combined triggers. Among the T-FMD patients, FMD were paroxysmal in 74% (n = 65) and persistent with paroxysmal variability in 26% (n = 23). The T-FMD patients were younger (p = 0.016) and had a gait disorder (p = 0.035) more frequently than the NoT-FMD patients.

Discussion

Triggers are frequent in FMD and may have diverse overlapping clinical presentations. In this sample, FMD was most often paroxysmal, suggesting the value of noting triggers as clinical clues in the diagnosis and rehabilitation of FMD.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11102-1.

Posttraumatic functional movement disorders and litigation

The concept of functional movement disorders has evolved considerably over the past few decades. More specifically, the views on the relation with psychological stressors or personality disorders have substantially changed, emphasizing a shift from the previously dominant dualistic scheme. This evolution is reflected in adaptations to diagnostic criteria and management approaches. Functional movement disorders which arise in a close temporal relationship with a peripheral trauma are specifically challenging with respect to diagnosis and treatment, but similar considerations seem to apply. The relationship of functional disorders with trauma appears to be much closer than is often thought. Clinical and pathophysiological research has identified shared factors underlying functional posttraumatic as well as primary movement disorders. These evolving insights impact on discussions in terms of litigation for compensation after trauma. The literature is reviewed and the consequences for argumentation in litigation are outlined, including ethical and legal considerations. Finally, we formulate a number of recommendations.