The Effects of Nebivolol and Irbesartan on Ambulatory Aortic Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Hemodialysis Patients with Intradialytic Hypertension

Beta-blocker efficacy for intra- and interdialytic hypertension patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Intradialytic hypertension affects 5-15% of hemodialysis patients, yet relevant studies are relatively scarce. It is also associated with higher interdialytic blood pressure. Beta-blockers can be preferred as antihypertensive drugs due to their superior blood pressure control, decreased risk of cardiovascular events, improved endothelial cell function, and decreased noradrenaline levels. Through this study, beta-blocker antihypertensive effects in intra- and interdialytic hypertension were analyzed.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following PRISMA guidelines. We registered our PROSPERO protocol (Registration ID: CRD42023446184) and included relevant full-text clinical trials or RCTs from 2008 to 2023 with predetermined keywords and criteria from multiple databases including PUBMED, COCHRANE, SCOPUS, and citation searching. Seven eligible articles were included in this review study.

RESULTS

Four studies with 82 participants for intradialytic hypertension evaluation were included. Meta-analysis showed a decrease in SBP in intradialytic hypertensive patients after beta-blocker intervention, with a significant estimated mean difference of - 15.19 mmHg (P < 0.00001; 95% CI - 19.47 to - 10.91). Supporting previous data, SBP remains constant between pre- and post-dialysis with beta-blocker therapy, with an insignificant estimated mean difference of - 2.72 mmHg (P = 0.29; 95% CI - 7.80 to 2.36). Whereas five studies with 142 participants were included for interdialytic hypertension evaluation. Meta-analysis shows a significant decrease in SBP before to after therapy, with an estimated mean difference of - 10.92 (P < 0.0001; 95% CI - 16.33 to - 5.51).

CONCLUSION

Beta-blocker treatment resulted in significant reductions in post-hemodialysis systolic blood pressure among intra- and interdialytic hypertensive patients.

Vascular Aging: Assessment and Intervention

Vascular aging represents a collection of structural and functional changes in a blood vessel with advancing age, including increased stiffness, vascular wall remodeling, loss of angiogenic ability, and endothelium-dependent vasodilation dysfunction. These age-related alterations may occur earlier in those who are at risk for or have cardiovascular diseases, therefore, are defined as early or premature vascular aging. Vascular aging contributes independently to cardio-cerebral vascular diseases (CCVDs). Thus, early diagnosis and interventions targeting vascular aging are of paramount importance in the delay or prevention of CCVDs. Here, we review the direct assessment of vascular aging by examining parameters that reflect changes in structure, function, or their compliance with age including arterial wall thickness and lumen diameter, endothelium-dependent vasodilation, arterial stiffness as well as indirect assessment through pathological studies of biomarkers including endothelial progenitor cell, lymphocytic telomeres, advanced glycation end-products, and C-reactive protein. Further, we evaluate how different types of interventions including lifestyle mediation, such as caloric restriction and salt intake, and treatments for hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia affect age-related vascular changes. As a single parameter or intervention targets only a certain vascular physiological change, it is recommended to use multiple parameters to evaluate and design intervention approaches accordingly to prevent systemic vascular aging in clinical practices or population-based studies.

Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Perspectives of Intradialytic Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Individuals with end-stage renal disease on chronic hemodialysis (HD) may encounter numerous HD-associated complications, including intradialytic hypertension (IDHYPER). Although blood pressure (BP) follows a predictable course in the post-HD period, BP levels during the session may vary across the individuals. Typically, a decline in BP is noted during HD, but a significant proportion of patients exhibit a paradoxical elevation.

SUMMARY

Several studies have been conducted to understand the complexity of IDHYPER, but much remains to be elucidated in the future. This review article aimed to present the current evidence regarding the proposed definitions, the pathophysiologic background, the extent and clinical implications of IDHYPER, as well as the possible therapeutic options that have emerged from clinical studies.

KEY MESSAGES

IDHYPER is noted in approximately 15% of individuals undergoing HD. Several definitions have been proposed, with a systolic BP rise >10 mm Hg from pre- to post-dialysis in the hypertensive range in at least four out of six consecutive HD treatments being suggested by the latest Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. Concerning its pathophysiology, extracellular fluid overload is a crucial determinant, with endothelial dysfunction, sympathetic nervous system overdrive, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation, and electrolyte alterations being important contributors. Although its association with ambulatory BP in the interdialytic period is controversial, IDHYPER is associated with adverse cardiovascular events and mortality. Moving to its management, the antihypertensive drugs of choice should ideally be nondialyzable with proven cardiovascular and mortality benefits. Finally, rigorous clinical and objective assessment of extracellular fluid volume is essential. Volume-overloaded patients should be instructed about the importance of sodium restriction, while physicians ought to alter HD settings toward a greater dry weight reduction. The use of a low-sodium dialysate and isothermic HD could also be considered on a case-by-case basis since no randomized evidence is currently available.

Correlation of NO and ET-1 Levels with Blood Pressure Changes in Hemodialysis Patients after Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery

Hemodialysis (HD) is the most common renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and can significantly reduce mortality and improve the quality of life of patients. The occurrence of intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic hypertension are important risk factors for death and disability during dialysis in patients with ESRD, yet their etiology remains unclear, and some studies suggest that nitric oxide (NO) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) may play an important role in these hemodynamic alterations. For this purpose we examined the changes in NO and ET-1 levels during hemodialysis in 30 patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) after arteriovenous fistula surgery. Thirty dialysis patients were divided into group I (stable blood pressure during dialysis), group II (Intradialytic hypotension) and group III (Intradialytic hypertension) according to the change of blood pressure (BP) during hemodialysis, with 10 cases in each group. BP of MHD patients were measured Pre-dialysis (Pre-D), at 1 h of dialysis (1h-D), at 2 h of dialysis (Mid-D, 2h-D), at 3 h of dialysis (3h-D), and at the end of dialysis (Post-D); and blood samples were taken from the arterial end at Pre-D, Mid-D, and Post-D to measure NO and ET-1 levels. The results of the analysis showed that as dialysis proceeded and ended, the NO levels in the three groups gradually decreased, with significant differences compared with those before dialysis (p < 0.05); the ET-1 levels in group III gradually increased, with significant differences compared with those before dialysis (p < 0.05), while the increasing trend of ET-1 levels in group I and group II was not significant. The increasing trend of MAP in group I was not significant (p > 0.05); MAP in group II showed a gradual decrease and MAP in group III showed an increasing trend, and the difference between MAP after dialysis and before dialysis was significant (p < 0.05). Correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between ET-1 levels and MAP in Group III at Mid-D (r = 0.847, p = 0.002). This shows that serum ET-1 and NO levels are significantly higher than normal in MHD patients after arteriovenous endovascular fistula surgery, and both ET-1 and NO levels are changing during dialysis, and there may be a link between their changes and blood pressure changes. It is suggested that the blood pressure fluctuations that occur during dialysis in MHD patients may be related to endothelial cell dysfunction.