Biology of the Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Immunohistochemical, RNA, and DNA Features

Addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

In recent years, the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to chemotherapy (CT) has become a research hotspot in the therapy of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Nevertheless, controversial results have been revealed among the published randomized controlled trials. Hence, a meta-analysis was performed to assess the therapeutic effect of this treatment regimen.

Methods

Five English databases (PubMed, WOS, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Embase), and four Chinese databases (CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang), as well as oncological meetings, were systematically searched to identify eligible studies that assessed the addition of ICI to CT versus CT alone in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using fixed- or random-effect model. Subgroup analyses were also performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and PD-L1-positive individuals.

Results

All told there are five eligible randomized controlled trials involving 3,000 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Compared with CT alone, the ICI plus CT regimen significantly increased PFS in the ITT (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88) and PD-L1-positive (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79) populations, as well as OS in the ITT (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.97) and PD-L1-positive populations (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.91). Moreover, the PFS of sufferers treated with the combination strategy of ICI with CT increased alongside PD-L1 enrichment. A clinical benefit in terms of objective response rate was also distinctly observed in both populations treated with ICI plus CT. In the subgroup analysis, patients in the no prior CT subgroup experienced a striking increase in PFS in both populations; however, a difference was not observed in other subgroups.

Conclusions

The combination strategy striking improves PFS and OS in both ITT and PD-L1-positive populations, and PFS is prolonged with PD-L1 enrichment. Patients who do not receive CT prior to this treatment are associated with longer PFS in both populations.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42021289817.

Prognostic Value of Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in an Unselected Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are considered to have prognostic and predictive value for patients with early breast cancer. We examined 1166 breast cancer patients from a prospective, multicentre cohort (Prognostic Assessment in Routine Application (PiA), n = 1270, NCT01592825) following recommendations from the International TILs Working Group. TIL quantification was performed using predefined groups and as a continuous variable in 10% increments. The primary objective was the distribution of TILs in different breast cancer types. The second objective was the association with the recurrence-free interval (RFI) and overall survival (OS). Stromal infiltration with more than 60% TILs appeared in 2% of hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative tumours, in 9.8% of HER2-positive tumours (any HR) and 19.4% of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). Each 10% increment was associated with an improvement in the prognosis in HER2-positive samples (RFI, hazard ratio 0.773, 95% CI 0.587-1.017; OS, hazard ratio 0.700, 95% CI 0.523-0.937). When defining exploratory cut-offs for TILs, the use of a 30% threshold for the HR-positive and HER2-negative group, a 20% threshold for the HER2 group and a 60% threshold for the TNBC group appeared to be the most suitable. TILs bore prognostic value, especially in HER2-positive breast cancer. For clinical use, additional research on the components of immune infiltration might be reasonable.

Identifying High-Risk Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients by Molecular Subtyping

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is considered the most aggressive type of breast cancer (BC) with limited options for therapy. TNBC is a heterogeneous disease and tumors have been classified into TNBC subtypes using gene expression profiling to distinguish basal-like 1, basal-like 2, immunomodulatory, mesenchymal, mesenchymal stem-like, luminal androgen receptor (LAR), and one nonclassifiable group (called unstable). <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of this study was to verify the clinical relevance of molecular subtyping of TNBCs to improve the individual indication of systemic therapy. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> Molecular subtyping was performed in 124 (82%) of 152 TNBC tumors that were obtained from a prospective, multicenter cohort including 1,270 histopathologically confirmed invasive, nonmetastatic BCs (NCT 01592825). Treatment was guideline-based. TNBC subtypes were correlated with recurrence-free interval (RFI) and overall survival (OS) after 5 years of observation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Using PAM50 analysis, 87% of the tumors were typed as basal with an inferior clinical outcome compared to patients with nonbasal tumors. Using the TNBCtype-6 classifier, we identified 23 (15%) of TNBCs as LAR subtype. After standard adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients with LAR subtype showed the most events for 5-year RFI (66.7 vs. 80.6%) and the poorest probability of 5-year OS (60.0 vs. 84.4%) compared to patients with non-LAR disease (RFI: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–5.05, <i>p</i> = 0.211; OS: aHR = 2.74, 95% CI 1.06–7.10, <i>p</i> = 0.037). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Molecular analysis and subtyping of TNBC may be relevant to identify patients with LAR subtype. These cancers seem to be less sensitive to conventional chemotherapy, and new treatment options, including androgen receptor-blocking agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, have to be explored.