The Management of Myelomeningocele Study: Short-Term Neonatal Outcomes

Exploring research hotspots and future directions in neural tube defects field by bibliometric and bioinformatics analysis

Background

Neural tube defects (NTDs) is the most common birth defect of the central nervous system (CNS) which causes the death of almost 88,000 people every year around the world. Much efforts have been made to investigate the reasons that contribute to NTD and explore new ways to for prevention. We trawl the past decade (2013-2022) published records in order to get a worldwide view about NTDs research field.

Methods

7,437 records about NTDs were retrieved from the Web of Science (WOS) database. Tools such as shell scripts, VOSviewer, SCImago Graphica, CiteSpace and PubTator were used for data analysis and visualization.

Results

Over the past decade, the number of publications has maintained an upward trend, except for 2022. The United States is the country with the highest number of publications and also with the closest collaboration with other countries. Baylor College of Medicine has the closest collaboration with other institutions worldwide and also was the most prolific institution. In the field of NTDs, research focuses on molecular mechanisms such as genes and signaling pathways related to folate metabolism, neurogenic diseases caused by neural tube closure disorders such as myelomeningocele and spina bifida, and prevention and treatment such as folate supplementation and surgical procedures. Most NTDs related genes are related to development, cell projection parts, and molecular binding. These genes are mainly concentrated in cancer, Wnt, MAPK, PI3K-Akt and other signaling pathways. The distribution of NTDs related SNPs on chromosomes 1, 3, 5, 11, 14, and 17 are relatively concentrated, which may be associated with high-risk of NTDs.

Conclusion

Bibliometric analysis of the literature on NTDs field provided the current status, hotspots and future directions to some extant. Further bioinformatics analysis expanded our understanding of NTDs-related genes function and revealed some important SNP clusters and loci. This study provided some guidance for further studies. More extensive cooperation and further research are needed to overcome the ongoing challenge in pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of NTDs.

Postnatal Surgical Correction of Myelomeningoceles: Preoperative and Intraoperative Risk Factors Associated with Postoperative Neurologic Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Open spina bifida or myelomeningocele (MMC) is a congenital defect that results from failure of caudal neurulation. We present a case series of patients who were treated with postnatal surgical correction for MMC, evaluating the possible preoperative and intraoperative risk factors associated with neurologic outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent postnatal surgical correction for MMCs over 11 years at our institution was performed. MMCs were classified based on their morphologic configuration into 3 types. Type I includes defects without a sac and there is cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Type II includes where there is a sac ≤4 cm, with or without CSF leak. Type III includes defects with a sac that are greater than 4 cm.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included. The median age of gestation at surgery was 37.4 weeks. There were 30 females (60%). All mothers received adequate folate supplementation. All patients underwent surgical correction in the first 48 hours. Lower extremity motor function at the last clinical follow-up was normal in 34 patients (68%). CSF leak, infection, and mortality were 8%, 2%, and 0%, respectively. Twenty-one patients (42%) underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt for hydrocephalus.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite there being no statistically significant associations with a timely closure, all cases were treated within the first 48 hours and this could influence the low complication rate. Individuals of Hispanic background who received appropriate folate supplementation still had high rates of MMC and we posit that this may be caused in part by a genetic/molecular predisposition.

Outcomes after In Utero Myelomeningocele Repair Based on Delivery Location

Maternal and pediatric delivery outcomes may vary in patients who underwent open fetal myelomeningocele repair and elected to deliver at the fetal center where their fetal intervention was performed versus at the referring physician's hospital. A prospective cohort study of 88 patients were evaluated following in utero open fetal myelomeningocele repair at a single fetal center between the years 2011-2019. Exclusion criteria included patients that delivered within two weeks of the procedure (n = 6), or if a patient was lost to follow-up (n = 1). Of 82 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 36 (44%) patients were delivered at the fetal center that performed fetal intervention, and 46 (56%) were delivered locally. Comparative statistics found that with the exception of parity, baseline characteristics and pre-operative variables did not differ between the groups. No differences in oligohydramnios incidence, preterm rupture of membranes, gestational age at delivery or delivery indications were found. Patients who delivered with a referring physician were more likely to be multiparous (p = 0.015). With the exception of a longer neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay in the fetal center group (median 30.0 vs. 11.0 days, p = 0.004), there were no differences in neonatal outcomes, including wound dehiscence, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, patch management, ventricular diversion, or prematurity complications. Therefore, we conclude that it is safe to allow patients to travel home for obstetric and neonatal management after open fetal myelomeningocele repair.