Comparison of High-Resolution Manometry in Patients Complaining of Dysphagia among Patients with or without Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetic gastroenteropathy: a pan-alimentary complication

Autonomic neuropathy contributes to the pathophysiology of diabetic gastroenteropathy, which impacts the entire gastrointestinal tract alongside pancreatic and gallbladder functions. This is evident in the widespread morphological remodelling of the enteric nervous system, smooth muscle cells, interstitial cells of Cajal and vascular supply, causing pan-enteric motor, sensory and secretory disturbances. The gastrointestinal symptoms caused by these changes are often burdensome and non-specific and frequently coexist with poor glycaemic management and even malnutrition, impacting quality of life negatively. The Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale are validated questionnaires for assessing gastrointestinal symptoms. However, clinical supplementary objective measures are essential. Transit time assessments are frequently used and typically evaluated using gastric emptying scintigraphy, breath tests or colonic radiopaque markers, but they cannot measure contractile activity or fluid transport. The primary treatment goals are to prevent further disease progression and to obtain symptomatic relief. Treatments include improved glycaemic management and dietary modifications, while pharmacological treatments target gastrointestinal symptoms, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Invasive interventions may involve gastric peroral pyloromyotomy or the implantation of a gastric neurostimulator to manage pharmacologically refractory gastroparesis. This review describes the prevalence, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, assessment and treatment of diabetic gastrointestinal dysfunction within each segment of the gastrointestinal tract and directly connected exocrine organs.

Comparative Prevalence of Ineffective Esophageal Motility: Impact of Chicago v4.0 vs. v3.0 Criteria

Background and Objectives: The threshold for ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) diagnosis was changed in Chicago v4.0. Our aim was to determine IEM prevalence using the new criteria and the differences between patients with definite IEM versus "inconclusive diagnosis". Materials and Methods: We retrospectively selected IEM and fragmented peristalsis (FP) patients from the high-resolution esophageal manometries (HREMs) database. Clinical, demographic data and manometric parameters were recorded. Results: Of 348 HREMs analyzed using Chicago v3.0, 12.3% of patients had IEM and 0.86% had FP. Using Chicago v4.0, 8.9% of patients had IEM (IEM-4 group). We compared them with the remaining 16 with an inconclusive diagnosis of IEM (borderline group). Dysphagia (77% vs. 44%, Z-test = 2.3, p = 0.02) and weight loss were more commonly observed in IEM-4 compared to the borderline group. The reflux symptoms were more prevalent in the borderline group (87.5% vs. 70.9%, p = 0.2). Type 2 or 3 esophagogastric junction morphology was more prevalent in the borderline group (81.2%) vs. 64.5% in IEM-4 (p = 0.23). Distal contractile integral (DCI) was lower in IEM-4 vs. the borderline group, and resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and mean integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) were similar. The number of ineffective swallows and failed swallows was higher in IEM-4 compared to the borderline group. Conclusions: Using Chicago v4.0, less than 10% of patients had a definite diagnosis of IEM. The dominant symptom was dysphagia. Only DCI and the number of failed and inefficient swallows were different between definite IEM patients and borderline cases.

Ineffective esophageal motility is associated with diabetes mellitus end organ complications

BACKGROUND

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is known to induce a wide range of harmful effects on several organs, notably leading to ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). However, the relationship between DM and IEM is not fully elucidated. We aimed to determine the relationship between DM and IEM and to evaluate the impact of DM's end organ complications on IEM severity.

METHODS

A multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) was performed. We reviewed medical records of patients diagnosed with IEM using HREM, encompassing data on demographics, DM history, antidiabetic and other medications as well as comorbidities.

KEY RESULTS

Two hundred and forty six subjects met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in any of the HREM parameters between diabetics and nondiabetics. Out of 246 patients, 92 were diabetics. Diabetics with neuropathy presented a significantly lower distal contractile integral (DCI) value compared to those without neuropathy (248.2 ± 226.7 mmHg·cm·sec vs. 375.6 ± 232.4 mmHg·cm·sec; p = 0.02) Similarly, the DCI was lower in diabetics with retinopathy compared to those without retinopathy (199.9 ± 123.1 mmHg·cm·sec vs. 335.4 ± 251.7 mmHg·cm·sec; p = 0.041). Additionally, a significant difference was observed in DCI values among DM patients with ≥2 comorbidities compared to those without comorbidities (224.8 ± 161.0 mmHg·cm·sec vs. 394.2 ± 243.6 mmHg·cm·sec; p = 0.025). Around 12.6% of the variation in DCI could be explained by its linear relationship with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), with a regression coefficient (β) of -55.3.

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

DM is significantly associated with IEM in patients with neuropathy, retinopathy, or multiple comorbidities. These results are pivotal for tailoring patient-specific management approaches.

Dysphagia as a Manifestation of Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders

Dysphagia is a common manifestation of endocrine and metabolic diseases. Swallowing is a complex neuromuscular process, with an interplay of sensory and motor function, that has voluntary and involuntary control. Disruptions in any of these processes can cause significant dysphagia. Endocrine disorders and metabolic derangements are systemic conditions that affect multiple organ systems. They contribute to the development of neuropathies, myopathies, and motility disorders that lead to swallowing difficulty. Malnutrition and critical illness can lead to deconditioning and atrophy which can cause dysphagia, which in turn can lead to further malnutrition and deconditioning.

Construction and evaluation of a nomogram prediction model for aspiration pneumonia in patients with acute ischemic stroke

Background

Aspiration Pneumonia (AP) is a leading cause of death in patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS). Early detection, diagnosis and effective prevention measures are crucial for improving patient prognosis. However, there is a lack of research predicting AP occurrence after AIS. This study aimed to identify risk factors and develop a nomogram model to determine the probability of developing AP after AIS.

Method

A total of 3258 AIS patients admitted to Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University between January 1, 2016, and August 20, 2022, were included. Among them, 307 patients were diagnosed with AP (AP group), while 2951 patients formed the control group (NAP group). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify relevant risk factors for AP after AIS. These factors were used to establish a scoring system and develop a nomogram model using R software.

Results

Univariate analysis revealed 20 factors significantly associated (P < 0.05) with the development of AP after AIS. These factors underwent multivariate logistic regression analysis, which identified age (elderly), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, dysphagia, atrial fibrillation, cardiac insufficiency, renal insufficiency, hepatic insufficiency, elevated Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG), elevated C-Reactive Protein (CRP), elevated Neutrophil percentage (NEUT%), and decreased prealbumin as independent risk factors. A nomogram model incorporating these 11 risk factors was constructed, with a C-index of 0.872 (95 % CI: 0.845-0.899), indicating high accuracy. Calibration and clinical decision analyses demonstrated the model's reliability and clinical value.

Conclusion

A nomogram model incorporating age, NIHSS score, dysphagia, atrial fibrillation, cardiac insufficiency, renal insufficiency, hepatic insufficiency, FBG, CRP, NEUT%, and prealbumin effectively predicts AP risk in AIS patients. This model provides guidance for early intervention strategies, enabling the identification of high-risk individuals for timely preventive measures.

Exploring objective factors to predict successful outcomes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Currently, the reported parameters that predict the resolution of symptoms after surgery are largely subjective and unreliable. Considering that fundoplication rebuilds the structural integrity of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), the authors focused on searching for objective and quantitative predictors for the resolution of symptoms based on the anatomical issues and whether an antireflux barrier can be well established or not.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors reviewed the prospectively collected data of 266 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who had undergone laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). All patients were diagnosed with GERD using preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, and high-resolution esophageal manometry. The patients received GERD symptom surveys using the validated Korean Antireflux Surgery Group questionnaire twice: preoperatively and 3 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

After excluding patients with insufficient follow-up data, 152 patients were included in the analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that a longer length of the LES and lower BMI determined better resolution of typical symptoms after LNF (all P <0.05). Regarding atypical symptoms, higher resting pressure of LES and DeMeester score greater than or equal to 14.7 were associated with better resolution after the surgery (all P <0.05). After LNF, typical symptoms improved in 34 out of 37 patients (91.9%) with a length of LES >greater than .05 cm, BMI less than 23.67 kg/m 2 , and atypical symptoms were resolved in 16 out of 19 patients (84.2%) with resting pressure of LES greater than or equal to 19.65 mm Hg, DeMeester score greater than or equal to 14.7.

CONCLUSION

These results show that the preoperative length and resting pressure of LES is important in the objective prediction of symptom improvement after LNF.

Prevalence of Different Types of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders and Their Associated Factors in Patients Referring to Shariati Hospital during 2018-2019

BACKGROUND: Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are common in patients with dysphagia and are effectively diagnosed with high-resolution manometry (HREM). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of different types of primary EMDs in patients referred for HREM and to further investigate the factors associated with EMDs. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, all patients referred to the endoscopy section of Shariati Hospital during 2018-2019 (279 patients) were subjected to HREM and were evaluated according to their diagnosis, and the effect of each factor and each symptom on motility disorders was investigated. RESULTS: 84.5% (235) of the participants were diagnosed with at least one esophageal motility disorder; of them, achalasia was the most common form (52.6%). None of the predictive factors showed a statistically significant correlation with EMDs. However, regarding the symptoms, regurgitation and nocturnal cough were significantly more common in patients with EMD (P=0.001 and 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the high prevalence of EMDs in patients undergoing manometry. None of the factors studied, such as age, sex, diabetes, hypothyroidism, smoking, and alcohol and opium consumption, had a statistically significant correlation with EMDs.