Posttransplantation Hypomagnesemia as a Predictor of Better Graft Function after Transplantation

Hypomagnesemia May Predict Better Survival and Reduced Nonrelapse Mortality in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients

BACKGROUND

Magnesium (Mg) is an essential element that is required as a cofactor for many cellular reactions, including immunologic pathways. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential impact of serum Mg levels on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) outcomes.

METHODS

Medical records of 340 alloHSCT recipients (median age: 45 [18-71] years; M/F: 210/130) were reviewed for this retrospective study. Serum Mg levels on days -28, -7, 0, +7, +14, +21, +30, +60, and +90 were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Serum Mg+14 levels predicted nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (P = .025) and had a significant impact on the development of mucositis (P = .027), fungal infection (P = .006), engraftment syndrome (P < .001), sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) (P = .001), cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (P = .039), and acute graft vs host disease (GvHD) (P < .001). Based on the optimal threshold of serum Mg+14 level (1.33 mg/dL; area under the curve: 0.581 [0.515-0.648]; P = .018), the study group was divided into 2 subgroups as low- and high-Mg+14. The incidence of acute GvHD (P = .002), SOS (P = .013), engraftment syndrome (P = .013), CMV reactivation (P = .001), and Epstein Barr virus reactivation (P = .005) was significantly lower in low-Mg+14 group. The probability of overall survival (OS) was significantly better (P = .002), whereas NRM was lower in the low-Mg+14 group (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Hypomagnesemia seems to provide a considerable advantage for the post-transplant outcome, which may confirm its potential role in the immunologic microenvironment and adaptive immunity.

Non-Traditional Non-Immunological Risk Factors for Kidney Allograft Loss-Opinion

Rates of late allograft loss have improved slowly in the last decades. Well described traditional risk factors that influence allograft survival include cardiovascular events, rejection, infections and post-transplant neoplasia. Here, we critically evaluate the influence of several non-immunological, non-traditional risk factors and describe their impact on allograft survival and cardiovascular health of kidney transplant recipients. We assessed the following risk factors: arterial stiffness, persistent arteriovenous access, mineral bone disease, immunosuppressive drugs residual levels variability, hypomagnesemia, glomerular pathological alterations not included in Banff criteria, persistent inflammation and metabolic acidosis.