Sunitinib-Induced Acute Liver Failure

A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events for sunitinib

Background

Sunitinib is approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET). This study aims to investigate the safety profiles of sunitinib through data mining of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

The individual case safety reports (ICSRs) on sunitinib from 2006 Q1 to 2024 Q1 were collected from the ASCII data packages in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). After standardizing the data, a variety of disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) were employed to identify the potential safety signals of sunitinib-associated AEs.

Results

A total of 35,923 ICSRs of sunitinib as the "primary suspected" drug were identified within the reporting period. The search detected 276 disproportionate preferred terms (PTs). The most common AEs, including diarrhea, asthenia, decreased appetite, hypertension, and dysgeusia, were consistent with the drug label and clinical trials. Unexpected significant AEs, such as uveal melanocytic proliferation, salivary gland fistula, yellow skin, eyelash discoloration, scrotal inflammation, were detected. The median onset time of sunitinib-related AEs was 57 days (interquartile range [IQR]16-170 days), with most of the ICSRs developing within the first month (n = 4,582, 39.73%) after sunitinib therapy as initiated.

Conclusion

The results of our study were consistent with routine clinical observations, and some unexpected AEs signals were also identified for sunitinib, providing valuable evidence for the safe use of sunitinib in the real-world and contributing to the clinical monitoring and risk identification of sunitinib.

An Insight on the Pathways Involved in Crizotinib and Sunitinib Induced Hepatotoxicity in HepG2 Cells and Animal Model

Both crizotinib and sunitinib, novel orally-active multikinase inhibitors, exhibit antitumor activity and extend the survival of patients with a malignant tumor. However, some patients may suffer liver injury that can further limit the clinical use of these drugs, however the mechanisms underlying hepatotoxicity are still to be elucidated. Thus, our study was designed to use HepG2 cells in vitro and the ICR mice model in vivo to investigate the mechanisms of hepatotoxicity induced by crizotinib and sunitinib. Male ICR mice were treated orally with crizotinib (70 mg/kg/day) or sunitinib (7.5 mg/kg/day) for four weeks. The results demonstrated that crizotinib and sunitinib caused cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells and chronic liver injury in mice, which were associated with oxidative stress, apoptosis and/or necrosis. Crizotinib- and sunitinib-induced oxidative stress was accompanied by increasing reactive oxygen species and malondialdehyde levels and decreasing the activity of superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase. Notably, the activation of the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein-1/Nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 signaling pathway was involved in the process of oxidative stress, and partially protected against oxidative stress. Crizotinib and sunitinib induced apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway, which was characterized by decreasing Bcl2/Bax ratio to dissipate the mitochondrial membrane potential, and increasing apoptotic markers levels. Moreover, the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK improved the cell viability and alleviated liver damage, which further indicated the presence of apoptosis. Taken together, this study demonstrated that crizotinib- and sunitinib-caused oxidative stress and apoptosis finally impaired hepatic function, which was strongly supported by the histopathological lesions and markedly increased levels of serum alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase.

Severe tyrosine-kinase inhibitor induced liver injury in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: two case reports assessed for causality using the updated RUCAM and review of the literature

Background

Sunitinib and pazopanib are both oral small molecule multityrosine kinase inhibitors (MTKI) used in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Hepatotoxicity or “liver injury” is the most important adverse effect of pazopanib administration, but little is known about the underlying mechanism. Liver injury may also occur in patients treated with sunitinib, but severe toxicity is extremely rare. Herein we report two new cases of severe liver injury induced by MTKI. Both cases are unique and exceptional. We assessed both cases for drug-induced liver injury (DILI) using the updated score Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method (RUCAM). The literature on potential pathogenic mechanisms and precautionary measures is reviewed.

Case presentation

A case of a metastatic RCC (mRCC) patient treated with pazopanib who had manifestation of severe liver injury is presented. These manifestations consisted of grade 4 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase and grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia. Alternate causes of acute or chronic liver disease were excluded. The patient gradually recovered from the liver injury and refused any further therapy for mRCC. The patient was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) two years later and eventually succumbed to the disease. The second case describes a mRCC patient treated with sunitinib for 3,5 years and fatal liver failure after 2 weeks of clarithromycin co-medication for acute bronchitis.

Conclusions

Liver injury has been commonly observed in TKI-treated patients with unpredictable course. Management requires regular routine liver enzyme-monitoring and the collaboration of medical oncologist and hepatologist. There is an unmet medical need for a risk stratification and definition of predictive biomarkers to identify potential genetic polymorphisms or other factors associated with TKI-induced liver injury. Any potential unrecommended concomitant therapy has to be avoided.

Indolin-2-one derivatives as selective Aurora B kinase inhibitors targeting breast cancer

Aurora B is a pivotal cell cycle regulator where errors in its function results in polyploidy, genetic instability, and tumorigenesis. It is overexpressed in many cancers, consequently, targeting Aurora B with small molecule inhibitors constitutes a promising approach for anticancer therapy. Guided by structure-based design and molecular hybridization approach we developed a series of fifteen indolin-2-one derivatives based on a previously reported indolin-2-one-based multikinase inhibitor (1). Seven derivatives, 5g, 6a, 6c-e, 7, and 8a showed preferential antiproliferative activity in NCI-60 cell line screening and out of these, carbamate 6e and cyclopropylurea 8a derivatives showed optimum activity against Aurora B (IC₅₀ = 16.2 and 10.5 nM respectively) and MDA-MB-468 cells (IC₅₀ = 32.6 ± 9.9 and 29.1 ± 7.3 nM respectively). Furthermore, 6e and 8a impaired the clonogenic potential of MDA-MB-468 cells. Mechanistic investigations indicated that 6e and 8a induced G2/M cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and necrosis of MDA-MB-468 cells and western blot analysis of 8a effect on MDA-MB-468 cells revealed 8a's ability to reduce Aurora B and its downstream target, Histone H3 phosphorylation. 6e and 8a displayed better safety profiles than multikinase inhibitors such as sunitinib, showing no cytotoxic effects on normal rat cardiomyoblasts and murine hepatocytes. Finally, 8a demonstrated a more selective profile than 1 when screened against ten related kinases. Based on these findings, 8a represents a promising candidate for further development to target breast cancer via Aurora B selective inhibition.