Modification and Validation of the Phosphate Removal Model: A Multicenter Study

Phosphorus balance calculator: an individualized tool for treatment of hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Lack of evaluations of the dietary phosphorus and dialysis phosphorus removal in daily clinical practice are common obstacles to assessing phosphorus balance and controlling phosphorus in hemodialysis patients. We aimed to investigate whether individualized therapy using a phosphorus balance calculator improves phosphorus control.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, multicenter, 4-week clinical trial was conducted. A total of 119 maintenance hemodialysis patients aged 18-85 years old and with serum phosphorus level >1.45 mmol/L from three university teaching hospitals in Shanghai were enrolled. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to individualized therapy (n = 60) or conventional therapy (n = 59). The primary outcome was the serum phosphorus concentration after 4-week treatment. Secondary outcomes included the serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations, changes in serum phosphorus, calcium and PTH concentrations, and the proportion of patients achieving target ranges of serum phosphorus, calcium and PTH after 4-week treatment.

RESULTS

Among 119 randomized participants [mean age 62 years; 68 male (57%)], 116 completed the trial. Using the phosphorus balance calculator, the individualized group achieved a better phosphorus balance state and significantly reduced serum phosphorus (1.62 ± 0.45 mmol/L versus 1.85 ± 0.45 mmol/L, P = .006), increased the proportions of patients achieving target serum phosphorus range (41% versus 18%, P = .006) and had greater adjusted mean difference in change in serum phosphorus over the 4 weeks (-0.47 versus -0.23 mmol/L, P = .010) when compared with conventional therapy. No significant changes were observed in serum calcium and PTH levels, the proportion of patients achieving target serum calcium or PTH levels, or the adjusted mean difference of serum calcium and PTH levels over the treatment period.

CONCLUSION

Phosphorus balance calculator was proved to improve serum phosphorus control in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, offering a new tool for managing hyperphosphatemia.

Hyperphosphatemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: The Search for New Treatment Paradigms and the Role of Tenapanor

Hyperphosphataemia represents a significant challenge in the management of chronic kidney disease, exerting a pronounced influence on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular complications and mineral bone disorders. Traditional approaches to address hyperphosphataemia involve implementing dietary phosphate restrictions, administering phosphate binders, and, in cases of end-stage renal disease, resorting to dialysis. Unfortunately, these interventions frequently prove inadequate in maintaining phosphate levels within recommended ranges. Additionally, commonly employed pharmacological agents are not immune to eliciting adverse events, thereby limiting their prescription and therapeutic adherence. There is a growing focus on exploring novel therapeutic strategies in this context. The current discussion centres on tenapanor, a pharmacological agent predominantly acting as a selective inhibitor of sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3). Its mechanism of action involves modulating tight junctions, resulting in reduced sodium absorption and intestinal paracellular permeability to phosphate. Furthermore, tenapanor downregulates sodium-dependent phosphate 2b transport protein (NaPi2b) expression, thereby impeding active transcellular phosphate transport. Clinical trials have elucidated the efficacy and safety profile of tenapanor. This evidence hints at a potential paradigm shift in the management of hyperphosphataemia. However, the burgeoning optimism surrounding tenapanor warrants tempered enthusiasm, as further research remains indispensable. The imperative lies in meticulously delineating its efficacy and safety contours within the crucible of clinical practice. In this review, we synthesize the intricate interplay between hyperphosphataemia and Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone Disorder, and we discuss the existing pharmacological interventions for hyperphosphataemia and explore emerging treatment paradigms that offer novel perspectives in managing elevated phosphate levels in CKD patients.

Evaluation of a phosphate kinetics model in hemodialysis therapy-Assessment of the temporal robustness of model predictions

In-depth understanding of intra- and postdialytic phosphate kinetics is important to adjust treatment regimens in hemodialysis. We aimed to modify and validate a three-compartment phosphate kinetic model to individual patient data and assess the temporal robustness. Intradialytic phosphate samples were collected from the plasma and dialysate of 12 patients during two treatments (HD1 and HD2). 2-h postdialytic plasma samples were collected in four of the patients. First, the model was fitted to HD1 samples from each patient to estimate the mass transfer coefficients. Second, the best fitted model in each patient case was validated on HD2 samples. The best model fits were determined from the coefficient of determination (R2 ) values. When fitted to intradialytic samples only, the median (interquartile range) R2 values were 0.985 (0.959-0.997) and 0.992 (0.984-0.994) for HD1 and HD2, respectively. When fitted to both intra- and postdialytic samples, the results were 0.882 (0.838-0.929) and 0.963 (0.951-0.976) for HD1 and HD2, respectively. Eight patients demonstrated a higher R2 value for HD2 than for HD1. The model seems promising to predict individual plasma phosphate in hemodialysis patients. The results also show good temporal robustness of the model. Further modifications and validation on a larger sample are needed.

A New Calculation Model for Calcium Requirements After Parathyroidectomy in Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to develop a new calculation model for calcium requirements in dialysis patients following parathyroidectomy.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving parathyroidectomy from January 2014 to January 2022 were enrolled in this study. Among these patients, 78 were randomly selected for construction of the calcium requirement calculation model, and the remaining 20 patients were selected for model validation. The calcium requirement model estimated the total calcium supplementation for 1 week after surgery using variables with significant relationships in the derivation group by stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. Bias, precision, and accuracy were measured in the validation group to determine the performance of the model.

RESULTS

The model was as follows: calcium requirement for 1 week after surgery=33.798-8.929×immediate postoperative calcium+0.190×C-reactive protein-0.125×age+0.002×preoperative intact parathyroid hormone+0.003×preoperative alkaline phosphatase (R2=0.8). The model was successfully validated.

CONCLUSION

We generated a novel model to guide calcium supplementation. This model can assist in stabilizing the serum calcium levels of patients during the early postoperative period. Furthermore, it contributes to the individualized and precise treatment of hypocalcemia in patients following parathyroidectomy.

Comparison of measured vs kinetic-model predicted phosphate removal during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND

To what extent hemodiafiltration (HDF) improves management of hyperphosphatemia over hemodialysis (HD) is a subject of ongoing investigation.

METHODS

We modified a previously described phosphate kinetic model to include incorporation of EUDIAL recommended equations for hemodiafiltration (HDF) clearance. We used the model to predict the recovery of phosphate from spent dialysate/hemofiltrate and compared this with averaged data from five published studies. Mean study average predialysis serum phosphate was 1.81 ± 0.20 mmol/L. Session length was close to 240 min per treatment. All HDF was done postdilution, at an average rate of 65 ± 24 mL/min.

RESULTS

Measured mean phosphate removal was 1039 ± 136 mg (33.5 ± 4.41 mmol, slightly lower than the model-predicted mean value of 1092 ± 127 mg (35.3 ± 4.09 mmol). The measured ratio of phosphate removal with HDF compared with HD averaged 1.15 ± 0.22, ranging from 1.01 to 1.44. Using mean study input parameters for patient size and treatment characteristics, the predicted ratio of phosphate removal with HDF compared with HD averaged 1.095 ± 0.029, ranging from 1.05 to 1.13.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of EUDIAL-recommended convective clearance equations to a phosphate kinetic model predicts a 10% or greater benefit in terms of phosphate removal for HDF compared with HD at typical dialysis and hemodiafiltration treatment settings. These predictions are similar to the HDF advantage reported in the literature in studies where phosphate removal has been measured in spent dialysate.