Holmium Laser Enucleation, Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy, or Open Prostatectomy: The Role of the Prostate Volume in terms of Operation Time

Urethral-sparing laparoscopic simple prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with asymptomatic urethral stricture after urethral stricture surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of urethral-sparing laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (US-LSP) for the treatment of large-volume (>80 ml) benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with asymptomatic urethral stricture (urethral lumen > 16 Fr) after urethral stricture surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 39 large-volume BPH patients with asymptomatic urethral stricture after urethral stricture surgery who underwent US-LSP from January 2016 to October 2021. Postoperative follow-ups were scheduled at 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

All patients affected by significant BPH-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) including 22 cases with asymptomatic anterior urethral stricture and 17 cases with asymptomatic posterior urethral stricture. Median operative time was 118 min (interquartile range [IQR]100-145). Median estimated blood loss was 224 ml (IQR: 190-255). 33 patients(84.6%) avoided continuous bladder irrigation. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (12.8%), including 4 cases with Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and grade 2 and 1 case with grade 3a. During follow-up, US-LSP presented statistically significant improvements in LUTS compared to baseline (P < 0.05). A total of 25 patients had normal ejaculation preoperatively and 3 patients (12%) complained retrograde ejaculation postoperatively. Two patients (5.1%) reported stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and no patient reported aggravated urethral stricture during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

US-LSP was safe and effective in treating large-volume BPH with asymptomatic urethral stricture after urethral stricture surgery. Meanwhile, US-LSP could reduce the risk of SUI in patients with asymptomatic posterior urethral stricture and maintain ejaculatory function in a high percentage of patients.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy and laser enucleation of prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia

Laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) and robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) are two main treatment methods for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but the superiority between these two methods in treating large BPH is currently unclear. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and the safety of LEP and RASP in treating large BPH. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that compared safety and efficacy outcomes of both LEP and RASP. Review Manager 5.3 was used for the meta-analysis. Six studies with a total of 1235 patients were included in the analysis. Resected adenoma weight was similar in LEP than RASP group. Operative time [mean difference (MD) - 67.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 131.66 to - 4.25; p = 0.04], catheterization time (MD -6.31; 95% CI - 9.44 to - 3.18; p < 0.0001), and length of stay (MD - 2.44; 95% CI - 3.55 to - 1.34; p < 0.0001) were lower in LEP. The International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, prostate-specific antigen, and post-void residual urine volume were also comparable between two groups. Furthermore, LEP demonstrated lesser hemoglobin decrease (MD - 0.50; 95% CI - 0.96 to - 0.05; p = 0.03), lower blood transfusion rate [odd ratio (OR) 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.66; p = 0.006], and lower rate of Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ 3 complications (OR 0.435, 95% CI 0.189-0.998; p = 0.049). Finally, there was no significant difference in overall complications between two groups. Current evidence shows that LEP offers favorable perioperative outcomes compared with RASP. However, there was no conclusive evidence that LEP was advantaged in terms of efficacy outcomes.

An Outcomes Comparison Between Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate, Open Simple Prostatectomy, and Robotic Simple Prostatectomy for Large Gland Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative outcomes between Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), open simple prostatectomy (OSP), and robotic simple prostatectomy (RSP) for large prostates (> 80 cc).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 340 patients who underwent HoLEP (n = 209), OSP (n = 66), or RSP (n = 65) at a large academic medical center between January 2013 - September 2021 was performed. Length of stay (LOS), operative time, catheter duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion, and 30-day ED visits and readmissions were compared between the three groups. Univariate analyses consisted of ANOVA with Tukey's corrections and Chi-square tests. Linear and multivariate logistic regression was also performed. All tests were two-sided and a p-value <0.05 was pre-determined to be statistically significant. Analyses were performed with SAS v9.4.

RESULTS

HoLEP was found to have the shortest: operative time (1.4 vs 2.7 vs 3.8h), LOS (0.65 vs 4.2 vs 2.6d), and catheter duration (0.38 vs 9.9 vs 11.2d) compared to OSP and RSP, respectively (all P <.0001). HoLEP also had the lowest EBL (66 vs 795 vs 326 mL, P <.0001). HoLEP and RSP had a lower risk of blood transfusion compared to OSP (P <.0001). These associations remained significant on multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

HoLEP is a minimally invasive treatment option for large prostates that was found to have shorter operative time, LOS, and catheter duration as well as lower EBL compared to OSP and RSP.

Laser enucleation of the prostate in men with very large glands ≥175 ml: A systematic review

Background

Surgical treatment options for lower urinary tract symptoms can differ according to prostate size. There are few studies on the efficacy and safety of endoscopic enucleation of prostate (EEP) in patients with very large prostates focusing on laser as energy source. In this systematic review, we aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of laser-based EEP on prostate glands ≥150 ml.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed-MEDLINE, Wiley Online Library and Cochrane Library databases with the following search terms solely or in combination: "large prostate", "laser enucleation", "laser prostatectomy"by combining PICO (population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) terms. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed.

Results

We retrieved 6 studies included 375 patients with prostate sizes ≥175 ml treated with laser-based EEP for symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction. Three studies examined Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) outcomes with a prostate volume (PV) >200 ml, one evaluated HoLEP outcomes with a PV of 200–299 and ≥ 300 ml, two studies evaluated HoLEP outcomes with a PV > 175 ml. We observed improvement in postoperative functional outcomes in patients with a PV > 175, >200 and >300 ml. The retreatment rate was 0–1.3% in all studies involving prostate size ≥175 ml. Most of the complications were Clavien-Dindo I (%0–9) and II (%12.7–16.6).

Conclusions

Laser-based EEP is an efficient, safe and feasible procedure even in very large prostates with good functional outcomes, low perioperative complication and retreatment rates.

•

We observed better postoperative functional outcomes in prostates with a volume of ≥175, >200 and >300 ml in the present study.

•

The retreatment rate was 0–1.3% in all studies involving prostate size ≥175 ml.

•

Laser-based- endoscopic enucleation of the prostate is an efficient, safe and feasible procedure even in very large glands.

Thulium laser enucleation of prostate versus laparoscopic trans-vesical simple prostatectomy in the treatment of large benign prostatic hyperplasia: head-to-head comparison

OBJECTIVES

To compare thulium laser enucleation of prostate (ThuLEP) versus laparoscopic trans-vesical simple prostatectomy (LSP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of patients who underwent surgery for "large" BPH (>80mL) at three Institutions were collected and analyzed. Two institutions performed ThuLEP only; the third institution performed LSP only. Preoperative (indwelling catheter status, prostate volume (PVol), hemoglobin (Hb), Qmax, post-voiding residual volume (PVR), IPSS, QoL, IIEF-5) and perioperative data (operative time, enucleated adenoma, catheterization time, length of stay, Hb-drop, complications) were compared. Functional (Qmax, PVR, %ΔQmax) and patient-reported outcomes (IPSS, QoL, IIEF-5, %ΔIPSS, %ΔQoL) were compared at last follow-up.

RESULTS

80 and 115 patients underwent LSP and ThuLEP, respectively. At baseline, median PVol was 130 versus 120mL, p <0.001; Qmax 9.6 vs. 7.1mL/s, p=0.005; IPSS 21 versus 25, p <0.001. Groups were comparable in terms of intraoperative complications (1 during LSP vs. 3 during ThuLEP) and transfusions (1 per group). Differences in terms of operative time (156 vs. 92 minutes, p <0.001), Hb-drop (-2.5 vs. -0.9g/dL, p <0.001), catheterization time (5 vs. 2 days, p <0.001) and postoperative complications (13.8% vs. 0, p <0.001) favored ThuLEP. At median follow-up of 40 months after LSP versus 30 after ThuLEP (p <0.001), Qmax improved by 226% vs. 205% (p=0.5), IPSS decreased by 88% versus 85% (p=0.9), QoL decreased by 80% with IIEF-5 remaining almost unmodified for both the approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis showed that LSP and ThuLEP are comparable in relieving from BPO and improving the patient-reported outcomes. Invasiveness of LSP is more significant.

A Novel Modified Two-Lobe Holmium Prostate Enucleation Technique: Demirtaş-Erciyes Enucleation Prostatectomy

Objective

Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate has evolved and became popular for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) during the last decade. Different surgical techniques have been described so far. We hereby described a new modified two-lobe technique for urologists who are inexperienced in endoscopic enucleation. We aimed here to present the data on a learning curve of this stepwise technique named Demirtaş-Erciyes Enucleation Prostatectomy (DEEP): reverse S-J incision technique and its postoperative outcomes.

Material and methods

The study included 102 patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with the DEEP technique between October 2020 and December 2021. Demographic, preoperative, and postoperative variables were recorded. The operation was performed with a 150 W holmium laser system (Quanta System, Varese, Italy) with cutting and coagulation settings of 2J × 50 Hz with virtual basket mode and 2J × 12 Hz in bubble blast mode, respectively. Bladder irrigation was done for one day, and then, on the next day, the urethral catheter was removed. Postoperatively, uroflowmetry studies, continence status, and ejaculation status were recorded during follow-up. The data of all patients were divided into two groups (first 51 and final 51 patients). All variables were analyzed between two groups.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 68.48±8.74 years. The median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was 3. The median International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) values ​​were 26 (10-35) and 10 (0-25), respectively. Of the patients, 60.8% had Foley catheters due to urinary retention. The median anesthesia time, laser time, enucleation time, morcellation time, and enucleated tissue amount were 102.5 minutes, 17 minutes, 25 minutes, 20 minutes, and 50 g, respectively. Enucleation was performed in two stages in five patients due to bigger prostate volume or incomplete morcellation. The median catheter removal time was 48 hours. In six patients, the postoperative catheterization time was prolonged due to hematuria. The median increase in Qmax was 19.35 mL/second. The overall complication rate was 5.9%, which were all Clavien grade II. Enucleation time, laser time, and anesthesia time were significantly lower in the last 51 patients.

Conclusion

DEEP enucleation technique seems to provide effective and safe postoperative results for beginners in prostate enucleation.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Simple Prostatectomy and Endoscopic Enucleation of Prostate for Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Background: Minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (MISP) and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) are the two most commonly used methods for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but it remains unclear which of the two is superior. This study aims to perform a pooled analysis to compare efficacy and safety profiles between MISP and EEP.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify eligible studies comparing MISP with EEP. Parameters including efficacy and safety outcomes were compared using Stata 14.0 version.

Results: Eight comparative trials with 1,504 patients were included. Compared to MISP, EEP demonstrated shorter operative time (mean difference [MD] 46.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.92 to 72.82, p = 0.0006), lesser hemoglobin decrease (standardized MD [SMD] 0.59, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.95, p = 0.001), lower catheterization time (SMD 4.13, 95% CI 2.16 to 6.10, p < 0.001), and shorter length of stay (SMD 2.38, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.36, p < 0.001). However, overall complications and blood transfusions did not differ between the two groups. Moreover, EEP had better postvoid residual volume (PVR) at 6-month (MD 14.39, 95% CI 11.06 to 17.72, p < 0.001) and comparable 3- and 6-month International Prostate Symptom Score, 3- and 6-month maximum flow rate, 3-month PVR, and 3-month quality of life compared with MISP.

Conclusion: Both MISP and EEP are effective and safe surgical procedures for the treatment of large BPH. EEP appears to have a superior perioperative profile compared to MISP. This should be interpreted with caution due to the significant heterogeneity between studies. Hence, treatment selection should be based on the surgeon's experience and availability.

Three-dimensional measurement and analysis of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Background

The volume and thickness of intravesical prostatic protrusion and other characteristics of benign prostatic hyperplasia have not been investigated. We determine the effects of age and prostate volume on anatomical features of benign prostatic hyperplasia using three-dimensional measurement in this study.

Methods

This retrospective study included a total of 98 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Three-dimensional models of prostate, central gland, peripheral zone, intravesical prostatic protrusion, prostatic urethra and bladder were reconstructed according to pelvic T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of these patients. The models were used to measure the intravesical prostatic protrusion volume, intravesical prostatic protrusion thickness, intravesical prostatic protrusion index, intravesical prostatic protrusion, prostate volume, peripheral zone volume, peripheral zone thickness, peripheral zone index, prostatic urethra thickness, the angle and distance of distal prostatic urethra with regard to coronal plane and sagittal plane and so on.

Results

Intravesical prostatic protrusion volume, intravesical prostatic protrusion thickness and peripheral zone volume of prostate volume >80 mL group were significantly higher than these in prostate volume <80 mL group (P<0.001, 0.01, 0.01, respectively). These parameters significantly increased with age (P<0.001, 0.01, 0.05, respectively). Peripheral zone index was significantly lower of prostate volume >80 mL group than these in prostate volume <80 mL group (P<0.05). Peripheral zone index significantly decreased with age (P<0.01). Intravesical prostatic protrusion index had no significant difference in all age groups. Peripheral zone thickness and prostatic urethra thickness had no significant difference in all groups. The distance and angle of distal prostatic urethra prostatic urethra with regard to coronal plane were significantly higher than these with regard to sagittal plane (both P<0.001).

Conclusions

The rearward slope of the prostatic urethra is greater than the left or right offset during the process of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Three-dimensional measurement provides good supports for further clinical and scientific research.