Cultural and Linguistic Practice with Children with Developmental Language Disorder: Findings from an International Practitioner Survey

Child health care nurses' experience of language screening for 2.5-year-old children: A qualitative study

AIM

To investigate the experience of Child Health Care Nurses (CHCNs) using language screening for 2.5-year-old children.

DESIGN

An exploratory qualitative design with an inductive approach.

METHOD

Data were collected through semi-structured, interviews with Swedish CHCNs who regularly performed language screening for children. The interviews were analysed by thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified: 'The difficult visit', 'Explanations for language delay', 'Language screening across cultures' and 'Language screening with children exposed to adverse life events'.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Our findings suggest that in routine care a modified procedure is used for the language screening of children aged 2.5 to secure the child's cooperation and to preserve an alliance with the parents. Consequently, the validity of the screening is called into question, particularly when it comes to children from families with origins outside the dominant culture and children exposed to adverse life events.

Assessment of Developmental Language Disorder in Multilingual Children: Results from an International Survey

INTRODUCTION

The Multilingual-Multicultural Affairs Committee of the International Association of Communication Disorders (IALP) conducted a survey of diagnostic criteria for developmental language disorder (DLD) in multilingual children to discover how clinicians apply terminology and diagnostic criteria to multilingual children in different parts of the world.

METHODS

An international web survey was used to survey 354 participants from 44 countries about their assessment practices, and clinical opinions about assessing multilingual children for DLD.

RESULTS

The findings show that most clinicians felt confident in assessing multilingual children, and they applied the DLD terminology and inclusionary criteria to multilingual children with difficulty learning language. Clinicians used different procedures to assess heritage and societal languages. Barriers to access to services included a lack of knowledge by parents and referral sources about services available and typical multilingual development, with additional reasons differing by geographical region.

DISCUSSION

Speech pathologists across the globe have many similarities in the way that they assess multilingual children. Differences may be attributed to clinical experience, professional education, the clinician's role, the system they work in, and the clinician's own language skills. This paper advances knowledge of current clinical practices, which can be used to evaluate frameworks in international and national contexts, with implications for policy and practice to improve access to clinical services.

RETRACTED: Allocation and funding of Speech and Language Therapy for children with Developmental Language Disorders across Europe and beyond

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of Authors and Editor-in-Chief. Whilst conducting further analyses for a companion paper in June 2021 using the survey data reported in this study, it came to the authors' attention that unfortunately there were errors in the data used in the analyses for this paper. The authors believe this to be either human error in data entry or coding or a technical error whilst recoding a variable. They therefore reran their analyses with the correct data for the paper to understand if and how the results differed from those published, and they did indeed change the findings. As soon as this came to the authors' attention (July 2021), they contacted the Editorial office. All authors on the paper are in agreement with this retraction. A new revised article with the correct data, analysis and results is now available: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104139.