Efficacy of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose Compared to Sodium Hyaluronate as Submucosal Injectant for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review

ESGE suggests conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; marking and mucosal incision followed by circumferential incision and stepwise submucosal dissection) for most esophageal and gastric lesions. ESGE suggests tunneling ESD for esophageal lesions involving more than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference. ESGE recommends the pocket-creation method for colorectal ESD, at least if traction devices are not used. The use of dedicated ESD knives with size adequate to the location/thickness of the gastrointestinal wall is recommended. It is suggested that isotonic saline or viscous solutions can be used for submucosal injection. ESGE recommends traction methods in esophageal and colorectal ESD and in selected gastric lesions. After gastric ESD, coagulation of visible vessels is recommended, and post-procedural high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (or vonoprazan). ESGE recommends against routine closure of the ESD defect, except in duodenal ESD. ESGE recommends corticosteroids after resection of  > 50 % of the esophageal circumference. The use of carbon dioxide when performing ESD is recommended. ESGE recommends against the performance of second-look endoscopy after ESD. ESGE recommends endoscopy/colonoscopy in the case of significant bleeding (hemodynamic instability, drop in hemoglobin > 2 g/dL, severe ongoing bleeding) to perform endoscopic hemostasis with thermal methods or clipping; hemostatic powders represent rescue therapies. ESGE recommends closure of immediate perforations with clips (through-the-scope or cap-mounted, depending on the size and shape of the perforation), as soon as possible but ideally after securing a good plane for further dissection.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer in the Remnant Stomach

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with early gastric cancers (EGCs) in the remnant stomach is technically difficult, owing to the limited space and fibrosis under the suture lines and anastomoses. Conversely, ESD for patients with EGCs in the remnant stomach is less invasive and provides better quality of life than completion total gastrectomy. To clarify the effectiveness and safety of ESD, we reviewed the medical records of patients with EGCs in the remnant stomach who underwent ESD between July 2006 and October 2020 at our institution. All identified patients were included in the analysis. Of 25 patients with 27 lesions, the en bloc and R0 resection rates were 88.9% and 85.2%, respectively. Neither perforation nor postoperative bleeding was observed. During a median follow-up period of 48 (range, 5–162) months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 71.0%, whereas the 5-year cause-specific survival rate was 100%. No obvious differences in the outcomes of procedures with suture line involvement and without suture line or anastomosis involvement were noted. In conclusion, ESD was effective and safe in patients with EGCs in the remnant stomach despite the suture line involvement.

Association between Submucosal Fibrosis and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers after Chemoradiotherapy

Simple Summary

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy have not been established. In this study, we focused on the fibrosis of the submucosa. As a result, we found that endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer can be performed reliably without adverse events, but the procedure takes longer for lesions with strong fibrosis of the submucosa.

Abstract

Endoscopic resection is a treatment of choice for a metachronous early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) appearing after a radical cure of esophageal cancer by chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, non-curative resection, and procedural complications including perforation due to radiation-induced submucosal fibrosis, are a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the association between submucosal fibrosis and the usefulness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in ESCC after CRT. This study retrospectively analyzed 13 lesions in 11 patients in our institute. Submucosal fibrosis under the lesion (F score) was classified into three levels (F0: none or mild, F1: moderate, and F2: severe) based on endoscopic and histopathologic findings. All lesions were F1 or greater (F1: 8 lesions and F2: 5 lesions). En bloc and R0 resection rates were both 100%. The procedural speed was slower in F2 than in F1 (F1 vs. F2; 15.1 mm²/min vs. 7.1 mm²/min, p = 0.019), without procedure-related adverse events. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range: 14–117 months) after ESD, 7 of 11 (63.6%) patients were alive without recurrence, and without ESCC-related death. ESCC after CRT reliably and safely resected en bloc by ESD but was more difficult in lesions with strong submucosal fibrosis.