The Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine in Preterm Newborns: No Influence of Doxapram but Important Maturation with Age

A small step toward precision dosing of caffeine in preterm infants: An external evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models

BACKGROUND

Several population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models of caffeine in preterm infants have been published, but the extrapolation of these models to facilitate model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) in clinical practice is uncertain. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate their predictive performance using an external, independent dataset.

METHODS

Data used for external evaluation were based on an independent cohort of preterm infants. Currently available PopPK models for caffeine in preterm infants were identified and re-established. Prediction- and simulation-based diagnostics were used to assess model predictability. The influence of prior information was assessed using Bayesian forecasting.

RESULTS

120 plasma samples from 76 preterm infants were included in the evaluation dataset. Twelve PopPK models of caffeine in preterm infants were re-established based on our previously published study. Although two models showed superior predictive performance, none of the 12 PopPK models met all the clinical acceptance criteria of these external evaluation items. Besides, the external predictive performances of most models were unsatisfactory in prediction- and simulation-based diagnostics. Nevertheless, the application of Bayesian forecasting significantly improved the predictive performance, even with only one prior observation.

CONCLUSIONS

Two models that included the most covariates had the best predictive performance across all external assessments. Inclusion of different covariates, heterogeneity of preterm infant characteristics, and different study designs influenced predictive performance. Thorough evaluation is needed before these PopPK models can be implemented in clinical practice. The implementation of MIPD for caffeine in preterm infants could benefit from the combination of PopPK models and Bayesian forecasting as a helpful tool.

Effect of early preventive use of caffeine citrate on prevention together with treatment of BPD within premature infants and its influence on inflammatory factors

OBJECTIVE

To explore caffeine citrate prophylactic and therapeutic influences upon broncho-pulmonary dysplasia (BPD) within premature infants and its influence on inflammatory factors.

METHODS

A total of 128 premature infants from January 2021 to June 2022 were investigated, segregated within control group and observation group through randomized number table protocol, having 64 cases per group.

RESULTS

Effective rate of observation group was elevated in comparison to control group (95.31% versus 84.38%, P < 0.05). The number of apnea of prematurity (AOP) in observation group was reduced in comparison to control group, while duration of auxiliary ventilation together with hospitalization days were reduced in comparison to control group (P < 0.05). Post-therapy, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) were downregulated within observation group, while scorings for psychomotor development index (PDI) and mental development index (MDI) in observation group were elevated in comparison to control group (P < 0.05). Weight-gain rate and growth rate of body length within observation group was elevated in comparison to control group (P < 0.05). Post-therapy, work of breathing (WOB) and airway resistance (Raw) within observation group were lower compared to control group, while respiratory system compliance (Crs) was elevated in comparison to control group (P < 0.05). Occurrences of broncho-pulmonary dysplasia (BPD) within observation group was reduced in comparison to control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Early prophylactic use of caffeine citrate can effectively reduce the incidence of BPD in premature infants.

Caffeine: The Story beyond Oxygen-Induced Lung and Brain Injury in Neonatal Animal Models-A Narrative Review

Caffeine is one of the most commonly used drugs in intensive care to stimulate the respiratory control mechanisms of very preterm infants. Respiratory instability, due to the degree of immaturity at birth, results in apnea of prematurity (AOP), hyperoxic, hypoxic, and intermittent hypoxic episodes. Oxidative stress cannot be avoided as a direct reaction and leads to neurological developmental deficits and even a higher prevalence of respiratory diseases in the further development of premature infants. Due to the proven antioxidant effect of caffeine in early use, largely protective effects on clinical outcomes can be observed. This is also impressively observed in experimental studies of caffeine application in oxidative stress-adapted rodent models of damage to the developing brain and lungs. However, caffeine shows undesirable effects outside these oxygen toxicity injury models. This review shows the effects of caffeine in hyperoxic, hypoxic/hypoxic-ischemic, and intermittent hypoxic rodent injury models, but also the negative effects on the rodent organism when caffeine is administered without exogenous oxidative stress. The narrative analysis of caffeine benefits in cerebral and pulmonary preterm infant models supports protective caffeine use but should be given critical consideration when considering caffeine treatment beyond the recommended corrected gestational age.

Development and application of a population pharmacokinetic model repository for caffeine dose tailoring in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Considerable interindividual variability for the pharmacokinetics of caffeine in preterm infants has been demonstrated, emphasizing the importance of personalized dosing. This study aimed to develop and apply a repository of currently published population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models of caffeine in preterm infants to facilitate model-informed precision dosing (MIPD).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Relevant publications were screened, and their quality was assessed. PopPK models were reestablished to develop the model repository. Covariate effects were evaluated and the concentration-time profiles were simulated. An online simulation and calculation tool was developed as an instance.

RESULTS

Twelve PopPK models were finally included in the repository. Preterm infants' age and body size, especially the postnatal age and current weight, were identified as the most clinically critical covariates. Simulated blood concentration-time profiles across these models were comparable. Caffeine citrate-dose regimen should be adjusted according to the age and body size of preterm infants. The developed online tool can be used to facilitate clinical decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

The first developed repository of PopPK models for caffeine in preterm infants has a wide range of potential applications in the MIPD of caffeine.

Grading the level of evidence of neonatal pharmacotherapy: midazolam and phenobarbital as examples

BACKGROUND

Many drugs are used off-label or unlicensed in neonates. This does not mean they are used without evidence or knowledge. We aimed to apply and evaluate the Grading and Assessment of Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Studies (GAPPS) scoring system for the level of evidence of two commonly used anti-epileptic drugs.

METHODS

Midazolam and phenobarbital as anti-epileptics were evaluated with a systematic literature search on neonatal pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or pharmacodynamic [PD, (amplitude-integrated) electroencephalography effect] studies. With the GAPPS system, two evaluators graded the current level of evidence. Inter-rater agreement was assessed for dosing evidence score (DES), quality of evidence (QoE), and strength of recommendation (REC).

RESULTS

Seventy-two studies were included. DES scores 4 and 9 were most frequently used for PK, and scores 0 and 1 for PD. Inter-rater agreements on DES, QoE, and REC ranged from moderate to very good. A final REC was provided for all PK studies, but only for 25% (midazolam) and 33% (phenobarbital) of PD studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a reasonable level of evidence concerning midazolam and phenobarbital PK in neonates, although using a predefined target without integrated PK/PD evaluation. Further research is needed on midazolam use in term neonates with therapeutic hypothermia, and phenobarbital treatment in preterms.

IMPACT

There is a reasonable level of evidence concerning pharmacotherapy of midazolam and phenobarbital in neonates. Most evidence is however based on PK studies, using a predefined target level or concentration range without integrated, combined PK/PD evaluation. Using the GAPPS system, final strength of recommendation could be provided for all PK studies, but only for 25% (midazolam) to 33% (phenobarbital) of PD studies. Due to the limited PK observations of midazolam in term neonates with therapeutic hypothermia, and of phenobarbital in preterm neonates these subgroups can be identified for further research.

Doxapram for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Apnea of prematurity is a common problem in preterm infants that may have significant consequences on their development. Methylxanthines (aminophylline, theophylline, and caffeine) are effective in the treatment of apnea of prematurity. Doxapram is used as a respiratory stimulant in cases refractory to the methylxanthine treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of doxapram administration on the incidence of apnea and other short-term and longer-term clinical outcomes in preterm infants.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was March 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the role of doxapram in prevention and treatment of apnea of prematurity and prevention of reintubation in preterm infants (less than 37 weeks' gestation). We included studies comparing doxapram with either placebo or methylxanthines as a control group, or when doxapram was used as an adjunct to methylxanthines and compared to methylxanthines alone as a control group. We included studies of doxapram at any dose and route.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were clinical apnea, need for positive pressure ventilation after initiation of treatment, failed apnea reduction after two to seven days, and failed extubation (defined as unable to wean from invasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation [IPPV] and extubate or reintubation for IPPV within one week). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs enrolling 248 infants. Seven studies (214 participants) provided data for meta-analysis. Five studied doxapram for treatment of apnea in preterm infants. Three studied doxapram to prevent reintubation in preterm infants. None studied doxapram in preventing apnea in preterm infants. All studies administered doxapram intravenously as continuous infusions. Two studies used doxapram as an adjunct to aminophylline compared to aminophylline alone and one study as an adjunct to caffeine compared to caffeine alone. When used to treat apnea, compared to no treatment, doxapram may result in a slight reduction in failed apnea reduction (risk ratio [RR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20 to 1.05; 1 study, 21 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on need for positive pressure ventilation after initiation of treatment (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.01 to 6.74; 1 study, 21 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Doxapram may result in little to no difference in side effects causing cessation of therapy (0 events in both groups; risk difference [RD] 0.00, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.17; 1 study, 21 participants; low-certainty evidence). Compared to alternative treatment, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on failed apnea reduction (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.53 to 3.45; 4 studies, 84 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on need for positive pressure ventilation after initiation of treatment (RR 2.40, 95% CI 0.11 to 51.32; 2 studies, 37 participants; very-low certainty evidence; note 1 study recorded 0 events in both groups. Thus, the RR and CIs were calculated from 1 study rather than 2). Doxapram may result in little to no difference in side effects causing cessation of therapy (0 events in all groups; RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.15; 37 participants; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). As adjunct therapy to methylxanthine, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on failed apnea reduction after two to seven days (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.17; 1 study, 10 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported on clinical apnea, chronic lung disease at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA), death at any time during initial hospitalization, long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in the three comparisons, and need for positive pressure ventilation and side effects when used as adjunct therapy to methylxanthine. In studies to prevent reintubation, when compared to alternative treatment, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on failed extubation (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.83; 1 study, 25 participants; very low-certainty evidence). As adjunct therapy to methylxanthine, doxapram may result in a slight reduction in 'clinical apnea' after initiation of treatment (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.98; 1 study, 56 participants; low-certainty evidence). Doxapram may result in little to no difference in failed extubation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.62; 1 study, 56 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on side effects causing cessation of therapy (RR 6.42, 95% CI 0.80 to 51.26; 2 studies, 85 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported need for positive pressure ventilation, chronic lung disease at 36 weeks' PMA, long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in the three comparisons; failed extubation when compared to no treatment; and clinical apnea, death at any time during initial hospitalization, and side effects when compared to no treatment or alternative treatment. We identified two ongoing studies, one conducted in Germany and one in multiple centers in the Netherlands and Belgium.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In treating apnea of prematurity, doxapram may slightly reduce failure in apnea reduction when compared to no treatment and there may be little to no difference in side effects against both no treatment and alternative treatment. The evidence is very uncertain about the need for positive pressure ventilation when compared to no treatment or alternative treatment and about failed apnea reduction when used as alternative or adjunct therapy to methylxanthine. For use to prevent reintubation, doxapram may reduce apnea episodes when administered in adjunct to methylxanthine, but with little to no difference in failed extubation. The evidence is very uncertain about doxapram's effect on death when used as adjunct therapy to methylxanthine and about failed extubation when used as alternative or adjunct therapy to methylxanthine. There is a knowledge gap about the use of doxapram as a therapy to prevent apnea. More studies are needed to clarify the role of doxapram in the treatment of apnea of prematurity, addressing concerns about long-term outcomes. The ongoing studies may provide useful data.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of caffeine in preterm infants with apnea of prematurity: New findings from concomitant erythromycin and AHR genetic polymorphisms

Current standard-dose caffeine therapy results in significant intersubject variability. The aims of this study were to develop and evaluate population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models of caffeine in preterm infants through comprehensive screening of covariates and then to propose model-informed precision dosing of caffeine for this population. A total of 129 caffeine concentrations from 96 premature neonates were incorporated into this study. Comprehensive medical record and genotype data of these neonates were collected for analysis. PPK modeling was performed by a nonlinear mixed effects modeling program (NONMEM). Final models based on the current weight (CW) or body surface area (BSA) were evaluated via multiple graphic and statistical methods. The model-informed dosing regimen was performed through Monte Carlo simulations. In addition to CW or BSA, postnatal age, coadministration with erythromycin (ERY), and aryl hydrocarbon receptor coding gene (AHR) variant (rs2158041) were incorporated into the final PPK models. Multiple evaluation results showed satisfactory prediction performance and stability of the CW- and BSA-based models. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that trough concentrations of caffeine in preterm infants would be affected by concomitant ERY therapy and rs2158041 under varying dose regimens. For the first time, ERY and rs2158041 were found to be associated with the clearance of caffeine in premature infants. Similar predictive performance and stability were obtained for both CW- and BSA-based PPK models. These findings provide novel insights into caffeine precision therapy for preterm infants.

Caffeine for the Pharmacological Treatment of Apnea of Prematurity in the NICU: Dose Selection Conundrum, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Genetic Factors

Caffeine citrate is the drug of choice for the pharmacological treatment of apnea of prematurity. Factors such as maturity and genetic variation contribute to the interindividual variability in the clinical response to caffeine therapy in preterm infants, making the optimal dose administered controversial. Moreover, the necessity for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of caffeine is still worth discussing due to the need to achieve the desired target concentrations as well as concerns about the safety of higher doses. Therefore, we reviewed the pharmacokinetic profile of caffeine in preterm infants, evidence of the safety and efficacy of different doses of caffeine, therapeutic concentration ranges of caffeine and impact of genetic variability on caffeine therapy. Whereas the safety and efficacy of standard-dose caffeine have been demonstrated, evidence for the safety of higher administered doses is insufficient. Thus, preterm infants who lack clinical response to standard-dose caffeine therapy are of interest for TDM when dose optimization is performed. Polymorphisms in pharmacodynamics-related genes, but not in pharmacokinetics-related genes, have a significant impact on the interindividual variability in clinical response to caffeine therapy. For preterm infants lacking clinical response, how to develop individualized medication regimens for caffeine remains to be explored.