Increased Incidence of Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis in Germany

Stroke risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients: exploring connections and implications for patient care

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can independently increase the risk of stroke, affecting both young and adult RA patients. Recent attention has been drawn to the association between stroke and RA, supported by mounting evidence. Given that stroke is a significant and an urgent public health concern, this review aims to highlight the relationship between stroke and RA, covering mechanisms, underlying risk factors, early detection tools, and treatment implications. By uncovering the connection that links RA to stroke, we can pave the way for targeted healthcare practices and the development of preventive strategies for individuals with RA. Therefore, further research is imperative to deepen our understanding of this association and, ideally, guide treatment decisions for individuals at risk of both RA and stroke.

Increased risk of stroke among patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. This study aimed to determine the relationship between ankylosing spondylitis and the risk of stroke.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were conducted from inception to December 2021 to identify relevant articles investigating the risk of stroke in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. A random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird) was used to estimate a pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-regression based on the length of follow-up and subgroup analysis based on the type of stroke, study location, and year of publication to investigate the source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of eleven studies comprising 1.7 million participants were included in this study. Pooled analysis showed a significantly increased stroke risk (56%) among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (HR: 1.56, 95% CI 1.33-1.79). Subgroup analysis revealed a higher risk of ischemic stroke among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.23-1.68). However, meta-regression analysis showed no association between the duration of ankylosing spondylitis and stroke incidence (Coef=-0.0010, P=0.951).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that ankylosing spondylitis was associated with an increased risk of suffering a stroke. Management of cerebrovascular risk factors and the control of systemic inflammation should be considered in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs improve the cardiovascular profile in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting about 0. 5–1% of the adult population and manifesting as persistent synovitis, systemic inflammation and production of autoantibodies. Patients affected by RA not only experience chronic disease progression, but are also burdened by a 1.5-fold increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, which is comparable to the risk experienced by patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. RA patients also have a higher incidence and prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Although RA patients frequently present traditional CV risk factors such as insulin resistance and active smoking, previous studies have clarified the pivotal role of chronic inflammation–driven by proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha)–in accelerating the process of atherosclerosis and impairing the coagulation system. Over the last years, a number of studies have shown that disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) reducing the inflammatory state in general improve the CV risk, however some drugs may carry some apparent negative effects. Thus, RA is a model of disease in which targeting inflammation may counteract the progression of atherosclerosis and reduce CV risk. Clinical and experimental evidence indicates that the management of RA patients should be tailored based on the positive and negative effects of DMARDs on CV risk together with the individual traditional CV risk profile. The identification of genetic, biochemical and clinical biomarkers, predictive of evolution and response to treatment, will be the next challenge for a precision approach to reduce the burden of the disease.

An elevated FIB-4 score is not associated with cardiovascular events: a longitudinal analysis from 137 842 patients with and without chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Liver diseases and cardiovascular diseases are closely associated. Noninvasive tests (NITs), such as the FIB-4 score, have been recommended by different guidelines to rule out advanced fibrosis and estimate the risk of liver-related outcomes in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs). However, the association of an elevated FIB-4 score with the development of myocardial infarction and/or stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) is unknown.

METHODS

By using the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA), which compiles diagnoses, laboratory values as well as basic medical and demographic data of over 7.5 million patients followed in general practices in Germany, we identified 68 921 patients with available lab values for FIB-4 score calculation between 2005 and 2019. Patients with an FIB-4 score of less than 1.3 were matched 1:1 to patients with an FIB-4 score of at least 1.3 by age, sex and yearly consultation frequency.

RESULTS

In regression analysis, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of myocardial infarction was similar among patients with an FIB-4 score of at least 1.3 compared with patients with a low FIB-4 score of less than 1.3, regardless of whether patients with or without preexisting liver disease were analyzed. Moreover, there was no significant increase in the IRR of stroke/TIA between patients with a high or low FIB-4 score, both in the general population and patients with CLD.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the FIB-4 score is not associated with cardiovascular events both in the general population as well as in patients with CLD.

No increased incidence of venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Germany

Objectives

Vaccination is one of the most effective measures to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. The main reason for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination hesitancy is the potential side-effects. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Study design

This was a retrospective cohort study.

Methods

Individuals aged ≥18 years who received an initial vaccination for COVID-19 in one of 1134 general practices in Germany between April and June 2021 were included in the study. Vaccinated patients were matched to unvaccinated individuals by age, sex, index month (April to June 2020 [unvaccinated cohort] or April to June 2021 [vaccinated cohort]) and diagnoses that may be associated with an increased incidence of thrombosis documented within 12 months before the index date. The incidences of thrombosis and non-fatal pulmonary embolism as a function of COVID-19 vaccination were analysed.

Results

The present study included 326,833 individuals who were vaccinated against COVID-19 and 326,833 matched unvaccinated individuals. During the follow-up period, 406 vaccinated patients and 342 individuals in the control group received a diagnosis of thrombosis or non-fatal pulmonary embolism. This resulted in an incidence rate of 11.9 vs 11.3 cases per 1000 patient-years for vaccinated vs unvaccinated individuals, respectively, and a non-significant overall incidence rate ratio (IRR: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93–1.22). The highest IRR was observed in the 41–60 years age group (IRR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.98–1.73), and the lowest IRR was seen in the 18–40 years age group (IRR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.0–1.05); however, none of the individual age group incidence rates was significant.

Conclusions

The results indicate that the occurrence of thrombosis or pulmonary embolism after COVID-19 vaccination is a coincidental finding rather than a consequence of vaccination.