The Efficacy of Etoposide-Based Therapy in Adult Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

Etoposide Therapy of Cytokine Storm Syndromes

Etoposide has revolutionized the treatment of primary as well as secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), and it is, together with corticosteroids, the most widely used therapy for HLH. In the early 1980s, long-term survival in primary HLH was <5% but with the etoposide-/dexamethasone-based protocols HLH-94 and HLH-2004, in combination with stem cell transplantation, 5-year survival increased dramatically to around 60% in primary HLH, and based on analyses from the HLH-2004 study, there is likely room for further improvement. Biologically, etoposide administration results in potent selective deletion of activated T cells as well as efficient suppression of inflammatory cytokine production. Moreover, etoposide has also been reported to promote programmed cell death (apoptosis) rather than proinflammatory lytic cell death (pyroptosis), conceivably ameliorating subsequent systemic inflammation, i.e., a treatment very suitable for cytokine storm syndromes (CSS). The combination of etoposide and corticosteroids may also be beneficial in cases of severe or refractory secondary HLH (sHLH) with imminent organ failure, such as infection-associated HLH caused by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) or malignancy-triggered HLH. In CSS associated with rheumatic diseases (macrophage activation syndrome, MAS or MAS-HLH), etoposide is currently used as second- or third-line therapy. Recent studies suggest that etoposide perhaps should be part of an aggressive therapeutic intervention for patients with severe refractory or relapsing MAS, in particular if there is CNS involvement. Importantly, awareness of sHLH must be further increased since treatment of sHLH is often delayed, thereby missing the window of opportunity for a timely, effective, and potentially life-saving HLH-directed treatment.

Inflamed-HLH, MAS, or something else?

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a syndrome of excessive and maladaptive inflammation. Primary HLH is most frequently encountered in young children, and, without timely recognition and therapy, can lead to multiorgan failure and death. It is most often diagnosed using the HLH-2004 criteria and by identifying pathological mutations. However, the HLH-2004 criteria are not specific for HLH, and patients can easily fulfill these diagnostic criteria in other proinflammatory states in which HLH-therapy would not be indicated, including hematologic malignancies, infections, and rheumatologic disease. Therefore, great care must be taken to ensure that the specific disease associated with features of HLH is accurately recognized, as consequences of improper treatment can be catastrophic. We propose a diagnostic pathway for patients for whom HLH is on the differential (visual abstract). Importantly, in situations in which the initial diagnostic workup is equivocal or unrevealing, reevaluation for occult malignancy, infection, or rheumatologic disease would be prudent, as occult presentations may be missed on primary evaluation. Temporizing medications can be used in critically ill patients while awaiting secondary evaluation. By using this framework, clinicians will be able to more reliably discern primary HLH from other pro-inflammatory states and thus provide timely, appropriate disease-specific therapy.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with jaundice as first manifestation: A case report

BACKGROUND

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare but life-threatening condition. It is an immune-mediated disease that has a wide range of causes, elicits a hyperinflammatory response, and results in multiple organ damage. Clinical presentations vary, and in some cases, jaundice occurs as the first symptom.

CASE SUMMARY

We report the case of a 71-year-old female patient who presented with jaundice. She was admitted to our hospital because of the occurrence of "jaundice for half a month", and upon examination, obstructive jaundice with choledocholithiasis and gallstones was suggested. Cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy were performed. However, the jaundice did not improve after surgery. We found splenomegaly, cytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and elevated ferritin. Bone marrow biopsy revealed hemophagocytosis. Later, cardiac arrest occurred when she returned 3 wk after the surgery. We considered that HLH was triggered by septic shock. The patient's condition deteriorated rapidly, with multiple organ dysfunction and severe gastrointestinal bleeding. Corticosteroid therapy and symptomatic treatment failed to save her life.

CONCLUSION

Jaundice rarely presents as the first symptom in HLH patients. The HLH in this case was triggered by septic shock with jaundice as the first symptom. Clinicians should try hard to reduce missed diagnoses and misdiagnoses.

Risk factors and prognosis of early death in secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

The aim of our study was to summarize the clinical characteristics of early death patients with newly diagnosed secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH), analyze the risk factors of early death, and analyze the survival of patients. The clinical characteristics of 324 newly diagnosed sHLH patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical College and Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital from January 2014 to February 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Analyze the independent risk factors of early death, compare the secondary diseases and treatment methods of patients with early death group and non early death group, and analyze the survival of all patients with sHLH. Among the 324 newly diagnosed patients with sHLH, 134 died early, with an early mortality rate of 41.4%. Comparing the clinical characteristics of patients with early death group and patients with non early death group, logistic regression model was used to conduct multifactor analysis. Age > 60 years, Plt ≤ 20.0 × 109/L, APTT > 36.0 s and LDH > 1000.0 U/L were independent risk factors for early death of newly diagnosed sHLH patients (P < 0.05). Comparing the secondary diseases and treatment methods between early death group and non early death group, the proportion of sHLH patients secondary to lymphoma was higher in early death group than that in non early death group (P < 0.05). The proportion of sHLH patients secondary to connective tissue disease and infection was lower in early death group than that in non early death group (P < 0.05), and the proportion of sHLH patients used hormone combined chemotherapy was lower in early death group than that in non early death group (P < 0.05). The median follow-up time of all patients was 12.0 (1-65) months. The 5-year OS rates of patients with age > 60 years and age ≤ 60 years were 25.8% and 49.6% respectively (P < 0.001); The 5-year OS rates of patients with Plt > 20.0 × 109/L and Plt ≤ 20.0 × 109/L were 52.5% and 25.5% respectively (P < 0.001); The 5-year OS rates of patients with APTT > 36.0 s and APTT ≤ 36.0 s were 34.5% and 57.4% respectively (P < 0.001); The 5-year OS rates of patients with LDH > 1000.0 U/L and LDH ≤ 1000.0 U/L were 23.3% and 56.3% respectively (P < 0.001). Age > 60 years, Plt ≤ 20.0 × 109/L, APTT > 36.0 s and LDH > 1000.0 U/L are independent risk factors for early death of sHLH patients. The early mortality of lymphoma associated HLH (LA-HLH) patients is high, and early use of hormone combined chemotherapy can reduce the early mortality.

Etoposide: A rider on the cytokine storm

For more than 40 years, the epipodophyllotoxin drug etoposide is prescribed to treat cancer. This semi-synthetic compound remains extensively used to treat advanced small-cell lung cancer and in various chemotherapy regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation, and other anticancer protocols. Etoposide is a potent topoisomerase II poison, causing double-stranded DNA breaks which lead to cell death if they are not repaired. It is also a genotoxic compound, responsible for severe side effects and secondary leukemia occasionally. Beyond its well-recognized function as an inducer of cancer cell death (a "killer on the road"), etoposide is also useful to treat immune-mediated inflammatory diseases associated with a cytokine storm syndrome. The drug is essential to the treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and the macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), in combination with a corticosteroid and other drugs. The use of etoposide to treat HLH, either familial or secondary to a viral or parasitic infection, or treatment-induced HLH and MAS is reviewed here. Etoposide dampens inflammation in HLH patients via an inhibition of the production of pro-inflammatory mediators, such as IL-6, IL-10, IL-18, IFN-γ and TNF-α, and reduction of the secretion of the alarmin HMGB1. The modulation of cytokines production by etoposide contributes to deactivate T cells and to dampen the immune stimulation associated to the cytokine storm. This review discussed the clinical benefits and mechanism of action of etoposide (a "rider on the storm") in the context of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, notably life-threatening HLH and MAS. The question arises as to whether the two faces of etoposide action can apply to other topoisomerase II inhibitors.

The role of etoposide in the treatment of adult patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a potentially fatal inflammatory clinical condition, in which an exaggerated immune response is ineffectively regulated. Although etoposide-containing regimens are generally recommended for children with HLH, the exact role of etoposide in the adult setting remains unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature on the use of etoposide in adults with HLH. All articles written in English on the use of etoposide in adults with HLH available from seven databases and published on or before July 2021 were analyzed. Thirteen studies were found to be relevant to the search results. Ten of these studies report a statistical analysis on the effect of etoposide, of which five found etoposide-containing regimens superior to non-etoposide-containing regimens. Seven studies provided sufficient data to be included in the meta-analysis. For these data, the estimated logit relative risk of etoposide on survival was 1.06 (95% confidence interval: 0.92-1.21, standard error: 2.06). The pooled data of the meta-analysis did thus not support a beneficial effect of etoposide. It should be taken into account that the presented results are highly susceptible to bias and that the effect of etoposide differs between HLH-triggers. Although the meta-analysis does not support the effect of etoposide, we do not recommend abandoning etoposide as treatment modality. The limitations of the meta-analysis, together with several individual articles confirming the benefit of etoposide, justify etoposide for select cases in adults with HLH such as refractory or severe disease with (threatening) multiorgan failure.

Macrophage activation syndrome in adults: Characteristics, outcomes, and therapeutic effectiveness of etoposide-based regimen

Objectives

To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) patients and to provide experience for the treatment.

Methods

Adult patients with MAS admitted to Beijing Friendship Hospital from December 2014 to September 2021 were enrolled in this study. Clinical data of patients were collected and analyzed.

Results

A total of 118 adult MAS patients entered this study. MAS was the first manifestation in 43 (36.4%) patients, while 75 (63.6%) developed MAS after the diagnosis of autoimmune disease (AID) with a median diagnostic interval of 2 (0.5–359) months. Eighty-two patients were initially treated with glucocorticoid-based regimen; the overall response (OR) rate at the 2-week posttreatment was 37.8%. Forty-five patients switched to etoposide-based regimen, and the OR rate was 84.4%. Thirty-six patients were initially treated with etoposide-based regimen, and the OR rate at the 2-week posttreatment was 80.6%. Serum IL-18 (P = 0.021), IFN-γ (P = 0.013), IP-10 (P = 0.001), IL-10 (P = 0.041), IL-1RA (P < 0.001), and TNF-α (P = 0.020) levels of patients were significantly decreased in the remission phase than in the active phase. Levels of SDF-1α (P = 0.018) and IL-7 (P = 0.022) were higher in refractory patients, while the GRO-α level had a strong tendency toward statistical significance (P = 0.050). The probability of overall survival (OS) at 3, 6, and 36 months after HLH diagnosis were 89.8%, 89.0%, and 87.9%, retrospectively. The active MAS status at the 2-week post initial treatment [P = 0.009, HR = 15.281, 95% CI, (0.1.972, 118.430)] and baseline neutrophil count (Neu) <1.5 × 10⁹/l [P = 0.017, HR = 3.678, 95% CI, (1.267, 10.672)] were negative prognostic factors.

Conclusion

MAS typically occurs within 2 months after the onset of autoimmune disease in adults. SDF-1α, IL-7, and GRO-α could be used to predict refractory MAS. The etoposide-based regimen is effective and tolerable for adult MAS.

Practice patterns and outcomes of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adults: a 2-decade provincial retrospective review

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a heterogeneous, life-threatening clinical syndrome. There are scarce data on the quality of care in HLH or data comparing treatment patterns and outcomes between different triggers. We aimed to examine quality-of-care indicators and outcomes in adults with various HLH triggers. In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study of adult HLH in the province of Alberta, Canada (1999-2019), we examined quality indicators including diagnostic testing, time to diagnosis and treatment and trigger identification. We also compared treatment regimens and outcomes across HLH triggers. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of etoposide use. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We identified 97 patients; 66 (68%) were male. Triggers included malignancy (36%), infection (35%), autoimmune disease (21%) and idiopathic/others (8%). Specialized tests such as sCD25 (53%) and natural killer degranulation assay (19%) were under-performed, as were testing for infectious triggers. Etoposide was administered in only 33 (34%). Neutropenia, hyperbilirubinemia and hyperferritinemia, but not age, sex and comorbidities, were significant predictors of etoposide use. At median follow-up of 32 months, median OS was 18.8 months. Worse OS was seen in malignancy-associated and idiopathic HLH (log-rank P < 0.001). Our study showed low rates of specialized testing such as sCD25 and a low rate of etoposide use. Development of a standardized provincial protocol has the potential to improve quality of care in adult HLH.

Anakinra for the treatment of adult secondary HLH: a retrospective experience

Anti-cytokine therapies have been gaining attention as a means of improving outcomes in adult secondary HLH (asHLH), which currently has poor outcomes when treated with standard etoposide-based therapies. Anakinra is an interleukin-1 antagonist that is increasingly being used in the management of asHLH. Here is described a multi-hospital series of 16 adult patients with secondary HLH treated with anakinra. Provoking factors of secondary HLH included hematologic malignancy (n = 7, 44%), bacterial infection (n = 7, 44%), viral infection (n = 5, 31%), rheumatologic disorder (n = 4, 25%), and unknown (n = 1, 6%). Five patients remained alive at time of last follow-up (OS = 31%). Median OS was 1.7 months from initiation of anakinra (range 0.2–59). OS among patients with rheumatologic causes of secondary HLH was 75%, whereas only 17% of patients with other provoking factors survived (p = 0.0293). Anakinra was well tolerated, with only 1 patient experiencing associated toxicity (grade 3 liver injury). Anakinra may be useful in the management of asHLH provoked by rheumatologic conditions, although its benefit in asHLH provoked by other factors may be limited.

Lamotrigine-associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) confounded with underlying rheumatoid arthritis

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is one of the rare haematological syndromes more commonly reported in infants/children than adults. This disease is known for its aggressive dysregulated immune response affecting the host rapidly, causing multiorgan dysfunction and thus carries a high mortality. The disease still remains cryptic in this current decade despite all the developments in the ever-evolving field of haematology. Due to its rare occurrence and being more frequent in infants and the paediatric population, the literature lacks enough data to standardise therapies. Such events in adults and the elderly are invariably related to an underlying insult such as infections, other autoimmune or rheumatological diseases or drugs. We describe an interesting case of a middle-aged Caucasian woman who presented with fever, pancytopenia and hepatitis, who was eventually diagnosed with HLH just in time to receive the life-saving specific treatment as per available guidelines.

Malignancy-associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an inflammatory syndrome that can occur with cancer (malignancy-associated HLH) or with immune-activating therapies for cancer. Patients with lymphoma appear to be at particularly high risk for malignancy-associated HLH. The familial form of HLH is characterised by uncontrolled activation of macrophages and cytotoxic T cells, which can be identified by genetics or specific immune markers. However, the pathophysiology of malignancy-associated HLH is not well understood, and distinguishing pathological immune activation from the laboratory and clinical abnormalities seen in cancer and cancer treatment is challenging. Emerging diagnostic tools, such as serum cytokine or chemokine concentrations, flow cytometry, and other functional measures, are discussed. Mortality remains high with current approaches. Targeted therapy, including blockade of specific cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and IFNγ, and inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathways might improve outcomes for some patients. Finally, we discuss a framework for thinking of malignancy-associated HLH within a larger umbrella concept of cytokine storm syndrome.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis occurring after liver transplantation: A case series and review of the literature

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening disease characterized by excessive inflammation and tissue destruction due to a dysregulated immune response. Its secondary form is most commonly triggered by viral infection or malignancy. There have previously been 11 cases of acquired HLH described following liver transplantation in adult transplant recipients, most occurring within the first year following transplantation. Herein, we describe two cases of HLH in liver transplant recipients that both occurred remotely following transplantation. In the first case, HLH was thought to be triggered by the development of a post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in a patient who was initially diagnosed with recurrent autoimmune hepatitis. In the second, it was thought to be triggered by a newly acquired human herpesvirus-8 infection. In both cases, the syndrome was not recognized until treatment for the initial putative diagnoses was unsuccessful. Despite treatment, both patients unfortunately died from multiorgan failure. HLH in the post-liver transplant setting is likely under-recognized and has a high mortality; early diagnosis and intervention may lead to improved outcomes.