Obesity in Renal Transplantation

[Comprehensive care for kidney transplantation-optimization of interdisciplinary support before and after kidney transplantation]

Due to the divergence between the number of potential organ recipients and organ availability, transplant survival is of particular importance. In order to create the best possible conditions, it is not only important to address the risk factors for loss of organ functionality after transplantation, but also to focus on the time before transplantation. During this period, which lasts several years on average, the patient can create the conditions for risk reduction before and after transplantation with support. The optimization of physical health plays an important role here in order to maintain transplantability, on the one hand, and to counteract the general loss of physical performance due to dialysis, on the other. Therefore, the focus must be placed on "exercise" and "nutrition", which represent an increased risk of declining physical health in dialysis patients. After transplantation, the focus should again be on physical health. Through support, patients learn how to improve their cardiovascular risk profile and increase their physical performance. Psychosocial support is also important to combat psychological comorbidities and prevent risks such as nonadherence. In addition to improved physical and mental health, the focus here is also on the long-term survival of the patient and the transplant.

Bariatric Surgery as a Bridge to Facilitate Renal Transplantation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

PURPOSE

Renal transplantation (RT) is not recommended above BMI 40 kg/m2 as post-operative risks (delayed graft function, wound complications) are increased. Bariatric surgery (BS) results in sustained long-term weight loss. However, renal failure (RF) patients are theoretically higher risk candidates. We aim to investigate the safety of BS in patients with RF and the effect of BS on access to renal transplantation.

METHODS

We reviewed data from 31 patients with RF referred for BS between 2013 and 2021. We compared the outcomes of patients with RF who underwent BS to those who were referred but did not undergo BS. Controls matched for age/BMI/comorbidity (MC) but without RF were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Of 31 patients referred, 19 proceeded with BS (68% female, median age 52 years, BMI 46.2 ± 4.9 kg/m2) and 12 did not (58% female, median age 58, mean BMI 41.5 ± 4.1). Excess body weight loss (EBWL) was 71.2% ± 20.2% at 2 years in RF patients versus 66.0% ± 28.0% in MC patients. In the operated group, 11/19 (58%) patients reached their treatment target (six transplanted, five placed on waiting list) versus 3/12 (25%) in unoperated patients (three transplanted). There was no difference in perioperative complications between RF and MC groups. Long-term, there were seven deaths amongst RF patients (two operated, five unoperated), none amongst the MC group.

CONCLUSION

BS in patients with RF increased access to RT and was safe and effective. We therefore recommend consideration of BS in patients with obesity and RF in specialised units.

Body mass index affects kidney transplant outcomes: A cohort study over 5 years using a steroid sparing protocol

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding the suitability of high body mass index (BMI) candidates accessing the transplant waitlist.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Observational study on consecutive kidney transplant recipients undergoing surgery between January 2014 and March 2016 at our center. Patients were stratified according to BMI. Survival outcomes and graft function were analyzed to investigate the effect of donor's and recipient's demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

396 kidney transplant recipients: 260 males, mean age 51.8 ± 15.9 years, followed up for a mean time of 5.86 ± 2.29 years. Mean BMI 26.2 ± 5.1. BMI class 1 (20 ≤ BMI ≤ 24.9) n=133, class 2 (25 ≤ BMI ≤ 29.9) n= 155, class 3 (30 ≤ BMI ≤34.9) n=53, class 4 (BMI ≥ 35) n=21, class V (BMI ≤ 19.9) n=34. Patient survival was not significantly different according to the recipient's BMI class (p=0.476); graft survival was affected (p=0.031), as well as graft function up to 2 years post-transplant and at 4 years follow up (p=0.016). At logistic regression the factors independently associated with graft loss were only donor's age (p=0.05) and BMI class of the recipient (p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity did not impact on patient's survival but affected graft function and graft loss.