Decreased Time on the Nondominant One-Leg Standing Test Associated with Repeated Falls in Older Residents with Healthy Aging, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Dementia: The Wakuya Project

Discriminant Accuracy of Standing Balance Tests for the Level of Gait Dependency in Hospitalized Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

INTRODUCTION

When determining the level of gait independence in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), detailed functional assessment is difficult in some patients. The previous literature has suggested simple standing balance tests for patients with AD due to their ease of implementation in clinical practice and relevance to gait. However, their usefulness for discriminating the level of gait independence remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the discrimination accuracy of a simple standing balance test in the level of gait independence among hospitalized patients with AD.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was a post hoc analysis of a study conducted on 63 inpatients with AD in a single hospital. Participants were divided into three groups according to their level of gait independence: independent, modified independent (independent, walking with walking aids), and dependent groups (supervision). Gait independence was determined using the Functional Independence Measure. Four standing balance tests were used - closed-leg, semi-tandem, tandem, and one-leg standings - and the discrimination accuracy of each test was calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

One-leg standing was best at discriminating between the independent and modified independent groups (positive predictive value = 80.0%, negative predictive value = 94.1%). Tandem standing was best at discriminating between the modified independent and dependent groups (positive predictive value = 74.1%, negative predictive value = 93.3%).

CONCLUSION

A simple standing balance test may assist in the determining level of gait independence in patients with AD when it is difficult to perform a mobility assessment.

Falling of older adults with cognitive impairment: a new home environment evaluation chart and a preliminary examination in the Wakuya Project

It is important to evaluate the home environment because most fractures in older adults are caused by falls indoors. However, previous studies have not separated individual abilities from environments. Also, the interrelationship between falls, cognitive function, and home environments has not been clarified.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to develop an evaluation method specific to the home environment and examine the effects of environment and cognitive impairment on falls.

Methods

This was a case-control study analyzing 95 older adults living in the community. A Visiting Checklist for the Home Environment (VICHe) was developed and examined for reliability and validity. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) was examined by determining Cohen's kappa and the intra-class correlation coefficient. Guttman's split-half method was used for internal consistency, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was obtained. Criterion-related validity was confirmed by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient with the Fall Risk Index's (FRI) total score of the environmental factor items. As a preliminary study, trends in the number of falls by cognitive function and home environment were examined.

Results

The VICHe obtained validity, but the IRR was inadequate. In contrast, the version that focused on the on-floor environment (VICHe-OFI) showed IRR for all items and validity through correlations with the FRI. The number of fallers increased in the cognitive impairment group when the home environment was bad.

Conclusions

Reliability and validity of the VICHe-OFI were obtained. Preliminary examination using this scale indicates that falls in the home of the elderly may be more affected by the home environment as cognitive function declines.

Prevalence, risk factors and effectiveness of falls prevention interventions for adults living with Mild Cognitive Impairment in the community: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To identify falls prevalence, falls risk factors and evaluate the effectiveness of falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling people with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed articles (inception to 4 August 2022) from PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, EMBASE, Scopus, SportDiscus and the Cochrane library.

REVIEW METHODS

All types of methodological approaches were considered. Inclusion criteria were community-dwelling; diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment; aged 50+ years. Interventions needed to include falls prevention programs aiming to reduce falls and/or risk of falls. Outcomes of interest included number and/or rate of falls, falls prevalence and falls risk factors. For controlled trials, any control group was included. Quality assessment was completed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials and the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields for all other studies. Where statistical data pooling was not possible, narrative synthesis was used to present data in tables and figures.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were included. Prevalence of falls was 43% when data were gathered prospectively for 12 months. Confirmed falls risk factors included slow gait, dual-tasking, postural control and non-amnesic Mild Cognitive Impairment. Few studies evaluated interventions to reduce falls. Six meta-analyses were conducted, no significant reduction in falls was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Until further high-quality, adequately powered studies are available to guide practice, best practice guidelines recommend balance training as a core component of falls prevention programs for older people generally, as well as people with Mild Cognitive Impairment.