Geriatric Patients and Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections: Analysis of Bacterial Range and Resistance Rates at a 3rd Level of Care Hospital in Germany

Efficacy of Fosfomycin against Planktonic and Biofilm-Associated MDR Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are a severe public health problem and are caused mainly by the uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC). Antimicrobial resistance and limited development of new antimicrobials have led to the reuse of old antibiotics such as fosfomycin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of fosfomycin on a collection of multidrug-resistant (MDR) UPEC and the degradative activity on biofilm producers. A total of 100 MDR UPEC clinical isolates were collected from patients at Mexican second- and third-level hospitals. Microorganism identification was performed using an automated system, the evaluation of the susceptibility of clinical isolates to fosfomycin was performed using the resazurin microtiter assay, and the identification of biofilm producers and the effect of fosfomycin in biofilms were evaluated using the crystal violet method. Among planktonic MDR UPEC, 93% were susceptible to fosfomycin. Eighty-three MDR UPEC were categorized as weak (39.8%), moderate (45.2%), and strong (14.5%) biofilm producers. Fosfomycin exhibited degradative activity ranging from 164.4 µg/mL to 1,045 µg/mL. Weak producers required statistically lower concentrations of fosfomycin to destroy the biofilm, contrary to moderate and strong producers. In conclusion, fosfomycin could be an option for the treatment of infections caused by MDR UPEC, for which the antimicrobial treatment is more often becoming limited.

Cranberry Supplement, D-Mannose, and Other OTC Modalities for Prevention of Recurrent UTI in Women Post-Electrofulguration

Purpose

To assess patient reliance on various over-the-counter (OTC) modalities used for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection (RUTI) after electrofulguration (EF).

Patients and Methods

Following IRB approval, qualifying women were offered a short survey over the phone by a medical researcher to collect information about their use of various OTC modalities for prophylaxis of RUTI. Data was compared between two cohorts, ≥70 years old and <70 years old, using chi-squared and Student’s t-tests.

Results

From a database of 324 patients, 163 accepted the interview. 17% (28/163) reported current use of cranberry supplements, 10% (16/163) D-mannose supplements, and 42% (69/163) another non-prescription modality for RUTI prophylaxis. The non-geriatric (<70 years old) cohort spent, on average, $80 less annually on cranberry/D-mannose supplements (P=0.043) than the geriatric cohort and were more likely to use non-prescription modalities for the prevention of UTI (52% vs 30%; P=0.0061). Individuals using D-mannose were also much more likely to purchase their product online compared to those using cranberry supplements (85% vs 56%). Across all modalities, the perceived benefit difference in reducing UTI/year ranged from a median of 0 for Pyridium® (phenazopyridine hydrochloride) to four for probiotics, with D-mannose and cranberry at two/year, and those increasing daily fluid consumption at 2.5 fewer UTI/year.

Conclusion

Continued use of non-prescription modalities for RUTI prophylaxis were common among women with an EF history, but varied based on age groups. Across both age cohorts, annual expenditure and perceived benefit also varied among different OTC prophylactic modalities. Awareness of type and method of OTC modality implementation by patients with RUTI is essential to aligning use with current field recommendations.