1
|
Berkhout-Byrne NC, Voorend CGN, Meuleman Y, Mooijaart SP, Brunsveld-Reinders AH, Bos WJW, Van Buren M. Nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment as decision-making tool in kidney failure. J Ren Care 2024; 50:112-127. [PMID: 37031361 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dialysis might not benefit all older patients with kidney failure, particularly those with multimorbid conditions and frailty. Patients' and healthcare professionals' awareness of the presence of geriatric impairments could improve outcomes by tailoring treatment plans and decisions for individual patients. OBJECTIVE We aimed to explore the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment to fuel decision-making for treatment choices in older patients with kidney failure. DESIGN In an exploratory qualitative study using focus groups, participants discussed perspectives on the use and value of nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment for the decision-making process to start or forego dialysis. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS Patients (n = 18) with kidney failure, caregivers (n = 4), and professionals (n = 25) were purposively sampled from 10 hospitals. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and inductively analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Three main themes emerged that supported or impeded decision-making in kidney failure: (1) patient psycho-social situation; (2) patient-related factors on modality choice; (3) organisation of health care. Patients reported feeling vulnerable due to multiple chronic conditions, old age, experienced losses in life and their willingness to trade longevity for quality of life. Professionals recognised the added value of nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment in three major themes: (i) facilitating continual holistic assessment, (ii) filling the knowledge gap, and (iii) uncovering important patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment was perceived as a valuable tool to identify geriatric impairments in older patients with kidney failure. Integration of its outcomes can facilitate a more holistic approach to inform choices and decisions about kidney replacement therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noeleen C Berkhout-Byrne
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn G N Voorend
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette Meuleman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Willem Jan W Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn Van Buren
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Nephrology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quint EE, Pol RA, Segev DL, McAdams-DeMarco MA. Age Is Just a Number for Older Kidney Transplant Patients. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00760. [PMID: 38771060 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
The rise in the mean age of the global population has led to an increase in older kidney transplant (KT) patients. This demographic shift, coupled with the ongoing organ shortage, requires a nuanced understanding of which older adults are most suitable for KT. Recognizing the increased heterogeneity among older adults and the limitations of solely relying on chronological age, there is a need to explore alternative aging metrics beyond chronological age. In this review, we discuss the impact of older age on access to KT and postoperative outcomes. Emphasizing the need for a comprehensive evaluation that extends beyond chronological age, we explore alternative aging metrics such as frailty, sarcopenia, and cognitive function, underscoring their potential role in enhancing the KT evaluation process. Most importantly, we aim to contribute to the ongoing discourse, fostering an optimized approach to KT for the rapidly growing population of older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien E Quint
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Robert A Pol
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mara A McAdams-DeMarco
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Voorend CG, Berkhout-Byrne NC, van Bodegom-Vos L, Diepenbroek A, Franssen CF, Joosten H, Mooijaart SP, Bos WJW, van Buren M. Geriatric Assessment in CKD Care: An Implementation Study. Kidney Med 2024; 6:100809. [PMID: 38660344 PMCID: PMC11039322 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Older people with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) have complex health care needs. Geriatric evaluation preceding decision making for kidney replacement is recommended in guidelines, but implementation is lacking in routine care. We aimed to evaluate implementation of geriatric assessment in CKD care. Study Design Mixed methods implementation study. Setting & Participants Dutch nephrology centers were approached for implementation of geriatric assessment in patients aged ≥70 years and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≤20 mL/min/1.73 m2. Quality Improvement Activities/Exposure We implemented a consensus-based nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment: a patient questionnaire and professionally administered test set comprising 16 instruments covering functional, cognitive, psychosocial, and somatic domains and patient-reported outcome measures. Outcomes We aimed for implementation in 10 centers and 200 patients. Implementation was evaluated by (i) perceived enablers and barriers of implementation, including integration in work routines (Normalization Measure Development Tool) and (ii) relevance of the instruments to routine care for the target population. Analytical Approach Variations in implementation practices were described based on field notes. The postimplementation survey among health care professionals was analyzed descriptively, using an explanatory qualitative approach for open-ended questions. Results Geriatric assessment was implemented in 10 centers among 191 patients. Survey respondents (n = 71, 88% response rate) identified determinants that facilitated implementation, ie, multidisciplinary collaboration (with geriatricians) -meetings and reports and execution of assessments by nurses. Barriers to implementation were patient illiteracy or language barrier, time constraints, and patient burden. Professionals considered geriatric assessment sufficiently integrated into work routines (mean, 6.7/10 ± 2.0 [SD]) but also subject to improvement. Likewise, the relevance of geriatric assessment for routine care was scored as 7.8/10 ± 1.2. The Clinical Frailty Score and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were perceived as the most relevant instruments. Limitations Selection bias of interventions' early adopters may limit generalizability. Conclusions Geriatric assessment could successfully be integrated in CKD care and was perceived relevant to health care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlijn G.N. Voorend
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Noeleen C. Berkhout-Byrne
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Adry Diepenbroek
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Casper F.M. Franssen
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke Joosten
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Geriatric Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Simon P. Mooijaart
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Jan W. Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn van Buren
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kennard AL, Glasgow NJ, Rainsford SE, Talaulikar GS. Narrative Review: Clinical Implications and Assessment of Frailty in Patients With Advanced CKD. Kidney Int Rep 2024; 9:791-806. [PMID: 38765572 PMCID: PMC11101734 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Frailty is a multidimensional clinical syndrome characterized by low physical activity, reduced strength, accumulation of multiorgan deficits, decreased physiological reserve, and vulnerability to stressors. Frailty has key social, psychological, and cognitive implications. Frailty is accelerated by uremia, leading to a high prevalence of frailty in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) as well as contributing to adverse outcomes in this patient population. Frailty assessment is not routine in patients with CKD; however, a number of validated clinical assessment tools can assist in prognostication. Frailty assessment in nephrology populations supports shared decision-making and advanced communication and should inform key medical transitions. Frailty screening and interventions in CKD or ESKD are a developing research priority with a rapidly expanding literature base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice L. Kennard
- Department of Renal Medicine, Canberra Health Services, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Nicholas J. Glasgow
- Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Suzanne E. Rainsford
- Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Girish S. Talaulikar
- Department of Renal Medicine, Canberra Health Services, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kennard AL, Rainsford S, Glasgow NJ, Talaulikar GS. Use of frailty assessment instruments in nephrology populations: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:449. [PMID: 37479978 PMCID: PMC10360289 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04101-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty is a clinical syndrome of accelerated aging associated with adverse outcomes. Frailty is prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease but is infrequently assessed in clinical settings, due to lack of consensus regarding frailty definitions and diagnostic tools. This study aimed to review the practice of frailty assessment in nephrology populations and evaluate the context and timing of frailty assessment. METHODS The search included published reports of frailty assessment in patients with chronic kidney disease, undergoing dialysis or in receipt of a kidney transplant, published between January 2000 and November 2021. Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsychINFO, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were examined. A total of 164 articles were included for review. RESULTS We found that studies were most frequently set within developed nations. Overall, 161 studies were frailty assessments conducted as part of an observational study design, and 3 within an interventional study. Studies favoured assessment of participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and transplant candidates. A total of 40 different frailty metrics were used. The most frequently utilised tool was the Fried frailty phenotype. Frailty prevalence varied across populations and research settings from 2.8% among participants with CKD to 82% among patients undergoing haemodialysis. Studies of frailty in conservatively managed populations were infrequent (N = 4). We verified that frailty predicts higher rates of adverse patient outcomes. There is sufficient literature to justify future meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS There is increasing recognition of frailty in nephrology populations and the value of assessment in informing prognostication and decision-making during transitions in care. The Fried frailty phenotype is the most frequently utilised assessment, reflecting the feasibility of incorporating objective measures of frailty and vulnerability into nephrology clinical assessment. Further research examining frailty in low and middle income countries as well as first nations people is required. Future work should focus on interventional strategies exploring frailty rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice L Kennard
- Department of Renal Medicine, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra Health Services, Building 15, Yamba Drive, Garran, ACT 2605, Australia.
- Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
| | | | | | - Girish S Talaulikar
- Department of Renal Medicine, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra Health Services, Building 15, Yamba Drive, Garran, ACT 2605, Australia
- Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weimann A, Ahlert M, Seehofer D, Zieschang T, Schweda M. Old Age and Frailty in Deceased Organ Transplantation and Allocation-A Plea for Geriatric Assessment and Prehabilitation. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11296. [PMID: 37476294 PMCID: PMC10354295 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Due to demographic ageing and medical progress, the number and proportion of older organ donors and recipients is increasing. At the same time, the medical and ethical significance of ageing and old age for organ transplantation needs clarification. Advanced age is associated with the frailty syndrome that has a negative impact on the success of organ transplantation. However, there is emerging evidence that frailty can be modified by suitable prehabilitation measures. Against this backdrop, we argue that decision making about access to the transplant waiting list and the allocation of donor organs should integrate geriatric expertise in order to assess and manage frailty and impairments in functional capacity. Prehabilitation should be implemented as a new strategy for pre-operative conditioning of older risk patients' functional capacity. From an ethical point of view, advanced chronological age per se should not preclude the indication for organ transplantation and the allocation of donor organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arved Weimann
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery, St. George Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marlies Ahlert
- Department of Economics, Martin-Luther-University of Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tania Zieschang
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Mark Schweda
- Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu HHL, Chinnadurai R, Walker RJ, Tennankore KK. Is It Time to Integrate Frailty Assessment in Onconephrology? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061674. [PMID: 36980558 PMCID: PMC10046649 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary There are an increasing number of older people living with kidney cancer and/or cancer and kidney disease worldwide, sparking a wider discussion on the impact of frailty and the clinical significance of conducting frailty assessments for this patient population. We provide an update on the current evidence related to frailty assessment in onconephrology and identify areas where further research efforts are anticipated to address knowledge gaps within this topic. Abstract Onconephrology has emerged as a novel sub-specialty of nephrology dedicated to the intersection between the kidney and cancer. This intersection is broad and includes a number of important areas of focus, including concurrent chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cancer, acute kidney complications of cancer, and cancer-treatment-induced nephrotoxicity. The importance of onconephrology is even more evident when considering the global growth in the population of older adults, many of whom are living with some degree of frailty. Furthermore, a considerable proportion of older adults have CKD (some of whom eventually progress to kidney failure) and are at high risk of developing solid tumour and hematologic malignancies. Specific to kidney disease, the association between frailty status and kidney disease has been explored in depth, and tools to capture frailty can be used to guide the management and prognostication of older adults living with kidney failure. Whilst there is emerging data regarding the assessment and impact of frailty in onconephrology, there remains a relative paucity of knowledge within this topic. In this article, we evaluate the definition and operationalization of frailty and discuss the significance of frailty within onconephrology. We review evidence on current approaches to assessing frailty in onconephrology and discuss potential developments and future directions regarding the utilization of frailty in this patient population. A greater awareness of the intersections and interactions between frailty and onconephrology and further efforts to integrate frailty assessment in onconephrology to optimize the delivery of realistic and goal-directed management strategies for patients is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry H. L. Wu
- Renal Research Laboratory, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-9926-4751
| | - Rajkumar Chinnadurai
- Department of Renal Medicine, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford M6 8HD, UK
| | - Robert J. Walker
- Department of Medicine, Dunedin Campus, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
| | - Karthik K. Tennankore
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kao J, Reid N, Hubbard RE, Homes R, Hanjani LS, Pearson E, Logan B, King S, Fox S, Gordon EH. Frailty and solid-organ transplant candidates: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:864. [PMCID: PMC9667636 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03485-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is currently no consensus as to a standardized tool for frailty measurement in any patient population. In the solid-organ transplantation population, routinely identifying and quantifying frailty in potential transplant candidates would support patients and the multidisciplinary team to make well-informed, individualized, management decisions. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesise the literature regarding frailty measurement in solid-organ transplant (SOT) candidates.
Methods
A search of four databases (Cochrane, Pubmed, EMBASE and CINAHL) yielded 3124 studies. 101 studies (including heart, kidney, liver, and lung transplant candidate populations) met the inclusion criteria.
Results
We found that studies used a wide range of frailty tools (N = 22), including four ‘established’ frailty tools. The most commonly used tools were the Fried Frailty Phenotype and the Liver Frailty Index. Frailty prevalence estimates for this middle-aged, predominantly male, population varied between 2.7% and 100%. In the SOT candidate population, frailty was found to be associated with a range of adverse outcomes, with most evidence for increased mortality (including post-transplant and wait-list mortality), post-operative complications and prolonged hospitalisation. There is currently insufficient data to compare the predictive validity of frailty tools in the SOT population.
Conclusion
Overall, there is great variability in the approach to frailty measurement in this population. Preferably, a validated frailty measurement tool would be incorporated into SOT eligibility assessments internationally with a view to facilitating comparisons between patient sub-groups and national and international transplant services with the ultimate goal of improved patient care.
Collapse
|
9
|
Meyer AM, Pickert L, Heeß A, Becker I, Kurschat C, Bartram MP, Benzing T, Polidori MC. Prognostic Signature of Chronic Kidney Disease in Advanced Age: Secondary Analysis from the InGAH Study with One-Year Follow-Up. Biomolecules 2022; 12:biom12030423. [PMID: 35327615 PMCID: PMC8946591 DOI: 10.3390/biom12030423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The negative impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on health status and quality of life in older patients has been well documented. However, data on frailty trajectories and long-term outcomes of older CKD patients undergoing structured Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) with multidimensional frailty evaluation are sparse. Here, we analysed records from 375 CKD patients admitted to our university hospital (mean age 77.5 (SD 6.1) years, 36% female) who had undergone a CGA-based calculation of the frailty score with the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) as well as follow-up evaluations at 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge. Based on the MPI score at admission, 21% of the patients were frail and 56% were prefrail. MPI values were significantly associated with KDIGO CKD stages (p = 0.003) and rehospitalisation after 6 months (p = 0.027) and mortality at 3, 6 and 12 months (p = 0.001), independent of chronological age. Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) showed a significantly lower frailty compared to patients with renal replacement therapy (RRT, p = 0.028). The association between frailty and mortality after 12 months appeared particularly strong for KTR (mean MPI 0.43 KTR vs. 0.52 RRT, p < 0.001) and for patients with hypoalbuminemia (p < 0.001). Interestingly, RRT was per se not significantly associated with mortality during follow up. However, compared to patients on RRT those with KTR had a significantly lower grade of care (p = 0.031) and lower rehospitalisation rates at 12 months (p = 0.010). The present analysis shows that the large majority of older CKD inpatients are prefrail or frail and that the risk for CKD-related adverse outcomes on the long term can be accurately stratified by CGA-based instruments. Further studies are needed to explore the prognostic and frailty-related signature of laboratory biomarkers in CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Meyer
- Ageing Clinical Research, Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (A.M.M.); (L.P.); (A.H.); (C.K.); (M.P.B.); (T.B.)
| | - Lena Pickert
- Ageing Clinical Research, Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (A.M.M.); (L.P.); (A.H.); (C.K.); (M.P.B.); (T.B.)
| | - Annika Heeß
- Ageing Clinical Research, Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (A.M.M.); (L.P.); (A.H.); (C.K.); (M.P.B.); (T.B.)
| | - Ingrid Becker
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Christine Kurschat
- Ageing Clinical Research, Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (A.M.M.); (L.P.); (A.H.); (C.K.); (M.P.B.); (T.B.)
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress-Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Malte P. Bartram
- Ageing Clinical Research, Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (A.M.M.); (L.P.); (A.H.); (C.K.); (M.P.B.); (T.B.)
| | - Thomas Benzing
- Ageing Clinical Research, Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (A.M.M.); (L.P.); (A.H.); (C.K.); (M.P.B.); (T.B.)
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress-Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Maria Cristina Polidori
- Ageing Clinical Research, Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (A.M.M.); (L.P.); (A.H.); (C.K.); (M.P.B.); (T.B.)
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress-Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-221-478-4480
| |
Collapse
|