1
|
Gliksberg O, Kushnir T, Sznitman SR, Lev-Ran S, Brill S, Amit BH, Feingold D. Negative experiences of patients using medicinal cannabis: A systematic review of qualitative studies. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:5607-5618. [PMID: 36807590 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES In this study, we systematically reviewed qualitative studies concerning patients' experience with medicinal cannabis (MC) use, to gain insight into the negative effects of MC. BACKGROUND Over the past decades, the use of MC for therapeutic purposes has increased. However, there is conflicting and insufficient data on possible negative physiological and psychological effects of MC treatment. DESIGN A systematic review was conducted and the PRISMA guidelines were adopted. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO and EMBASE. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative checklist used to assess risk of bias in the included studies. METHODS We included studies focusing on conventional medical treatment using cannabis-based products, approved by a physician for a particular health issue. RESULTS Of the 1230 articles identified in the initial search, eight articles were included in the review. Following the compilation of themes in the eligible studies, six themes were identified: (1) MC approval; (2) administrative barriers; (3) social perception; (4) MC misuse/widespread effect; (5) adverse effects; and (6) dependence or addiction. These were grouped into two meta-themes: (1) administrative and social aspects of MC use; and (2) experiences of the effects of medicinal cannabis. CONCLUSIONS Our findings call for specific attention to unique consequences associated with MC use. Further research is needed in order to assess the degree to which negative experiences associated with MC use may affect various aspects of patients' medical condition. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Describing the complex experience of MC treatment and its spectrum of consequences for patients may enable physicians, therapists and researchers to provide more attentive and accurate MC treatment to their patients. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION In this review, patients' narratives were explored, yet the research methods did not directly involve patients or the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Or Gliksberg
- Doctoral Program, Department of Psychology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| | - Talma Kushnir
- Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
- Department of Psychology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| | | | - Shaul Lev-Ran
- Israel Center on Addiction, Netanya, Israel
- Lev Hasharon Medical Center, Netanya, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Silviu Brill
- Institute of Pain Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ben H Amit
- Cannabis Clinic, Reuth Rehabilitation Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jacobs RJ, Colon J, Kane MN. Medical Students’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Beliefs about Medical Cannabis: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Cureus 2022; 14:e28336. [PMID: 36168342 PMCID: PMC9502535 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There has been increased attention given to understanding the uses of medical cannabis (MC) for symptom management of various medical conditions. Physicians receive minimal training in medical school and rely mostly on anecdotal evidence; by proxy, medical students generally do receive formal training in MC. It is unknown how medical students perceive MC, including its efficacy, appropriateness in medicine, its possible adverse effects, and its value for patients. This study investigated medical students’ perceived knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes toward MC to better understand their knowledge about and attitudes toward MC. Method Using a semi-structured interview guide, eight focus groups were conducted with 83 medical students via Zoom virtual meeting platform (Zoom Video Communications, Inc., San Jose, California, United States) in June 2022. The interviews were guided by the following content areas: (1) beliefs about cannabis' therapeutic utility, (2) perceived knowledge about MC, (3) the role of the physician regarding MC, (4) concern for cannabis’ adverse effects, and (5) MC education in the school curriculum. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, an iterative, systematic process of coding patterns, and emerged themes in the interview data to explore medical students’ perceptions about MC. Themes were validated based on whether each theme captured distinct parts of the interview data and whether their content cohered meaningfully. Results Four themes emerged from the focus group interviews investigating medical students’ perceptions of MC: (1) erroneous beliefs about MC, (2) unreliable sources of information, (3) mixed attitudes toward legalization, and (4) desire for MC education while in medical school. Attitudes regarding MC in general, including legalization, varied by United States state of origin of the student and exposure to MC (e.g., use by family member). Conclusion MC seems to be a significant issue for medical trainees who might be required to recommend it to patients and manage coexisting therapies. Cultivating new knowledge about students’ perceptions and perceived knowledge about medicinal options and dosing of MC is critical for medical educators as they design undergraduate curricular initiatives for future physicians.
Collapse
|
3
|
Sajdeya R, Shavers A, Jean-Jacques J, Costales B, Jugl S, Crump C, Wang Y, Manfio L, Pipitone RN, Rosenthal MS, Winterstein AG, Cook RL. Practice Patterns and Training Needs Among Physicians Certifying Patients for Medical Marijuana in Florida. J Prim Care Community Health 2021; 12:21501327211042790. [PMID: 34452585 PMCID: PMC8404623 DOI: 10.1177/21501327211042790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the clinical training or practice experiences among physicians who certify patients for medical marijuana. The objective of this study was to determine information sources, factors influencing recommendations, clinical practices in patient assessment, communications, and recommendations, and priority areas for additional training among physicians who certify patients for medical marijuana. METHODS A cross-sectional state-wide anonymous survey of registered medical marijuana physicians in Florida between June and October 2020 was administered. Numerical responses were quantified using counts and percentages. The frequencies for "often" and "always" responses were aggregated when appropriate. RESULTS Among 116 respondents, the mean (standard deviation) age was 57 (12) years old, and 70% were male. The most frequently used information sources were research articles (n = 102, 95%), followed by online sources (n = 99, 93%), and discussions with other providers and dispensary staff (n = 84, 90%). Safety concerns were most influential in patient recommendations (n = 39, 39%), followed by specific conditions (n = 30, 30%) and patient preferences (n = 26, 30%). Ninety-three physicians (92%) reported they "often" or "always" perform a patient physical exam. Eighty-four (77%) physicians provided specific administration route recommendations. Half (n = 56) "often" or "always" provided specific recommendations for Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: cannabidiol ratios, while 69 (62%) "often" or "always" provided specific dose recommendations. Online learning/training modules were the most preferred future training mode, with 88 (84%) physicians "likely" or "very likely" to participate. The top 3 desired topics for future training were marijuana-drug interactions (n = 84, 72%), management of specific medical conditions or symptoms (n = 83, 72%), and strategies to reduce opioids or other drugs use (n = 78, 67%). CONCLUSIONS This survey of over 100 medical marijuana physicians indicates that their clinical practices rely on a blend of research and anecdotal information sources. While physicians report clinical factors as influential during patient recommendation, patient assessment practices and treatment regimen recommendations vary substantially and rely on experimental approaches. More research is needed to inform evidence-based practice and training, especially considering details on drug interactions, risk-benefit of treatment for specific clinical conditions, and strategies to reduce opioid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruba Sajdeya
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
| | - Anna Shavers
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer Jean-Jacques
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
| | - Brianna Costales
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
| | - Sebastian Jugl
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
| | - Carly Crump
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
| | - Yan Wang
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
| | - Luran Manfio
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
| | - R. Nathan Pipitone
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
- Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA
| | - Martha S. Rosenthal
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
- Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA
| | - Almut G. Winterstein
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
| | - Robert L. Cook
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|