Disparate Information Provided by Pulse Wave Velocity versus Other Measures of Aortic Compliance in End-Stage Renal Disease

Research Progress and Clinical Value of Subendocardial Viability Ratio

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with ischemic heart disease being a major contributor, either through coronary atherosclerotic plaque-related major vascular disease or coronary microvascular dysfunction. Obstruction of coronary blood flow impairs myocardial perfusion, which may lead to acute myocardial infarction in severe cases. The subendocardial viability ratio, also known as the Buckberg index, is a valuable tool for evaluation of myocardial perfusion because it reflects the balance between myocardial oxygen supply and oxygen demand. The subendocardial viability ratio can effectively evaluate the function of the coronary microcirculation and is associated with arterial stiffness. This ratio also has potential value in predicting adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in various populations. Moreover, the subendocardial viability ratio has demonstrated clinical significance in a range of diseases, including hypertension, aortic stenosis, peripheral arterial disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis. This review summarizes the applications of the subendocardial viability ratio, its particular progress in the relevant research, and its clinical significance in cardiovascular diseases.

Subendocardial Viability Ratio Predictive Value for Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertensive Patients

Background: The subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), also known as the Buckberg index, is a parameter of arterial stiffness with indirect prognostic value in assessing long-term cardiovascular risk. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 70 patients with uncomplicated hypertension admitted to a county medical reference hospital. We analyzed demographics, laboratory data, arterial stiffness parameters and cardiovascular risk scores (SCORE and Framingham risk scores) and aimed to identify paraclinical parameters associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Results: Of the arterial stiffness parameters, SEVR correlates statistically significantly with age, central and peripheral systolic blood pressure, as well as with heart rate. SEVR seems to have prognostic value among hypertensive patients by increasing the risk of major cardiovascular events assessed by SCORE and Framingham risk scores. SEVR correlates statistically significantly with serum fibrinogen (p = 0.02) and hemoglobin (p = 0.046). Between pulse wave velocity and lipid parameters (p = 0.021 for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and p = 0.030 for triglycerides) a statistically significant relationship was found for the study group. The augmentation index of the aorta also correlated with serum LDL-cholesterol (p = 0.032) and the hemoglobin levels (p = 0.040) of hypertensive patients. Conclusions: Age, abdominal circumference and Framingham score are independent predictors for SEVR in our study group, further highlighting the need for early therapeutic measures to control risk factors in this category of patients.