Management of Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive and Systematic Review

Calvarial Vault Remodeling Technique for Lambdoid Craniosynostosis

SUMMARY

Premature fusion of the lambdoid suture is the most uncommon single-suture synostosis. It presents with a classic "windswept" appearance, a trapezoid-shaped head, and significant skull asymmetry notable for an ipsilateral mastoid bulge and contralateral frontal bossing. Because of the rarity of lambdoid synostosis, little is known about optimal techniques for its treatment. In particular, the proximity of the lambdoid suture to critical intracranial structures such as the superior sagittal and transverse sinuses represents a potential for significant intraoperative bleeding. Prior work has shown that parietal asymmetry persists after repair in these cases. In this article, the authors present a technique for the treatment of unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis along with two representative cases. This calvarial vault remodeling technique requires the removal of both ipsilateral and contralateral parietal bones. These are moved across hemispheres and reinset on opposite sides to help correct the parietal asymmetry. Obliquely orientated barrel stave osteotomies are performed to provide a safe mechanism for correction of occipital flattening. The authors' early results show improvement in correction of volume asymmetry 1 year postoperatively relative to patients treated with prior calvarial vault remodeling techniques. The authors believe the technique presented here corrects the windswept appearance in patients with lambdoid craniosynostosis and also reduces the potential for complications. Further work will be necessary to confirm this technique's long-term efficacy in a larger cohort.

Cognitive Development in Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Lambdoid craniosynostosis affects approximately 1 in 33 000 live births per year, and surgical correction is often sought in order to achieve normocephaly and allow for adequate brain growth. However, the effects of lambdoid synostosis and its treatment on cognitive development are unknown.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

A systematic review of Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov was conducted in January 2022. Included studies assessed cognitive development of patients with nonsyndromic unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Results of developmental tests were compared to normative data or controls to generate Hedges' g for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of 3 studies describing general cognition showed that cases scored significantly lower than their peers, but within 1 standard deviation (g = 0.37, 95% CI [-0.64, -0.10], P = .01). Meta-analysis of verbal and psychomotor development showed no significant differences in children with lambdoid synostosis. Studies were of fair quality and had moderate-to-high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lambdoid craniosynostosis may score slightly below average on tests of general cognition in comparison to normal controls, but results in other domains are variable. Analyses were limited by small sample sizes. Multidisciplinary care and involvement of a child psychologist may be helpful in identifying areas of concern and providing adequate scholastic support. Further research recruiting larger cohorts will be necessary to confirm these findings and extend them to other developmental domains such as attention and executive function.

Long-term neurocognitive outcomes in 204 single-suture craniosynostosis patients

PURPOSE

Craniosynostosis, which describes premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, has been associated with a variety of neurocognitive deficits. We sought to explore the cognitive profiles of the various types of single-suture, non-syndromic craniosynostosis (NSC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of children 6-18 years old with surgically corrected NSC who underwent neurocognitive testing (Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visuomotor Integration) from the years 2014-2022 was conducted.

RESULTS

204 patients completed neurocognitive testing (139 sagittal, 39 metopic, 22 unicoronal, 4 lambdoid suture). 110 (54%) of the cohort was male, and 150 (74%) were White. Mean IQ was 106.10±14.01 and mean age at surgery and testing were 9.0±12.2 months and 10.9±4.0 years, respectively. Sagittal synostosis was associated with higher scores than metopic synostosis, with significant differences in verbal IQ (109.42±15.76 vs 101.37±10.41), full-scale IQ (108.32±14.44 vs 100.05±11.76), visuomotor integration (101.62±13.64 vs 92.44±12.07), visual perception (103.81±12.42 vs 95.87±11.23), and motor coordination (90.45±15.60 vs 84.21±15.44). Sagittal synostosis was associated with significantly higher scores for visuomotor integration (101.62±13.64 vs 94.95±10.24) and visual perception (103.81±12.42 vs 94.82±12.75) than unicoronal synostosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to patients with sagittal synostosis, patients with metopic synostosis exhibited lower scores in verbal IQ, full-scale IQ, visuomotor integration, visual perception, and motor control after surgical correction. Despite surgical correction for premature metopic suture fusion, the effect on the adjacent frontal lobe and white matter connections to other regions of the brain may have a lasting functional impact. Patients with unicoronal synostosis exhibited lower visuomotor integration and visual perception scores.

Management of Sagittal and Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: Minimally Invasive Approaches

The resurgence of strip craniectomies began in the mid-1990s with advances in surgical technique and anesthesia coupled with the critical observation that earlier interventions benefitted from an easily molded skull. Jimenez and Barone's pioneering introduction of endoscopic approaches to strip craniectomies coupled with postoperative helmeting in newborns and young infants and Claes Lauritzen's introduction of spring-mediated cranioplasty began the era of minimally invasive approaches in the surgical correction of craniosynostosis. This article provides technical descriptions of these treatment modalities, a comparative literature review, and our institutional algorithms for the correction of sagittal craniosynostosis and unilambdoid craniosynostosis.