1
|
Singh S, Mohan BP, Chandan S, Sharma N, Vinayek R, Dutta S, Kantsevoy SV, Le M, Adler DG. Conventional Versus Traction Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Tumors: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024:00004836-990000000-00258. [PMID: 38252678 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Compared with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) for colorectal lesions, the traction method (T-ESD) allows the lesion to be stabilized with easier dissection. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting results on the clinical outcomes of T-ESD as compared with C-ESD. We conducted a meta-analysis to compile the data. METHODS Multiple databases were searched for RCTs evaluating C-ESD versus T-ESD for colorectal tumors. The end points of interest were procedure time (min), resection speed (mm²/min), R0 resection, en bloc resection, delayed bleeding, and perforation. Standard meta-analysis methods were employed using the random-effects model. RESULTS Six RCTs with a total of 566 patients (C-ESD n=284, T-ESD n=282) were included. The mean age was 67±10 y and 60% were men. As compared with the T-ESD technique, the C-ESD group was associated with longer procedure time (SMD 0.91, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.23, P<0.00001) and lesser resection speed (SMD -1.03, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.06, P=0.04). No significant difference was found in the 2 groups with respect to R0 resection rate (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06, P=0.87), en bloc resection (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.01, P=0.35), delayed bleeding (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.59, P=0.55) and perforation (RR 2.16, 95% CI 0.75 to 6.27, P=0.16). DISCUSSION On meta-analysis, pooled procedure time was significantly faster with T-ESD compared with C-ESD. The clinical outcomes, however, were comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahib Singh
- Internal Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Orlando Gastroenterology PA, Orlando, FL
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHI Creighton Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Neil Sharma
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN
| | - Rakesh Vinayek
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sudhir Dutta
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Michelle Le
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Peak Gastroenterology Associates, Colorado Springs, CO
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Masunaga T, Kato M, Sasaki M, Iwata K, Miyazaki K, Kubosawa Y, Mizutani M, Takatori Y, Matsuura N, Nakayama A, Takabayashi K, Yahagi N. Effectiveness of water pressure method in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by novice endoscopists. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E641-E648. [PMID: 37502676 PMCID: PMC10370489 DOI: 10.1055/a-2102-7578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains challenging for novice endoscopists. Not only the underwater conditions but also active use of water pressure with the water pressure method (WPM) can help widen the submucosal layer. This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of WPM in colorectal ESD, especially for novice endoscopists. Methods This study was ex vivo and enrolled three novices. Each endoscopist performed conventional ESD (C-ESD) and ESD with WPM (WPM-ESD) 10 times on an excised bovine rectum. The treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results Median procedure time was significantly shorter in the WPM-ESD group than in the C-ESD group (54 minutes, interquartile range [IQR] 42-67 vs. 45 minutes, IQR 34-55, P = 0.035). Although no significant difference in the activation time of electrical surgical unit (ESU) during the procedure was noted, the interval time during the procedure at which the ESU was not activated was significantly shorter in the WPM-ESD group (52 minutes, IQR 40-65 vs. 42 minutes, IQR 32-52, P = 0.030) than in the C-ESD group. Moreover, the time required for the endoscope to enter the submucosa was significantly shorter in the WPM-ESD group than in the C-ESD group (8.0 minutes, IQR 6.0-10 vs. 5.0 minutes, IQR 3.0-6.0, P < 0.001). Conclusions The present study reveals that the WPM method significantly shortens the procedure times for novices in colorectal ESD, especially the interval time, which refers to the time spent creating the field of view, and the time required for the endoscope to enter the submucosa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teppei Masunaga
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motohiko Kato
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motoki Sasaki
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Iwata
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kurato Miyazaki
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoko Kubosawa
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mari Mizutani
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusaku Takatori
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noriko Matsuura
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Nakayama
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kaoru Takabayashi
- Center for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen B, Bisschops R, Bourke MJ, Deprez PH, Esposito G, Lemmers A, Leclercq P, Maselli R, Messmann H, Pech O, Pioche M, Vieth M, Weusten BLAM, Fuccio L, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2023; 55:361-389. [PMID: 36882090 DOI: 10.1055/a-2031-0874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
ESGE suggests conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; marking and mucosal incision followed by circumferential incision and stepwise submucosal dissection) for most esophageal and gastric lesions. ESGE suggests tunneling ESD for esophageal lesions involving more than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference. ESGE recommends the pocket-creation method for colorectal ESD, at least if traction devices are not used. The use of dedicated ESD knives with size adequate to the location/thickness of the gastrointestinal wall is recommended. It is suggested that isotonic saline or viscous solutions can be used for submucosal injection. ESGE recommends traction methods in esophageal and colorectal ESD and in selected gastric lesions. After gastric ESD, coagulation of visible vessels is recommended, and post-procedural high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (or vonoprazan). ESGE recommends against routine closure of the ESD defect, except in duodenal ESD. ESGE recommends corticosteroids after resection of > 50 % of the esophageal circumference. The use of carbon dioxide when performing ESD is recommended. ESGE recommends against the performance of second-look endoscopy after ESD. ESGE recommends endoscopy/colonoscopy in the case of significant bleeding (hemodynamic instability, drop in hemoglobin > 2 g/dL, severe ongoing bleeding) to perform endoscopic hemostasis with thermal methods or clipping; hemostatic powders represent rescue therapies. ESGE recommends closure of immediate perforations with clips (through-the-scope or cap-mounted, depending on the size and shape of the perforation), as soon as possible but ideally after securing a good plane for further dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute - Porto, Portugal.,MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) & RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, FMUP, Porto, Portugal.,Gastroenterology, Unilabs, Portugal
| | - Barbara Bastiaansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Western Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gianluca Esposito
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Leclercq
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, Germany
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute - Porto, Portugal.,MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) & RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ichijima R, Ikehara H, Sumida Y, Inada T, Nemoto D, Nakajima Y, Minagawa T, Sumiyoshi T, Inoki K, Yoshida N, Inoue K, Fukuzawa M, Minoda Y, Tsutsumi K, Esaki M, Gotoda T. Randomized controlled trial comparing conventional and traction endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colon tumor (CONNECT-C trial). Dig Endosc 2023; 35:86-93. [PMID: 35997037 DOI: 10.1111/den.14426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely used treatment for early gastrointestinal cancer. However, colon ESD remains challenging. Previous studies on colon ESD using the traction method used a small sample, single-center design, providing insufficient evidence of this procedure's efficacy. We thus aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the traction method in colon ESD in this multicenter randomized trial. METHODS We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, two-arm controlled trial at 10 facilities in Japan. A 1:1 allocation was conducted for the conventional ESD (C-ESD) and traction ESD (T-ESD) groups. The primary end-point was ESD procedure time. RESULTS We included 128 C-ESD and 123 T-ESD cases from April 2020 to August 2021. The median procedure times for C-ESD and T-ESD were 61 (40-100) and 53 (40-76) min (P = 0.18), respectively, and no significant differences were observed between the groups. Subgroup analysis showed that the median procedure times for patients with a lesion diameter of ≥30 mm in the C-ESD and T-ESD groups were 89 (57-80) and 69 (50-104) min (P = 0.05), respectively, and for nonexpert operators were 81 (62-120) and 64 (52-109) min (P = 0.07), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The traction method did not contribute to a significantly shortened ESD procedure time. However, this method may be useful when the tumor diameter is large or if the procedure is conducted by nonexpert endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryoji Ichijima
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisatomo Ikehara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yorinobu Sumida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Taisuke Inada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Daiki Nemoto
- Department of Coloproctology, Fukushima Medical University Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yuki Nakajima
- Department of Coloproctology, Fukushima Medical University Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | | | | | - Kazuya Inoki
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohisa Yoshida
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ken Inoue
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masakatsu Fukuzawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Minoda
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Koshiro Tsutsumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Esaki
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takuji Gotoda
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|