Primary Nonfunction and Early Allograft Dysfunction after Liver Transplantation

Icaritin attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury by anti-inflammation, anti-oxidative stress, and anti-autophagy in mouse liver

BACKGROUND

Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury is a major complication of liver transplantation and gravely affects patient prognosis. Icaritin (ICT), the primary plasma metabolite of icariin (ICA), plays a critical role in anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory processes. However, the role of ICT in hepatic IR injury remains largely undefined. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the role of ICT in hepatic IR injury.

METHODS

We established hepatic IR injury models in animals, as well as an oxygen-glucose deprivation/reperfusion (OGD/R) cell model. Liver injury in vivo was assessed by measuring serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, necrotic areas by liver histology and local hepatic inflammatory responses. For in vitro analyses, we implemented flow-cytometric and western blot analyses, transmission electron microscopy, and an mRFP-GFP-LC3 adenovirus reporter assay to assess the effects of ICT on OGD/R injury in AML12 and THLE-2 cell lines. Signaling pathways were explored in vitro and in vivo to identify possible mechanisms underlying ICT action in hepatic IR injury.

RESULTS

Compared to the mouse model group, ICT preconditioning considerably protected the liver against IR stress, and diminished the levels of necrosis/apoptosis and inflammation-related cytokines. In additional studies, ICT treatment dramatically boosted the expression ratios of p-PI3K/PI3K, p-AKT/AKT, and p-mTOR/mTOR proteins in hepatic cells following OGD/R damage. We also applied LY294002 (a PI3K inhibitor) and RAPA (rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor), which blocked the protective effects of ICT in hepatocytes subjected to OGD/R.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that ICT attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury by exerting anti-inflammation, anti-oxidative stress, and anti-autophagy effects, as demonstrated in mouse livers. We thus posit that ICT could have therapeutic potential for the treatment of hepatic IR injury.

Rescue liver transplantation for post-hepatectomy liver failure- single center retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplantation (LT) is a well-established method applied for the treatment of various liver diseases, including primary and secondary malignancies, as well as acute liver failure triggered by different mechanisms. In turn, liver failure (PHLF) is the most severe complication observed after liver resection (LR). PHLF is an extremely rare indication for LT. The aim of the present study was to assess the results of LT in patients with PHLF.

METHODS

Relevant cases were extracted from the prospectively collected database of all LTs performed in our center. All clinical variables, details of the perioperative course of each patient and long-term follow-up data were thoroughly assessed.

RESULTS

Between January 2000 and August 2023, 2703 LTs were carried out. Among them, six patients underwent LT for PHLF, which accounted for 0.2% of all patients. The median age of the patients was 38 years (range 24-66 years). All patients underwent major liver resection before listing for LT. The 90-day mortality after LT was 66.7% (4 out of 6 patients), and all patients experienced complications in the posttransplant course. One patient required early retransplantation due to primary non-function (PNF). The last two transplanted patients are alive at 7 years and 12 months after LT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In an unselected population of patients with PHLF, LT is a very morbid procedure associated with high mortality but should be considered the only life-saving option in this group.

Wogonin Alleviates DCD Liver Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Regulating ALOX15/iNOS-mediated Ferroptosis

BACKGROUND

Donation after circulatory death livers are more susceptible to ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) because of a longer period of warm ischemia. Growing evidence now suggests that ferroptosis plays a key regulatory role in the development of IRI, so targeting ferroptosis may be an effective strategy to alleviate IRI in liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

Using donation after circulatory death LT models in rats and oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) models in BRL-3A cells, we tested the effect of the Chinese medicine monomer wogonin on liver IRI and explored the specific mechanism.

RESULTS

Wogonin attenuated liver IRI and increased the survival rate of rats by inhibiting lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis. Mechanistically, arachidonic acid 15-lipoxygenase-1 (ALOX15) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) were identified as potential targets of baicalein through bioinformatics analysis combined with in vivo and in vitro experiments. This result was further confirmed by molecular docking and cellular thermal shift assays. Finally, we silenced ALOX15 and iNOS in the OGD/R cell model and found that silencing ALOX15 and iNOS could reproduce the regulatory effect of wogonin and abrogate the regulatory effect of wogonin.

CONCLUSIONS

In brief, this study emphasizes that wogonin exerts a protective effect in liver IRI through the regulation of ALOX15- and iNOS-mediated ferroptosis. ALOX15 and iNOS are potential targets for intervention in IRI induced by LT, and wogonin is a drug candidate for LT patients.

Advancements in Predictive Tools for Primary Graft Dysfunction in Liver Transplantation: A Comprehensive Review

Orthotopic liver transplantation stands as the sole curative solution for end-stage liver disease. Nevertheless, the discrepancy between the demand and supply of grafts in transplant medicine greatly limits the success of this treatment. The increasing global shortage of organs necessitates the utilization of extended criteria donors (ECD) for liver transplantation, thereby increasing the risk of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) encompasses early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and the more severe primary nonfunction (PNF), both of which stem from ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and mitochondrial damage. Currently, the only effective treatment for PNF is secondary transplantation within the initial post-transplant week, and the occurrence of EAD suggests an elevated, albeit still uncertain, likelihood of retransplantation urgency. Nonetheless, the ongoing exploration of novel IRI mitigation strategies offers hope for future improvements in PGD outcomes. Establishing an intuitive and reliable tool to predict upcoming graft dysfunction is vital for early identification of high-risk patients and for making informed retransplantation decisions. Accurate diagnostics for PNF and EAD constitute essential initial steps in implementing future mitigation strategies. Recently, novel methods for PNF prediction have been developed, and several models for EAD assessments have been introduced. Here, we provide an overview of the currently scrutinized predictive tools for PNF and EAD evaluation strategies, accompanied by recommendations for future studies.

Algorithmic Approach to Deranged Liver Functions After Transplantation

Liver transplant (LT) recipients require close follow-up with regular monitoring of the liver function tests (LFTs). Evaluation of deranged LFT should be individualized depending upon the time since LT, peri-operative events, clinical course, and any complications. These derangements can range from mild and asymptomatic to severe and symptomatic elevations requiring expedited personalized assessment and management. Pattern of LFT derangement (hepatocellular, cholestatic, or mixed), donor-recipient risk factors, timing after LT (post-operative, 1-12 months, and >12 months since LT) along with clinical context and symptomatology are important considerations before proceeding with the initial evaluation. Compliance to immunosuppression and drug interactions should be ascertained along with local epidemiology of infections. Essential initial evaluation must include an ultrasound abdomen with Doppler to rule out any structural causes such as biliary or vascular complications apart from focussed laboratory evaluation. Early allograft dysfunction, ischemia reperfusion injury, small-for-size syndrome, biliary leaks, hepatic artery, and portal vein thrombosis are usual culprits in the early post-operative period whereas viral hepatitis (acute or reactivation), opportunistic infections, and recurrence of the primary disease are more frequent in the later period. Graft rejection, biliary strictures, sepsis, and drug induced liver injury remain possible etiologies at all times points after LT. Initial evaluation algorithm must be customized based on history, clinical examination, risk factors, and pattern and severity of deranged LFT. Allograft rejection is a diagnosis of exclusion and requires liver biopsy to confirm and assess severity. Empirical treatment of rejection sans liver biopsy is discouraged.

Characterization of Perioperative Serotonin in Patients Undergoing Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Background: Platelets were shown to be relevant for liver regeneration. In particular, platelet-stored serotonin (5-HT) proved to be a pro-regenerative factor in this process. The present study aimed to investigate the perioperative course of 5-HT and evaluate associations with patient and graft outcomes after othotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Methods: 5-HT was quantified in plasma and serum of 44 OLT recipients perioperatively, and in their respective donors. Olthoff's criteria for early allograft dysfunction (EAD) were used to evaluate postoperative outcomes. Results: Patients with higher donor intra-platelet 5-HT per platelet (IP 5-HT PP) values had significantly lower postoperative transaminases (ASAT POD1: p = 0.006, ASAT POD5: p = 0.006, ASAT POD10: p = 0.02, ALAT POD1: p = 0.034, ALAT POD5: p = 0.017, ALAT POD10: p = 0.04). No significant differences were seen between postoperative 5-HT values and the occurrence of EAD. A tendency was measured that donor IP 5-HT PP is lower in donor-recipient pairs that developed EAD (p = 0.07). Conclusions: Donor IP 5-HT PP might be linked to the postoperative development of EAD after OLT, as higher donor levels are correlated with a more favorable postoperative course of transaminases. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings.

Short-term postoperative bacteriobilia or fungibilia in liver transplantation patients with donation after circulatory death allografts associated with a longer hospital stay: A single-center retrospective observational study in China

BACKGROUND

Normal bile is sterile. Studies have shown that cholangitis after liver transplantation (LT) was associated with a relatively poor prognosis. It remains unclear whether the bacteriobilia or fungibilia impact the patient outcomes in LT recipients, especially with donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts, which was correlated with a higher risk of allograft failure.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 139 LT recipients of DCD grafts from 2019 to 2021. All patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of bacteriobilia or fungibilia. The prevalence and microbial spectrum of postoperative bacteriobilia or fungibilia and its possible association with outcomes, especially hospital stay were analyzed.

RESULTS

Totally 135 and 171 organisms were isolated at weeks 1 and 2, respectively. Among all patients included in this analysis, 83 (59.7%) developed bacteriobilia or fungibilia within 2 weeks post-transplantation. The occurrence of bacteriobilia or fungibilia (β = 7.43, 95% CI: 0.02 to 14.82, P = 0.049), particularly the detection of Pseudomonas (β = 18.84, 95% CI: 6.51 to 31.07, P = 0.003) within 2 weeks post-transplantation was associated with a longer hospital stay. However, it did not affect the graft and patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of bacteriobilia or fungibilia, particularly Pseudomonas within 2 weeks post-transplantation, could influence the recovery of liver function and was associated with prolonged hospital stay but not the graft and patient survival.

Intraoperative Anesthetic Strategies to Mitigate Early Allograft Dysfunction After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the most effective treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Hepatic insufficiency within a week of OLT, termed early allograft dysfunction (EAD), occurs in 20% to 25% of deceased donor OLT recipients and is associated with morbidity and mortality. Primary nonfunction (PNF), the most severe form of EAD, leads to death or retransplantation within 7 days. The etiology of EAD is multifactorial, including donor, recipient, and surgery-related factors, and largely driven by ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). IRI is an immunologic phenomenon characterized by dysregulation of cellular oxygen homeostasis and innate immune defenses in the allograft after temporary cessation (ischemia) and later restoration (reperfusion) of oxygen-rich blood flow. The rising global demand for OLT may lead to the use of marginal allografts, which are more susceptible to IRI, and thus lead to an increased incidence of EAD. It is thus imperative the anesthesiologist is knowledgeable about EAD, namely its pathophysiology and intraoperative strategies to mitigate its impact. Intraoperative strategies can be classified by 3 phases, specifically donor allograft procurement, storage, and recipient reperfusion. During procurement, the anesthesiologist can use pharmacologic preconditioning with volatile anesthetics, consider preharvest hyperoxemia, and attenuate the use of norepinephrine as able. The anesthesiologist can advocate for normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and machine perfusion during allograft storage at their institution. During recipient reperfusion, the anesthesiologist can optimize oxygen exposure, consider adjunct anesthetics with antioxidant-like properties, and administer supplemental magnesium. Unfortunately, there is either mixed, little, or no data to support the routine use of many free radical scavengers. Given the sparse, limited, or at times conflicting evidence supporting some of these strategies, there are ample opportunities for more research to find intraoperative anesthetic strategies to mitigate the impact of EAD and improve postoperative outcomes in OLT recipients.

An Overview of Liver Transplantation: Current Status, Recent Techniques, and Challenges-Perspectives From a Center in China

Liver transplantation is the best way to treat end-stage liver disease.With benefits from enhanced techniques, refined management, and advanced medications, liver transplant boasts a commendable 5-year survival rate for recipients. Nevertheless, acquiring the perioperative management and surgical skills essential for liver transplant is a time-consuming process for new surgeons. In addition, COVID-19 has also affected the field. Based on our actual situation in China, we have provided an overview of donor evaluation,recipient selection,transplant procedures, postoperative complications and management, longterm management, and pandemic strategies to guide new clinical surgeons in the field.

Post-transplant outcomes and financial burden of donation after circulatory death donor liver transplant after the implementation of acuity circle policy

BACKGROUND

After implementation of the Acuity Circles (AC) allocation policy, use of DCD liver grafts has increased in the United States.

METHODS

We evaluated the impact of AC on rates of DCD-liver transplants (LT), their outcomes, and medical costs in a single practice. Adult LT patients were classified into three eras: Era 1 (pre-AC, 1/01/2015-12/31/2017); Era 2 (late pre-AC era, 1/01/2018-02/03/2020); and Era 3 (AC era, 05/10/2020-09/30/2021).

RESULTS

A total of 520 eligible LTs were performed; 87 were DCD, and 433 were DBD. With each successive era, the proportion of DCD increased (Era 1: 11%; Era 2: 20%; Era 3: 24%; p < .001). DCD recipients had longer ICU stays, higher re-admission/re-operation rates, and higher incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy compared to those with DBD. Direct, surgical, and ICU costs during first admission were higher with DCD than DBD (+8.0%, p < .001; +4.2%, p < .001; and +33.3%, p = .001). DCD-related costs increased after Era 1 (Direct: +4.9% [Era 2 vs. 1] and +12.4% [Era 3 vs. 1], p = .04; Surgical: +17.7% and +21.7%, p < .001). In the AC era, there was a significantly higher proportion of donors ≥50 years, and more national organ sharing. Compared to DCD from donors <50 years, DCD from donors ≥50 years was associated with significantly higher total direct, surgical, and ICU costs (+12.6%, p = .01; +9.5%, p = .01; +84.6%, p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of DCD-LT, especially from older donors, has increased after the implementation of AC policies. These changes are likely to be associated with higher costs in the AC era.

Emergency Liver Retransplantation With Marginal Donors

BACKGROUND

The goal of the present study is to determine if using marginal donors negatively impacts the outcomes of emergency liver retransplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed, including all emergency liver retransplantations done in our center between 1990 and 2021. Recipients from the control group received the second grafts from "ideal donors", and patients from the case group received them from marginal donors. Analyzed variables included demographics of recipients and donors, complications, and survival rates.

RESULTS

38 emergency retransplantations were performed. 23 recipients were included in the control group, and the remaining 15 were in the case group. The second donors from the case group were significantly older (mean age 58 vs 71 years old, P < 0.0001). On the contrary, there were no differences between groups regarding the mean age of recipients, comorbidities, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, or causes of retransplantation (the most common was hepatic artery thrombosis). No differences were found in early perioperative death rates (control group 26.1% vs case group 20%, P =1) and, although the case group seemed to have slightly poorer outcomes in long-term survival (control group 70%, 61%, and 55% vs case group 73%, 59%, and 39%, respectively, at 1, 5, and 10 years), the differences were not statistically significant (log-rank = 0.808).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of marginal donors for emergency liver retransplantation was proved safe in our study, as there were no differences in complications or in short- or mid-term survival rates.

Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study

Although pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been used during liver transplantation surgery, the usefulness of PAC has rarely been investigated. We evaluated whether the use of PAC is associated with better clinical outcomes compared to arterial waveform-based monitoring after liver transplantation. A total of 1565 cases undergoing liver transplantation were reviewed. We determined whether patients received PAC or not and divided our cohort into the PAC with hemodynamic monitoring using PAC and the non-PAC with arterial waveform-based monitoring using FloTrac-Vigileo. Propensity score matching was performed. Acute kidney injury (AKI), early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and 1-year all-cause mortality or graft failure were compared in the matched cohorts. Logistic regression analysis was performed in the inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) cohort for postoperative EAD and AKI, respectively. Five-year overall survival was compared between the two groups. In the matched cohort, there was no significant difference in the incidence of AKI, EAD, length of hospital or ICU stay, and 1-year all-cause mortality between the groups. In the IPTW cohort, the use of PAC was not a significant predictor for AKI or EAD (AKI: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.20 (0.47-1.56), p = 0.229; EAD: 0.99 (0.38-1.14), p = 0.323). There was no significant difference in the survival between groups after propensity score matching (Log-rank test p = 0.578). In conclusion, posttransplant clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the groups with and without PAC. Anesthetic management without the use of PAC may be possible in low-risk patients during liver transplantation. The risk should be carefully assessed by considering MELD scores, ischemic time, surgical history, previous treatment of underlying liver disease, and degree of portal and pulmonary hypertension.Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05457114 (registration date: July 15, 2022).

Liver ischemia-reperfusion injury: From trigger loading to shot firing

An ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) results from a prolonged ischemic insult followed by the restoration of blood perfusion, being a common cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in liver transplantation. At the maximum of the potential damage, IRI is characterized by 2 main phases. The first is the ischemic phase, where the hypoxia and vascular stasis induces cell damage and the accumulation of damage-associated molecular patterns and cytokines. The second is the reperfusion phase, where the local sterile inflammatory response driven by innate immunity leads to a massive cell death and impaired liver functionality. The ischemic time becomes crucial in patients with underlying pathophysiological conditions. It is possible to compare this process to a shooting gun, where the loading trigger is the ischemia period and the firing shot is the reperfusion phase. In this optic, this article aims at reviewing the main ischemic events following the phases of the surgical timeline, considering the consequent reperfusion damage.

Mortality and Morbidity Among Adult Liver Retransplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage liver failure with up to 20% of patients suffering graft failure following primary transplantation. Retransplantation (ReLT) remains the only definitive treatment for irreversible graft failure.

AIMS

We aimed to explore the postoperative outcomes following liver ReLT.

METHODS

Patients who had received a liver transplant between 2003 and 2016 were retrospectively identified using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTRs). Patients were stratified based on previous liver transplant history. The primary outcomes of this study were 5-year postoperative mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay following LT.

RESULTS

60,554 (96%) recipients were first LT recipients and 2524 (4%) were ReLT recipients. Compared with first LT, ReLT recipients had significantly higher rates of mortality (OR 1.93, 95%CI 1.76-2.12), overall morbidity (OR 1.80, 95%CI 1.65-1.96), and prolonged length of stay (OR 1.66, 95%CI 1.52-1.81) on multivariate analysis. Morbidity including cardiovascular (CVD) complications (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.08-1.60), graft failure (OR 2.18, 95%CI 1.84-2.57), infection (OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.82-2.50), and hemorrhage (OR 2.67, 95%CI 2.00-3.61) were significantly greater in ReLT recipients. Compared to first LT, ReLT patients had a significant increase in overall 5-year mortality (p < 0.001), 5-year mortality due to CVD complications (p < 0.001), infection (p = 0.009), but not graft failure (p = 0.3543).

CONCLUSION

ReLT is associated with higher rates of 5-year mortality, overall morbidity, CVD morbidity, infection, and graft failure. Higher 5-year mortality in ReLT is due to CVD and infections. These results could be used in preoperative patient assessment and prognostic counseling for ReLT.

Ventilator support in the pretransplant period predisposes early graft failure after deceased donor liver transplantation

Purpose

Deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients in Korea are generally sicker due to an increasing organ shortage. In the present study, the risk factors for early 30-day liver graft failure after DDLT were identified.

Methods

From August 2017 to February 2021, 265 adult DDLTs were performed. The characteristics of patients with and without 30-day graft failure were compared.

Results

Liver graft failure occurred in 11 patients (17.7%) after DDLT. Baseline and perioperative characteristics of donors and recipients were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. The cumulative graft and overall survival rates at 6 months were 83.9% and 88.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed ventilator support in the pretransplant period was a predisposing factor for 30-day graft failure after DDLT.

Conclusion

Present study indicates that cautious decision is required when allocating DDLT in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilatory support.

Prostaglandins for adult liver transplanted recipients

BACKGROUND

Prostaglandins are naturally occurring lipids that are synthesised from arachidonic acid. Multiple studies have evaluated the benefits of prostaglandins in reducing ischaemia reperfusion injury after liver transplantation. New studies have been published since the previous review, and hence it was important to update the evidence for this intervention.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of prostaglandins in adults undergoing liver transplantation compared with placebo or standard care.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 27 December 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials evaluating prostaglandins initiated in the perioperative period compared with placebo or standard care for adults undergoing liver transplantation. We included trials irrespective of reported outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. all-cause mortality, 2. serious adverse events, and 3. health-related quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were 4. liver retransplantation, 5. early allograft dysfunction, 6. primary non-function of the allograft, 7. acute kidney failure, 8. length of hospital stay, and 9. adverse events considered non-serious. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 randomised clinical trials with 771 adult liver transplant recipients (mean age 47.31 years, male 61.48%), of whom 378 people were randomised to receive prostaglandins and 393 people were randomised to either placebo (272 participants) or standard care (121 participants). All trials were published between 1993 and 2016. Ten trials were conducted in high- and upper-middle-income countries. Prostaglandins may reduce all-cause mortality up to one month (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 1.23; risk difference (RD) 21 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 63 fewer to 36 more; 11 trials, 771 participants; low-certainty evidence). Prostaglandins may result in little to no difference in serious adverse events (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.40; RD 81 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 148 fewer to 18 more; 6 trials, 568 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the included trials reported health-related quality of life. Prostaglandins may result in little to no difference in liver retransplantation (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.96; RD 1 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 33 fewer to 62 more; 6 trials, 468 participants; low-certainty evidence); early allograft dysfunction (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.18; RD 137 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 241 fewer to 47 more; 1 trial, 99 participants; low-certainty evidence); primary non-function of the allograft (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.32; RD 23 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 40 fewer to 16 more; 7 trials, 624 participants; low-certainty evidence); and length of hospital stay (mean difference (MD) -1.15 days, 95% CI -5.44 to 3.14; 4 trials, 369 participants; low-certainty evidence). Prostaglandins may result in a large reduction in the development of acute kidney failure requiring dialysis (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.73; RD 100 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 132 fewer to 49 fewer; 5 trials, 477 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of prostaglandins on adverse events considered non-serious (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.42 to 3.36; RD 225 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 294 fewer to 65 fewer; 4 trials, 329 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two trials reported receiving funding; one of these was with vested interests. We found one registered ongoing trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Eleven trials evaluated prostaglandins in adult liver transplanted recipients. Based on low-certainty evidence, prostaglandins may reduce all-cause mortality up to one month; may cause little to no difference in serious adverse events, liver retransplantation, early allograft dysfunction, primary non-function of the allograft, and length of hospital stay; and may have a large reduction in the development of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. We do not know the effect of prostaglandins on adverse events considered non-serious. We lack adequately powered, high-quality trials evaluating the effects of prostaglandins for people undergoing liver transplantation.

Early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation-current concepts and future directions

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) after liver transplantation is a significant clinical problem that negatively impacts graft and patient outcomes. The rising incidence of EAD and what it means concerning living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an area of great interest. However, EAD after LDLT is a complex research topic yet to be reviewed comprehensively. Most of the literature on EAD is based on experience in deceased donor liver transplantation, and limited information is available in the context of LDLT. Thus, in this review, we present an overview of EAD after LDLT and have attempted to present balanced points of view on all its aspects, such as definitions, pathogenesis, risk factors, predictive markers, and management. The review aims to broadly overview the nature and extent of ongoing research evidence on this complex topic and inform practice in the field by identifying key concepts and knowledge gaps and highlighting areas that require further inquiry.

New therapeutic concepts against ischemia-reperfusion injury in organ transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) involves a positive amplification feedback loop that stimulates innate immune-driven tissue damage associated with organ procurement from deceased donors and during transplantation surgery. As our appreciation of its basic immune mechanisms has improved in recent years, translating putative biomarkers into therapeutic interventions in clinical transplantation remains challenging.

AREAS COVERED

This review presents advances in translational/clinical studies targeting immune responses to reactive oxygen species in IRI-stressed solid organ transplants, especially livers. Here we focus on novel concepts to rejuvenate suboptimal donor organs and improve transplant function using pharmacologic and machine perfusion (MP) strategies. Cellular damage induced by cold ischemia/warm reperfusion and the latest mechanistic insights into the microenvironment's role that leads to reperfusion-induced sterile inflammation is critically discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Efforts to improve clinical outcomes and increase the donor organ pool will depend on improving donor management and our better appreciation of the complex mechanisms encompassing organ IRI that govern the innate-adaptive immune interface triggered in the peritransplant period and subsequent allo-Ag challenge. Computational techniques and deep machine learning incorporating the vast cellular and molecular mechanisms will predict which peri-transplant signals and immune interactions are essential for improving access to the long-term function of life-saving transplants.