Preoperative Risk Factors and Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Complications Associated with Total Gastrectomy

Impact of D2 Total Gastrectomy Including Splenectomy for Scirrhous Gastric Cancer in the Era of Effective Adjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Total gastrectomy with D2 dissection including splenectomy (TGS) is usually selected for locally resectable scirrhous gastric cancer (SGC), which was established in the era of surgery alone. However, it remains unclear whether TGS for SGC is justified in the era of effective adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

This study included 112 SGC patients, consisting of 60 cases treated between January 2000 and December 2006 (Former group), and 52 cases treated between January 2007 and December 2016 (Latter group). We collected clinicopathological data and then examined the survival and the therapeutic value indexes.

RESULTS

The background characteristics were well-balanced, except for sex and physical status. The Latter group might be characterized by frequent female (P = 0.037) and poorer physical status (P = 0.048). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 86.5% of the Latter group and was 11.7% of the Former group (P < 0.001). The 5-year-overall survival rate of the Latter group was 58.7% (95% confidence interval: 43.5-71.1), seems better than that of the Former group (44.5%; 95% confidence interval 31.7-56.6) (hazard ratio = 0.758, P = 0.291). Improvement of the index from the Former group was observed in the Latter group at almost all stations. The ratio of the index between two groups was 1.42 at the D1 station and 1.67 at the D2 station. Index of splenic hilar node ranked similarly high in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic value index was improved in almost all nodal stations by S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, especially in D2 nodes. TGS would be more important for locally resectable SGC in the era of effective adjuvant chemotherapy.

Preoperative Frailty and Malnutrition in Surgical Oncology Patients Predicts Higher Postoperative Adverse Events and Worse Survival: Results of a Blinded, Prospective Trial

BACKGROUND

Frailty, a multidimensional state leading to reduced physiologic reserve, is associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Despite the availability of various frailty tools, surgeons often make subjective assessments of patients' ability to tolerate surgery. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a validated preoperative frailty assessment tool that has not been studied in cancer patients with plans for curative-intent surgery.

METHODS

In this prospective, surgeon-blinded study, patients who had abdominal malignancy with plans for resection underwent preoperative frailty assessment with the RAI and nutrition assessment by measurement of albumin, prealbumin, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Postoperative outcomes and survival were assessed.

RESULTS

The study included 220 patients, 158 (72%) of whom were considered frail (RAI ≥21). Frail patients were more likely to be readmitted within 30 and 90 days, (16% vs. 3% [P = 0.006] and 16% vs. 5% [P = 0.025], respectively). Patients with abnormal CRP, prealbumin, and albumin experienced higher rates of unplanned intensive care unit admission (CRP [27% vs. 8%; P < 0.001], albumin [30% vs. 10%; P < 0.001], prealbumin [29% vs. 9%; P < 0.001]) and increased postoperative mortality at 90 and 180 days. Survival was similar for frail and non-frail patients. In the multivariate analysis, frailty remained an independent risk factor for readmission (hazard ratio, 5.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-22.15; P = 0.015). In the post hoc analysis using the pre-cancer RAI score, the postoperative outcomes did not differ between the frail and non-frail patients.

CONCLUSION

In conjunction with preoperative markers of nutrition, the RAI may be used to identify patients who may benefit from additional preoperative risk stratification and increased postoperative follow-up evaluation.