The Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Outcomes of Pembrolizumab or Atezolizumab Monotherapy in Patients with Pretreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Prognostic Value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) has proven to be a good biomarker for lung cancer prognosis. However, its usefulness in lung cancer patients receiving checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of the GPS in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase were systematically searched for relevant studies up to May 31, 2023, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were merged to investigate the prognostic value of the GPS for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Seven studies comprising 833 patients were included in the primary analysis, and the pooled results indicated that a higher baseline GPS was associated with poorer OS and PFS in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (OS: HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.47-2.58, p < 0.01; PFS: HR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.26-2.11, p < 0.01). These findings were robust after subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The GPS can serve as a biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy with significant prognostic value; however, these findings require more prospective evidence for validation.

The Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Survival in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Sensitive Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations Who Are Treated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitive EGFR mutations. The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) is an inflammation-assessing score based on C-reactive protein and albumin concentrations. Information regarding the association between the GPS and EGFR-TKI treatment effectiveness is limited; hence, we investigated whether the GPS can predict the response of NSCLC to EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

We evaluated 340 patients with NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations who received EGFR-TKI monotherapy between March 2009 and July 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 26.6 months, patients with a GPS of 0, 1, and 2 had PFS of 15.7, 10.0, and 6.3 months, respectively, and OS of 40.1, 25.8, and 14.4 months, respectively; patients with a GPS of 0 had significantly better PFS and OS than those with a GPS of 1 (p = 0.03, p = 0.001, respectively) or 2 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified poor performance status, stage 4 at diagnosis, type of EGFR-TKI (gefitinib/erlotinib vs. afatinib), and GPS = 2 as predictors of a short PFS. Meanwhile, poor performance status, gefitinib/erlotinib administration, and GPS = 2 were predictors of a short OS.

CONCLUSION

The GPS predicted the survival of NSCLC patients harboring sensitive EGFR mutations who were undergoing EGFR-TKI treatment. The GPS might be ideal for routine use in clinical practice, given that it is an easily calculated parameter.