Illness Denial in Medical Disorders: A Systematic Review

Key psychosocial issues in medical care

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to illustrate an innovative framework for assessing the psychosocial aspects of medical disorders within the biopsychosocial model. It is based on clinimetrics, the science of clinical measurements. It may overcome the limitations of DSM-5 in identifying highly individualized responses at the experiential, behavioral, and interpersonal levels.

METHOD

A critical review of the clinimetric formulations of the biopsychosocial model in the setting of medical disease was performed. References were identified through searches from PubMed for English articles on human subjects published from January 1982 to October 2023.

RESULTS

Clinimetric methods of classification have been found to deserve special attention in four major areas: allostatic load (the cumulative cost of fluctuating and heightened neural or neuroendocrine responses to environmental stressors); health attitudes and behavior; persistent somatization; demoralization and irritable mood. This type of assessment, integrated with traditional psychiatric nosography, may disclose pathophysiological links and provide clinical characterizations that demarcate major prognostic and therapeutic differences among patients who otherwise seem deceptively similar because they have the same medical diagnosis. It may be of value in a number of medical situations, such as: high level of disability or compromised quality of life in relation to what is expected by disease status; delayed or partial recovery; insufficient participation in self-management and/or rehabilitation; failure to resume healthy role after convalescence; unhealthy lifestyle; high attendance of medical facilities disproportionate to detectable disease; lack of treatment adherence; illness denial.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinimetric approach to the assessment of key psychosocial variables may lead to unique individual profiles, that take into account both biology and biography. It may offer new opportunities for integrating psychosocial and medical perspectives.

Illness perception profile among cancer patients and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore latent profiles of illness perception among cancer patients and its influencing factors.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional study adopting convenience sampling to select cancer patients from two hospitals in China. A total of 286 patients completed Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, Post-traumatic Growth Inventory, Fear of Disease Progression Questionnaire and Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale. Latent profile analysis and multiple linear regression were performed to explore the subgroups and factors influencing classification.

RESULTS

Three subgroups were identified, which were labelled as "Moderate Illness Perception Group" (16.8%; C1), "High Illness Perception with Heightened Concerns Group" (68.5%; C2) and "High Resilience and Low Symptomatic Impact Group" (14.7%; C3). Specifically, "Normal", "Mild symptom" and "Bed time during the day <50%" of "Functional Status" were more associated with C3. "Worker", "Farmer" and "Self-employed" were more associated with C1 and C2. Patients who had more "knowledge of the disease" were more associated with C2 and C3, who had less "post-traumatic growth" were more associated with C1, and who had less "fear of disease progression" and more "psychosocial adjustment" were more associated with C3 (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant variability of illness perception among three subgroups of cancer patients, which emphasized the complexity of psychological condition. The insights derived from these distinct profiles enables tailored interventions and patient-centered communication strategies. However, integrating objective measures or biomarkers is needed to complement self-reported data.

Clinical Interviewing: An Essential but Neglected Method of Medicine

Clinical interviewing is the basic method to understand how a person feels and what are the presenting complaints, obtain medical history, evaluate personal attitudes and behavior related to health and disease, give the patient information about diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment, and establish a bond between patient and physician that is crucial for shared decision making and self-management. However, the value of this basic skill is threatened by time pressures and emphasis on technology. Current health care trends privilege expensive tests and procedures and tag the time devoted to interaction with the patient as lacking cost-effectiveness. Instead, the time spent to inquire about problems and life setting may actually help to avoid further testing, procedures, and referrals. Moreover, the dialogue between patient and physician is an essential instrument to increase patient's motivation to engage in healthy behavior. The aim of this paper was to provide an overview of clinical interviewing and its optimal use in relation to style, flow and hypothesis testing, clinical domains, modifications according to settings and goals, and teaching. This review points to the primacy of interviewing in the clinical process. The quality of interviewing determines the quality of data that are collected and, eventually, of assessment and treatment. Thus, interviewing deserves more attention in educational training and more space in clinical encounters than it is currently receiving.