Women in Interventional Pulmonology: Results from a Worldwide Survey

The influence of the interventionalist's sex on the outcome and complications of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy

BACKGROUND

To date there are no data on sex aspects evaluating outcomes of interventional pneumology (IP). Our aim was to investigate sex differences in transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) outcomes in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD).

METHODS

All consecutive (TBLC)s performed for ILD evaluation between Nov 17 and Dec 21 at a tertiary referral center for ILDs and IP were analyzed. The indication for the procedure was determined by a multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). Final results including bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and histology were discussed in a 2nd MDD and outcomes and procedure related complications were assessed.

RESULTS

TBLC was performed in 406 patients (38.4 % female/67.8 years/FVC 76.8 %). Among 32 interventionalists, 16 females performed 53 % of interventions. Females had longer procedure times (29.9 vs. 26.6 min, p = 0.046), used fluoroscopy more often (76.7 vs. 50.3 %, p < 0.001) and obtained more samples (3.6 vs. 3.2, p = 0.021) than their male counterparts. No difference was found for major bleeding or pneumothorax. MDD was able to conclude on a diagnosis in 88.4 % of interventions performed by women and in 78.5 % performed by men (p = 0.010). In a multivariate analysis, female gender (OR 1.93) and lower FVC% values (OR 0.98) were significantly associated with diagnostic yield, whereas the number of biopsies, professional experience, use of fluoroscopy or antiplatelet drugs were not relevant.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study strengthen the role of women in endoscopy and may help to motivate women to pursue a career in IP.

Training in interventional pulmonology: a leap into the future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review holds significant relevance and is timely; as of June 2022, the United States Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) formally recognized interventional pulmonary medicine as a novel subspecialty with a unique fellowship training program pathway beyond Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine. This recognition stands as a culmination of extensive efforts spanning decades, aimed at establishing a specialized training program for interventional pulmonary medicine beyond traditional Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellowship in the United States. Globally, there are apprenticeship models in non-US programs with ongoing efforts to further standardize training in interventional pulmonary medicine. It underscores the progressive evolution and innovative nature inherent to this subspecialty, signifying a distinctive leap forward in medical education and practice, which calls for further inventive development of training tools and standardized educational delivery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newly discovered insights from the recent literature review will highlight methodologies of procedural education and innovative training approaches. These findings will underscore the significance of standardized curriculum development within the field as well as ongoing challenges.

SUMMARY

Identifying and addressing future challenges in integrating new technologies into clinical education and broadening the educational scope of trainees in this newly recognized subspecialty is crucial for enhancing competency. The implications of moving toward a more standardized process, creating new clinical pathways with research, and adopting emerging minimally invasive technologies aim to impact patient outcomes in both nonmalignant and malignant thoracic diseases. This progressive shift is redefining the specialty, moving beyond specific procedures, and pivoting towards a more distinct educational pathway. Such a transformation will lead to more diverse, comprehensive, and evidence-based driven patient care delivery.