Absence of "rebound" platelet hyperreactivity following cessation of prasugrel

The effect of cessation of 2nd generation P2Y12 inhibitor therapy on platelet reactivity in patients 1 year after acute myocardial infarction

To assess the effect of cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimens containing 2nd generation P₂Y₁₂ inhibitors on platelet reactivity, in patients who completed 12 months of DAPT following an acute myocardial infarction. Clinical data has shown an increased cardiovascular risk in the 90 days following cessation of DAPT. One possible explanation is a transient platelet hyper-reactivity after cessation of treatment. Data from patients treated with 2nd generation P₂Y₁₂ inhibitors is scarce. Patients who completed 12 month DAPT with prasugrel/ticagrelor underwent serial assessment of platelet reactivity (on DAPT and 1, 4 and 12 weeks post cessation). The primary outcome was platelet reactivity, expressed as platelet reactivity units (PRU) at each time point. 41 participants were included in this study, (23 ticagrelor, 18 prasugrel). There was no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between prasugrel/ticagrelor treated patients . The pattern of platelet reactivity recovery after DAPT cessation differed between the ticagrelor and prasugrel: with ticagrelor, after the initial PRU increase from baseline, the PRU remained stable, while with prasugrel, there was a further increase in PRU between 1 and 4 weeks, with a return to the 1 week level by 12 weeks (p = 0.034 for the time × treatment interaction between ticagrelor and prasugrel). Our results suggest there is a transient platelet hyper-reactivity after cessation of ADP receptor blockers therapy with prasugrel, but not ticagrelor. Further research is required to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind these findings and to evaluate potential strategies to prevent or overcome this "rebound" effect.

Coming safely to a stop: a review of platelet activity after cessation of antiplatelet drugs

The platelet P2Y12 antagonists are widely used, usually in combination with aspirin, to prevent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes during percutaneous coronary intervention and after placement of arterial stents. Inhibition by clopidogrel or prasugrel lasts for the lifetime of the affected platelets and platelet haemostatic function gradually recovers after stopping the drug, as new unaffected platelets are formed. The optimal durations for dual antiplatelet therapy are prescribed by clinical guidelines. Continuation beyond the recommended duration is associated with an increased mortality, mainly associated with major bleeding. Fear of a 'rebound' of prothrombotic platelet activity on stopping the drug has provoked much discussion and many studies. However, review of the available literature reveals no evidence for production of hyper-reactive platelets after cessation of clopidogrel in patients who are stable. Any increase in acute coronary and other vascular events after stopping seems most likely therefore to be due to premature discontinuation or disruption of treatment while thrombotic risk is still high. No difference in rebound was found with the newer P2Y12 inhibitors, although ticagrelor and prasugrel are more potent platelet inhibitors than clopidogrel. Recent randomized controlled trials confirm it is safe to stop the thienopyridine and continue with aspirin alone in most patients after the duration of treatment recommended by the guidelines. Decisions on when to stop therapy in individuals, however, remain challenging and there is a growing rationale for platelet testing to assist clinical judgement in certain situations such as patients stopping dual antiplatelet therapy before surgery or in individuals at highest bleeding or thrombotic risk.

Gradual increase in thrombogenicity of juvenile platelets formed upon offset of prasugrel medication

In patients with acute coronary syndrome, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor like prasugrel is prescribed for one year. Here, we investigated how the hemostatic function of platelets recovers after discontinuation of prasugrel treatment. Therefore, 16 patients who suffered from ST-elevation myocardial infarction were investigated. Patients were treated with aspirin (100 mg/day, long-term) and stopped taking prasugrel (10 mg/day) after one year. Blood was collected at the last day of prasugrel intake and at 1, 2, 5, 12 and 30 days later. Platelet function in response to ADP was normalized between five and 30 days after treatment cessation and in vitro addition of the reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist ticagrelor fully suppressed the regained activation response. Discontinuation of prasugrel resulted in the formation of an emerging subpopulation of ADP-responsive platelets, exhibiting high expression of active integrin αIIbβ3. Two different mRNA probes, thiazole orange and the novel 5'Cy5-oligo-dT probe revealed that this subpopulation consisted of juvenile platelets, which progressively contributed to platelet aggregation and thrombus formation under flow. During offset, juvenile platelets were overall more reactive than older platelets. Interestingly, the responsiveness of both juvenile and older platelets increased in time, pointing towards a residual inhibitory effect of prasugrel on the megakaryocyte level. In conclusion, the gradual increase in thrombogenicity after cessation of prasugrel treatment is due to the increased activity of juvenile platelets.

Randomised, double-blind trial on the value of tapered discontinuation of clopidogrel maintenance therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation. Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: CAUTION in Discontinuing Clopidogrel Therapy--ISAR-CAUTION

There is little evidence on the optimal mode of clopidogrel discontinuation. Epidemiological studies observed clustering of thrombotic events after cessation of chronic clopidogrel therapy. The underlying mechanism has been ascribed to transient platelet hyper-reactivity. Gradual tapering of clopidogrel may have the potential to attenuate this phenomenon. The objective of the present study was to assess whether in patients with drug-eluting stents (DES) gradual discontinuation of clopidogrel maintenance therapy is superior to conventional, abrupt discontinuation. Patients with planned discontinuation of chronic clopidogrel therapy after DES implantation were randomised in a double-blinded fashion to either gradual discontinuation (according to a tapering schema over four weeks) or abrupt discontinuation (after continued clopidogrel therapy for additional four weeks). The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, major bleeding or rehospitalisation due to an acute coronary syndrome at 90 days. Enrollment of 3,000 patients was planned. The study was stopped prematurely due to slow recruitment after enrollment of 782 patients. At 90 days, nine of 392 patients (2.3%) with tapered cessation reached the primary endpoint compared to five of 390 patients (1.3%) with abrupt cessation (p=0.284). The composite of death or myocardial infarction occurred in three patients with tapered and three patients with abrupt discontinuation (p=0.764). In conclusion, tapered discontinuation of chronic clopidogrel therapy is not superior to abrupt discontinuation regarding the primary endpoint in this study. However, the results must be interpreted in view of the premature termination of the trial and low event rates.