Antiphospholipid antibodies in a large population-based cohort: genome-wide associations and effects on monocyte gene expression

The association of APOH and NCF1 polymorphisms on susceptibility to recurrent pregnancy loss in women with antiphospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is the main manifestation of pathological pregnancy in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) women. The immune state plays a significant role in the occurrence/development of APS and RPL susceptibility, but there is little research on genetic factors.

METHOD

Previous studies have described the important role of APOH and NCF1 in APS and pregnancy. To explore the association of APOH and NCF1 gene variants with RPL susceptibility in APS patients, we collected and analyzed 871 controls, 182 APS and RPL, and 231 RPL patients. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs1801690, rs52797880, and rs8178847 of APOH and rs201802880 of NCF1) were selected and genotyped.

RESULTS

We found rs1801690 (p = 0.001, p = 0.003), rs52797880 (p = 8.73e-04, p = 0.001), and rs8178847 (p = 0.001, p = 0.001) of APOH and rs201802880 (p = 3.77e-26, p = 1.31e-26) of NCF1 showed significant differences between APS and RPL patients and controls in allelic and genotype frequencies respectively. Moreover, rs1801690, rs52797880, and rs8178847 showed strong linkage disequilibrium. Especially, our results revealed a complete linkage disequilibrium (D' = 1) between rs52797880 and rs8178847. Furthermore, higher serum TP (total protein) level was described in APOH rs1801690 CG/GG (p = 0.007), rs52797880 AG/GG (p = 0.033), and rs8178847 CT/TT (p = 0.033), while the higher frequency of positive serum ACA-IgM was found in NCF1 rs201802880 GA (p = 0.017) in APS and RPL patients.

CONCLUSION

Rs1801690, rs52797880, and rs8178847 of APOH and rs201802880 of NCF1 were associated with RPL susceptibility in APS patients.

Genetics of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare heterogenous disorder associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and can present in a wide variety of clinical manifestations including thrombosis and pregnancy complications. Although the etiology of APS remains poorly understood, there is strong support for considering APS as a complex genetic disease in which multiple genetic risk factors, in conjunction with environmental factors, affect its onset, progression, and severity. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the current knowledge of the genetic basis of APS, which remains in its infancy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most genetic studies to date in APS were performed in small cohorts of patients. As a result, only few genetic associations reported are convincing. Several reports suggested genetic associations with HLA class II alleles in APS, and only two genetic loci outside of the HLA region (STAT4 and C1D) reached the threshold for genome-wide level of significance (P < 5 × 10^-8). In this review, we also shed light on the genetic differences among the diverse clinical subsets of APS and briefly discuss the role that DNA methylation changes might play in the pathophysiology of this disease. The genetic basis of APS remains poorly characterized. Larger collaborative multicenter studies using well-characterized patients are needed to comprehensively understand the role of genetic susceptibility in APS.

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) anticardiolipin antibodies and recurrent cardiovascular events. A systematic review and Bayesian meta-regression analysis

BACKGROUND

Anticardiolipin antibodies of the immunoglobulin G isotype (IgG aCL) have been suggested as risk factor for arterial and venous thrombosis. No conclusive data in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) do exist. We investigate the risk of recurrent CAD according to the presence of IgG aCL.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of recurrent major adverse cardiac events (MACE) associated with the presence of IgG aCL in patients with CAD. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched. We conducted a meta-analysis of the relative risk (RR) both at 12 and 24 months.

RESULTS

We included 11 eligible studies with a total of 2425 patients, 283 IgG aCL+ and 2142 IgG aCL-. The prevalence of IgG aCL+ ranged from 6.1% to 43.3%. A total of 341 cardiac events were reported: 71 (25.1%) in IgG aCL+ and 270 (12.6%) in IgG aCL- patients. We found an increased risk of recurrent MACE in patients with high IgG aCL both at 12 (RR 2.17, 2.5-97.5%CI, 1.54-3.00) and 24 months (RR 2.11, 2.5-97.5%CI, 1.62-2.66). This association was even stronger in patients with juvenile CAD (i.e. <50 years) at both 12 (RR 3.21, 2.5-97.5%CI, 1.74-5.41) and 24 months (RR 3.24, 2.5-97.5%CI, 1.84-5.21).

CONCLUSION

Patients with CAD and elevated IgG aCL have a doubled risk of recurrent MACE at 12 and 24 months. The presence of aCL should be suspected in patients with recurrent CAD events or in patients with juvenile CAD.

Primary antiphospholipid syndrome and antiphospholipid syndrome associated to systemic lupus: Are they different entities?

Primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) and antiphospholipid syndrome associated to lupus (SAPS) have several overlapping characteristics. As systemic manifestations are also reported in patients with PAPS, and as a subgroup of PAPS patients could evaluate to a SAPS, the differentiation between the two types of APS could be performed based on the clinical experience of the medical teams and is related to a variety of clinical, biological, histological and genetic features. Several data are available in the literature with respect to the identification of distinctive features between these two entities. However, there are some limitation in the interpretation of results issued from studies performed prior to updated Sydney criteria. Based on recent data, a certain number of features more frequent in one type of APS as compared to the other could be distinguished. The major differentiation between these two entities is genetical. New genetic data allowing the identification of specific subgroups of APS are ongoing.

Copy number variation profile in the placental and parental genomes of recurrent pregnancy loss families

We have previously shown an extensive load of somatic copy number variations (CNVs) in the human placental genome with the highest fraction detected in normal term pregnancies. Hereby, we hypothesized that insufficient promotion of CNVs may impair placental development and lead to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). RPL affects ~3% of couples aiming at childbirth and idiopathic RPL represents ~50% of cases. We analysed placental and parental CNV profiles of idiopathic RPL trios (mother-father-placenta) and duos (mother-placenta). Consistent with the hypothesis, the placental genomes of RPL cases exhibited 2-fold less CNVs compared to uncomplicated 1^st trimester pregnancies (P = 0.02). This difference mainly arose from lower number of duplications. Overall, 1^st trimester control placentas shared only 5.3% of identified CNV regions with RPL cases, whereas the respective fraction with term placentas was 35.1% (P = 1.1 × 10⁻⁹). Disruption of the genes NUP98 (embryonic stem cell development) and MTRR (folate metabolism) was detected exclusively in RPL placentas, potentially indicative to novel loci implicated in RPL. Interestingly, genes with higher overall expression were prone to deletions (>3-fold higher median expression compared to genes unaffected by CNVs, P = 6.69 × 10⁻²⁰). Additionally, large pericentromeric and subtelomeric CNVs in parental genomes emerged as a risk factor for RPL.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies: Their Origin and Development

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are a hallmark of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which is the most commonly acquired thrombophilia. To date there is consensus that aPL cause the clinical manifestations of this potentially devastating disorder. However, there is good evidence that not all aPL are pathogenic. For instance, aPL associated with syphilis show no association with the manifestations of APS. While there has been intensive research on the pathogenetic role of aPL, comparably little is known about the origin and development of aPL. This review will summarize the current knowledge and understanding of the origin and development of aPL derived from animal and human studies.