Outcomes of distal femoral fractures treated with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) plate system: a single centre experience spanning 15 years

Retrograde intramedullary nailing with supplemental plate and lag screws allows early weight bearing following distal end-segment femur fractures (AO/OTA 33) in a low-resource setting

PURPOSE

To underline the feasibility of achieving early weight bearing in patients with distal end-segment femur fractures (AO/OTA 33) treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing and supplemental plate or lag screws in the absence of C-arm.

METHODS

41 distal end-segment femur fractures (DFFs) included in the study were treated with SIGN nails with or without a side plate in a center that lacked intraoperative fluoroscopy and fracture table. A medial or lateral para-patellar incision was used for fracture reduction, nail insertion and side plate placement. Follow-ups were done at six weeks, 12 weeks, and six months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Distal end-segment fractures constituted 13.2% of all femur fractures treated. The patients' mean age and range were 49.6 and 23-83 years respectively. They were mostly injured in road traffic accidents. 27 were daily-income earners. By the 12th week post-operatively, 82.1% of them could flex their knee beyond 90°, all of them could bear weight fully, and 71.8% could squat & smile.

CONCLUSION

The study highlighted the procedure for retrograde nailing of DFFs in a setting without the requisite facilities for minimally-invasive surgeries. The findings demonstrated the feasibility of achieving an expedited weight bearing for the predominantly daily-income-earning victims to ensure early return to work and poverty reduction. While the small sample size is a limitation, the study does provide information that could serve as a basis for future randomized controlled trials in low-resource settings.

Radiographic Union Assessment in Surgically Treated Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Distal femur fractures are known to have challenging nonunion rates. Despite various available treatment methods aimed to improve union, optimal interventions are yet to be determined. Importantly, there remains no standard agreement on what defines radiographic union. Although various proposed criteria of defining radiographic union exist in the literature, there is no clear consensus on which criteria provide the most precise measurement. The use of inconsistent measures of fracture healing between studies can be problematic and limits their generalizability. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify how fracture union is defined based on radiographic parameters for surgically treated distal femur fractures in current literature.

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched from inception to October 2022. Studies that addressed surgically treated distal femur fractures with reported radiographic union assessment were included. Outcomes extracted included radiographic definition of union; any testing of validity, reliability, or responsiveness; reported union rate; reported time to fracture union; and any functional outcomes correlated with radiographic union.

RESULTS

Sixty articles with 3,050 operatively treated distal femur fractures were included. Operative interventions included lateral locked plate (42 studies), intramedullary nail (15 studies), dynamic condylar screw or blade plate (7 studies), dual plate or plate and nail construct (5 studies), distal anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior screws (1 study), and external fixation with a circular frame (1 study). The range of mean follow-up time reported was 4.3 to 44 months. The most common definitions of fracture union included "bridging or callus formation across 3 of 4 cortices" in 26 (43%) studies, "bony bridging of cortices" in 21 (35%) studies, and "complete bridging of cortices" in 9 (15%) studies. Two studies included additional assessment of radiographic union using the Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (RUST) or modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (mRUST) scores. One study included description of validity, and the other study included reliability testing. The reported mean union rate of distal femur fractures was 89% (range 58%-100%). The mean time to fracture union was documented in 49 studies and found to be 18 weeks (range 12-36 weeks) in 2,441 cases. No studies reported correlations between functional outcomes and radiographic parameters.

CONCLUSION

The current literature evaluating surgically treated distal femur fractures lacks consistent definition of radiographic fracture union, and the appropriate time point to make this judgement is unclear. To advance surgical optimization, it is necessary that future research uses validated, reliable, and continuous measures of radiographic bone healing and correlation with functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.