Should Progestins Be Blamed for the Failure of Hormone Replacement Therapy to Reduce Cardiovascular Events in Randomized Controlled Trials?

Use of oral estradiol plus vaginal progesterone in healthy postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of oral estradiol (E2) plus vaginal progesterone (P4) against placebo on endometrial thickness, endometrial biopsy pathology, cervical cytology and total cancer incidence among healthy postmenopausal women.

STUDY DESIGN

This study is a sub-analysis of the Early versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol (ELITE), a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial that previously demonstrated that hormone therapy (HT) was associated with less progression of subclinical atherosclerosis than placebo when therapy was initiated within 6 years after menopause but not when it was initiated 10 or more years after menopause. This sub-analysis included only ELITE participants with an intact uterus, who were randomized to either daily oral micronized 17-beta-E2 1 mg/day with 4% vaginal micronized P4 gel 45 mg/day for 10 days each month or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants were evaluated at baseline and annually during a median follow-up of 4.8 years for endometrial thickness as determined by pelvic transvaginal ultrasound followed by an endometrial biopsy when indicated, and cervical cytology and cancer incidence.

RESULTS

Over up to 80 months of follow-up, participants randomized to oral E2 plus vaginal P4 had progressive and statistically significant increases in endometrial thickness (p<0.001), underwent more endometrial biopsies and had a higher rate of endometrial hyperplasia on endometrial biopsy compared with the placebo group. Due to the close follow-up of participants in the trial protocol, these abnormal findings were effectively treated.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that 10 days of vaginal P4 45 mg/day is insufficient to completely oppose the effect of oral E2 1 mg/day on the endometrium. Further studies are needed to test alternative doses or frequencies of administration of vaginal P4 for adequate endometrial protection from E2 therapy among postmenopausal women. ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT00114517.

The Metabolic Syndrome in Women

The clustering of metabolic risk factors, overweight and hypertension is of particular importance in postmenopausal women due to the negative effect of menopause on bodyweight, glucose metabolism and the development of hypertension. Menopause acts directly as a risk factor by reducing the direct beneficial effect of ovarian hormones on cardiovascular functions, and indirectly by negatively influencing traditional risk factors for coronary artery disease. All changes occurring after the menopause must be regarded under a unifying mechanism that induces unfavorable changes in cardiovascular risk factors and vascular functions, which interact with each other, amplifying the effect of ovarian hormone deficiency and aging.

Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ (PPARγ) and CD36 Protein Expression: THE DUAL PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES OF PROGESTERONE

Progesterone or its analog, one of components of hormone replacement therapy, may attenuate the cardioprotective effects of estrogen. However, the underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. Expression of CD36, a receptor for oxidized LDL (oxLDL) that enhances macrophage/foam cell formation, is activated by the transcription factor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ). CD36 also functions as a fatty acid transporter to influence fatty acid metabolism and the pathophysiological status of several diseases. In this study, we determined that progesterone induced macrophage CD36 expression, which is related to progesterone receptor (PR) activity. Progesterone enhanced cellular oxLDL uptake in a CD36-dependent manner. Mechanistically, progesterone increased PPARγ expression and PPARγ promoter activity in a PR-dependent manner and the binding of PR with the progesterone response element in the PPARγ promoter. Specific deletion of macrophage PPARγ (MφPPARγ KO) expression in mice abolished progesterone-induced macrophage CD36 expression and cellular oxLDL accumulation. We also determined that, associated with gestation and increased serum progesterone levels, CD36 and PPARγ expression in mouse adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and peritoneal macrophages were substantially activated. Taken together, our study demonstrates that progesterone can play dual pathophysiological roles by activating PPARγ expression, in which progesterone increases macrophage CD36 expression and oxLDL accumulation, a negative effect on atherosclerosis, and enhances the PPARγ-CD36 pathway in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, a protective effect on pregnancy.

Window of opportunity: estrogen as a treatment for ischemic stroke

The neuroprotection research in the last 2 decades has witnessed a growing interest in the functions of estrogens as neuroprotectants against neurodegenerative diseases including stroke. The neuroprotective action of estrogens has been well demonstrated in both in vitro and in vivo models of ischemic stroke. However, the major conducted clinical trials so far have raised concern for the protective effect of estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. The discrepancy could be partly due to the mistranslation between the experimental stroke research and clinical trials. While predominant experimental studies tested the protective action of estrogens on ischemic stroke using acute treatment paradigm, the clinical trials have mainly focused on the effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the primary and secondary stroke prevention which has not been adequately addressed in the experimental stroke study. Although the major conducted clinical trials have indicated that estrogen replacement therapy has an adverse effect and raise concern for long term estrogen replacement therapy for stroke prevention, these are not appropriate for assessing the potential effects of acute estrogen treatment on stroke protection. The well established action of estrogen in the neurovascular unit and its potential interaction with recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator (rtPA) makes it a candidate for the combined therapy with rtPA for the acute treatment of ischemic stroke. On the other hand, the "critical period" and newly emerged "biomarkers window" hypotheses have indicated that many clinical relevant factors have been underestimated in the experimental ischemic stroke research. The development and application of ischemic stroke models that replicate the clinical condition is essential for further evaluation of acute estrogen treatment on ischemic stroke which might provide critical information for future clinical trials. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Hormone Therapy.

Vasomotor hot flushes and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure in normotensive women: A placebo-controlled trial on post-menopausal hormone therapy

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure (BP) is one of the most powerful determinants of cardiovascular risk in women. This risk may differ between post-menopausal women with and without vasomotor hot flushes, possibly indicating different vascular responses to hormone therapy (HT). Thus, we compared in a clinical trial the effect of HT on ambulatory BP in normotensive, recently post-menopausal women with or without severe hot flushes.

METHODS

A total of 147 women recorded prospectively their hot flushes for 2 weeks; 70 women were symptomatic (>or=7 moderate/severe hot flush episodes/day), whereas 77 women were defined as asymptomatic (<or=3 mild hot flush episodes/day). Women were treated for 6 months with either transdermal estradiol, oral estradiol with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate, or placebo.

RESULTS

In symptomatic women decreases in BPs were seen during estradiol use. In contrast, in asymptomatic women receiving oral but not transdermal estradiol, increases in 24-h and day-time systolic and diastolic BPs were encountered.

CONCLUSION

Hot flushes modify the HT-mediated responses in ambulatory BP. In asymptomatic women oral but not transdermal estradiol show potentially harmful cardiovascular effect by increasing BP. Our results give additional justification to prescribing HT primarily for the treatment of troublesome hot flushes and avoiding HT in women without vasomotor symptoms.

Long-Term Prevention with Hormone-Replacement Therapy after the Menopause: Which Women should be Targeted?

For decades, hormone-replacement therapy (HRT) was considered safe and was the first choice in prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis induced by estrogen deficiency. Numerous experimental and epidemiological studies further supported a protective effect of exogenous female sex hormones on atherogenesis and coronary heart disease (CHD) in women after the menopause. However, the fact that these promising results were not translated into lower incidences of CHD events in hormone-treated women compared with placebo in subsequent, large, randomized studies of healthy subjects as well as women with known CHD raised a very intense debate concerning the safety of HRT in terms of cardiovascular risk. A critical mass of data points toward a protective influence of HRT on cardiovascular disease end points in early postmenopausal women, but increased harm in elderly women, especially those with abdominal adiposity or metabolic syndrome. Once the quasi-hysterical reaction to the largest of the randomized studies (the Women's Health Initiative) has abated, a future strategy should be to concentrate on identifying those relatively few individuals who are not suitable for HRT, as HRT still remains the most thoroughly investigated pharmacological prevention strategy of osteoporosis.

Hormone therapy modulates ET(A) mRNA expression in the aorta of ovariectomised New Zealand White rabbits

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) or conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) alone and in combination with norethisterone acetate (NETA) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) on the endothelin-1 (ET-1) system.

METHODS

New Zealand White rabbits were treated with E(2), CEE, E(2) + NETA, CEE + MPA or placebo. The thoracic aorta and the epicardial coronary artery were used for mRNA expression and myograph analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

E(2) and CEE alone significantly reduced ET-1 receptor subtype A (ET(A)) mRNA expression compared with placebo treatment. The E(2)-induced reduction in ET(A) mRNA expression persisted with the co-administration of NETA, but the CEE induced reduction in ET(A) mRNA expression was not maintained with the co-administration of MPA. Treatment with CEE alone significantly increased endotelin-1 converting enzyme (ECE) mRNA expression and CEE combined with MPA reduced prepro-endothelin-1 (ppET-1) mRNA expression when compared with placebo. ET-1 receptor subtype B mRNA expression and ET-1 induced vasocontraction was unaffected by treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

E(2) and CEE treatment exert potentially beneficial vascular effects through regulation of the ET(A) receptor. The effect was maintained with the co-administration of NETA, but not MPA. The differential effects of specific hormone components may explain the variable effects of hormone therapy on the arterial wall.

Estrogen replacement therapy decreases plasma adiponectin but not resistin in postmenopausal women

The effects of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) to cardiovascular disease risk are still unclear. Low adiponectin and high resistin plasma concentrations are reported to be associated with atherosclerosis. However, it is not known how ERT affects plasma adiponectin and resistin concentrations. Seventy-three hysterectomized, nondiabetic, postmenopausal women were randomized in a double-blind, double-dummy study to receive either peroral estradiol valerate or transdermal 17beta-estradiol gel for 6 months. Biochemical measurements were determined from samples taken before and after the therapy. Peroral estradiol valerate therapy decreased adiponectin concentrations from 13.6 to 11.6 mg/L (P = .008), whereas transdermal 17beta-estradiol gel had no effect (12.7 vs 12.2 mg/L). Neither treatment changed the resistin concentrations significantly. Plasma concentrations of estradiol and estrone did not correlate with adiponectin or resistin concentrations before or after therapy. The change in adiponectin concentration correlated significantly with the changes in waist-hip ratio, very low-density lipoprotein triglycerides, and insulin-like growth factor 1 in the peroral estradiol valerate group. The changes in these variables and the change in estradiol concentration explained 43.1% (P = .001) of the variability in the change of plasma adiponectin, the change in very low-density lipoprotein triglycerides being the strongest determinant (beta = -.407, P = .011). The results show that peroral ERT can decrease plasma adiponectin levels. However, ERT does not seem to influence plasma resistin concentrations.

Oral but not transdermal estrogen replacement therapy changes the composition of plasma lipoproteins

The role of hormone replacement therapy and estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in cardiovascular disease prevention has not been unambiguously defined yet. The metabolic effects of estrogens may vary depending upon the route of administration. Therefore, we compared the impact of unopposed oral or transdermal ERT on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in 41 hysterectomized women. This was an open-label, randomized, crossover study (with 2 treatments and 2 periods). The 41 hysterectomized women were randomized to receive oral or transdermal 17beta-estradiol in the first or second of two 12-week study periods. Plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels were assayed before and after each treatment using standard automated methods. Lipid content of lipoprotein subclasses was assessed by sequential ultracentrifugation. The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) was calculated as log(triglyceride [TG]/high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol). The difference between the 2 forms of administration was tested using a linear mixed model. The change from baseline for each of the forms was tested using paired t test. Oral ERT resulted in a significant increase in HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I levels, whereas it significantly decreased total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and increased TG concentrations. Transdermal ERT had no such effect. Oral ERT led to a significant TG enrichment of HDL (0.19 +/- 0.06 vs 0.27 +/- 0.07 mmol/L, P < .001) and LDL particles (0.23 +/- 0.08 vs 0.26 +/- 0.10 mmol/L, P < .001) compared with baseline, whereas transdermal therapy did not have any effect on lipoprotein subclasses composition. The difference between the 2 treatments was statistically significant for HDL-TG and LDL-TG (0.27 +/- 0.07 vs 0.19 +/- 0.05 mmol/L, P < .001 and 0.26 +/- 0.10 vs 0.22 +/- 0.07 mmol/L, P< .001, respectively). The transdermal but not oral ERT significantly reduced the AIP compared with baseline (-0.17 +/- 0.26 vs -0.23 +/- 0.25, P = .023), making the difference between the therapies statistically significant (-0.23 +/- 0.25 vs -0.18 +/- 0.22, P = .017). Oral administration of ERT resulted in TG enrichment of LDL and HDL particles. Transdermal ERT did not change the composition of the lipoproteins and produced a significant improvement of AIP. Compared with transdermal ERT, orally administered ERT changes negatively the composition of plasma lipoproteins.

Estrogen, medroxyprogesterone acetate, endothelial function, and biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in young women

Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is widely known for its use in combination hormone therapy for postmenopausal women. However, MPA is also commonly used in young women for contraception and treatment of a number of gynecological conditions. Despite its widespread use, the cardiovascular effects of MPA in young women are unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the acute effects of MPA when used in combination with estradiol on markers of cardiovascular risk in young women. We suppressed endogenous estrogens and progesterone in 10 premenopausal women using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRHa) for 10 days. On day 4 of GnRHa subjects received 0.1 mg of estradiol (GnRHa+E(2)), and on day 7 5 mg of MPA was added (GnRHa+E(2)+MPA). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation and endothelium-independent vasodilation of the brachial artery, lipids, homocysteine, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and endothelin-1 were assessed during treatment with GnRHa, GnRHa+E(2), and GnRHa+E(2)+MPA. Four additional subjects were tested to validate the efficacy of the GnRHa model and confirm the findings. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was greater during GnRHa+E(2) than during GnRHa or GnRHa+E(2)+MPA (P = 0.006). Endothelin-1 was lower during GnRHa+E(2) than GnRHa alone (P = 0.039). Endothelin-1 increased with the addition of MPA and was not significantly different from GnRHa alone. There were no differences in the other markers of cardiovascular risk between hormone treatment days. These data suggest that acute MPA administration negates the beneficial effects of estradiol on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in young women. In addition, these data suggest that estradiol decreases endothelin-1 concentrations and the addition of MPA may counteract the effect of estradiol on endothelin-1.

Changes in lipid metabolism in postmenopausal Japanese women using hormone therapy evaluated by capillary isotachophoresis: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to clarify the changes in lipid metabolism in postmenopausal Japanese women during continuous combined hormone therapy (HT) in detail by using capillary isotachophoresis (cITP).

DESIGN

Twenty-three postmenopausal Japanese women with climacteric symptoms were recruited. Blood samples were collected from all participants before HT and after 3 and 6 months of HT, and changes in total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I, apoB, and lipoprotein(a) were assessed. The same blood samples were analyzed for charge-based lipoprotein subfractions using cITP.

RESULTS

Total cholesterol (-8.5%), LDL-cholesterol (-16.2%), and lipoprotein(a) (-25.5%) decreased and apoA-I (9.5%) increased significantly from the baseline level at 6 months after starting continuous combined HT. HDL-cholesterol increased nonsignificantly (+2.4%). cITP revealed that the fast HDL subfraction (+24.7%), which contains apoA-I and may be antiatherogenic, significantly increased. Conversely, the fast LDL subfraction (+14.4%), which may possess atherogenic potential, increased during HT.

CONCLUSIONS

The changes in lipid metabolism in postmenopausal Japanese women receiving HT are inconclusive regarding atherogenicity, ie, it increased fast HDL and simultaneously increased fast LDL. cITP is useful for clarifying the changes in lipid metabolism during HT.

Estrogens in vascular biology and disease: where do we stand today?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Whereas hormone therapy may increase the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in menopausal women, epidemiological studies (protection in premenopausal women) suggest and experimental studies (prevention of fatty streak development in animals) demonstrate a major atheroprotective action of estradiol. There is also evidence for a thrombogenic effect of oral estrogens. An understanding of the deleterious and beneficial effects of estrogens is thus required.

RECENT FINDINGS

The immuno-inflammatory system plays a key role in the development of fatty streak deposit as well as in the rupture of the atherosclerotic plaque. Whereas estradiol favors an anti-inflammatory effect in vitro (cultured cells), it rather elicits a pro-inflammatory response in vivo involving several subpopulations of the immuno-inflammatory system, which could contribute to plaque destabilization. Endothelium is another important target for estrogens, since estradiol potentiates endothelial nitric oxide and prostacyclin production. The respective actions of estrogens on these cell populations may be influenced by the timing of hormonal therapy initiation, hormone regimens, status of the vessel wall and expression of isoforms of estrogen receptors alpha and beta.

SUMMARY

A better understanding of the balance between the deleterious and beneficial effects of estrogens is required and should help to improve hormonal therapy safety and to optimize the prevention of cardiovascular disease after menopause.

Progesterone: Therapeutic opportunities for neuroprotection and myelin repair

Progesterone and its metabolites promote the viability of neurons in the brain and spinal cord. Their neuroprotective effects have been documented in different lesion models, including traumatic brain injury (TBI), experimentally induced ischemia, spinal cord lesions and a genetic model of motoneuron disease. Progesterone plays an important role in developmental myelination and in myelin repair, and the aging nervous system appears to remain sensitive to some of progesterone's beneficial effects. Thus, the hormone may promote neuroregeneration by several different actions by reducing inflammation, swelling and apoptosis, thereby increasing the survival of neurons, and by promoting the formation of new myelin sheaths. Recognition of the important pleiotropic effects of progesterone opens novel perspectives for the treatment of brain lesions and diseases of the nervous system. Over the last decade, there have been a growing number of studies showing that exogenous administration of progesterone or some of its metabolites can be successfully used to treat traumatic brain and spinal cord injury, as well as ischemic stroke. Progesterone can also be synthesized by neurons and by glial cells within the nervous system. This finding opens the way for a promising therapeutic strategy, the use of pharmacological agents, such as ligands of the translocator protein (18 kDa) (TSPO; the former peripheral benzodiazepine receptor or PBR), to locally increase the synthesis of steroids with neuroprotective and neuroregenerative properties. A concept is emerging that progesterone may exert different actions and use different signaling mechanisms in normal and injured neural tissue.

Novel perspectives for progesterone in hormone replacement therapy, with special reference to the nervous system

The utility and safety of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy has recently been put into question by large clinical trials. Their outcome has been extensively commented upon, but discussions have mainly been limited to the effects of estrogens. In fact, progestagens are generally only considered with respect to their usefulness in preventing estrogen stimulation of uterine hyperplasia and malignancy. In addition, various risks have been attributed to progestagens and their omission from hormone replacement therapy has been considered, but this may underestimate their potential benefits and therapeutic promises. A major reason for the controversial reputation of progestagens is that they are generally considered as a single class. Moreover, the term progesterone is often used as a generic one for the different types of both natural and synthetic progestagens. This is not appropriate because natural progesterone has properties very distinct from the synthetic progestins. Within the nervous system, the neuroprotective and promyelinating effects of progesterone are promising, not only for preventing but also for reversing age-dependent changes and dysfunctions. There is indeed strong evidence that the aging nervous system remains at least to some extent sensitive to these beneficial effects of progesterone. The actions of progesterone in peripheral target tissues including breast, blood vessels, and bones are less well understood, but there is evidence for the beneficial effects of progesterone. The variety of signaling mechanisms of progesterone offers exciting possibilities for the development of more selective, efficient, and safe progestagens. The recognition that progesterone is synthesized by neurons and glial cells requires a reevaluation of hormonal aging.

Age moderates the short-term effects of transdermal 17beta-estradiol on endothelium-dependent vascular function in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated age and coronary heart disease (CHD) as potential moderators of the effects of 17beta-estradiol on vascular endothelial function in postmenopausal women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a double-blind crossover design, 100 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 80 years were randomized to each of 3 transdermal patches, releasing 17beta-estradiol (0.05 mg/d), 17beta-estradiol (0.05 mg/d) + norethindrone acetate (NETA, 0.14 mg/d), and placebo. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and response to 400 microg sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN-D) were assessed approximately 18 hours after patch placement. Age, but not CHD, moderated the FMD response to treatment (P=0.01). For women in their fifties, the estradiol patch was associated with improved FMD (7.69+/-4.79%) compared with placebo (4.81+/-5.97%, P<0.05), but the estradiol+norethindrone patch response (5.81+/-4.85%) was not significantly different from placebo. Women in their sixties and seventies showed no alterations in FMD response to either active patch. GTN-D response declined with advancing age (P<0.01), with women in their seventies exhibiting blunted GTN-D response compared with younger women.

CONCLUSIONS

The cardiovascular benefits of natural estrogen supplementation on vascular endothelial function may be dependent on postmenopausal age, with improved vascular function evident only in the early postmenopausal years. Short-term FMD response to estradiol might help stratify individual differences in risks versus benefits of HRT.

Understanding the oestrogen action in experimental and clinical atherosclerosis

Whereas hormone replacement/menopause therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women increases the coronary artery risk, epidemiological studies (protection in premenopaused women) suggest and experimental studies (prevention of the development of fatty streaks in animals) demonstrate a major atheroprotective action of oestradiol (E2). The understanding of the deleterious and beneficial effects of oestrogens is thus required. The immuno-inflammatory system plays a key role in the development of fatty streak deposit as well as in the rupture of the atherosclerotic plaque. Whereas E2 favours an anti-inflammatory effect in vitro (cultured cells), it rather elicits in vivo a proinflammation at the level of several subpopulations of the immuno-inflammatory system, which could contribute to plaque destabilization. Endothelium is another important target for E2, as it potentiates endothelial NO and prostacyclin production, thus promoting the beneficial effects as vasorelaxation and inhibition of platelet aggregation. Prostacyclin, but not NO, appears to be involved in the atheroprotective effect of E2. E2 also accelerates endothelial regrowth, thus favouring vascular healing. Finally, most of these effects of E2 are mediated by oestrogen receptor alpha, and are independent of oestrogen receptor beta. In summary, a better understanding of the mechanisms of oestrogen action not only on the normal and atheromatous arteries, but also on innate and adaptive immune responses is required and should help to optimize the prevention of cardiovascular disease after menopause. These mouse models should help to screen existing and future selective oestrogen receptor modulators.

Current trends in coronary artery disease in women

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There are some striking sex differences regarding presentation, symptoms and sign, diagnosis, and treatment of coronary artery disease. Historically, healthcare delivery to women has been plagued with treatment bias favoring men. This review will present relevant cardiovascular physiologic sex differences, current treatment options for coronary artery disease both surgical and medical, and clinical outcomes of such treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past, pharmacologic and interventional studies generally excluded women from their subjects. As a result, women have been traditionally treated based on the findings in their male counterparts. Recent studies examining sex differences in the treatment of coronary artery disease have given new insight into the hormonal and behavioral influences associated with coronary artery disease. Finally, these studies have drawn attention to possibly inadvertent discrepancies in the way men and women are treated for coronary artery disease.

SUMMARY

Despite significant advances in medical and surgical approaches to treat coronary artery disease, it remains and will continue to be the most important healthcare challenge of the 21st century. Whereas efforts are underway to encourage inclusion of more women in therapeutic trials, the educational process, particularly in medical school, needs to broadly address sex specific pathophysiology and treatment, rather than relying on sub-subspecialty training for optimizing healthcare delivery in women.

The long-term impact of 2-3 years of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular mortality and atherosclerosis in healthy women

OBJECTIVE

The effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular risk is intensely debated. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of HRT given for a few years on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and the severity of atherosclerosis.

METHODS

This analysis was based on a cohort of 1,458 postmenopausal women (55.8 +/- 6.1 years old) who previously participated in a number of randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials assessing the efficacy of 2-3 years of therapy with various estrogen plus progestin combinations for preventing bone loss. Women were followed on average for 9.8 years and came for a follow-up visit. Outcome variables were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and the severity of atherosclerosis, as estimated by semi-quantitative scoring of vascular calcification in the lumbar aorta on lateral radiographs.

RESULTS

A total of 174 women died during the observation period. All-cause mortality was decreased by 30% in the HRT+ group compared with the HRT- group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.97) after adjusting for age, body mass index and smoking. Under the same conditions, similar results characterized mortality from cardiovascular disease (n = 61 deaths; 35.1% of all deaths) and coronary heart disease (n = 39 deaths; 22.4% of all deaths), which were decreased by 46% (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.29-0.98, p = 0.045) and 53% (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.21-1.03, p = 0.062), respectively. Furthermore, the mean severity score of aortic calcification at follow-up was significantly lower in hormone-treated compared to non-treated women (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Women who receive 2-3 years of HRT after menopause do not have increased all-cause mortality, and results of the present study suggest relative cardiovascular benefits compared to those who had not used hormones.

Hormone replacement therapy in menopausal women: Past problems and future possibilities

Oral administration of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) with and without the synthetic progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in postmenopausal women is associated with side-effects that include increased risk of stroke and breast cancer. The current evidence that transdermal administration of estradiol may provide a safer alternative to orally administered CEE is reviewed. Transdermally administered estradiol has been shown to be an efficacious treatment for hot flushes possibly without the increase in blood clotting that is associated with administration of oral CEE. Further, natural progesterone may have a more beneficial spectrum of physiological effects than synthetic progestins. The substantial differences between CEE compared with estradiol and estriol, as well as the differences between synthetic MPA and natural progesterone, are detailed. Estriol is an increasingly popular alternative hormone therapy used for menopausal symptoms. There is evidence that estriol, by binding preferentially to estrogen receptor-beta, may inhibit some of the unwanted effects of estradiol. New clinical trials are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically or transdermally administered combinations of estradiol, estriol and progesterone. Future studies should focus on relatively young women who begin estrogen supplement use near the start of menopause.

Medroxyprogesterone acetate attenuates long-term effects of 17beta-estradiol in coronary arteries from hyperlipidemic rabbits

OBJECTIVE

The progestin component in hormone replacement treatment may oppose the effects of estrogen on vascular function. This study examined the effect of long-term treatment with 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) alone and in combination with two progestins on K(+) and Ca(2+)-mediated mechanisms in coronary arteries.

METHODS

Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits were treated orally with either E(2) (4 mg/day), medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) (10 mg/day), norethindrone acetate (NETA) (2 mg/day), E(2)+MPA, E(2)+NETA, or placebo for 16 weeks (n=10 in each group). Coronary arteries were used for mRNA and myograph studies.

RESULTS

E(2) increased vasodilatation induced by sodium nitroprusside and decreased vasocontraction induced by potassium. The first but not the latter response was opposed by MPA. The combination of MPA and E(2), but neither compound alone enhanced nimodipine-induced vasodilatation and increased the expression of L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel mRNA. NETA had no opposing effects. Hormone treatment did not affect large-conductance Ca(2+) activated or ATP-sensitive K(+) channels or cGMP-dependent protein kinase mRNA expression. Hyperlipidemia had no effect on vascular reactivity.

CONCLUSION

When E(2) is administered with MPA, effects of E(2) on nitric oxide and Ca(2+)-mediated vascular reactivity in rabbit coronary arteries are modulated. The results suggest that the progestin component in hormone replacement treatment may interfere with the supposed beneficial vascular effects of estrogen.

Circulating chemoattractants RANTES, negatively related to endogenous androgens, and MCP-1 are differentially suppressed by hormone therapy and raloxifene

BACKGROUND

The cardinal role of chronic inflammation in the development of atherosclerosis is increasingly being recognized. Estrogens may prevent the evolution of atherosclerosis by suppressing immune response. Furthermore, the conflicting reports on the cardiovascular effects of hormone therapy between observational and clinical trials have triggered interest on the effect of alternative therapies on the cardiovascular system.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of estrogen, estrogen-progestin, tibolone and raloxifene therapy on circulating markers of chemotaxis in healthy postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Eighty-eight postmenopausal women aged 44-62 years were randomly allocated to daily: (1) conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg (CEE), (2) 17beta-estradiol 1mg plus norethisterone acetate 0.5mg (E(2)/NETA), (3) tibolone 2.5mg, (4) raloxifene HCl 60 mg or (5) no treatment. Serum monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) were measured at baseline and at 3 months.

RESULTS

Endogenous testosterone and free androgen index (FAI) correlated negatively, while SHBG correlated positively with serum RANTES (testosterone: r=-0.27, p=0.033; FAI: r=-0.43, p=0.004: SHBG: r=0.34, p=0.026). Serum MCP-1 decreased significantly in the CEE group (baseline 125.3+/-51 pg/ml, 3 months 84.5+/-36.1 pg/ml, p=0.043), while no difference was detected between baseline and post-treatment levels in the other groups. Furthermore, a significant decrease in serum RANTES was observed at the end of 3 months only in the E2/NETA and the raloxifene group (E2/NETA baseline 8690.6+/-3880.0 pg/ml, 3 months 6894.0+/-1720.0 pg/ml, p=0.007; raloxifene baseline 9042.4+/-3765.6 pg/ml, 3 months 6718.1+/-2366.2 pg/ml, p=0.011).

CONCLUSION

Endogenous androgens may suppress chemotactic response. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and raloxifene may inhibit the expression of chemoattractant molecules and thus attenuate inflammation. The relevance of these findings in terms of clinically established caridoprotection remains to be clarified.

Medroxyprogesterone acetate inhibits the cardioprotective effect of estrogen in experimental ischemia-reperfusion injury

OBJECTIVE

Results from recent clinical trials of estrogen and progestogen therapy (EPT) suggest that some progestogens may interfere with the cardiovascular benefits of estrogen (E). The aim of this study was to investigate whether medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) modifies the protective effect of E in experimental ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury in vivo and in vitro in the rat.

DESIGN

Ovariectomized female Wistar rats (250-280 g, n = 61) received E, MPA, E and MPA, or placebo subcutaneously. Fourteen days later, hearts were isolated and perfused with Krebs Henseleit for in vitro experiments or left in situ for in vivo experiments. In both cases, the left coronary artery was occluded for 45 minutes, followed by 2 hours of reperfusion.

RESULTS

In vivo E significantly reduced the necrotic zone of reperfused hearts (21.8% +/- 1.7% of area at risk) compared with placebo (42.8% +/- 4.8% area at risk; P < 0.05). This protection was reversed by co-administration of MPA with E (necrotic zone 38.2% +/- 6.1% area at risk). The influence of E on neutrophil infiltration was demonstrated by its ability to reduce myocardial myeloperoxidase activity (0.2 +/- 0.1 U/g tissue) relative to placebo (1.3 +/- 0.5 U/g tissue; P < 0.05). Myocardial myeloperoxidase activity was significantly increased to 1.1 +/- 0.3 U/g tissue in rats receiving E and MPA. However, MPA also reversed the protective effect of E in neutrophil-free buffer-perfused hearts, suggesting that additional mechanisms are involved.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we showed that the administration of MPA can inhibit the effects of E that lead to protection of the myocardium from reperfusion injury and that this involves both neutrophil-dependent and neutrophil-independent mechanisms.

Dimeric progestins from rhizomes of Ligusticum chuanxiong

Five dimeric phthalides were isolated from rhizomes of Ligusticum chuanxiong and their structures deduced based on spectral data. All compounds and their parent extracts were assessed for progesterone-like activity using a progesterone receptor driven reporter-gene bioassay. Among all the compounds, riligustilide, displayed weak progesterone-like activity (EC50 approximately 81 microM), whereas, (3Z')-(3a'R,6'R,3R,6R,7R)-3,8-dihydro-6.6',7.3a'-diligustilide (Mr: 382, EC50 approximately 90 nM), was found to be a potent and specific activator of the progesterone receptor. Levistolide A, although having a very similar plenary structure, was inactive indicating the importance of stereochemistry of chiral centers and flexibility of butylidene side chain for progestogenic activity. These bioactive phthalides and their parent extracts (EC50 approximately 8 microg/ml) may have utility for treatment of conditions requiring progesterone action.

Premature ovarian failure, endothelial dysfunction and estrogen-progestogen replacement

Cardiovascular disease, including coronary artery disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disease, is the leading cause of death among women. Vascular endothelial dysfunction is an early marker of atherosclerosis. Women with premature ovarian failure (or premature menopause) present an increased risk for cardiovascular disease, which might be attributed to the early onset of vascular endothelial dysfunction, associated with sex steroid deficiency. Cyclical estrogen and progestogen therapy has been shown to restore endothelial function in these young women. Further research is required to assess primarily the long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular and overall prognosis in young women with premature ovarian failure, as well as the effects of different doses, duration and routes of hormone administration in these women.

Clinical study comparing the effects of sequential hormone replacement therapy with oestradiol/dydrogesterone and conjugated equine oestrogen/norgestrel on lipids and symptoms

A clinical study comparing the effects of sequential hormone replacement therapy with oestradiol/dydrogesterone and conjugated equine oestrogen/norgestrel on lipids and symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare the effects of sequential 17beta-oestradiol/dydrogesterone and conjugated equine oestrogens (CEE)/norgestrel on lipid parameters, climacteric symptoms, bleeding patterns and tolerability.

STUDY DESIGN

This double-blind study was conducted in 193 peri- and post-menopausal women randomised to receive six, 28-day cycles of oral sequential oestradiol 1 mg/dydrogesterone 10 mg or CEE 0.625 mg/norgestrel 0.15 mg. The change from baseline in serum lipids and hot flushes was analysed using a two-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks there was a statistically significant increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in the oestradiol/dydrogesterone group and a significant reduction in the CEE/norgestrel group. The difference between the groups was significant (P=0.001). The number of hot flushes was reduced by 86% in both groups; this improvement was supported by the Greene Climacteric Symptom Scale score, the patients' opinion and quality of life assessments. The percentage of women experiencing cyclic bleeding was greater with CEE/norgestrel, as was the mean duration and severity of bleeding. Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Oestradiol/dydrogesterone and CEE/norgestrel were equally effective in treating climacteric symptoms, but oestradiol/dydrogesterone showed some advantages in terms of lipid profile and incidence of bleeding.

Is Bio-Identical Hormone Replacement Therapy Safer than Traditional Hormone Replacement Therapy?

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated an increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women using oral hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Bio-identical HRT (BHRT) is widely used by alternative healthcare practitioners for the treatment of symptoms of menopause, with the prevailing assumption that BHRT provides the benefits of HRT while attenuating the risks. However, considering the serious risks of HRT, the use of any form of HRT, including BHRT, without sufficient scientific evaluation may create considerable risk.The main hormone found in BHRT is estriol. Estriol is used alone or in combination with estradiol and estrone. The total daily oral dose of BHRT used is, on average, ten times higher than that used in HRT, and both oral and topical forms are used for bio-identical hormone administration. The clinical trials that have examined cardiovascular outcomes associated with estriol therapy are limited, and there is evidence to demonstrate variable effects on markers associated with cardiovascular risk.Based on the current evidence, the same cardiovascular risks that have recently been found to be associated with oral HRT may also be associated with the administration of oral estriol in BHRT. The use of oral bio-identical hormones cannot be promoted until further evidence is available to demonstrate its safety.

Endothelial cell dysfunction: can't live with it, how to live without it

Endothelial cell dysfunction is emerging as an ultimate culprit for diverse cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular complications of chronic renal diseases, yet the definition of this new syndrome, its pathophysiology, and therapy remain poorly defined. Here, I summarize some molecular mechanisms leading from hyperhomocystinemia, elevated asymmetric dimethylarginine, and advanced glycolation end product-modified protein level to the proatherogenic, prothrombogenic, and proinflammatory endothelial phenotype and offer a model of endothelial dysfunction based on the interconnectedness of diverse functions. Finally, several therapeutic strategies to prevent and correct endothelial dysfunction are discussed in the light of uncertainty of their action modulated by the endothelial dysfunction per se.

Significant differential effects of lower doses of hormone therapy or tibolone on markers of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study

AIMS

We have previously reported that lower doses of hormone therapy (L-HT) and tibolone have different effects on markers of cardiovascular disease when compared with conventional doses of HT. The objective was to compare the effects of L-HT and tibolone on lipid profile, vasodilation, and factors associated with inflammation and haemostasis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-one women received a combination of micronized progesterone 100 mg with conjugated equine estrogen 0.3 mg vs. tibolone 2.5 mg alone daily in random order during 2 months with 2 months washout period. When compared with L-HT, tibolone significantly reduced total cholesterol (P<0.001), triglyceride (P<0.001), HDL cholesterol (P<0.001) levels, and triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratios (P=0.004) except total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratios. Tibolone improved flow-mediated response to hyperaemia from baseline values (P<0.001) by a similar magnitude to L-HT. L-HT and tibolone did not increase high-sensitivity C-reactive protein relative to baseline values. L-HT reduced antithrombin III from baseline values (P=0.037), compared with tibolone showing no changes. However, there was no difference between either. In contrast, tibolone increased pro-thrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) from baseline values (P=0.002), compared with L-HT showing no changes. Tibolone significantly reduced plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) antigen levels from baseline values (P=0.004), compared with L-HT showing no changes. The effects of L-HT and tibolone on F1+2 and PAI-1 were significantly different (P=0.045 and P=0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Both tibolone and L-HT improved flow-mediated response by a similar magnitude and did not significantly increase high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. However, tibolone significantly reduced PAI-1, but increased F1+2 more than L-HT.