Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5'-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans

Evaluation of Intravenous Versus Intracoronary Adenosine in Coronary Reactivity Testing

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) obtained through coronary bolus thermodilution are used to assess and treat patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease. Previous studies demonstrate comparable results assessing epicardial ischemia by fractional flow reserve using intravenous (IV) or intracoronary (IC) adenosine. It is unknown if there is a similarity between IC and IV hyperemia with adenosine when performing coronary reactivity testing (CRT). We reviewed CRT data and baseline demographics in a cohort of patients who underwent CRT for ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease. We evaluated CFR and IMR in patients whereby maximal hyperemia was obtained by both IC and IV means using linear regression, one-way analysis of variance, Wilcoxon, and Bland-Altman analysis. We assessed 62 patients with a median age of 60.5 years (50 to 67), and 72% were females. The average CFR with IC adenosine was 3.12 (2.31 to 4.06) and 2.71 (2.0 to 3.88) with IV adenosine, with an R2 value of 0.50 (p <0.0001). The average IMR with IC adenosine was 28.23 (16.24 to 50.72) and 22.27 (14.79 to 37.0) with IV adenosine, with an R2 value of 0.33 (p <0.0001). Average intra-method variability between IC and IV adenosine was nonsignificant (p = 0.31 for CFR and p = 0.55 for IMR). Bland-Altman analysis showed reasonable agreement between IV and IC adenosine for CFR and IMR with slightly higher values using IC adenosine. Therefore, in CRT with bolus thermodilution, CFR and IMR values obtained with IC adenosine correlate well with those obtained with IV adenosine. This presents a potential alternative to IV adenosine for bolus thermodilution CRT.

Diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR with a new coarse-to-fine subpixel algorithm in detecting lesion-specific ischemia: a prospective multicenter study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

A new computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) technique with a "coarse-to-fine subpixel" algorithm has been developed to generate precise lumen contours. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of this new CT-FFR algorithm for discriminating lesion-specific ischemia using wire-based FFR ≤ 0.80 as the reference standard in patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter study screened 330 patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and invasive FFR (median interval 2 days) from 6 tertiary hospitals. CT-FFR was evaluated in a blinded fashion with a "coarse-to-fine subpixel" algorithm for lumen contour.

RESULTS

Between March 2019 and May 2020, we included 316 patients with 324 vessels. There was a good correlation between CT-FFR and invasive FFR (r=0.76, P<.001). The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy on a per-vessel level were 95.3%, 89.8%, and 92.0% for CT-FFR, and 96.4%, 26.4%, and 53.1% for CCTA>50% stenosis, respectively. CT-FFR showed improved discrimination of ischemia compared with CCTA alone overall (AUC, 0.95 vs 0.74, P<.001) and in intermediate (AUC, 0.96 vs 0.62, P<.001) and "gray zone" lesions (AUC, 0.88 vs 0.61, P<.001). The diagnostic specificity, accuracy, and AUC for CT-FFR (71.9%, 82.8%, and 0.84) outperformed CCTA (9.4%, 48.3%, and 0.66) in patients or in vessels with severe calcification (all P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-FFR with a new "coarse-to-fine subpixel" algorithm showed high performance in identifying hemodynamically significant stenosis. The diagnostic performance of CT-FFR was superior to that of CCTA in intermediate lesions, "gray zone" lesions, and severely calcified lesions. Clinical Trial Register: NCT04731285.

Continuous vs Bolus Thermodilution to Assess Microvascular Resistance Reserve

BACKGROUND

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) can, in principle, be derived by any method assessing coronary flow.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare CFR and MRR as derived by continuous (CFRcont and MRRcont) and bolus thermodilution (CFRbolus and MRRbolus).

METHODS

A total of 175 patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease were studied. Bolus and continuous thermodilution measurements were performed in the left anterior descending coronary artery. MRR was calculated as the ratio of CFR to fractional flow reserve and corrected for changes in systemic pressure. In 102 patients, bolus and continuous thermodilution measurements were performed in duplicate to assess test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

Mean CFRbolus was higher than CFRcont (3.47 ± 1.42 and 2.67 ± 0.81 [P < 0.001], mean difference 0.80, upper limit of agreement 3.92, lower limit of agreement -2.32). Mean MRRbolus was also higher than MRRcont (4.40 ± 1.99 and 3.22 ± 1.02 [P < 0.001], mean difference 1.2, upper limit of agreement 5.08, lower limit of agreement -2.71). The correlation between CFR and MRR values obtained using both methods was significant but weak (CFR, r = 0.28 [95% CI: 0.14-0.41]; MRR, r = 0.26 [95% CI: 0.16-0.39]; P < 0.001 for both). The precision of both CFR and MRR was higher when assessed using continuous thermodilution compared with bolus thermodilution (repeatability coefficients of 0.89 and 2.79 for CFRcont and CFRbolus, respectively, and 1.01 and 3.05 for MRRcont and MRRbolus, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution yields lower values of CFR and MRR accompanied by an almost 3-fold reduction of the variability in the measured results.

Predictors of discordance between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and diastolic pressure ratio (dPR) in intermediate coronary lesions

Background

Recently, non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs) have been validated as a reliable alternative to fractional flow reserve (FFR). However, a discordance between FFR and NHPRs is observed in 20-25% of cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate predictors of discordance between FFR and diastolic Pressure ratio (dPR).

Methods

PREDICT is a retrospective, single center, investigator-initiated study including 813 patients (1092vessels) who underwent FFR assessment of intermediate coronary lesions (angiographic 30%-80% stenosis). dPR was calculated using individual pressure waveforms and dedicated software. Clinical, angiographic and hemodynamic variables were compared between patients with concordant and discordant FFR and dPR values.

Results

Median age was 65 (IQR:59-73) years and 70% were male. Hemodynamically significant lesions, as defined by FFR ≤ 0.80, and dPR ≤ 0.89, were identified in 29.6% and 30.3% of cases, respectively. Overall, FFR and dPR values were discordant in 22.1% patients (17.4% of the vessels). Discordance was related to FFR+/dPR- and FFR-/dPR + in 11.8% and 10.3% of patients, respectively.In case of FFR-dPR discordance, a higher prevalence of left anterior descending arteries lesions was observed (70.5% vs. 53.1%, p < 0.001) and mean values of both FFR and dPR were significantly lower (FFR 0.81 ± 0.05 vs 0.85 ± 0.08, p < 0.001, and dPR 0.89 ± 0.04 vs 0.92 ± 0.08,p < 0.001) as compared to vessels with FFR and dPR concordance. Following multivariable adjustment, dPR delta (defined as the absolute difference between measured dPR to the cut-off value of 0.89) turned out to be the only independent predictor of discordance (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.79, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that FFR-to-dPR discordance occurs in approximately one-fifth of patients. Absolute dPR delta appears to be the only independent predictor of discordance.

Reproducibility of bolus versus continuous thermodilution for assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with ANOCA

BACKGROUND

A bolus thermodilution-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) has emerged as the standard for assessing coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Continuous thermodilution has recently been introduced as a tool to quantify absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance directly. Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) derived from continuous thermodilution has been proposed as a novel metric of microvascular function, which is independent of epicardial stenoses and myocardial mass.

AIMS

We aimed to assess the reproducibility of bolus and continuous thermodilution in assessing coronary microvascular function.

METHODS

Patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) at angiography were prospectively enrolled. Bolus and continuous intracoronary thermodilution measurements were obtained in duplicate in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either bolus thermodilution first or continuous thermodilution first.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were enrolled. The mean fractional flow reserve (FFR) was 0.86±0.06. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) calculated with continuous thermodilution (CFRcont) was significantly lower than bolus thermodilution-derived CFR (CFRbolus; 2.63±0.65 vs 3.29±1.17; p<0.001). CFRcont showed a higher reproducibility than CFRbolus (variability: 12.7±10.4% continuous vs 31.26±24.85% bolus; p<0.001). MRR showed a higher reproducibility than IMR (variability 12.4±10.1% continuous vs 24.2±19.3% bolus; p<0.001). No correlation was found between MRR and IMR (r=0.1, 95% confidence interval: -0.09 to 0.29; p=0.305).

CONCLUSIONS

In the assessment of coronary microvascular function, continuous thermodilution demonstrated significantly less variability on repeated measurements than bolus thermodilution.

Coronary Physiology: Modern Concepts for the Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Medical Therapy

Recent evidence on ischemia, rather than coronary artery disease (CAD), representing a major determinant of outcomes, has led to a progressive shift in the management of patients with ischemic heart disease. According to most recent guidelines, myocardial revascularization strategies based on anatomical findings should be progressively abandoned in favor of functional criteria for the guidance of PCI. Thus, emerging importance has been assigned to the assessment of coronary physiology in order to determine the ischemic significance of coronary stenoses. However, despite several indexes and tools that have been developed so far, the existence of technical and clinical conditions potentially biasing the functional evaluation of the coronary tree still cause debates regarding the strategy of choice. The present review provides an overview of the available methods and the most recent acquirements for the invasive assessment of ischemia, focusing on the most widely available indexes, fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instant-wave free ratio (iFR), in addition to emerging examples, as new approaches to coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance, aiming at promoting the knowledge and application of those "full physiology" principles, which are generally advocated to allow a tailored treatment and the achievement of the largest prognostic benefits.

Discordance between fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio in patients with severe aortic stenosis: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Discordance between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) occurs in approximately 20 % of cases. However, no studies have reported the discordance in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic discordance between FFR and iFR in patients with severe AS.

METHODS

We examined 140 consecutive patients with severe AS (164 intermediate coronary artery stenosis vessels). FFR and iFR were calculated in four quadrants based on threshold FFR and iFR values of ≤0.8 and ≤0.89, respectively (Group 1: iFR >0.89, FFR >0.80; Group 2: iFR ≤0.89, FFR >0.80; Group 3: iFR >0.89, FFR ≤0.80; and Group 4: iFR ≤0.89, FFR ≤0.80). Concordant groups were Groups 1 and 4, and discordant groups were Groups 2 and 3. Positive and negative discordant groups were Groups 3 and 2, respectively.

RESULTS

The median (Q1, Q3) FFR and iFR were 0.84 (0.76, 0.88) and 0.85 (0.76, 0.91), respectively. Discordance was observed in 48 vessels (29.3 %). In the discordant group, negative discordance (Group 2: iFR ≤0.89 and FFR >0.80) was predominant (45 cases, 93.6 %). Multivariate analysis showed that the left anterior descending artery [odds ratio (OR), 3.88; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.54-9.79, p = 0.004] and peak velocity ≥5.0 m/s (OR, 3.21; 95%CI: 1.36-7.57, p = 0.008) were independently associated with negative discordance (FFR >0.8 and iFR ≤0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe AS, discordance between FFR and iFR was predominantly negative and observed in 29.3 % of vessels. The left anterior descending artery and peak velocity ≥5.0 m/s were independently associated with negative discordance.

Feasibility of CT Angiography-derived Kinetic Energy of Coronary Flow to Improve the Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Stenosis

Purpose

To investigate whether coronary flow kinetic energy has incremental value over simulated fractional flow reserve (sFFR) in diagnosing hemodynamically significant stenosis assessed with coronary CT angiography and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Materials and Methods

This single-center retrospective study included 113 patients (mean age, 68 years ± 9 [SD]; 80 men) who underwent coronary CT angiography showing intermediate stenosis (30%-70% stenosis) and subsequent invasive FFR between December 2015 and March 2020. Kinetic energy was calculated using proximal coronary diameter and myocardial mass of the stenotic region. A mesh-free simulation was performed to calculate the sFFR. Invasive FFR of 0.80 or less indicated hemodynamically significant stenosis. Models using diameter stenosis, kinetic energy, and sFFR were compared by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Of the 144 vessels evaluated, 53 vessels (37%) had hemodynamically significant stenosis. Kinetic energy of vessels with significant stenosis was higher than that of vessels with nonsignificant stenosis (79 mJ/kg [IQR, 58-104 mJ/kg] vs 36 mJ/kg [IQR, 23-59 mJ/kg]; P < .001). Multivariable analysis including diameter stenosis and sFFR showed that kinetic energy (per 20 mJ/kg; odds ratio, 1.92; 95% CI: 1.37, 2.95; P < .001) was a predictor of hemodynamically significant stenosis. Adding kinetic energy to diameter stenosis and sFFR improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.95) to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.97) (P = .04).

Conclusion

Kinetic energy had incremental value over sFFR in detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis assessed with invasive FFR.Keywords: Coronary CT Angiography, Coronary Arteries, Fractional Flow Reserve, Kinetic Energy, Cardiac Supplemental material is available for this article © RSNA, 2022.

Assessment of Splenic Switch-Off With Arterial Spin Labeling in Adenosine Perfusion Cardiac MRI

BACKGROUND

In patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial perfusion is assessed under rest and pharmacological stress to identify ischemia. Splenic switch-off, defined as the stress to rest splenic perfusion attenuation in response to adenosine, has been proposed as an indicator of stress adequacy. Its occurrence has been previously assessed in first-pass perfusion images, but the use of noncontrast techniques would be highly beneficial.

PURPOSE

To explore the ability of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) to identify splenic switch-off in patients with suspected CAD.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Five healthy volunteers (age 24.8 ± 3.8 years) and 32 patients (age 66.4 ± 8.2 years) with suspected CAD.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 1.5-T/PCASL (spin-echo) and first-pass imaging (gradient-echo).

ASSESSMENT

In healthy subjects, multi-delay PCASL data (500-2000 msec) were acquired to quantify splenic blood flow (SBF) and determine the adequate postlabeling delay (PLD) for single-delay acquisitions (PLD > arterial transit time). In patients, single-delay PCASL (1200 msec) and first-pass perfusion images were acquired under rest and adenosine conditions. PCASL data were used to compute SBF maps and SBF stress-to-rest ratios. Three observers classified patients into "switch-off" and "failed switch-off" groups by visually comparing rest-stress perfusion data acquired with PCASL and first-pass, independently. First-pass categories were used as reference to evaluate the accuracy of quantitative classification.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Wilcoxon signed-rank, Pearson correlation, kappa, percentage agreement, Generalized Linear Mixed Model, Mann-Whitney, Pearson Chi-squared, receiver operating characteristic, area-under-the-curve (AUC) and confusion matrix.

SIGNIFICANCE

P value < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients (84.4%) experienced splenic switch-off according to first-pass categories. Comparison of PCASL-derived SBF maps during stress and rest allowed assessment of splenic switch-off, reflected in a reduction of SBF values during stress. SBF stress-to-rest ratios showed a 97% accuracy (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 100%, AUC = 85.2%).

DATA CONCLUSION

This study could demonstrate the feasibility of PCASL to identify splenic switch-off during adenosine perfusion MRI, both by qualitative and quantitative assessments.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 2.

Coronary physiology in the catheterisation laboratory: an A to Z practical guide

Coronary revascularisation, either percutaneous or surgical, aims to improve coronary flow and relieve myocardial ischaemia. The decision-making process in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains largely based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA), even though until recently ICA could not assess the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses. Invasive wire-based approaches for physiological evaluations were developed to properly assess the ischaemic relevance of epicardial CAD. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and later, instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), were shown to improve clinical outcomes in several patient subsets when used for coronary revascularisation guidance or deferral and for procedural optimisation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results. Despite accumulating evidence and positive guideline recommendations, the adoption of invasive physiology has remained quite low, mainly due to technical and economic issues as well as to operator-resistance to change. Coronary image-based computational physiology has been recently developed, with promising results in terms of accuracy and a reduction in computational time, costs, radiation exposure and risks for the patient. Lastly, the integration of intracoronary imaging and physiology allows for individualised PCI treatment, aiming at complete relief of ischaemia through optimised morpho-functional immediate procedural results. Instead of a conventional state-of-the-art review, this A to Z dictionary attempts to provide a practical guide for the application of coronary physiology in the catheterisation laboratory, exploring several methods, their pitfalls, and useful tips and tricks.

Factors Predicting 150 and 200 Microgram Adenosine Requirement during Four Increasing Doses of Intracoronary Adenosine Bolus Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment

Direct intracoronary adenosine bolus is an excellent alternative to intravenous adenosine fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. This study, during four increasing adenosine boluses (50, 100, 150, and 200 mcg), aimed to explore clinical and angiographic predictors of coronary stenotic lesions for which the significant ischemic FFR (FFR ≤ 0.8) occurred at 150 and 200 mcg adenosine doses. Data from 1055 coronary lesions that underwent FFR measurement at the Central Chest Institute of Thailand from August 2011 to July 2021 were included. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were analyzed. The FFR ≤ 0.8 occurred at adenosine 150 and 200 mcg boluses in 47 coronary lesions, while the FFR ≤ 0.8 occurred at adenosine 50 and 100 mcg boluses in 186 coronary lesions. After univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, four characteristics, including male sex, younger age, non-smoking status, and FFR procedure of RCA, were predictors of the occurrence of FFR ≤ 0.8 at adenosine 150 and 200 mcg doses. Combining all four predictors as a predictive model resulted in an AuROC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.68–0.76), an 86% negative predictive value. Comparing these four predictors, the FFR procedure of RCA gave the most predictive power, with the AuROC of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.56–0.63).

Coronary flow disturbance assessed by vorticity as a cause of functionally significant stenosis

OBJECTIVES

Vorticity calculated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) could assess the flow disturbance generated by coronary stenosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether vorticity would be an underlying cause of functionally significant stenosis assessed by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 113 patients who underwent coronary CT angiography showing intermediate stenosis and subsequent invasive FFR between December 2015 and March 2020. Vorticity at the stenosis site was calculated using a mesh-free CFD method. We also evaluated the minimum lumen area (MLA) and diameter stenosis (DS) of the lesion. Invasive FFR of ≤ 0.80 was considered functionally significant. Data were compared using Student's t-test and logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of the evaluated 144 vessels, 53 vessels (37%) showed FFR ≤ 0.80. Vorticity of significant stenosis was significantly higher than non-significant stenosis (569 ± 78 vs. 328 ± 34 s^-1, p < 0.001). A significant negative relationship was present between vorticity and invasive FFR (R² = 0.31, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis including MLA and DS showed that vorticity (per 100 s^-1, odds ratio: 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-1.57, p < 0.001) was a statistically significant factor to detect functional significance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve statistically significantly increased when vorticity was combined with DS and MLA (0.76 vs. 0.87, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Vorticity had a statistically significant negative relationship with invasive FFR independent of geometric stenosis.

KEY POINTS

• Flow disturbance caused by coronary stenosis could be evaluated by calculating vorticity which is defined as the norm of the rotation of the velocity vector. • Vorticity was statistically significantly higher in stenosis with functional significance than stenosis without. • Vorticity has an additive value to detect functionally significant stenosis over geometrical stenosis.

Splenic switch-off as a novel marker for adenosine response in nitrogen-13 ammonia PET myocardial perfusion imaging: Cross-validation against CMR using a hybrid PET/MR device

BACKGROUND

No methodology is available to distinguish truly reduced myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (PET MPI) from seemingly impaired MFR due to inadequate adenosine response. The adenosine-induced splenic switch-off (SSO) sign has been proposed as a potential marker for adequate adenosine response in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). We assessed the feasibility of detecting SSO in nitrogen-13 ammonia PET MPI using SSO in CMR as the standard of reference.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent simultaneous CMR and PET MPI on a hybrid PET/MR device with co-injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent and nitrogen-13 ammonia during rest and adenosine-induced stress. In CMR, SSO was assessed visually (positive vs negative SSO) and quantitatively by calculating the ratio of the peak signal intensity of the spleen during stress over rest (SIR). In PET MPI, the splenic signal activity ratio (SAR) was calculated as the maximal standard uptake value of the spleen during stress over rest. The median SIR was significantly lower in patients with positive versus negative SSO in CMR (0.57 [IQR 0.49 to 0.62] vs 0.89 [IQR 0.76 to 0.98]; P < .001). Similarly, median SAR in PET MPI was significantly lower in patients with positive versus negative SSO (0.40 [IQR 0.32 to 0.45] vs 0.80 [IQR 0.47 to 0.98]; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Similarly to CMR, SSO can be detected in nitrogen-13 ammonia PET MPI. This might help distinguish adenosine non-responders from patients with truly impaired MFR due to microvascular dysfunction or multivessel coronary artery disease.

Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022

Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio are widely accepted and recommended in Western and Japanese guidelines for appropriate percutaneous coronary intervention. There are, however, many differences in clinical situations between Japan and Western countries. Therefore, the Task Force on coronary physiology of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) has proposed an expert consensus document to summarize current evidence and suggest the practical use of physiological lesion assessment in Japan.

A Practical Approach to Invasive Testing in Ischemia with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries (INOCA)

Up to 65% of women and approximately 30% of men have ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD; commonly known as INOCA) on invasive coronary angiography performed for stable angina. INOCA can be due to coronary microvascular dysfunction or coronary vasospasm. Despite the absence of obstructive CAD, those with INOCA have an increased risk of all-cause mortality and adverse outcomes, including recurrent angina and cardiovascular events. These patients often undergo repeat testing, including cardiac catheterization, resulting in lifetime healthcare costs that rival those for obstructive CAD. Patients with INOCA often remain undiagnosed and untreated. This review discusses the symptoms and prognosis of INOCA, offers a systematic approach to the diagnostic evaluation of these patients, and summarizes therapeutic management, including tailored therapy according to underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary nicardipine and adenosine for fractional flow reserve assessment of coronary stenosis

BACKGROUND

Administration of intracoronary (IC) adenosine allows an easily feasible, inexpensive, and more rapid alternative method for fractional flow reserve (FFR). It is common practice in many centers worldwide. Nicardipine is a strong coronary vasodilator but its efficacy and safety for assessing FFR is not established. The purpose of present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of IC nicardipine and adenosine for assessing FFR.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-nine patients with a total of 193 vessels undergoing clinically indicated FFR assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses were included. For the initial assessment of FFR, hyperemia was induced by an IC adenosine. After a washout period of 3 min, FFR was reassessed using 200 μg of IC nicardipine.

RESULTS

Hyperemic efficacy among two different stimuli was compared. The mean FFR with IC adenosine was 0.83 ± 0.09 and that with an IC nicardipine was 0.84 ± 0.09. The median FFR with an IC adenosine was 0.83 (0.78-0.91) and that with an IC nicardipine was 0.85 (0.79-0.91) (p-value 0.246). Both FFR values showed an excellent correlation (R² = 0.982, p < 0.001). Nicardipine produced fewer changes in heart rate, less chest pain and less flushing than adenosine. Transient atrioventricular block occurred in 29 patients with IC adenosine and none with IC nicardipine.

CONCLUSIONS

IC bolus injection of nicardipine could be introduced as a safe and practical alternative method of inducing hyperemia during FFR measurements. Compared to IC adenosine, IC nicardipine has a similar hyperemic efficacy and excellent side-effect profile.

Linear concentration-response relationship of serum caffeine with adenosine-induced fractional flow reserve overestimation: a comparison with papaverine

BACKGROUND

Caffeine intake from one cup of coffee one hour before adenosine stress tests, corresponding to serum caffeine levels of 3-4 mg/L, is thought to be acceptable for non-invasive imaging.

AIMS

We aimed to elucidate whether serum caffeine is independently associated with adenosine-induced fractional flow reserve (FFR) overestimation and their concentration-response relationship.

METHODS

FFR was measured using adenosine (FFRADN) and papaverine (FFRPAP) in 209 patients. FFRADN overestimation was defined as FFRADN - FFRPAP. The locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) approach was applied to evaluate the relationship between serum caffeine level and FFRADN overestimation. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine independent factors associated with FFRADN overestimation.

RESULTS

Caffeine was ingested at <12 hours in 85 patients, at 12-24 hours in 35 patients, and at >24 hours in 89 patients. Multiple regression analysis identified serum caffeine level as the strongest factor associated with FFRADN overestimation (p<0.001). The LOWESS curve demonstrated that FFRADN overestimation started from just above the lower detection limit of serum caffeine and increased approximately 0.01 FFR unit per 1 mg/L increase in serum caffeine level with a linear relationship. The 90th percentile of serum caffeine levels for the ≤12-hour, the 12-24-hour, and the >24-hour groups corresponded to FFRADN overestimations by 0.06, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum caffeine overestimates FFRADN values in a linear concentration-response manner. FFRADN overestimation occurs at much lower serum caffeine levels than those that were previously believed. Our results highlight that standardised caffeine control is required for reliable adenosine-induced FFR measurements.

Instantaneous wave-free ratio compared with fractional flow reserve in PCI: A cost-minimization analysis

BACKGROUND

Coronary physiology is a routine diagnostic tool when assessing whether coronary revascularization is indicated. The iFR-SWEDEHEART trial demonstrated similar clinical outcomes when using instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide revascularization. The objective of this analysis was to assess a cost-minimization analysis of iFR-guided compared with FFR-guided revascularization.

METHODS

In this cost-minimization analysis we used a decision-tree model from a healthcare perspective with a time-horizon of one year to estimate the cost difference between iFR and FFR in a Nordic setting and a United States (US) setting. Treatment pathways and health care utilizations were constructed from the iFR-SWEDEHEART trial. Unit cost for revascularization and myocardial infarction in the Nordic setting and US setting were derived from the Nordic diagnosis-related group versus Medicare cost data. Unit cost of intravenous adenosine administration and cost per stent placed were based on the average costs from the enrolled centers in the iFR-SWEDEHEART trial. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to test the robustness of the result.

RESULTS

The cost-minimization analysis demonstrated a cost saving per patient of $681 (95% CI: $641 - $723) in the Nordic setting and $1024 (95% CI: $934 - $1114) in the US setting, when using iFR-guided compared with FFR-guided revascularization. The results were not sensitive to changes in uncertain parameters or assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS

IFR-guided revascularization is associated with significant savings in cost compared with FFR-guided revascularization.

Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion mapping to assess hyperaemic response to adenosine stress

AIMS

Assessment of hyperaemia during adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) remains a clinical challenge with lack of a gold-standard non-invasive clinical marker to confirm hyperaemic response. This study aimed to validate maximum stress myocardial blood flow (SMBF) measured using quantitative perfusion mapping for assessment of hyperaemic response and compare this to current clinical markers of adenosine stress.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred and eighteen subjects underwent adenosine stress CMR. A derivation cohort (22 volunteers) was used to identify a SMBF threshold value for hyperaemia. This was tested in a validation cohort (37 patients with suspected coronary artery disease) who underwent invasive coronary physiology assessment on the same day as CMR. A clinical cohort (159 patients) was used to compare SMBF to other physiological markers of hyperaemia [splenic switch-off (SSO), heart rate response (HRR), and blood pressure (BP) fall]. A minimum SMBF threshold of 1.43 mL/g/min was derived from volunteer scans. All patients in the coronary physiology cohort demonstrated regional maximum SMBF (SMBFmax) >1.43 mL/g/min and invasive evidence of hyperaemia. Of the clinical cohort, 93% had hyperaemia defined by perfusion mapping compared to 71% using SSO and 81% using HRR. There was no difference in SMBFmax in those with or without SSO (2.58 ± 0.89 vs. 2.54 ± 1.04 mL/g/min, P = 0.84) but those with HRR had significantly higher SMBFmax (2.66 1.86 mL/g/min, P < 0.001). HRR >15 bpm was superior to SSO in predicting adequate increase in SMBF (AUC 0.87 vs. 0.62, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Adenosine-induced increase in myocardial blood flow is accurate for confirmation of hyperaemia during stress CMR studies and is superior to traditional, clinically used markers of adequate stress such as SSO and BP response.

Comparison Between 5- and 1-Year Outcomes Using Cutoff Values of Pressure Drop Coefficient and Fractional Flow Reserve for Diagnosing Coronary Artery Diseases

Background

The current pressure-based coronary diagnostic index, fractional flow reserve (FFR), has a limited efficacy in the presence of microvascular disease (MVD). To overcome the limitations of FFR, the objective is to assess the recently introduced pressure drop coefficient (CDP), a fundamental fluid dynamics-based combined pressure–flow index.

Methods

We hypothesize that CDP will result in improved clinical outcomes in comparison to FFR. To test the hypothesis, chi-square test was performed to compare the percent major adverse cardiac events (%MACE) at 5 years between (a) FFR < 0.75 and CDP > 27.9 and (b) FFR < 0.80 and CDP > 25.4 groups using a prospective cohort study. Furthermore, Kaplan–Meier survival curves were compared between the FFR and CDP groups. The results were considered statistically significant for p < 0.05. The outcomes of the CDP arm were presumptive as clinical decision was solely based on the FFR.

Results

For the complete patient group, the %MACE in the CDP > 27.9 group (10 out of 35, 29%) was lower in comparison to the FFR < 0.75 group (11 out of 20, 55%), and the difference was near significant (p = 0.05). The survival analysis showed a significantly higher survival rate (p = 0.01) in the CDP > 27.9 group (n = 35) when compared to the FFR < 0.75 group (n = 20). The results remained similar for the FFR = 0.80 cutoff. The comparison of the 5-year MACE outcomes with the 1-year outcomes for the complete patient group showed similar trends, with a higher statistical significance for a longer follow-up period of 5 years.

Conclusion

Based on the MACE and survival analysis outcomes, CDP could possibly be an alternate diagnostic index for decision-making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Clinical Trial Registration

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01719016.

Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis: Current Status and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a commonly used treatment option in coronary artery disease (CAD). Reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in those randomized to PCI compared to optimal medical therapy have been demonstrated only if it is performed for physiologically significant coronary lesions. Despite data demonstrating improved outcomes primarily in stable CAD and then acute settings, physiology-guided PCI remains underutilized. This review summarizes the evidence and commonly used methods for physiologic assessment of coronary stenosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard for the analysis of lesion severity. Its use is limited by the need for adenosine, which adds time, complexity, and potential adverse effects. Non-hyperemic instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided revascularization and quantitative flow reserve ratio assessment both have shown safety and effectiveness with improved patient outcomes. Coronary physiological assessment solves the ambiguity of coronary angiography. Detecting physiologically significant stenoses is crucial to decide which lesion needs to be treated. Technological advances have led to the development of new assessment indices in addition to FFR.

Diagnostic performance of corrected FFRCT metrics to predict hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic performance of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) (FFR_CT) difference across the lesion (ΔFFR_{CT lesion}) or the vessel (ΔFFR_{CT vessel}) and the gradient of FFR_CT for the identification of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.

METHODS

From June 2016 to December 2018, 73 patients suspected of having coronary artery disease who underwent CCTA followed invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 1 month were retrospectively included. ΔFFR_{CT lesion}, ΔFFR_{CT vessel}, and FFR_CT gradient were calculated. Performance characteristics of different corrected FFR_CT metrics in detecting ischemic stenosis were analyzed. Impacts of coronary calcification and lesion length on the corrected FFR_CT metrics were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The diagnostic sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of 94.4%, 88.7%, and 91.0% with ΔFFR_{CT lesion}, 57.1%, 72.3%, and 65.2% with ΔFFR_{CT vessel}, and 50.0%, 85.1%, and 68.5% with FFR_CT gradient, respectively, were detected. There was higher specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) for ΔFFR_{CT lesion} compared with CCTA (p < 0.05 for all). The specificity and AUC of FFR_CT gradient and ΔFFR_{CT vessel} were significantly higher than CCTA (p < 0.05 for all). Coronary calcification showed no impact on corrected FFR_CT metrics. ΔFFR_{CT lesion} for lesion length ratio (LLR) < 1/10 was significantly lower than that for LLR 1/10 to 3/10 and LLR > 3/10.

CONCLUSIONS

ΔFFR_{CT lesion} was significantly correlated with the hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. ΔFFR_{CT lesion} had the potential to be immediately used in real-world practice to discriminate ischemic coronary artery stenosis.

KEY POINTS

• The difference of FFR_CT across the lesion or the vessel and the gradient of FFR_CT was related to the hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. • The difference of FFR_CT across the lesion showed the best diagnostic performance in detecting the hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. • Coronary calcification showed no impact on corrected FFR_CT metrics, while lesion length related to the difference of FFR_CT across the lesion.

Multicenter clinical evaluation of a piezoresistive-MEMS-sensor rapid-exchange pressure microcatheter system for fractional flow reserve measurement

Objectives

This multicenter, prospective clinical study investigates whether the microelectromechanical‐systems‐(MEMS)‐sensor pressure microcatheter (MEMS‐PMC) is comparable to a conventional pressure wire in fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement.

Background

As a conventional tool for FFR measurement, pressure wires (PWs) still have some limitations such as suboptimal handling characteristics and unable to maintain the wire position during pullback assessment. Recently, a MEMS‐PMC compatible with any 0.014″ guidewire is developed. Compared with the existing optical‐sensor PMC, this MEMS‐PMC has smaller profiles at both the lesion crossing and sensor packaging areas.

Methods

Two hundred and forty‐two patients with visually 30–70% coronary stenosis were enrolled at four centers. FFR was measured first with the MEMS‐PMC, and then with the PW. The primary endpoint was the Bland–Altman mean bias between the MEMS‐PMC and PW FFR.

Results

From the 224‐patient per‐protocol data, quantitative coronary angiography showed 17.9% and 55.9% vessels had diameter < 2.5 mm and stenosis >50%, respectively. The two systems' mean bias was −0.01 with [−0.08, 0.06] 95% limits‐of‐agreement. Using PW FFR≤0.80 as cutoff, the MEMS‐PMC per‐vessel diagnostic accuracy was 93.4% [95% confidence interval: 89.4–96.3%]. The MEMS‐PMC's success rate was similar to that of PW (97.5 vs. 96.3%, p = .43) with no serious adverse event, and its clinically‐significant (>0.03) drift rate was 43% less (9.5 vs. 16.7%, p = .014).

Conclusions

Our study showed the MEMS‐PMC is safe to use and has a minimal bias equal to the resolution of current FFR systems. Given the MEMS‐PMC's high measurement accuracy and rapid‐exchange nature, it may become an attractive new tool facilitating routine coronary physiology assessment.

Pericoronary adipose tissue CT attenuation and volume: Diagnostic performance for hemodynamically significant stenosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic abilities of both pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) CT attenuation and volume for the predication hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis as evaluated by fractional flow reserve (FFR).

METHODS

Patients with ≥ 30 % in at least 1 major epicardial coronary artery were retrospectively included. Furthermore, all eligible patients underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as well as FFR within 1 month. PCAT CT attenuation and volume around ischemic and non-ischemic coronary stenosis were measured and compared. The diagnostic accuracy of PCAT CT attenuation and volume for the identification of hemodynamically significant stenosis was determined against the reference standard of FFR ≤ 0.80.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients (mean age, 57.8 years ± 11.8) with 77 vessels were included. Average PCAT CT attenuation of all vessels was -70.3 ± 7.4 HU. PCAT CT attenuation in coronary arteries with hemodynamically significant stenosis (FFR ≤ 0.80) (-65.6 ± 5.9 HU) was significantly higher than those with FFR > 0.80 (-75.3 ± 5.4 HU; p = 0.000). There was a strong correlation between FFR and PCAT CT attenuation (r = 0.64, p < 0.001). However, no significant difference in PCAT volume was observed between FFR ≤ 0.8 (5.0 ± 3.5 cm³) and FFR > 0.80 (5.5 ± 3.7 cm³, p = 0.511). The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the combination of CCTA and PCAT CT attenuation compared with CCTA alone (area under the curve: 0.869 vs. 0.569, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PCAT CT attenuation but not volume was related to the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. For the patients with suspected coronary artery disease, after adding of PCAT CT attenuation to CCTA, the diagnostic ability for the identification of ischemic coronary stenosis was significantly improved.

Splenic switch-off as a predictor for coronary adenosine response: validation against 13N-ammonia during co-injection myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner

BACKGROUND

Inadequate coronary adenosine response is a potential cause for false negative ischemia testing. Recently, the splenic switch-off (SSO) sign has been identified as a promising tool to ascertain the efficacy of adenosine during vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We assessed the value of SSO to predict adenosine response, defined as an increase in myocardial blood flow (MBF) during quantitative stress myocardial perfusion 13 N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 64 patients who underwent simultaneous CMR and PET myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner with co-injection of gadolinium based contrast agent (GBCA) and 13N-ammonia during rest and adenosine-induced stress. A myocardial flow reserve (MFR) of  > 1.5 or ischemia as assessed by PET were defined as markers for adequate coronary adenosine response. The presence or absence of SSO was visually assessed. The stress-to-rest intensity ratio (SIR) was calculated as the ratio of stress over rest peak signal intensity for splenic tissue. Additionally, the spleen-to-myocardium ratio, defined as the relative change of spleen to myocardial signal, was calculated for stress (SMRstress) and rest.

RESULTS

Sixty-one (95%) patients were coronary adenosine responders, but SSO was absent in 18 (28%) patients. SIR and SMRstress were significantly lower in patients with SSO (SIR: 0.56 ± 0.13 vs. 0.93 ± 0.23; p < 0.001 and SMRstress: 1.09 ± 0.47 vs. 1.68 ± 0.62; p < 0.001). Mean hyperemic and rest MBF were 2.12 ± 0.68 ml/min/g and 0.78 ± 0.26 ml/min/g, respectively. MFR was significantly higher in patients with vs. patients without presence of SSO (3.07 ± 1.03 vs. 2.48 ± 0.96; p = 0.038), but there was only a weak inverse correlation between SMRstress and MFR (R = -0.378; p = 0.02) as well as between SIR and MFR (R = -0.356; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of SSO implies adequate coronary adenosine-induced MBF response. Its absence, however, is not a reliable indicator for failed adenosine-induced coronary vasodilatation.

Diagnostic utility and safety of intracoronary nicorandil as a hyperemic agent for the measurement of fractional flow reserve

We investigated the diagnostic utility and safety of intracoronary bolus administration of nicorandil compared with intravenous administration of adenosine for evaluating FFR in patients with intermediate (40-70%) coronary stenosis. The FFR values obtained with nicorandil and adenosine showed linear relationship. This correlation is statistically significant with regression coefficient of 0.932 (R2 = 0.834, p < 0.001). The side effects such as bronchospasm, hypotension, and bradycardia were significantly higher after administration of adenosine compared to nicorandil (20% vs. 1.66%, p = 0.001). Intracoronary use of nicorandil seems to be promising in offering the advantages of lesser side effects, similar efficacy, and lesser cost as compared to adenosine.

Contrast FFR plus intracoronary injection of nitro-glycerine accurately predicts FFR for coronary stenosis functional assessment

BACKGROUND

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the "gold standard" for assessing the physiological significance of coronary disease. In the last decade, several alternative adenosine-free indexes have been proposed in order to facilitate the dissemination of the functional evaluation of coronary stenosis. Our aim was to investigate whether radiographic contrast plus intracoronary nitroglycerin (cFFR-NTG) can predict functional assessment of coronary stenosis offering superior diagnostic agreement with FFR compared to non-hyperemic indexes and contrast mediated FFR (cFFR).

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-nine lesions evaluated with pressure wire in 266 patients were prospectively included in this multicenter study.

RESULTS

The ROC curves for cFFR-NTG using an FFR≤0.80 showed a higher accuracy in predicting FFR (AUC=0.97) than resting Pd/Pa (AUC=0.90, P<0.01) and cFFR (AUC=0.93.5, P<0.01). A significant (P<0.01) strong correlation was found between FFR and the four analyzed indexes: Pd/Pa (r=0.78); iFR/RFR (r=0.73); cFFR(r=0.89) and cFFR-NTG (r=0.93). cFFR-NTG showed the closest agreement at Bland-Altman analysis. The cFFR-NTG cut off value >0.84 showed the highest negative predictive value (88%), specificity (91%), sensitivity (94%) and accuracy (92%) of the studied indexes.

CONCLUSIONS

Submaximal hyperemic adenosine-free indexes are an efficient alternative to adenosine for the physiological assessment of epicardial coronary disease. The most accurate index in predicting the functional significance of coronary stenosis using FFR as reference was cFFR-NTG.

Impact of instantaneous wave-free ratio on graft failure after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess an impact of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) on a graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 131 coronary arteries from 88 patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography, intracoronary pressure measurements, CABG, and scheduled follow-up coronary computed tomography angiography within one year were investigated. All studied arteries had FFR <0.80. The rate of graft failure was significantly higher in vessels with negative iFR (>0.89) than in those with positive iFR (<0.89) (25.7% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.012). The graft failure rates increased as the preoperative iFR values rose (iFR <0.80, 3.3%; iFR: 0.80-0.84, 5.6%; iFR: 0.85-0.89, 16.0%; iFR: 0.90-0.94, 28.0%; and iFR: 0.95-1.00, 50.0%; p = 0.002). A cut-off value of iFR to predict graft failures was determined as 0.84 by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 88%, 62%, 25%, 97%, and 66%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of graft failure becomes higher, as the preoperative iFR increases. The graft failure is significantly more frequent when a bypass graft is anastomosed on vessels with negative iFR than those with positive iFR.

Impact of Age on the Functional Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses With Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve

The optimal strategy for assessing the ischemic significance of intermediate coronary stenoses with adenosine-induced fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is still debated. Few studies have previously assessed the impact of age on FFR and iFR, which was the aim of our study. Patients undergoing FFR and iFR evaluation for intermediate (40%-70%) coronary lesions were included and divided according to age. Fractional flow reserve was performed by intracoronary boluses of adenosine (60-1440 μg). Instantaneous wave-free ratio was automatically calculated. Among 148 patients undergoing FFR measurement of 166 lesions, 45.3% were ≥70 years. Elderly patients had higher minimal lumen diameter (P = .03). We also observed a linear relationship between iFR and FFR independently of age. Fractional flow reserve values were higher in the elderly patients, whereas iFR was not related to age. A total of 33 lesions had a positive iFR with no difference for age (17.3% vs 22%, P = .56), while FFR <0.80 was more infrequent in the elderly patients (17.1% vs 34.8%, P = .02). In intermediate coronary stenoses, iFR and FFR correlation is unaffected by age. Fractional flow reserve is higher in the elderly patients, whereas iFR is less affected by age. Future large-scale studies are needed to define whether iFR should be the preferred choice in elderly patients.

Determinants and prognostic implications of instantaneous wave-free ratio in patients with mild to intermediate coronary stenosis: Comparison with those of fractional flow reserve

The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is used for assessing the hemodynamic severity of a lesion, as an alternative to the fractional flow reserve (FFR). We evaluated the relationship between iFR and FFR in detail and the clinical significance of iFR in patients with mild to intermediate coronary artery stenosis. We recruited consecutive 323 patients (421 lesions) with lesions exhibiting 30% to 80% diameter stenosis on angiography in whom FFR and iFR were measured. In the total lesions, mean diameter stenosis was 48.6% ± 9.0%, and physiological significance, defined by FFR of 0.80 or less or by iFR of 0.92 or less, was observed in 32.5% or 33.5%, respectively. Mismatch between iFR and FFR was observed in 18.1% of the lesions. Clinical factors did not predict FFR value; however, gender, diabetes mellitus, aortic stenosis, anemia, high-sensitivity CRP value, and renal function predicted iFR value. In multivariate logistic analysis after adjustment for FFR value, gender (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.005), aortic stenosis (p = 0.016), high-sensitivity CRP (p < 0.001), and renal function (p = 0.003) were all independent predictors of iFR value. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the baseline iFR predicted the subsequent major cardiovascular events (MACE) (hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.16–4.93; p = 0.018) and the results of the iFR-guided strategy for predicting rates of MACE and myocardial infarction/revascularization were superior to those of the FFR-guided strategy. In conclusion, significant clinical factors predicted iFR value, which affected the prognostic capacity. The iFR-guided strategy may be superior in patients with mild to intermediate stenosis.

Effect of QTU prolongation on hyperemic instantaneous wave-free ratio value: a prospective single-center study

We hypothesized that in patients with QT prolongation, resistance might not decrease in the wave-free period, because QTU prolongation cannot be detected by instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) analysis software. We investigated whether corrected QTU (QTUc) prolongation affects the hyperemic iFR value. Forty-two consecutive patients with intermediate stenosis (≥ 50%) in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) were analyzed. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and hyperemic iFR were simultaneously and continuously recorded with intravenous adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and papaverine infusions. In 17 patients with stenosis in the proximal LAD, coronary flow was measured. Patients were divided into two groups according to the median absolute deviation of the QTUc by ATP administration/QTUc by papaverine administration. FFR, hyperemic iFR, and flow data were compared between each stimulus and group. Moreover, influences of pressure and electrocardiogram parameters on differences in iFR values under ATP and papaverine administration were compared between the following two groups (group 1: the absolute difference of hyperemic iFR values between ATP and papaverine administration is ≤ 0.05; group 2: that is > 0.05). The paired t test and t test were used in analysis. Hyperemic iFR values of patients under the use of papaverine were lower than those of patients under the use of ATP when QTUc was more prolonged by papaverine administration than by ATP administration (ATP 0.74 ± 0.14, papaverine 0.71 ± 0.15, P = 0.025). No significant differences were observed in the FFR value and flow data between the groups. Regarding QTU, QTUc, and QTUc by ATP/QTUc by papaverine, significant differences were observed between group 1 and group 2. Pressure parameters did not induce significant differences. QTUc prolongation induced by papaverine was associated with lower hyperemic iFR values. An iFR-based assessment might lead to inappropriate treatment of patients with QTUc prolongation.

Splenic Switch-Off for Determining the Optimal Dosage for Adenosine Stress Cardiac MR in Terms of Stress Effectiveness and Patient Safety

BACKGROUND

Adenosine stress MRI is well established for the evaluation of known and suspected coronary artery disease. However, a proportion of patients might be "under-stressed" using the standard adenosine dose.

PURPOSE

To compare three different adenosine dosages for stress MRI in terms of stress adequacy based on splenic switch-off (SSO) and limiting side effects.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

In all, 100 patients were randomized in group 1 (33 pts), group 2 (34 pts), and group 3 (33 pts), receiving dosages of 140 μg/kg/min, 175 μg/kg/min, or 210 μg/kg/min, respectively. SSO was evaluated visually and quantitatively.

SEQUENCE

Stress perfusion was performed using a 1.5T scanner in three short axes using a standard single-shot, saturation recovery gradient-echo sequence.

ASSESSMENT

Three blinded experienced operators evaluated SSO on stress and rest perfusion acquisitions in the three groups. The signal intensity of the spleen and myocardium and the presence of inducible ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement were assessed.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

T-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-squared test, and Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

SSO was present more frequently in patients receiving 175 μg/kg/min and 210 μg/kg/min (31/33 [94%] and 27/29 [93%], respectively) compared to those receiving the standard dose (19/33 [58%], P < 0.05). A positive stress result was noted in 3/33 (9%) patients receiving 140 μg/kg/min vs. 9/33 (27%) patients receiving 175 μg/kg/min and 10/31 (33%) patients receiving 210 μg/kg/min (P < 0.05 for all, P < 0.05 for group 1 vs. groups 2, 3). The relative decrease of splenic signal intensity at hyperemia vs. baseline was significantly lower in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (-33% vs. -54%, -56%, respectively; P < 0.05). No adverse events during scanning were noted in groups 1 and 2, whereas in group 3 four examinations were stopped due to severe dyspnea (n = 2) and AV-blockage (n = 2).

DATA CONCLUSION

A dosage of 175 μg/kg/min adenosine results in a higher proportion of SSO, which may be an indirect marker of adequate coronary vasodilatation and simultaneously offers similar safety compared to the standard 140 μg/kg/min dosage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2020;52:1732-1742.

Relationship between adenosine A2a receptor polymorphism rs5751876 and fractional flow reserve during percutaneous coronary intervention

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessed during adenosine-induced maximal hyperemia has emerged as a useful tool for the guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, interindividual variability in the response to adenosine has been claimed as a major limitation to the use of adenosine for the measurement of FFR, carrying the risk of underestimating the severity of coronary stenoses, with potential negative prognostic consequences. Genetic variants of the adenosine receptor A2a (ADORA2A gene), located in the coronary circulation, have been involved in the modulation of the hyperemic response to adenosine. However, no study has so far evaluated the impact of the single nucleotide polymorphism rs5751876 of ADORA2A on the measurement of FFR in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention that was, therefore, the aim of our study. We included patients undergoing coronary angiography and FFR assessment for intermediate (40-70%) coronary lesions. FFR measurement was performed by pressure-recording guidewire (Prime Wire, Volcano), after induction of hyperemia with intracoronary boli of adenosine (from 60 to 1440 μg, with dose doubling at each step). Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was performed to assess the presence of rs5751876 C>T polymorphism of ADORA2a receptor. We included 204 patients undergoing FFR measurement of 231 coronary lesions. A total of 134 patients carried the polymorphism (T allele), of whom 41 (30.6%) in homozygosis (T/T).Main clinical and angiographic features did not differ according to ADORA2A genotype. The rs5751876 C>T polymorphism did not affect mean FFR values (p = 0.91), the percentage of positive FFR (p = 0.54) and the duration of maximal hyperemia. However, the time to recovery to baseline FFR values was more prolonged among the T-allele carriers as compared to wild-type patients (p = 0.04). Based on these results, in patients with intermediate coronary stenoses undergoing FFR assessment with adenosine, the polymorphism rs5751876 of ADORA2A does not affect the peak hyperemic response to adenosine and the results of FFR. However, a more prolonged effect of adenosine was observed in T-carriers.

Feasibility of intracoronary nicorandil for inducing hyperemia on fractional flow reserve measurement: Comparison with intracoronary papaverine

BACKGROUND

Adenosine and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) are widely used to induce hyperemia for fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements. Caffeine attenuates their hyperemic effects, but not those of nicorandil and papaverine. No studies have systematically compared the hyperemic efficacies of nicorandil, papaverine, and ATP with and without caffeine abstention.

METHODS

FFRs were measured using nicorandil 2 mg (FFR_NC2), nicorandil 4 mg (FFR_NC4), and papaverine (FFR_PAP) in 40 patients (group 1), and using nicorandil 2 mg, ATP (FFR_ATP), ATP plus nicorandil (FFR_ATP+NC2), and papaverine in 20 patients with (group 2) and in 20 patients without caffeine abstention (group 3).

RESULTS

In group 1, FFR_NC2 and FFR_NC4 did not differ (p = 0.321) and were higher than FFR_PAP (p < 0.001 and p = 0.0026). Likewise, FFR_NC2 was higher than FFR_PAP in groups 2 (p = 0.049) and 3 (p < 0.010). In the whole group, Bland-Altman analysis showed a modest mean difference (0.015, p < 0.001) and narrow 95% limits of agreement (-0.025 and 0.056). FFR_NC2 and FFR_PAP strongly correlated (r = 0.975, p < 0.001). Compared with FFR_PAP, FFR_ATP and FFR_ATP+NC2 did not differ in group 2 (p = 1.0 and p = 0.780), but they were higher (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02) in group 3. Adjunctive nicorandil did not decline FFR further in groups 2 (p = 0.942) and 3 (p = 0.294).

CONCLUSIONS

Nicorandil 2 mg is a safe and practical alternative for patients who consume caffeine-containing products before the test or have contraindications for adenosine/ATP. Increasing the nicorandil dose to 4 mg or administering adjunctive nicorandil during ATP infusions does not offer any clinical advantages compared with administering nicorandil 2 mg alone.

Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Fractional Flow Reserve versus Quantitative Flow Ratio for Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses

Background. Use of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) technique is recommended to evaluate coronary stenosis severity and guide revascularization. However, its high cost, time to administer, and the side effects of adenosine reduce its clinical utility. Two novel adenosine-free indices, contrast-FFR (cFFR) and quantitative flow ratio (QFR), can simplify the functional evaluation of coronary stenosis. This study aimed to analyze the diagnostic performance of cFFR and QFR using FFR as a reference index. Methods. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in which cFFR or QFR was compared to FFR. A bivariate model was applied to pool diagnostic parameters. Cochran’s Q test and the I2 index were used to assess heterogeneity and identify the potential source of heterogeneity by metaregression and sensitivity analysis. Results. Overall, 2220 and 3000 coronary lesions from 20 studies were evaluated by cFFR and QFR, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.91) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94) for cFFR and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.91) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.93) for QFR, respectively. No statistical significance of sensitivity and specificity for cFFR and QFR were observed in the bivariate analysis (P=0.8406 and 0.4397, resp.). The area under summary receiver-operating curve of cFFR and QFR was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97) for cFFR and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97). Conclusion. Both cFFR and QFR have good diagnostic performance in detecting functional severity of coronary arteries and showed similar diagnostic parameters.

Acute alterations in glucose homeostasis impact coronary microvascular function in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Background

Microvascular dysfunction in the setting of ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) is thought to be related to stress-related metabolic changes, including acute glucose intolerance. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between admission glucose levels and microvascular function in non-diabetic STEMI patients.

Methods

92 consecutive patients with a first anterior-wall STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) were enrolled. Blood glucose levels were determined immediately prior to PPCI. After successful PPCI, at 1‑week and 6‑month follow-up, Doppler flow was measured in culprit and reference coronary arteries to calculate coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), baseline (BMR) and hyperaemic (HMR) microvascular resistance.

Results

The median admission glucose was 8.3 (7.2–9.6) mmol/l respectively 149.4 mg/dl [129.6–172.8] and was significantly associated with peak troponin T (standardised beta coefficient [std beta] = 0.281; p = 0.043). Multivariate analysis revealed that increasing glucose levels were significantly associated with a decrease in reference vessel CFVR (std beta = −0.313; p = 0.002), dictated by an increase in rest average peak velocity (APV) (std beta = 0.216; p = 0.033), due to a decreasing BMR (std beta = −0.225; p = 0.038) in the acute setting after PPCI. These associations disappeared at follow-up. These associations were not found for the infarct-related artery.

Conclusion

Elevated admission glucose levels are associated with impaired microvascular function assessed directly after PPCI in first anterior-wall STEMI. This influence of glucose levels is an acute phenomenon and contributes to microvascular dysfunction through alterations in resting flow and baseline microvascular resistance.

A Highly-sensitized Response of B-type Natriuretic Peptide to Cardiac Ischaemia Quantified by Intracoronary Pressure Measurements

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) secretion is stimulated by cardiac dysfunction. However, it is unclear how finely myocardial ischaemia contributes to BNP secretion and whether increases in BNP secretion contribute to coronary vasodilation. This study investigated the direct interaction between plasma BNP levels and cardiac ischaemia using the baseline distal-to-aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa). We examined the baseline Pd/Pa and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in 167 patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. The plasma BNP level appeared to be associated with the baseline Pd/Pa in the study population, and this association appeared to become clear only in patients with an FFR ≤ 0.80. To examine the effect of the baseline Pd/Pa on the BNP level in these patients, structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed. The baseline Pd/Pa significantly affected the BNP level (β: -0.37, p = 0.003) and the left ventricular ejection fraction (β: 0.43, p = 0.001). To examine the role of BNP in coronary vasodilation, we proposed another path model using a novel value obtained by dividing the FFR by the baseline Pd/Pa (FFR/baseline Pd/Pa) as an index of the hyperaemic response. The BNP level significantly affected the FFR/baseline Pd/Pa (β: 0.48, p = 0.037). This study demonstrated that BNP finely responded to an exacerbation of cardiac ischaemia and that increases in BNP secretion effectively ameliorated coronary vasoconstriction.

Individual Lesion-Level Meta-Analysis Comparing Various Doses of Intracoronary Bolus Injection of Adenosine With Intravenous Administration of Adenosine for Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment

BACKGROUND

Intravenous infusion of adenosine is considered standard practice for fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment but is associated with adverse side-effects and is time-consuming. Intracoronary bolus injection of adenosine is better tolerated by patients, cheaper, and less time-consuming. However, current literature remains fragmented and modestly sized regarding the equivalence of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine. We aim to investigate the relationship between intracoronary adenosine and intravenous adenosine to determine FFR.

METHODS

We performed a lesion-level meta-analysis to compare intracoronary adenosine with intravenous adenosine (140 µg/kg per minute) for FFR assessment. The search was conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. Lesion-level data were obtained by contacting the respective authors or by digitization of scatterplots using custom-made software. Intracoronary adenosine dose was defined as; low: <40 µg, intermediate: 40 to 99 µg, and high: ≥100 µg.

RESULTS

We collected 1972 FFR measurements (1413 lesions) comparing intracoronary with intravenous adenosine from 16 studies. There was a strong correlation (correlation coefficient =0.915; P<0.001) between intracoronary-FFR and intravenous-FFR. Mean FFR was 0.81±0.11 for intracoronary adenosine and 0.81±0.11 for intravenous adenosine (P<0.001). We documented a nonclinically relevant mean difference of 0.006 (limits of agreement: -0.066 to 0.078) between the methods. When stratified by the intracoronary adenosine dose, mean differences between intracoronary and intravenous-FFR amounted to 0.004, 0.011, or 0.000 FFR units for low-dose, intermediate-dose, and high-dose intracoronary adenosine, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study documents clinically irrelevant differences in FFR values obtained with intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine. Intracoronary adenosine hence confers a practical and patient-friendly alternative for intravenous adenosine for FFR assessment.

[Echocardiographic Stress Test with Adenosine Triphosphate: Optimization of the Algorithm]

PURPOSE

To: 1) optimize algorithm of stress echocardiography (s-Echo) with intravenous adenosine triphosphate (ATP) infusion taking into account pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ATP in human body, 2) test new algorithm in patients with coronary and other heart diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In order to determine spectrum of factors influencing the results of stress test with ATP we inspected main scientific data bases and found 48 publications on ATP application for diagnostic purposes. Analysis of these publications allowed us to optimize algorithm of ATP s-Echo. Optimized algorithm was tested on 26 subjects, who underwent ATP 4D strain-stress-echocardiography of the left ventricle.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Optimized algorithm has three stages: registration of Echo data sets before, at the time of ATP infusion, and after 5 min of ATP infusion termination. Registration of Echo parameters at the second stage must begin not earlier than 3 min after the onset of ATP infusion and only in the presence of signs of coronary vasodilation. We think that the main indirect criterion of submaximal coronary vasodilation is 5 mm Hg or more decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP), but not below SBP level of 90 mm Hg. Initial dose of ATP is 140 µg/kg/min. If after 2 min of infusion SBP do not diminish we increase the infusion rate at first to 175 and then to 210 µg/kg/min. While testing new algorithm in all cases we have achieved criteria of effective vasodilation. Mean SBP decrease was 16.4±13.7 mm Hg, heart rate increase - 12.7±8.1 bpm. In all patients we obtained interpretable 4D LV Echo data sets for visual analysis of local contractility and automatic strain analysis.

CONCLUSION

Optimization of ATP s-Echo algorithm was performed. Safety and efficacy of optimized algorythm for registration of echo data was demonstrated. New ATP infusion algorithm can also be recommended for testing with other cardiac imaging modalities in evaluation of myocardial perfusion and contractility (SPECT, CT, MRI, PET).

Clinical and angiographic factors predicting fractional flow reserve and explaining the visual-functional mismatch in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been reported, and the underlying reason remains poorly understood. Therefore, the relationship between angiographic measurements and FFR was evaluated, and predictors for FFR in intermediate coronary artery stenosis were determined.

METHODS

Consecutive 314 patients (405 lesions) with a lesion of 30-80% angiographic diameter stenosis who underwent invasive FFR were recruited. The myocardial area supplied by the coronary artery distal to the stenosis was evaluated using a modified version of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) score. Participants underwent follow-up, and major cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization were recorded.

RESULTS

Although % diameter stenosis was correlated with FFR (R = 0.279, P < 0.001), diameter stenosis-FFR mismatch was observed in 37.8% of the lesions. Although FFR values were not associated with clinical factors, such as age, sex, and comorbidities, it was correlated with minimal lumen diameter (MLD), diffuse lesion, presence of proximal lesion, and BARI score. In addition, the lesions in left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery showed low FFR values compared with those in the left circumflex coronary artery or right coronary artery. In multivariate logistic analysis, MLD (β coefficient = 0.330), diffuse lesion (β coefficient = -0.266), proximal lesion (β coefficient = -0.144), BARI score (β coefficient = -0.219), and LAD lesion (β coefficient = -0.293) were all independent predictors for FFR value. The estimated FFR value based on these factors showed smaller mismatch and higher sensitivity. No difference was observed in the event rates for MACE and MI or revascularization between the FFR-guided and estimated FFR-guided strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

MLD, diffuse lesion, proximal lesion, BARI score, and lesion vessel were independent predictors for FFR in intermediate coronary stenosis. Not only the extent of local lesion stenosis but also the amount of myocardial supply and the lesion location may determine the physiological significance and explain the visual-functional mismatch. The estimation of FFR by these factors may be useful in clinical practice.

Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions

Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR in de novo lesion treatment with PCB. Baseline, post-balloon and 9-month angiographical parameters were obtained from 116 lesions of 104 patients. The cutoff value of iFR after balloon angioplasty used to define functionally nonsignificant residual stenotic lesions was 0.86 and they were subdivided into PCB or Stent group according to the treated device. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss at 9 months and the secondary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 3 years. Fifty-eight lesions were treated with PCB only and 58 lesions were treated with metal stent implantation. There were no differences in iFR between PCB and Stent groups at baseline (0.76 ± 0.19 vs. 0.73 ± 0.23, p = 0.630) and after procedure (0.93 ± 0.04 vs. 0.94 ± 0.05, p = 0.574). At 9 months, late lumen loss was significantly lower in PCB group compared with Stent group (0.04 ± 0.32 mm vs. 0.59 ± 0.77 mm, p = 0.001). At 3-year follow-up, TVF were not different between the treatment groups (5.2% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.453). PCB treatment guided by iFR measured right after balloon angioplasty is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions with good angiographic results at 9 months and similar clinical outcomes at 3 years compared to stent group.

Assessment of Cerebral Vasodilatory Capacity as Part of Catheter-Based Cerebral Angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cerebral vasodilatory capacity assessment for risk stratification in patients with extracranial arterial stenosis or occlusion may be useful. We describe a new method that assesses cerebral vasodilatory capacity as part of catheter-based cerebral angiography.

METHODS

We prospectively assessed regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) in the arterial distribution of interest using a controlled contrast injection in the common carotid or the subclavian arteries. rCBV maps were created using a predefined algorithm based on contrast distribution in the venous phase (voxel size: .466 mm³ ). rCBV maps were acquired again after selective administration of intra-arterial nicardipine (2.0 mg) distal to the stenosis. Two independent observers graded the change in rCBV in 10 predefined anatomical regions within the tributaries of the artery of interest (0 = reduction, 1 = no change, 2 = increase) and total rCBV change scores were summated.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with internal carotid artery stenosis (n = 18; 0-90% in severity) or extracranial vertebral artery stenosis (n = 7; 0-100% in severity) were assessed. There was an increase in rCBV in a tributary of the artery of interest in 18 of 25 after intra-arterial nicardipine (mean score: 11.98; range 0-19.5). There was no change or decrease in rCBV in 7 of 25 patients. The mean rCBV change score was similar in patients with an assessment of internal carotid artery or vertebral artery distributions (12.2 ± 5.3; 11.4 ± 2.5; P = .68).

CONCLUSION

Selective vasodilatory response to intra-arterial nicardipine in the affected arterial distribution during catheter-based cerebral angiography may provide new data for risk stratification.