Improvement of impaired myocardial vasodilatation due to diffuse coronary atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemics after lipid-lowering therapy

Effect of rosuvastatin on coronary flow reserve in patients with systemic hypertension

Although statins reduce cardiac events in hypertensive patients with cardiovascular risk factors, the effect of statins on coronary flow reserve (CFR) has not been examined. We tried to examine the effect of rosuvastatin on CFR in hypertensive patients at cardiovascular risk. CFR was studied in 56 hypertensive patients (40 men, 61 ± 9 years) with cardiovascular risk factors and without coronary artery disease in a prospective clinical trial. Using Doppler echocardiography, coronary flow velocity in the distal left anterior descending artery was recorded at baseline and during intravenous adenosine infusion, and CFR was defined as the ratio of hyperemic to basal average peak diastolic flow velocity. The primary efficacy measure was defined as the change in CFR after rosuvastatin therapy for 12 months. CFR was measured successfully in 55 of 56 enrolled patients (98%). CFR was 3.16 ± 0.44 at baseline and negatively correlated with age (R = -0.30, p = 0.025). All patients continued rosuvastatin 10 mg/day without any serious adverse events. After rosuvastatin therapy, serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein significantly decreased from 222 ± 18 to 142 ± 20 mg/dl, 148 ± 21 to 85 ± 18 mg/dl, and 1.7 ± 2.9 to 1.2 ± 3.1 mg/L, respectively (all p <0.01). CFR significantly increased from 3.16 ± 0.44 to 3.31 ± 0.42 (p <0.001). The change in CFR correlated with the change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (R = -0.28, p = 0.040) but not with the change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. In conclusion, CFR was significantly improved after 12 months of rosuvastatin therapy in hypertensive patients at cardiovascular risk and average levels of serum cholesterol.

Quantitative cardiac positron emission tomography: the time is coming!

In the last 20 years, the use of positron emission tomography (PET) has grown dramatically because of its oncological applications, and PET facilities are now easily accessible. At the same time, various groups have explored the specific advantages of PET in heart disease and demonstrated the major diagnostic and prognostic role of quantitation in cardiac PET. Nowadays, different approaches for the measurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) have been developed and implemented in user-friendly programs. There is large evidence that MBF at rest and under stress together with the calculation of coronary flow reserve are able to improve the detection and prognostication of coronary artery disease. Moreover, quantitative PET makes possible to assess the presence of microvascular dysfunction, which is involved in various cardiac diseases, including the early stages of coronary atherosclerosis, hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy, and hypertensive heart disease. Therefore, it is probably time to consider the routine use of quantitative cardiac PET and to work for defining its place in the clinical scenario of modern cardiology.

Assessment of advanced coronary artery disease: advantages of quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion analysis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this paper was to compare quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion imaging to qualitative interpretation for determining the presence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

Adenosine CMR can detect CAD by measuring perfusion reserve (PR) or by qualitative interpretation (QI).

METHODS

Forty-one patients with an abnormal nuclear stress scheduled for X-ray angiography underwent dual-bolus adenosine CMR. Segmental myocardial perfusion analyzed using both QI and PR by Fermi function deconvolution was compared to quantitative coronary angiography.

RESULTS

In the 30 patients with complete quantitative data, PR (mean +/- SD) decreased stepwise as coronary artery stenosis (CAS) severity increased: 2.42 +/- 0.94 for <50%, 2.14 +/- 0.87 for 50% to 70%, and 1.85 +/- 0.77 for >70% (p < 0.001). The PR and QI had similar diagnostic accuracies for detection of CAS >50% (83% vs. 80%), and CAS >70% (77% vs. 67%). Agreement between observers was higher for quantitative analysis than for qualitative analysis. Using PR, patients with triple-vessel CAD had a higher burden of detectable ischemia than patients with single-vessel CAD (60% vs. 25%; p = 0.02), whereas no difference was detected by QI (31% vs. 21%; p = 0.26). In segments with myocardial scar (n = 64), PR was 3.10 +/- 1.34 for patients with CAS <50% (n = 18) and 1.91 +/- 0.96 for CAS >50% (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative PR by CMR differentiates moderate from severe stenoses in patients with known or suspected CAD. The PR analysis differentiates triple- from single-vessel CAD, whereas QI does not, and determines the severity of CAS subtending myocardial scar. This has important implications for assessment of prognosis and therapeutic decision making.

Quantification of myocardial blood flow: what is the clinical role?

Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow and of its responses to targeted physiologic and pharmacologic interventions, which is now available with positron emitting tracers of blood flow and positron emission tomography (PET), extends the diagnostic potential of standard myocardial perfusion imaging. These noninvasive flow measurements serve as tools for quantifying functional consequences of epicardial coronary artery disease, as well as of impairments in microcirculatory reactivity that escape detection by standard perfusion imaging. Flow measurements are clinically useful for more comprehensively assessing the extent and severity of coronary vascular disease or impairments in microcirculatory function in noncoronary cardiac disease. Flow estimates in these disorders contain independent or unique prognostic information about future major cardiac events. Flow measurements are also useful for assessing the coronary risk, for predicting long-term cardiovascular events, and for monitoring the effectiveness of risk reduction strategies.

Positron emission tomography in coronary artery disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mortality and coronary events are dramatically reduced in coronary artery disease by intense lifestyle and pharmacologic management without further improvement by revascularization procedures, thereby requiring definitive noninvasive diagnostic imaging. Consequently, this review summarizes the evidence supporting cardiac positron emission tomography as a definitive, noninvasive, 'one-stop' test for routine management of coronary artery disease that is well validated in the scientific literature and illustrated by clinical cases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Substantial evidence documents accuracy of positron emission tomography for identifying early or advanced coronary artery disease, quantifying its severity, risk stratification, deciding on revascularization procedures, following progression or regression and for evaluating coronary endothelial function as the basis for preventive treatment. Recent technology like positron emission tomography-computed tomography, however, requires advanced knowledge, training and attention to technical details to avoid common artifactual results and to provide definitive conclusions illustrated in this review.

SUMMARY

Cardiac positron emission tomography, done correctly with attention to technical details, provides definitive noninvasive assessment of early or advanced coronary atherosclerosis as the basis for invasive procedures or for lifelong intense risk factor management, demonstrates progression or regression of disease, predicts clinical outcomes and serves as the primary definitive noninvasive guide for managing coronary artery disease.

Will 3-dimensional PET-CT enable the routine quantification of myocardial blood flow?

Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and flow reserve has been used extensively with positron emission tomography (PET) to investigate the functional significance of coronary artery disease. Increasingly, flow quantification is being applied to investigations of microvascular dysfunction in early atherosclerosis and in nonatherosclerotic microvascular disease associated with primary and secondary cardiomyopathies. Fully three-dimensional (3D) acquisition is becoming the standard imaging mode on new equipment, bringing with it certain challenges for cardiac PET, but also the potential for MBF to be measured simultaneously with routine electrocardiography (ECG)-gated perfusion imaging. Existing 3D versus 2D comparative studies support the use of 3D cardiac PET for flow quantification, and these protocols can be translated to PET-CT, which offers a virtually noise-free attenuation correction. This technology combines the strengths of cardiac CT for evaluation of anatomy with cardiac PET for quantification of the hemodynamic impact on the myocardium. High throughput clinical imaging protocols are needed to evaluate the incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of this technology.

Myocardial flow reserve is influenced by both coronary artery stenosis severity and coronary risk factors in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

PURPOSE

Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measurement has an important role in assessing the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis. However, a discrepancy between the anatomical severity of coronary artery stenosis and MFR is often observed. Such a discrepancy may be explained by coronary risk factors. In this study, we aimed to investigate the influence of coronary artery stenosis severity and risk factors on MFR.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients suspected to have coronary artery disease and seven age-matched healthy volunteers were enrolled. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MFR were measured using 15O-labelled water PET. Regional MFR was calculated in regions with significant coronary artery stenosis (stenotic regions) and in regions without significant stenosis (remote regions). The contributions of coronary artery stenosis severity and coronary risk factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In stenotic regions, MFR correlated inversely with coronary artery stenosis severity (r=-0.50, p<0.01). Univariate analysis did not show any significant difference in MFR between the patients with and the patients without each risk factor. In remote regions, however, MFR was significantly decreased in the diabetes and smoking groups (each p<0.05). By multivariate analysis, diabetes and smoking were independent predictors of MFR (each p<0.05). In the group with more than one risk factor, MFR was significantly lower (2.78+/-0.79) than in the other group (3.40+/-1.22, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

MFR is influenced not only by coronary stenosis severity but also by coronary risk factors. In particular, the influence of risk factors should be considered in regions without severe coronary stenosis.

Effect of simvastatin on coronary flow reserve in patients with atherosclerosis and hypercholesterolemia: an intracoronary Doppler study

BACKGROUND

Early stages of coronary atherosclerosis are accompanied by a functional impairment of coronary vasodilator capacity and endothelial dysfunction. Reduced coronary flow reserve has been reported in patients with hypercholesterolemia, despite angiographically normal coronary arteries. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of simvastatin on coronary flow reserve.

METHODS

The study was an open non-placebo-controlled serial investigation in which every patient acted as his own control: 36 male patients with hypercholesterolemia and a non-significant coronary artery lesion in a not previously revascularized coronary artery. Intracoronary Doppler measurements were performed. Coronary flow reserve, relative coronary flow reserve and average peak velocity were performed at baseline, after 3 months on a lipid-lowering diet (control period), and after another 12 months of simvastatin 40 mg/day. In the same patient cohort, significant reduction in lesion plaque plus media has been demonstrated by intravascular ultrasound.

RESULTS

Changes in coronary flow reserve were not influenced by either diet or simvastatin (2.5+/-0.6 vs. 2.6+/-0.5 vs. 2.6+/-0.6, P=ns). Maximum hyperemic flow (34.8+/-12.2 vs. 36.7+/-12.5 vs. 42.5+/-13.1, P<0.001) as well as resting flow (14.3+/-5.3 vs. 14.5+/-4.4 vs. 16.6+/-4.6, P<0.001) increased significantly after 12 months simvastatin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Despite plaque plus media, regression simvastatin therapy for 12 months does not affect coronary flow reserve obtained using serial intracoronary Doppler studies. Simvastatin, however, increases the hyperemic flow velocity.

Cardiac positron emission tomography imaging

Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has advanced from primarily a research tool to a practical, high-performance clinical imaging modality. The widespread availability of state-of-the-art PET gamma cameras, the commercial availability of perfusion and viability PET imaging tracers, reimbursement for PET perfusion and viability procedures by government and private health insurance plans, and the availability of computer software for image display of perfusion, wall motion, and viability images have all been a key to cardiac PET imaging becoming a routine clinical tool. Although myocardial perfusion PET imaging is an option for all patients requiring stress perfusion imaging, there are identifiable patient groups difficult to image with conventional single-photon emission computed tomography imaging that are particularly likely to benefit from PET imaging, such as obese patients, women, patients with previous nondiagnostic tests, and patients with poor left ventricular function attributable to coronary artery disease considered for revascularization. Myocardial PET perfusion imaging with rubidium-82 is noteworthy for high efficiency, rapid throughput, and in a high-volume setting, low operational costs. PET metabolic viability imaging continues to be a noninvasive standard for diagnosis of viability imaging. Cardiac PET imaging has been shown to be cost-effective. The potential of routine quantification of resting and stress blood flow and coronary flow reserve in response to pharmacologic and cold-pressor stress offers tantalizing possibilities of enhancing the power of PET myocardial perfusion imaging. This can be achieved by providing assurance of stress quality control, in enhancing diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease, and expanding diagnostic imaging into the realm of detection of early coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction subject to risk factor modification. Combined PET and x-ray computed tomography imaging (PET-CT) results in enhanced patient throughput and efficiency. The combination of multislice computed tomography scanners with PET opens possibilities of adding coronary calcium scoring and noninvasive coronary angiography to myocardial perfusion imaging and quantification. Evaluation of the clinical role of these creative new possibilities warrants investigation.

Elevated plasma endothelin-1 levels in coronary sinus during rapid right atrial pacing in patients with slow coronary flow

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether there was an imbalance between endothelin-1 (ET-1) and nitric oxide (NOx) release and diffuse atherosclerotic changes existed in patients with slow coronary flow (SCF). Baseline and post-atrial pacing coronary sinus ET-1 and NOx levels were measured in 19 patients with SCF (11 female, 56 +/- 9 years) and in 14 control subjects (nine female, 54 +/- 7 years). All patients underwent subsequent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) investigation at the same setting with right atrial pacing. Baseline arterial (12.4 +/- 9.9 vs. 6.3 +/- 5.1 pg/ml, P<0.005) and coronary sinus (12.2 +/- 11.1 vs. 6.4 +/- 6.9 pg/ml, P<0.005) ET-1 plasma levels were higher in patients than in controls. After atrial pacing, concentration of ET-1 level from coronary sinus (24.7 +/- 14.6) significantly increased as compared to baseline (12.4 +/- 9.9, P<0.0001) and control levels (5.3 +/- 6.3, P<0.0001). Additionally, coronary sinus ET-1 level increased significantly with atrial pacing compared to femoral artery ET-1 level (16.3 +/- 8.5, P<0.005) in patients with SCF. After atrial pacing, the femoral artery ET-1 level also increased in patients compared to control level (P<0.0001). No significant differences in arterial and coronary sinus NOx plasma levels were found between the two groups, both at baseline and after pacing. Upon IVUS investigation, the common finding was longitudinally extended massive calcification throughout the epicardial arteries in patients with SCF. Mean intimal thickness was 0.59 +/- 0.18 mm. The data of this study suggest that increased ET-1 levels and insufficient NOx response, as well as the pathological data of IVUS may be associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction and may be the manifestation of early diffuse epicardial atherosclerosis in these patients with SCF.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on worsening of the left ventricular ejection fraction in exercise-gated 201Tl myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in patients with coronary artery disease

It remains uncertain whether factors other than the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) are associated with the worsening of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by exercise. In the present study the impact of coronary risk factors on the worsening of LVEF by exercise was investigated in 391 patients with known or suspected CAD using exercise-gated (201)Tl scanning to calculate the LVEF. Significant worsening of the LVEF by exercise was defined as >4.7% (mean plus 1 SD of the value in 116 patients without CAD). Multivariate analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus (DM) was an independent risk factor for the worsening of LVEF by exercise in patients with multivessel (2- or 3-vessel) CAD with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 2.2 (1.1-4.5, p=0.037). In 157 patients with 2- or 3-vessel CAD, 20 (23.5%) of 85 nondiabetic patients and 31 (43.1%, p=0.009 vs nondiabetic patients) of 72 diabetic patients showed significant worsening of LVEF by exercise. In patients with 2- or 3-vessel CAD, there was no significant difference in Gensini score or reversibility of perfusion defects between nondiabetic and diabetic patients. Thus, DM is a risk factor for worsening LVEF by exercise in addition to the severity of CAD.

Meaning of low-density lipoprotein-apheresis for hypercholesterolemic patients at high risk for recurrence of coronary heart disease

The goal of cholesterol-lowering therapy in hypercholesterolemic patients at high risk for recurrence of coronary heart disease (CHD) is the prevention of acute coronary syndrome by stabilization of coronary atheromatous plaque. We often encounter patients in whom it is difficult to maintain the serum cholesterol level at a desirable level with dietary therapy and drug treatment, despite the development and use of statins. For secondary prevention in patients who are at high risk for the recurrence of CHD and whose cholesterol level cannot be controlled by drugs alone, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-apheresis therapy, which involves removal of LDL through extracorporeal circulation, is now available. Many reports concerning improvement of vascular endothelial function, improvement of myocardial ischemia, regression of coronary atherosclerotic lesions, stabilization of coronary plaque, and reduction in the incidence of cardiac events as a result of LDL-apheresis treatment have been published in various countries. We believe that LDL-apheresis should be performed on hypercholesterolemic patients with existing CHD for whom diet and maximum cholesterol-lowering drug therapies have been ineffective or not tolerated and whose LDL cholesterol level is 160 mg/dL or higher.

Effect of lipid-lowering therapy with pravastatin on myocardial blood flow in young mildly hypercholesterolemic adults

Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration is an important regulator of vascular reactivity. This double-blinded study examined the effect of lipid-lowering therapy on myocardial vasodilatory function in young hypercholesterolemic but otherwise healthy men. Fifty-one men (age 35 +/- 4 years) with mild hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol, 5.6 +/- 0.8 mM ) were randomly assigned to receive pravastatin, 40 mg/day, or placebo for 6 months. Myocardial blood flow was measured at rest and during adenosine-induced hyperemia using positron emission tomography and oxygen-15-labeled water at baseline and after treatment. Pravastatin lowered low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol by 33% from 3.77 +/- 0.76 mM (p < 0.001), whereas placebo had no effect. At baseline, resting and adenosine-induced flow values were 0.85 +/- 0.27 and 3.61 +/- 1.00 ml/min per gram in the pravastatin group and 0.83 +/- 0.18 and 3.17 +/- 0.69 ml/min per gram in the placebo group. Despite significant low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol lowering, resting and adenosine-stimulated blood flow values remained similar at follow-up: 0.86 +/- 0.23 and 3.79 +/- 1.31 vs. 0.78 +/- 0.20 and 3.20 +/- 0.86 ml/min per gram, in the pravastatin and placebo groups, respectively. An improvement in adenosine-induced flow after pravastatin, but not after placebo, was seen only in a subgroup of subjects (n = 15) with relatively low adenosine flow (<4.0 ml/min per gram) at baseline. Six months of cholesterol-lowering therapy with statin treatment has no overall significant effect on coronary vasodilator capacity in healthy subjects with mildly elevated cholesterol levels. A controlled study is needed to further test whether improvement in coronary function is obtained in subjects with initially reduced hyperemic flow response.

Standardization of lipoprotein reporting

We wanted to ascertain whether the current format of lipid laboratory reports seemed adequate to promote identification and treatment of patients with dyslipidemia. In a random survey of lipid laboratory reports from 25 laboratories, we found great inconsistencies among reporting formats and contents. Fewer than half the laboratories correctly reported the ranges for cholesterol, only 4 correctly reported ranges for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, only 2 correctly reported ranges for triglycerides, and none presented low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ranges in terms of risk factors for coronary heart disease. Reports typically were disjointed and difficult to read. The current practice of reporting results for lipid panels is confusing and does not follow the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines. We recommend that reporting of results be standardized, and a "model" standardized report is presented herein, based on consensus from a team of experts. The standardized report uses current recommendations for ranges, follows the flowcharts of the NCEP guidelines, and takes the patient's clinical condition (the number of risk factors and the presence of coronary heart disease) into consideration. Standardizing lipid reports should decrease confusion and perhaps increase application of the guidelines and patient compliance with treatment.

Low-density lipoprotein-independent effects of statins

Statins have pleiotropic properties that complement their cholesterol-lowering effects. These properties may partly account for their established benefit in the prevention of coronary artery disease beyond the reduction of LDL-cholesterol levels. The most widely recognized properties are reviewed here. They include: (i) nitric oxide-mediated improvement of endothelial dysfunction and upregulation of endothelin-1 expression; (ii) antioxidant effects; (iii) anti-inflammatory properties; (iv) inhibition of cell proliferation with anticarcinogenic actions in animals; (v) stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques; (vi) anticoagulant effects; and (vii) inhibition of graft rejection after heart and kidney transplantation. As advances are made in our knowledge, new properties are steadily being uncovered. Pleiotropic effects are currently being given consideration when instituting combination therapy for patients at high cardiovascular risk. Some pleiotropic effects are negative, and may account for occasional untoward drug interactions. For many of these new properties, the clinical relevance has not been established. The challenge for the future will be to design and carry out appropriate clinical trials to establish their relative importance in the prevention of coronary artery disease.

Modification of coronary artery disease progression by cholesterol-lowering therapy: the angiographic studies

Large randomized placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated that cholesterol lowering with statin therapy reduces the incidence of adverse cardiac events. Smaller angiographic studies have shown that coronary artery disease progression can be slowed and, in some cases, reversed by cholesterol-lowering interventions. These anatomical changes, however, are small and occur too slowly to account for the early clinical benefit. Current evidence suggests that plaque stabilization is the most important mechanism, by which cholesterol-lowering therapy reduces both the incidence of adverse cardiac events and coronary artery disease progression.