Validity of indicator-dilution determinations of cardiac output in patients with mitral regurgitation

Determination of cardiac output by ultrasound dilution technique in infants and children: a validation study against direct Fick principle

BACKGROUND

In critically ill children, monitoring of cardiac output (CO) is essential to guide haemodynamic management and facilitate cardiovascular therapy. The ultrasound dilution technique (UDT), a novel minimally invasive indicator method, was recently introduced to determine CO. We validated UDT against the 'gold standard' reference technique, the direct Fick principle, in infants and children.

METHODS

Twenty-six children (median age: 6 yr 2 months; median weight: 19.2 kg) underwent diagnostic heart catheterization. In each child, CO was determined by the Fick principle using direct measurement of oxygen consumption and invasive oximetry. Consecutively, haemodynamically stable conditions provided; three independent measurements of CO were conducted with UDT. CO values were compared using bias and limits of agreement calculated using the Bland-Altman approach and linear regression analysis for the complete study group and for a subgroup with body weight <20 kg (n=14).

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation) CO values were 3.76 (1.73) litre min(-1) (range 1.38-6.97) for the direct Fick principle and 3.49 (1.72) litre min(-1) (range 1.31-7.00) for UDT. An excellent correlation (r=0.96) was found between both methods (P<0.0001). The Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good clinical agreement with a mean bias of 0.26 litre min(-1), limits of agreement of -0.66 and 1.19 litre min(-1), and percentage error of 25.9%. Comparable results were obtained for patients <20 kg (mean bias=0.19 litre min(-1), percentage error=25.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

CO measurements by UDT agree favourably with Fick-derived CO data and both techniques were found to be equivalent and interchangeable. UDT represents a valid and applicable method for repetitive CO determinations in infants and children.

Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution

Cardiac output (CO) determination by thermodilution, which was introduced by Fegler in 1954, has gained wide acceptance in clinical medicine and animal experiments because it has several advantages over other methods with respect to simplicity, accuracy, reproducibility, repeated measurements at short intervals, and because there is no need for blood withdrawal. However, errors in determination of CO by thermodilution may be introduced by technical factors and the patients' pathological conditions. The current review summarizes these issues and provides our recommendations, based on the medical literature published between 1954-1992. To obtain more reproducible and accurate CO values by thermodilution, one should make several determinations (1) by using 10 ml injectate at room temperature for adults and 0.15 ml.kg-1 injectate for infants and children; (2) at evenly spaced intervals of the ventilation cycle; (3) when rapid intravenous fluid administration is discontinued; (4) by observing thermodilution curves so that baseline pulmonary artery temperature drift or the existence of intra- and extracardiac shunts are noticed. Finally, CO determination by thermodilution may be unreliable or impossible in patients with low CO states and tricuspid or pulmonary regurgitation. Since non-invasive CO monitoring has not replaced CO determination by thermodilution, intimate knowledge of this method is crucial for anaesthetists to prevent errors in the management of patients.

Analysis of factors affecting the variability of Fick versus indicator dilution measurements of cardiac output

This study was performed to assess the relation between Fick and indicator dilution measurements of cardiac output (CO) in a large number of subjects and to evaluate this relation in patients with a low CO, a high CO, and left-sided cardiac regurgitation. In 808 patients (428 men, 380 women, mean age 50 +/- 11), CO was measured by Fick and either thermodilution (right atrium to pulmonary artery)(n = 252) or indocyanine green dye ("dye")(pulmonary artery to systemic artery)(n = 556) within 10 minutes of each other. There was excellent agreement between Fick and both thermodilution and dye. The difference between Fick and indicator dilution measurements was 9 +/- 9%; it was 10% or less in 67% and 20% or less in 91% of patients. The disparity between Fick and indicator dilution measurements was increased in patients with a low CO (less than 2 liters/min/m2)(n = 152) (difference 14 +/- 11%, p less than 0.001) and those with aortic or mitral regurgitation (n = 83) (difference 13 +/- 11%, p less than 0.001). In these groups, the disparity between Fick and thermodilution measurements was not exaggerated, but the disparity between Fick and dye measurements was greater. Thus, although there is excellent agreement between Fick and both thermodilution and dye measurements of CO, thermodilution is preferable to dye in patients with a low CO and those with aortic or mitral regurgitation.

Measurement of cardiac output in man with a nonrecirculating indicator

The present investigation was undertaken to evaluate the utility of constant-rate injection of a nonrecirculating indicator (H(2)) for the measurement of cardiac output in man. 42 patients were studied during cardiac catheterization and 8 during acute complications of arteriosclerotic heart disease, including acute myocardial infarction. Pulmonary (or systemic) arterial H(2) concentration was measured chromatographically from 2.0 ml blood samples drawn during constant-rate injection of dissolved H(2) into the systemic venous circulation (or left heart). The chromatograph was a thermal conductivity unit housed in a constant-temperature water bath to achieve an improved signal-to-noise ratio. Intrapulmonary H(2) elimination from mixed venous blood was measured directly in 14 patients and averaged 98 +/-1.5% (SD). Reproducibility of output measurements was evaluated using triplicate determinations obtained over 45-60 sec in 25 consecutive patients. Coefficients of variation (SD/Mean x 100) averaged 3.4 +/-2.0%, making it possible to evaluate relatively small changes in measured output with conventional statistical tests. Individual measurements could be repeated at 10-15 sec intervals. Comparisons of H(2) and direct Fick measurements were made in 14 patients; H(2) outputs averaged 106 +/-4% (SEM) of Fick outputs (P > 0.1). Comparisons of H(2) and dye dilution measurements were performed in an additional 24 patients. Seven had angiographically-negligible valvular regurgitation and dye outputs averaged 106 +/-3% of H(2) outputs (P > 0.1). 17 had moderate-to-severe regurigation and dye outputs averaged 91 +/-4% of H(2) outputs (P < 0.05), suggesting a small but systematic error due to undetected recirculation of dye. The H(2) technique appears advantageous for rapidly repeated determinations of output, for quantitation of small changes in output, and for situations in which recirculation of conventional indicators is a potentially significant problem.