Combination therapy with diltiazem and nifedipine in patients with effort angina pectoris

Engineering of Nanospheres Dispersed Microneedle System for Antihypertensive Action

BACKGROUND

A combinational therapy is mostly preferred in hypertension treatment because of low-dose and less side effects like pretibial edema, and gastrointestinal bleeding.

OBJECTIVE

So the objective of the present work was to formulate an advanced drug delivery system in the form of bio-responsive microneedles by incorporating nifedipine, a cardiodepressant and diltiazem, a vasodilator for effective synergism in the treatment of hypertension.

METHODS

The pH-responsive PLGA nanospheres of diltiazem were formulated using Water-in-Oil-in- Water (W/O/W) double emulsion and solvent-diffusion-evaporation technique. These nanospheres were added to nifedipine-PVP mixture and then incorporated into mold to develop microneedles.

RESULTS

The microneedles showed the release of nifedipine almost 96.93± 2.31% for 24 h due to high PVP solubilization. The nanospheres of diltiazem on contact with acidic pH of skin managed to form of CO2 bubbles and increase the internal pressure to burst PLGA shell due to pore formation. The mean blood pressure observed for the normal group was 89.58 ± 3.603 mmHg, whereas the treatment with the new formulation significantly reduced the mean blood pressure up to 84.11 ± 2.98 mmHg in comparison to the disease control group (109.9 ± 1.825 mm Hg).

CONCLUSION

This system co-delivers the drugs nifedipine and diltiazem in hypertension and shows an advance alternative approach over conventional drug delivery system.

Efficacy and safety of dual calcium channel blockade for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dual calcium-channel blocker (CCB) with a dihydropyridine (DHP) and a nondihydropyridine (NDHP) has been proposed for hypertension treatment. However, the safety and efficacy of this approach is not well known.

METHODS

A MEDLINE/EMBASE/CENTRAL search for randomized clinical trials published on this topic from 1966 to February 2012 was performed. Efficacy outcomes of decrease in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures from baseline, changes in heart rate (HR), and adverse effects were compared between dual CCB therapy vs. DHP or NDHP. SBP, DBP, and HR were expressed as weighted mean deviation (WMD).

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies with 153 patients were included. Dual CCB produced a significantly greater reduction in SBP (21.6±9.2 mmHg) from baseline than DHP (10.3±6.3 mmHg (WMD = 10.9 mmHg, P < 0.0001)) or NDHP (8.9±4.2 mmHg (WMD = 14.1 mmHg, P = 0.002)). Dual CCB therapy reduced DBP from baseline more than either monotherapy (dual CCB = 17.5±10.2 mmHg vs. DHP = 11.6±8.7 mmHg, WMD = 5.5 mmHg, P < 0.001; and NDHP = 10.5±5.6 mmHg, WMD = 5.3 mmHg, P = 0.03). Dual CCB therapy had significantly lower HR compared to DHP (P < 0.001) but was comparable to NDHP (P = 0.12) (Delta change dual CCB = -4.0±3.5 vs. DHP = -2.0±1.5 and NDHP = -6.0±5.0 beats/min). Dual CCB therapy did not increase adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual CCB therapy lowers blood pressure significantly better than CCB monotherapy, without an increase in adverse events. However, given the lack of long-term outcome data on efficacy and safety, dual CCB therapy should be used with restraint, if at all. Large-scale long-term trials are needed to further evaluate such a strategy.

Clinical outcomes and management of mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4

Mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is characterized by NADPH-, time-, and concentration-dependent enzyme inactivation, occurring when some drugs are converted by CYPs to reactive metabolites. Such inhibition of CYP3A4 can be due to the chemical modification of the heme, the protein, or both as a result of covalent binding of modified heme to the protein. The inactivation of CYP3A4 by drugs has important clinical significance as it metabolizes approximately 60% of therapeutic drugs, and its inhibition frequently causes unfavorable drug–drug interactions and toxicity. The clinical outcomes due to CYP3A4 inactivation depend on many factors associated with the enzyme, drugs, and patients. Clinical professionals should adopt proper approaches when using drugs that are mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitors. These include early identification of drugs behaving as CYP3A4 inactivators, rational use of such drugs (eg, safe drug combination regimen, dose adjustment, or discontinuation of therapy when toxic drug interactions occur), therapeutic drug monitoring, and predicting the risks for potential drug–drug interactions. A good understanding of CYP3A4 inactivation and proper clinical management are needed by clinical professionals when these drugs are used.

Mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 by therapeutic drugs

Consistent with its highest abundance in humans, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A is responsible for the metabolism of about 60% of currently known drugs. However, this unusual low substrate specificity also makes CYP3A4 susceptible to reversible or irreversible inhibition by a variety of drugs. Mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 is characterised by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate hydrogen (NADPH)-, time- and concentration-dependent enzyme inactivation, occurring when some drugs are converted by CYP isoenzymes to reactive metabolites capable of irreversibly binding covalently to CYP3A4. Approaches using in vitro, in silico and in vivo models can be used to study CYP3A4 inactivation by drugs. Human liver microsomes are always used to estimate inactivation kinetic parameters including the concentration required for half-maximal inactivation (K(I)) and the maximal rate of inactivation at saturation (k(inact)). Clinically important mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitors include antibacterials (e.g. clarithromycin, erythromycin and isoniazid), anticancer agents (e.g. tamoxifen and irinotecan), anti-HIV agents (e.g. ritonavir and delavirdine), antihypertensives (e.g. dihydralazine, verapamil and diltiazem), sex steroids and their receptor modulators (e.g. gestodene and raloxifene), and several herbal constituents (e.g. bergamottin and glabridin). Drugs inactivating CYP3A4 often possess several common moieties such as a tertiary amine function, furan ring, and acetylene function. It appears that the chemical properties of a drug critical to CYP3A4 inactivation include formation of reactive metabolites by CYP isoenzymes, preponderance of CYP inducers and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate, and occurrence of clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with coadministered drugs. Compared with reversible inhibition of CYP3A4, mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 more frequently cause pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions, as the inactivated CYP3A4 has to be replaced by newly synthesised CYP3A4 protein. The resultant drug interactions may lead to adverse drug effects, including some fatal events. For example, when aforementioned CYP3A4 inhibitors are coadministered with terfenadine, cisapride or astemizole (all CYP3A4 substrates), torsades de pointes (a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia associated with QT prolongation) may occur.However, predicting drug-drug interactions involving CYP3A4 inactivation is difficult, since the clinical outcomes depend on a number of factors that are associated with drugs and patients. The apparent pharmacokinetic effect of a mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP3A4 would be a function of its K(I), k(inact) and partition ratio and the zero-order synthesis rate of new or replacement enzyme. The inactivators for CYP3A4 can be inducers and P-gp substrates/inhibitors, confounding in vitro-in vivo extrapolation. The clinical significance of CYP3A inhibition for drug safety and efficacy warrants closer understanding of the mechanisms for each inhibitor. Furthermore, such inactivation may be exploited for therapeutic gain in certain circumstances.

Combined Effects of Benidipine and Diltiazem in a Rat Model of Experimental Angina

We examined the combined effects of the calcium channel blockers 1,4-dihydropyridine (benidipine) and benzothiazepine (diltiazem) on vasopressin-induced myocardial ischemia in anesthetized rats, an experimental model of angina. Benidipine (3, 10 microg/kg, i.v.) and diltiazem (300, 1000 microg/kg, i.v.) caused dose-related inhibition of vasopressin-induced S-wave depression, an index of myocardial ischemia. Co-administration of low doses of benidipine (3 microg/kg) and diltiazem (300 microg/kg) almost completely inhibited the S-wave depression, where the efficacy was similar to that obtained with the use of high doses of benidipine (10 microg/kg) or diltiazem (1000 microg/kg). These results suggest that the administration strategy employed may be useful in the treatment of angina pectoris.

Combined administration of diltiazem and nicardipine attenuates hypertensive responses to emergence and extubation

Diltiazem and nicardipine, when injected as a mixture during anesthesia, reduce blood pressure in an additive manner without changing heart rate. The author evaluated the use of this mixture for controlling the blood pressure during emergence from general anesthesia and at extubation. The subjects included 15 preoperative hypertensive (HT) patients who underwent various types of surgery and 18 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) who underwent clipping of a cerebral aneurysm. General anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane or sevoflurane, supplemented with fentanyl. A mixed solution containing 2.5 mg diltiazem plus 0.5 mg nicardipine in 1 mL was injected intermittently every 2 to 4 minutes to bring the blood pressure to its resting level from cessation of inhaled anesthetics to extubation. Untreated patients who underwent similar types of surgery and anesthesia were selected for comparison. The average systolic blood pressure during emergence and at extubation increased to 156 +/- 19 mm Hg (mean +/- standard deviation) and 170 +/- 10 mm Hg in the untreated HT group, and increased to 157 +/- 16 mm Hg and 170 +/- 5mm Hg in the untreated SAH group. Systolic blood pressure was well controlled at 127 +/- 14 mm Hg and 145 +/- 14 mm Hg in the treated HT group with 3.7 +/- 1.9 mL of the mixture, and at 120 +/- 9 mm Hg and 137 +/- 20 mm Hg in the treated SAH group with 7.1 +/- 2.5 mL of the mixture. No significant difference (P < .05) in the heart rate was found between the untreated and the treated HT or SAH groups. Two patients in the treated SAH group exhibited tachycardia. The combined administration of diltiazem and nicardipine can help control blood pressure in patients with a possible HT response to emergence from general anesthesia and extubation.

Rescue of hereditary form of dilated cardiomyopathy by rAAV-mediated somatic gene therapy: amelioration of morphological findings, sarcolemmal permeability, cardiac performances, and the prognosis of TO-2 hamsters

The hereditary form comprises approximately 1/5 of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and is a major cause of advanced heart failure. Medical and socioeconomic settings require novel treatments other than cardiac transplantation. TO-2 strain hamsters with congenital DCM show similar clinical and genetic backgrounds to human cases that have defects in the delta-sarcoglycan (delta-SG) gene. To examine the long-term in vivo supplement of normal delta-SG gene driven by cytomegalovirus promoter, we analyzed the pathophysiologic effects of the transgene expression in TO-2 hearts by using recombinant adeno-associated virus vector. The transgene preserved sarcolemmal permeability detected in situ by mutual exclusivity between cardiomyocytes taking up intravenously administered Evans blue dye and expressing the delta-SG transgene throughout life. The persistent amelioration of sarcolemmal integrity improved wall thickness and the calcification score postmortem. Furthermore, in vivo myocardial contractility and hemodynamics, measured by echocardiography and cardiac catheterization, respectively, were normalized, especially in the diastolic performance. Most importantly, the survival period of the TO-2 hamsters was prolonged after the delta-SG gene transduction, and the animals remained active, exceeding the life expectancy of animals without transduction of the responsible gene. These results provide the first evidence that somatic gene therapy is promising for human DCM treatment, if the rAAV vector can be justified for clinical use.

Current concepts of pharmacotherapy in hypertension: combination calcium channel blocker therapy in the treatment of hypertension

Effective control of blood pressure is usually achieved only with the use of two or more antihypertensive medications. The treatment options for hypertension are numerous, and the number of possible combinations large. The selection of a specific combination drug regimen has often been linked to the perceived need for diuretic therapy as first- or second-step therapy; thus, the popularity of such drug combinations as an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/diuretic, an angiotensin-receptor blocker/diuretic, or a beta blocker/diuretic. Rational alternatives exist, including an ACE inhibitor/calcium channel blocker (CCB) or a dihydropyridine CCB/b blocker combination. Traditionally, recommendations have advised against the use of combination therapy with two drugs from the same therapeutic class. However, because of the different binding and pharmacologic characteristics of CCBs, a rationale exists for combining different agents in this class in the management of hypertension and/or symptomatic coronary artery disease. In the treatment of either hypertension or angina, combination CCB therapy can prove uniquely successful.

Dual calcium-channel blocker therapy in the treatment of hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To review the in vitro receptor binding data of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) and in vivo studies in humans regarding the use of dual calcium-channel blocker therapy, with a focus on the use of this therapy for hypertension.

DATA SOURCE

A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify literature pertaining to CCBs.

STUDY SELECTION

In vitro studies and investigations that evaluated CCB receptor binding and the interactions between subclasses of CCBs were chosen. All studies in humans and clinical trials that evaluated the use of dual CCB therapy in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases were selected for review. Also, case reports describing the use of dual CCB therapy were included in this article.

DATA EXTRACTION

The methodology, results, and conclusions of the selected data were evaluated. Data regarding the in vitro receptor binding kinetics of CCBs, as well as interactions, were reported. Because there is limited information on dual CCB therapy for hypertension, clinical studies using this treatment for ischemic heart disease were also reviewed. They were summarized and compared on the basis of the degree of disease control (e.g., blood pressure, exercise tolerance), adverse effects, and other clinical endpoints of pharmacologic therapy.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In vitro studies have identified binding sites for the dihydropyridine (nifedipine), diphenylalkylamine (verapamil), and benzothiazepine (diltiazem) subclasses of CCBs, and indicate that they are allosterically related to each other within the voltage-sensitive calcium-channel receptor. Dihydropyridine binding affinity is decreased with concomitant verapamil binding, but is enhanced by concomitant diltiazem binding. Dual CCB therapy has been shown to be efficacious in patients with ischemic heart disease. Although this therapy is limited by dose-related adverse effects, it appears to have an important role in patients with ischemia that is refractory to conventional therapy, or for those whose therapeutic options are limited by contraindications. Theoretically, many patients with hypertension may benefit similarly from dual CCB therapy. Because data evaluating this treatment option are sparse, recommendations regarding safety, efficacy, and the role of dual CCB therapy for hypertension would be premature.

CONCLUSIONS

Controlled data evaluating dual CCB therapy for the treatment of hypertension are lacking. This treatment modality may be beneficial in the future, but requires further investigation to determine safety and efficacy.

The effect of nifedipine on the pharmacokinetics and dynamics of diltiazem: the preliminary study in normal volunteers

To evaluate the influence of nifedipine on the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of diltiazem, five healthy subjects received 60 mg diltiazem orally on two occasions, diltiazem alone or after nifedipine pretreatment (10 mg three times daily for 3 days). After nifedipine pretreatment, the maximum concentration (Cmax) of diltiazem was increased and the time of Cmax was shortened, and the area under the concentration curve (AUC) tended to be increased. Although heart rate was increased, the corrected PQ interval tended to be prolonged after the nifedipine pretreatment. Both a decreased hepatic clearance and an increased bioavailability of diltiazem probably accounts for the increase in the Cmax and AUC of diltiazem after nifedipine pretreatment, and that might affect the pharmacodynamics of diltiazem.

The influence of pretreatment periods with diltiazem on nifedipine kinetics

The effect of durations of diltiazem pretreatment on nifedipine kinetics was evaluated. Eighteen healthy male subjects were randomly allocated to three groups, 6 subjects each, for single doses of 60 mg diltiazem, and 3 days and 6 days with diltiazem 60 mg three times a day. All subjects received 20 mg nifedipine orally on two occasions using a double-blind cross-over, placebo-controlled method. No significant difference on pharmacokinetic parameters of nifedipine without diltiazem were observed among three groups. The single dose with 60 mg diltiazem significantly increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for nifedipine compared with that in control an average of 35.1% (P < .05) and decreased the total body clearance (CL) an average of 24.0% (P < .05). Three days and 6 days pretreatment with diltiazem 60 mg three times a day significantly increased mean nifedipine AUC to 151.1% (P < .01), 188.0% (P < .05) of control values, and decreased CL to 58.2% (P < .01), 63.9% (P < .05) of control values, respectively. The elimination half-life (t1/2) of nifedipine were significantly prolonged both after 3 days' and after 6 days' pretreatment of diltiazem. These results suggest that diltiazem affects the nifedipine kinetics rapidly and pretreatment duration dependently. A clinically important drug interaction may occur when both drugs are administered simultaneously.

Response of angina and ischemia to long-term treatment in patients with chronic stable angina: a double-blind randomized individualized dosing trial of nifedipine, propranolol and their combination

Seventy-four patients with chronic stable mild angina, mild coronary artery disease (83% had one- or two-vessel disease) and normal left ventricular function were studied to measure the response of treadmill exercise performance and painful and silent ischemia in the ambulatory setting to randomly assigned treatment with nifedipine or propranolol and their combination; titration to maximal tolerated dosages was performed in double-blind manner. At 3 months both nifedipine and propranolol reduced the weekly angina rate (p less than 0.05); during treadmill exercise testing, increases (p less than 0.05) were noted in time to angina and total exercise time and decreases in maximal ST depression at the end of exercise. There were no differences between the responses to nifedipine and propranolol and no significant additional changes were seen after another 3 months of therapy. The combination of nifedipine and propranolol reduced the number of patients with angina on exercise treadmill testing from 64% to 38% (p less than 0.05). During ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring before treatment, there were 1.4 +/- 2.4 (mean +/- SD) episodes/24 h of painful ischemia and a very low silent ischemia frequency: mean 1.1 +/- 2.7 episodes/24 h, mean duration 16 +/- 25 min/24 h. Treatment with propranolol and nifedipine resulted in reduction of episodes and duration of painful and painless ischemia; approximately 77% of patients were free of all ischemic episodes. It is concluded that patients with chronic stable mild angina have a low incidence of silent ischemia. Nifedipine or propranolol alone, titrated to individualized maximally tolerated dosages, are equally effective in long-term control of painful and painless ischemia, anginal episodes and exercise-induced ischemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effects of diltiazem on hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes in man using antipyrine, trimethadione and debrisoquine as model substrates

Six healthy male subjects were given single oral doses of antipyrine (7 mg kg-1), trimethadione (4 mg kg-1) and debrisoquine (10 mg) before and during diltiazem treatment (30 mg three times daily orally for 8 days). Antipyrine clearance decreased from 33.7 +/- 9.1 to 22.5 +/- 4.9 ml min-1 (P less than 0.05, mean +/- s.e. mean) after diltiazem treatment without any significant change in apparent volume of distribution (0.59 +/- 0.06 to 0.60 +/- 0.04 1 kg-1), resulting in an increase in antipyrine elimination half-life from 13.4 +/- 4.8 to 19.7 +/- 3.2 h (P less than 0.05). The formation clearance of antipyrine to 4-hydroxyantipyrine was decreased significantly from 10.8 +/- 2.7 to 6.6 +/- 2.7 ml min-1 (P less than 0.05), while that to 3-hydroxymethylantipyrine and norantipyrine was not altered by diltiazem. The metabolic ratio of debrisoquine (urinary excretion of debrisoquine/4-hydroxydebrisoquine) was increased significantly from 0.70 +/- 0.05 to 1.95 +/- 0.20 (P less than 0.05), while that of trimethadione (serum concentration of dimethadione/trimethadione) was not changed significantly (0.48 +/- 0.08 vs 0.41 +/- 0.06) after diltiazem treatment. Diltiazem selectively inhibits cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes.

Arterial vasodilator effects of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist amlodipine alone and in combination with verapamil in systemic hypertension

The arterial vasodilator properties of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist amlodipine were compared with the effects of vascular muscle cyclic guanosine monophosphate production by sodium nitroprusside and with the effects of a combined infusion of amlodipine and the nondihydropyridine calcium antagonist verapamil in 8 untreated patients with primary hypertension. Arterial vasodilation was assessed by measurement of changes of forearm blood flow by mercury in Silastic strain-gauge plethysmography during brachial artery drug infusions. Forearm blood flow increased during amlodipine infusions (0.4 to 45 micrograms/min/100 ml forearm tissue) from 2.9 +/- 1.7 to a maximum of 23.6 +/- 7.6 ml/min/100 ml (687%), while sodium nitroprusside caused an increase from 3.0 +/- 1.8 to 16.2 +/- 5.4 ml/min/100 ml (449%), attesting to the importance of transmembrane calcium influx for the maintenance of vascular tone. The addition of verapamil 40 micrograms/min/100 ml to an infusion of amlodipine 44.5 micrograms/min/100 ml resulted in a further increase of forearm blood flow, from 23.6 +/- 7.6 to 34.4 +/- 9.8 ml/min/100 ml (p less than 0.05). The precise mechanisms of this finding have yet to be elucidated but may be due to interactions of the effects of the binding of these 2 chemically and pharmacologically different calcium antagonists to distinct binding sites at calcium channels. The clinical relevance of this observation for the treatment of coronary artery disease and systemic hypertension needs further study.

Dose dependent effect of diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine

The effect of diltiazem pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine were determined in six healthy male volunteers. Placebo or diltiazem (30 mg and 90 mg) was given orally three times daily for 3 days in a double-blind, Latin square method. On the fourth day, a 20-mg nifedipine was given orally 1 hour after the last dose of placebo or diltiazem. The mean elimination half-life of nifedipine prolonged significantly following diltiazem (2.54 hours on placebo vs 3.40 hours on 30 mg diltiazem and 3.47 on 90 mg diltiazem, both P less than .01). The mean AUC of nifedipine increased during diltiazem (1726.6 nmol X hr/ml on placebo vs 3838.0 on 30 mg diltiazem, and 5370.0 on 90 mg diltiazem, both P less than .05, 30 mg vs 90 mg, 0.1 less than P less than .05). The ratio of the AUC of primary metabolite (nitropyridine form) to the AUC of nifedipine was reduced by diltiazem pretreatment in a dose-dependent manner. ICG clearance was not influenced following diltiazem. These results indicate that diltiazem dose-dependently alters the pharmacokinetic profiles of nifedipine. The ICG clearance test showed that the liver blood flow did not decrease during diltiazem therapy, therefore, the reduction in the metabolic clearance of nifedipine might be caused by inhibiting effect of diltiazem on the activity of drug oxidizing enzymes.

Calcium channel antagonists: Part VI: Clinical pharmacokinetics of first and second-generation agents

A survey of the pharmacokinetic properties of the three prototypical calcium antagonist agents shows that they have in common a very high rate of hepatic first-pass metabolism with, in the case of verapamil and diltiazem, the formation of an active metabolite that affects the dose during chronic therapy. Therefore, the major factor altering the pharmacokinetic properties and the dose of the drug required is the capacity of the liver to metabolize the drug, which in turn depends on the hepatic blood flow and the activity of the hepatic metabolizing systems. Hence liver disease, a low cardiac output, and coadministration of certain drugs inducing or inhibiting the hepatic enzymes, all indirectly affect the pharmacokinetic properties of the calcium antagonists. There are also other potential drug interactions of a kinetic or dynamic nature that may arise. In general, renal disease has little effect on the pharmacokinetics of calcium antagonists.

Clinical utility of nifedipine and diltiazem plasma levels in patients with angina pectoris receiving monotherapy and combination treatment

The clinical utility of nifedipine and diltiazem blood levels in patients with angina pectoris receiving monotherapy (N = 14) and combination treatment (N = 9) were assessed in a placebo run-in, double blind, randomized, crossover study. Compared to placebo, diltiazem (mean daily dose 360 mg), nifedipine (mean daily dose 90 mg) and combination diltiazem-nifedipine therapy (mean daily dose 55 mg of nifedipine, 360 mg of diltiazem) were associated with reductions in weekly angina attacks and nitroglycerin consumption. Although both drugs used as monotherapy and in combination were also associated with significant increments in exercise tolerance and other improved angina parameters, these changes were not related to the plasma levels of either drug. Nifedipine plasma levels were measured by gas chromatography and diltiazem plasma levels measured by reverse high-pressure liquid chromatography from specimens obtained 2-5 hours after the last previous dose, after 1, 2 and 3 weeks of treatment, and during baseline placebo and placebo washout periods. With combination therapy, there was no effect on the diltiazem plasma level compared to monotherapy. The significant decrease in the nifedipine dose in patients on combination therapy did not significantly change nifedipine plasma levels. Determinations of plasma levels of diltiazem and nifedipine in the management of patients is of no value in the management of patients with angina pectoris except for monitoring treatment compliance and overdosage.

Effect of diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of propranolol, metoprolol and atenolol

The pharmacokinetic interaction between diltiazem and three beta-adrenoceptor blockers propranolol, metoprolol and atenolol was investigated in healthy volunteers given diltiazem 30 mg or placebo t.d.s. for 3 days, followed by a single dose of propranolol 20 mg, metoprolol 40 mg or atenolol 50 mg. The AUCs of propranolol and metoprolol were significantly increased after diltiazem and it significantly prolonged the elimination half-life of metoprolol. In contrast, it did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of atenolol. Propranolol significantly decreased the resting pulse rate after diltiazem pretreatment as compared to placebo. The results indicate that diltiazem impaired the clearance of propranolol and metoprolol, which are principally metabolized by an oxidative pathway, and that the kinetic interaction between diltiazem and propranolol may partly be related to the significant reduction in the pulse rate produced by the latter.