Effects of long-term enalapril therapy on cardiopulmonary exercise performance after myocardial infarction

Captopril reduces the VE/VCO2 ratio in myocardial infarction patients with low ejection fraction

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine whether captopril (CAP) therapy had an effect on the minute ventilation/carbon dioxide output (VE/VCO2) ratio at submaximal levels of exercise in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular function after myocardial infarction.

DESIGN

Double blinded, randomized, prospective, repeated measures.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

One hundred thirty-five patients with left ventricular ejection fractions of < 40% were randomly assigned to a treatment group (CAP; n = 62) or a placebo group (PLC; n = 73). Subjects had cycle ergometer exercise tests at 2 to 6 months (T1), 10 to 14 months (T2), and > 22 months (T3) postmyocardial infarction.

MEASUREMENTS

Oxygen uptake (VO2), VCO2, and VE were measured throughout each exercise test. Dependent variables were peak VO2 (VO2peak), the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), and the VE/VCO2 ratio measured at 30 W and at 75% VO2peak.

RESULTS

VO2peak and VAT did not differ as a result of treatment (CAP vs PLC; p = 0.92 and 0.80) or over time (T1 vs T2 vs T3; p = 0.51 and 0.07). VE/VCO2 was significantly lower for CAP at 30 W (p = 0.05) and, although lower at 75% VO2peak, did not obtain statistical significance (p = 0.22). The between group differences were larger at T2 and T3 when compared with T1.

CONCLUSIONS

CAP resulted in a reduced VE/VCO2 ratio during submaximal exercise. The reduced ventilation may permit patients to perform their normal activities of daily living at a lower perception of difficulty, reduce symptoms, and provide an improved quality of life.

Physical working capacity after acute myocardial infarction in patients with low ejection fraction and effect of captopril

Previous studies after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have reported conflicting results on the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on physical working capacity. In an effort to provide more insight into this subject, we examined the effects of captopril on working capacity of patients who had low ejection fractions but no congestive heart failure after AMI. One hundred sixty-six participants were recruited from 5 centers after randomization to either captopril or placebo for the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement study. Upright cycle ergometer tests were performed with continuous measurements of respiratory gases at 4, 12, and 24 months after AMI. Our study concurs with 2 of 3 previous post-AMI studies and supports the conclusion that working capacity is not affected by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition at 4 or 12 months after AMI in patients without congestive heart failure. In addition, no significant effect of captopril was noted at 24 months after AMI. Peak oxygen uptake tended to decrease between 12 and 24 months in the placebo group by an average (+/- SD) of -22 +/- 322 ml/min (n = 66), but to increase in the captopril group (+62 +/- 289, n = 57), a difference that was significant (Mann-Whitney chi-square, p = 0.02). This post-hoc observation suggests that a late beneficial effect may have been masked by inadequate study duration. Known benefits of captopril appear not to include an increase in working capacity within the first 24 months after AMI.

Expanding the paradigm of the renin-angiotensin system and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

The renin-angiotensin system acts systemically and locally to influence vascular tone, blood volume, myocardial contractility, thromboresistance, and tissue responses to injury. ACE inhibitors have assumed a vital role in the treatment of patients with ventricular dysfunction, including those who have sustained one or more myocardial infarctions. The greatest benefits appear over time and not unexpectedly are most pronounced in cases of moderate to severe reduction in left ventricular performance. Emerging evidence suggests that the paradigm for ACE inhibitor use will expand even further, opening new doors for patient care.

Effect on exercise performance of enalapril therapy initiated early after myocardial infarction. Nordic Enalapril exercise Trial

OBJECTIVES

The Nordic Enalapril Exercise Trial was a multicenter subtrial of the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS II) designed to evaluate the effect on maximal exercise performance of a 6-month period of enalapril treatment initiated early after myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

When begun early after myocardial infarction, converting enzyme inhibition therapy has been shown to attenuate infarct expansion and reduce left ventricular volume. Therapy has been associated with improved exercise performance.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-seven men (mean age 63.3 +/- 10.9 years) with documented acute myocardial infarction were randomized to treatment with enalapril or placebo on a double-blind basis. Intravenous enalaprilat or placebo therapy was initiated within 24 h after the onset of symptoms. Oral therapy was continued at a target dose of 20 mg/day. Patients exercised maximally at 1 month and 6 months after infarction to symptom-limited end points on a cycle ergometer with a 20 W/min incremental protocol.

RESULTS

The treatment and control groups were comparable in patient age, concurrent therapy and type and site of infarction. At 1 month, for all patients, mean total work performed was 34.9 +/- 20.9 kJ in the enalapril group (n = 169) versus 28.5 +/- 20.6 kJ in the placebo group (n = 158) (difference = 18.4%, p < 0.01). This between-group difference in favor of enalapril was greatest in patients > 70 years old (difference = 41.4%, p < 0.01, n = 105) and those with clinical evidence of heart failure (difference = 33.0%, p < 0.01, n = 122). At 6 months for all patients, mean total work performed was 35.4 +/- 23.8 kJ in the enalapril group versus 34.0 +/- 23.9 kJ in the placebo group (difference = 4.1%, NS).

CONCLUSIONS

This trial found that chronic converting enzyme inhibition initiated early after myocardial infarction was associated with significantly greater exercise capacity in men tested at 1 month. This difference was independent of type or site of infarction, patient age or the presence of clinical heart failure. The difference between the treatment and control groups was not significant at 6 months because of improvement in the placebo group. Further research is needed to elucidate the potential mechanisms involved, profile those patients most likely to profit from early therapy and establish the optimal timing and duration for intervention.

Rate responsive cardiac pacing using a minute ventilation sensor

A minute ventilation sensing rate responsive pacemaker was implanted in 15 patients (8 males and 7 females) with bradycardia. The mean age was 72.8 +/- 8.7 years. The single chamber system measures transthoracic impedance between the tip electrode of a standard bipolar lead and the pulse generator case. In the adaptive mode the pulse generator calculates a rate responsive factor or slope during maximal exercise but functions as in the VVI mode. The patients exercised maximally on an upright cycle ergometer with the pacemaker programmed to VVI mode, adaptive mode, and rate responsive mode. Exercise and gas exchange data were collected continuously and analyzed using an automated breath-by-breath system. The slope, heart rate, and ventilation were measured every 20 seconds. Heart rate in pacemaker dependent patients correlated well to minute ventilation (correlation coefficient ranging from 0.72-0.95, P < 0.0001). This study demonstrates that minute ventilation is a good metabolic sensor in rate responsive pacing.

Effects of lisinopril on cardiorespiratory, neuroendocrine, and renal function in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cardiac, renal, and neuroendocrine effects of lisinopril in men with untreated, symptom free left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

DESIGN

A randomised, double blind cross over trial with six week treatment periods to compare lisinopril (10 mg/day) and matching placebo.

SETTING

Hospital outpatient department.

PATIENTS

Patients with pronounced systolic dysfunction on cross sectional echocardiography due to myocardial infarction at least six months previously, without angina and with no or minimal breathlessness. Eighteen men were identified of whom 15 completed the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Lisinopril (10 mg) or placebo given once daily by mouth.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary: oxygen consumption at peak exercise. Secondary: resting cardiac function as measured by radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography, renal function estimated radioisotopically, and plasma indices of neuroendocrine activity.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, lisinopril increased (mean (SD)) peak oxygen consumption during exercise (19.8(3.1) ml/kg/min v 21.4(3.2) ml/kg/min; p < 0.003). Lisinopril did not improve indices of cardiac function at rest. It reduced plasma concentrations of angiotensin II (median values 7 pg/ml to 5 pg/ml; p < 0.02), aldosterone (median values 113 pg/ml to 66 pg/ml; p < 0.05) and atrial natriuretic peptide (median values 69 pg/ml to 40 pg/ml; p < 0.04), but noradrenaline and antidiuretic hormone concentrations did not change. Renal blood flow increased and glomerular filtration rate declined.

CONCLUSIONS

Even before the onset of heart failure lisinopril improves the cardiopulmonary response to exercise in patients with systolic ventricular dysfunction.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, left ventricular dysfunction, and early heart failure

A study was undertaken to examine the effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril on exercise performance in 18 patients with major impairment of left ventricular systolic function. The study was a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, and patients received treatment with either once-daily lisinopril (2.5-10 mg) or placebo for a period of 6 weeks. A total of 15 patients completed the study. Compared with placebo, lisinopril had no significant effect on supine or standing blood pressure or heart rate. Although lisinopril had no effect on exercise duration during a low-intensity exercise protocol, in patients undergoing a high-intensity exercise protocol, there was a trend toward improved exercise time and peak oxygen consumption improved significantly. In addition, treatment with lisinopril resulted in an increase in renal blood flow and a reduction in glomerular filtration rate. Moreover, administration of once-daily lisinopril 10 mg resulted in a decrease in plasma concentrations of angiotensin II, aldosterone, and atrial natriuretic peptide, and an increase in plasma concentrations of active renin.

Effect of timolol on cardiopulmonary exercise performance in men after myocardial infarction

The effect of the nonselective beta blocker timolol on maximal cardiopulmonary exercise performance was evaluated in 28 men with previous myocardial infarction without effort angina (mean age 63 +/- 8 years). Patients were randomized to placebo or timolol (10 mg twice daily) for 4 weeks and then crossed over to the alternative therapy in a double-blind manner. At the completion of each treatment period, patients underwent symptom-limited maximal cardiopulmonary exercise on a cycle ergometer. Exercise time, heart rate, oxygen consumption (VO2), oxygen (O2) pulse and respiratory exchange ratio were measured at peak exercise and at a submaximal exercise level defined at a respiratory exchange ratio of 1.00. Timolol treatment reduced peak heart rate from 153 +/- 11 to 102 +/- 14 beats/min (-33%, p less than 0.001). Exercise time decreased from 680 +/- 91 to 633 +/- 78 seconds (-7%, p less than 0.001). Peak VO2 decreased from 25.3 +/- 4.7 to 21.4 +/- 3.5 ml/min/kg (-15%, p less than 0.001). O2 pulse increased from 12.9 +/- 1.9 to 16.7 +/- 2.3 ml/beat (+29%, p less than 0.001). Peak respiratory exchange ratio did not change significantly, indicating comparable effort. At submaximal exercise, defined at a respiratory exchange ratio of 1.00, there was no difference in exercise time between placebo and timolol. Heart rate decreased with timolol compared with placebo, from 126 +/- 16 beats/min by 31% (p less than 0.001), VO2 decreased from 18.5 +/- 4.3 ml/min/kg by 10% (p less than 0.001), O2 pulse increased from 11.5 +/- 2.0 ml/beat by 30% (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)