Which pharmacological stress is optimal? A technique-dependent choice

The comparable diagnostic accuracies of dobutamine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies are widely used for pharmacological stress echocardiography, with wide geographical variations.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether evidence derived from the literature indicates or disapproves that either stress modality confers diagnostic superiority.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed literature of published trials with head-to-head comparison, on the same population, of high-dose (0.84 mg/kg) dipyridamole-stress versus high-dose (up to 40 micrograms/kg per min) dobutamine-stress echocardiography. Data from 12 studies performed in 12 institutions in seven countries were analysed. Angiographic information about 818 patients was considered.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracies of the two tests were similar (631 of 818, 77%, for dipyridamole versus 654 of 818, 80%, for dobutamine, NS). Overall sensitivities were 403 of 568 (71%) for dipyridamole and 437 of 568 (77%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Sensitivities for patients with single-vessel disease were 177 of 275 (64%) for dipyridamole and 203 of 275 (74%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Sensitivities for patients with multivessel disease were 162 of 203 (80%) for dipyridamole and 163 of 203 (80%) for dobutamine (NS). Specificities were 232 of 250 (93%) for dipyridamole and 217 of 250 (87%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Data from an additional 26 studies with dipyridamole alone and 47 studies with dobutamine alone were analysed. The diagnostic accuracies were 80% for dipyridamole (n = 2038 patients; 95% confidence interval 75-82%) and 82% for dobutamine (n = 4264 patients; 95% confidence interval 79-84%).

CONCLUSION

High-dose dobutamine-stress and high-dose dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies have comparable diagnostic accuracies, with a slightly higher sensitivity with dobutamine and a slightly higher specificity with dipyridamole.

Comparison between dobutamine echocardiography and thallium-201 scintigraphy in detecting residual stenosis, ischemia, and necrosis in patients with prior myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Following the first attempts to detect myocardial ischemia with two-dimensional echocardiography stress testing, pharmacologic stress using dobutamine infusion has become an alternative to echocardiography exercise testing for evaluation of coronary artery disease. It has been shown that stress echocardiography has a diagnostic accuracy similar to that of an exercise thallium test. Other studies, however, indicated that radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging was more sensitive than exercise or pharmacologic stress echocardiography for detection of ischemia or jeopardized myocardium.

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of the present study was to determine the ability of dobutamine stress echocardiography in comparison with thallium-201 scintigraphy to identify multivessel disease and the presence of myocardial scar and ischemia in 60 consecutive patients who suffered a first myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

Patients were evaluated by coronary angiography and ventriculography, thallium-201 (201TI) tomographic scintigraphy, and dobutamine echocardiography within 3 months of a first MI. Forty-seven had Q-wave MI and 13 had non-Q-wave MI. Eleven patients were excluded from final analysis-7 because of failure to achieve target heart rate in spite of the use of atropine, and 4 because of high blood pressure following the infusion of dobutamine.

RESULTS

Dobutamine echocardiography showed an overall sensitivity of 43% for detection of coronary artery lesions of 50-74% diameter stenosis and 201TI scintigraphy showed a sensitivity of 71%. For detection of lesions of > or = 75% diameter stenosis, dobutamine echocardiography showed a sensitivity of 52% and 201TI a sensitivity of 70%. Overall agreement between wall motion and myocardial perfusion for detection of necrosis and/or ischemia in the infarct area was 40.4% with a kappa coefficient of 0.09 (p = 0.13). For detection of ischemic myocardium outside the infarct zone, overall agreement was 78.6% with a kappa coefficient of 0.49 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Dobutamine echocardiography results showed a lower sensitivity than myocardial perfusion images in predicting multivessel coronary artery disease, and there was poor agreement between both methods in identifying necrosis or ischemia.

Cardiac performance in conscious healthy dogs during dobutamine infusion

The aim of this study was to determine the cardiac performance of conscious healthy dogs during stimulation with dobutamine. Eight healthy unsedated beagle dogs were used. Cardiac output was measured by the thermodilution technique and blood pressures by extravascular pressure transducers. Dobutamine challenge at a dosage ranging from 27.5 to 50 micrograms kg-1 min-1 induced a significant rise in cardiac power index (CPI), cardiac index (CI), stroke index (SI) and heart rate (HR) and a significant decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). The highest CPI was 2.05 times greater than its basal resting value. The CI was primarily responsible for this increase in CPI. The SI and HR contributed approximately 55 per cent and 45 per cent respectively of the maximal increase in CI.

Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography for assessment of perioperative and late cardiac risk in patients undergoing major vascular surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine the value of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography and clinical variables to predict perioperative and late cardiac events in patients scheduled for elective major non-cardiac vascular surgery.

DESIGN

Blinded prospective study.

PATIENTS

Patients (n = 187 mean age 69 yrs).

MEASUREMENTS

Dobutamine-atropine stress test was performed preoperatively. Results were not used for clinical management. The clinical risk profile was evaluated by Detsky's score.

RESULTS

Technically adequate images were obtained in 185/187 patients, one major complication occurred (ventricular fibrillation) and four tests were prematurely stopped due to side effects. Data from 181 patients were analysed. The stress test was positive (new or worsened wall motion abnormality) in 56/181 patients. Perioperative cardiac events were: five fatal myocardial infarctions, three non-fatal myocardial infarctions, nine unstable angina pectoris and one pulmonary edema. All patients with a cardiac event had a positive stress test (18/56). No event occurred in patients with a negative stress test. By multivariate analysis only a new wall motion abnormality during the stress test (odds ratio 45.0, 6-369) was a significant predictor of cardiac events. Patients (n = 154) were followed after operation for 16 +/- 9 months. Twenty-four cardiac events occurred in 21 patients: six fatal myocardial infarctions, three non-fatal myocardial infarctions, six unstable angina pectoris, three ventricular arrhythmias and six congestive heart failures. The stress echo was positive in 19/21 patients with late cardiac events. The cardiac events correlated by multivariate analysis with a history of myocardial infarction (odds ratio 9.6, 1.9-47.7) and new wall motion abnormalities (odds ratio 6.2, 1.5-25.1).

CONCLUSION

Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography is a relatively safe and useful test to identify patients at risk of perioperative and late postoperative cardiac events.