Validation of the proximal flow convergence method. Calculation of orifice area in patients with mitral stenosis

Rheumatic and Degenerative Mitral Stenosis: From an Iconic Clinical Case to the Literature Review

Mitral stenosis (MS) poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management due to its varied etiologies, such as rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS) and degenerative mitral stenosis (DMS). While rheumatic fever-induced RMS has declined in prevalence, DMS is rising with aging populations and comorbidities. Starting from a complex clinical case of DMS, the aim of this paper is to review the literature on mitral stenosis by analyzing the available tools and the differences in terms of diagnosis and treatment for rheumatic and degenerative stenosis. Emerging transcatheter techniques, such as transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) and lithotripsy-facilitated percutaneous mitral commissurotomy (PMC), represent promising alternatives for DMS patients deemed unfit for surgery. In particular, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has shown potential in facilitating percutaneous interventions by fracturing calcific deposits and enabling subsequent interventions. However, larger prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish IVL's role in DMS management. To further enhance this technique, research could focus on investigating the long-term outcomes and durability of mitral lithotripsy, as well as exploring its potential in combination with PMC or TMVR.

Impact of assuming a circular orifice on flow error through elliptical regurgitant orifices: computational fluid dynamics and in vitro analysis of proximal flow convergence

Grounded in hydrodynamic theory, proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) is a simplistic and practical technique widely used to quantify valvular regurgitation flow. PISA provides a relatively reasonable, though slightly underestimated flow rate for circular orifices. However, for elliptical orifices frequently seen in functional mitral regurgitation, PISA underestimates the flow rate. Based on data obtained with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and in vitro experiments using systematically varied orifice parameters, we hypothesized that flow rate underestimation for elliptical orifices by PISA is predictable and within a clinically acceptable range. We performed 45 CFD simulations with varying orifice areas 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 cm², orifice aspect ratios 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 5:1, and 10:1, and peak velocities (V_max) 400, 500 and 600 cm/s. The ratio of computed effective regurgitant orifice area to true effective area (EROA_C/EROA) against the ratio of aliasing velocity to peak velocity (V_A/V_max) was analyzed for orifice shape impact. Validation was conducted with in vitro imaging in round and 3:1 elliptical orifices. Plotting EROA_C/EROA against V_A/V_max revealed marginal flow underestimation with 2:1 and 3:1 elliptical axis ratios against a circular orifice (< 10% for 8% V_A/V_max), rising to ≤ 35% for 10:1 ratio. In vitro modeling confirmed CFD findings; there was a 8.3% elliptical EROA underestimation compared to the circular orifice estimate. PISA quantification for regurgitant flow through elliptical orifices produces predictable, but generally small, underestimation deemed clinically acceptable for most regurgitant orifices.

Surface tension effects on flow dynamics and alveolar mechanics in the acinar region of human lung

Background

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, in-vitro setups, and experimental ex-vivo approaches have been applied to numerous alveolar geometries over the past years. They aimed to study and examine airflow patterns, particle transport, particle propagation depth, particle residence times, and particle-alveolar wall deposition fractions. These studies are imperative to both pharmaceutical and toxicological studies, especially nowadays with the escalation of the menacing COVID-19 virus. However, most of these studies ignored the surfactant layer that covers the alveoli and the effect of the air-surfactant surface tension on flow dynamics and air-alveolar surface mechanics.

Methods

The present study employs a realistic human breathing profile of 4.75s for one complete breathing cycle to emphasize the importance of the surfactant layer by numerically comparing airflow phenomena between a surfactant-enriched and surfactant-deficient model. The acinar model exhibits physiologically accurate alveolar and duct dimensions extending from lung generations 18 to 23. Airflow patterns in the surfactant-enriched model support previous findings that the recirculation of the flow is affected by its propagation depth. Proximal lung generations experience dominant recirculating flow while farther generations in the distal alveolar region exhibit dominant radial flows. In the surfactant-enriched model, surface tension values alternate during inhalation and exhalation, with values increasing to 25 mN/m at the inhalation and decreasing to 1 mN/m at the end of the exhalation. In the surfactant-deficient model, only water coats the alveolar walls with a high surface tension value of 70 mN/m.

Results

Results showed that surfactant deficiency in the alveoli adversely alters airflow behavior and generates unsteady chaotic breathing through the production of vorticities, accompanied by higher vorticity magnitudes (100% increase at the end of exhalation) and higher velocity magnitudes (8.69% increase during inhalation and 11.9% increase during exhalation). In addition, high air-water surface tension in the surfactant-deficient case was found to induce higher shear stress values (by around a factor of 10) on the alveolar walls than that of the surfactant-enriched case.

Conclusion

Overall, it was concluded that the presence of the surfactant improves respiratory mechanics and allows for smooth breathing and normal respiration.

New perspectives by imaging modalities for an old illness: Rheumatic mitral stenosis

Mitral stenosis (MS) is a progressive and devastating disease and most often occurs among young women. Given its considerable prevalence in Mediterranean and Eastern European countries according to the Euro Heart Survey, new imaging modalities are warranted to improve the management of patients with this condition. A wide spectrum of abnormalities occurs involving all parts of this complex structure and causing different grades of MS and/or regurgitation as a consequence of rheumatic affection. Novel imaging modalities significantly improved the assessment of several aspects of this rheumatic destructive process including the morphological alterations of the mitral valve (MV) apparatus, left atrial (LA) function, LA appendage, right and left ventricular (LV) functions, and complications, namely, atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events. Furthermore, new imaging modalities improved the prediction of outcome of patients who underwent percutaneous balloon mitral comissurotomy and changed the paradigm of patient selection for intervention and risk stratification. The present review aimed to summarize the role of new multimodality, multiparametric imaging approaches to assess the morphological characteristics of the rheumatic MS and its associated complications, and to guide patient management.

Computational fluid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine

This paper reviews the methods, benefits and challenges associated with the adoption and translation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling within cardiovascular medicine. CFD, a specialist area of mathematics and a branch of fluid mechanics, is used routinely in a diverse range of safety-critical engineering systems, which increasingly is being applied to the cardiovascular system. By facilitating rapid, economical, low-risk prototyping, CFD modelling has already revolutionised research and development of devices such as stents, valve prostheses, and ventricular assist devices. Combined with cardiovascular imaging, CFD simulation enables detailed characterisation of complex physiological pressure and flow fields and the computation of metrics which cannot be directly measured, for example, wall shear stress. CFD models are now being translated into clinical tools for physicians to use across the spectrum of coronary, valvular, congenital, myocardial and peripheral vascular diseases. CFD modelling is apposite for minimally-invasive patient assessment. Patient-specific (incorporating data unique to the individual) and multi-scale (combining models of different length- and time-scales) modelling enables individualised risk prediction and virtual treatment planning. This represents a significant departure from traditional dependence upon registry-based, population-averaged data. Model integration is progressively moving towards ‘digital patient’ or ‘virtual physiological human’ representations. When combined with population-scale numerical models, these models have the potential to reduce the cost, time and risk associated with clinical trials. The adoption of CFD modelling signals a new era in cardiovascular medicine. While potentially highly beneficial, a number of academic and commercial groups are addressing the associated methodological, regulatory, education- and service-related challenges.

Radius of proximal isovelocity surface area in the assessment of rheumatic mitral stenosis: Connecting flow to anatomy and hemodynamics

Background

Echocardiographic assessment of left atrial pressure (LAP) in mitral stenosis (MS) is controversial. We sought to examine the role of the radius of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA-r) in the assessment of the hemodynamic status of MS after fixing the aliasing velocity (Val).

Methods and results

We studied 42 candidates of balloon mitral valvuloplasty (BMV), for whom pre-BMV echocardiography was done and LAP invasively measured before dilatation. PISA-r was calculated after fixing aliasing velocity to 33 cm/s. In addition, the ratio IVRT/Te’–E was also measured, where IVRT was isovolumic relaxation time, and Te’–E was the time difference between the onset of mitral flow E-wave and mitral annular early diastolic velocity. IVRT/Te’–E and PISA-r showed a strong correlation with LAP (r = −0.715 and −0.637, all p < 0.001) and with right-sided pressures. In addition, PISA-r correlated with mitral valve area by planimetry method (MVA) and with left ventricular outflow tract stroke volume (r = 0.66 and 0.71, all p < 0.001). Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC-curve) showed that PISA-r was not inferior to IVRT/Te’–E in differentiating LAP ⩾25 from <25 mmHg.

Conclusion

Provided that Val is set to a constant of 33 cm/s, PISA-r can assess the hemodynamic status of MS, and seems a simple alternative to the tedious IVRT/Te’–E for estimation of LAP.

Simplifying proximal isovelocity surface area as an assessment method of mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis by fixing aliasing velocity and mitral valve angle

We aimed to test the ability of a simple equation using proximal isovelocity surface area method (PISA), created by fixing the angle to 100° and the aliasing velocity to 33 cm/s, to calculate mitral valve area (MVA) and assess severity in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a series of 51 consecutive patients with rheumatic MS, MVA was assessed by four methods, conventional PISA equation (PISAconventional), simple PISA equation (PISAsimple), pressure half time (PHT), and planimetry (PLN) which was taken as the reference method. All methods correlated significantly with PLN with the highest correlation found in case of PISAconventional and PISAsimple (r = 0.97, 0.96, p < 0.001), while the correlation in case PHT was relatively weaker (r = 0.69, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the level of agreement with PLN was better in case of both PISA methods than PHT and, moreover, were close to each other. The number of cases that showed agreement of severity grade with planinetry was better in case of PISAconventional (42 cases) and PISAsimple (44 cases) than that in case of PHT (34 cases, p = 0.037). Finally, the measure of agreement with Cohen's Kappa test was better in case of PISAconventional and PISAsimple than that in case of PHT.

CONCLUSION

Provided that aliasing velocity is fixed at 33 cm/s, PISA can effectively predict mitral valve area and severity of MS by a simple equation, with the advantage of easy and accurate calculation over other methods.

Comparison of mitral valve area by pressure half-time and proximal isovelocity surface area method in patients with mitral stenosis: effect of net atrioventricular compliance

AIMS

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that, unlike calculation of the mitral valve area (MVA) with the pressure half-time method (PHT), the proximal isovelocity surface area method (PISA) is not affected by changes in net atrioventricular compliance (C(n)).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 51 patients with mitral stenosis (MS) from two centres. MVA was assessed with the PISA (MVA(PISA)), PHT (MVA(PHT)), and planimetry (MVA(PLN), serving as the gold standard) method. C(n) was calculated with a previously validated equation using 2D echocardiography. MVA(PISA) closely correlated with MVA(PLN) (r = 0.96, P < 0.0001), while MVA(PHT) and MVA(PLN) showed a weaker but still good correlation (r = 0.69, P < 0.0001). The correlation between MVA(PHT) and MVA(PLN) for patients with C(n) between 4 and 6 mL/mmHg (considered to be normal) was excellent (r = 0.93, P < 0.0001), but that for patients with C(n) of less than 4 or more than 6 mL/mmHg was not as good (r = 0.64, P < 0.0001). Importantly, a significant inverse correlation was detected between the percentage difference among MVA(PHT), MVA(PLN), and C(n) (r = -0.77, P < 0.0001), but the line of fit was nearly flat for the percentage difference among MVA(PISA), MVA(PLN), and C(n) (r = 0.1, P = 0.388).

CONCLUSION

MVA calculated with both the PISA and PHT methods correlated well with MVA calculated with the planimetry method. However, the PISA rather than PHT is recommended for patients with MS and extreme C(n) values because PISA, unlike PHT, is not affected by changes in C(n).

Evaluation of mitral stenosis in 2008

Percutaneous mitral valve commissurotomy (PMC) is the treatment of choice for patients with mitral stenosis (MS) and favorable anatomy. Evaluation of MS should answer two questions: is MS severe? And is the valve suitable for PMC? Evaluation of MS severity relies on accurate echocardiographic assessment of the mitral valve area (MVA). Several methods can be used, often in combination. The planimetry is the reference method but must be precisely performed at the tips of the leaflets in a well-oriented plane and thus requires experienced operators. New imaging technologies, such as 3D-echocardiography, MRI or computed tomography may reduce planimetry's operator dependence. The pressure half-time method (PHT) has the merit of simplicity but should be used cautiously in elderly patients or those in atrial fibrillation. It is invalid immediately after PMC but can still be used as a semi-quantitative method: a PHT less than 130 msec is associated with a good valve opening with an excellent specificity and positive predictive value whereas a PHT 130 msec does not allow any conclusion. The continuity equation, easy to perform, may be invalidated by the commonly associated aortic or mitral regurgitation or in case of atrial fibrillation. The PISA method, is reputed technically challenging and requires a direct measurement of angle between the mitral leaflets, although the use of a fixed value of 100 degrees provides an accurate MVA estimation. The main indication of transesophageal echocardiography is the exclusion of left atrial thrombus, which is a contra-indication to PMC as well as a 2/4 or greater mitral regurgitation grade. Two-dimensional-echocardiography allows detailed evaluation of valve morphology, including leaflet thickness and mobility, degree and localization of calcifications, extent of the subvalvular involvement. Unfavorable valve anatomy is associated with a lower rate of PMC success and lower event-free survival. However, given the low predictive value of all anatomic scores, the decision to perform or not the procedure should be based on a global approach taking into account not only the valve anatomy but also individual patients characteristics such as age, rhythm, NYHA class, MVA and the predicted operative mortality based on associated comorbidities.

Accuracy of the flow convergence method for quantification of aortic regurgitation in patients with central versus eccentric jets

Proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) has been proposed as a quantitative method to assess the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR). Yet the accuracy of this method in patients with eccentric AR jets is unknown. The aims of this study were to compare the accuracy of the PISA method for the quantification of AR severity in patients with central versus eccentric AR jets and to verify whether imaging from the left parasternal instead of the apical window improves the accuracy of the PISA method in patients with eccentric jets. Fifty patients with AR (21 with central jets and 29 with eccentric jets) underwent PISA and phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) measurements of AR volume. In patients with eccentric AR jets, PISA measurements obtained from the left parasternal and apical windows were compared. In patients with central AR jets, CMR- and PISA-derived AR volumes were similar (28 +/- 19 vs 30 +/- 20 ml, p = 0.34), were strongly correlated (r = 0.92, p <0.0001), and differed minimally from each other (by 2 +/- 8 ml). In patients with eccentric AR jets, PISA-derived AR volumes underestimated those measured by CMR (38 +/- 22 vs 51 +/- 27 ml, bias -13 +/- 20 ml) and were correlated only fairly (r = 0.69, p <0.001). Imaging from the left parasternal window eliminated the differences between CMR- and PISA-derived AR volumes (51 +/- 27 vs 53 +/- 26 ml, p = 0.24) and improved the correlation between the 2 measures (r = 0.95). In conclusion, in patients with eccentric AR jets imaged from the apical window, the PISA method significantly underestimated AR severity. This was no longer the case when imaging was performed from the left parasternal instead of the apical window.

A nomogram for measurement of mitral valve area by proximal isovelocity surface area method

INTRODUCTION

Although its accuracy has been documented in many studies, the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method is not used widely for mitral valve area (MVA) measurement. In this study, we prepared a new nomogram and tested its use in MVA assessment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 23 patients (age: 27 +/- 5 years) with mitral stenosis, of whom 7 were in atrial fibrillation. The MVA was measured by four methods: planimetry (PL) (reference method), pressure-half time (PHT), conventional PISA (CP), and nomogram (Nomo) methods. The nomogram included two unknowns: (1) r; the radius of the first PISA section; (2) a; the length of the border opposite to the PISA angle in the triangle with both adjacent borders of 1 cm. The nomogram was also tested for its popularity potential by eight echocardiographers, none of whom were included in the author list.

RESULTS

Mean MVA(PL) was 1.85 +/- 0.53 cm(2) (range: 0.72-2.99), mean MVA(PHT) was 1.72 +/- 0.56 cm(2) (range: 0.91-3.30), mean MVA(CP) was 1.69 +/- 0.45 cm(2) (range: 0.97-2.54), and MVA(Nomo) was 1.70 +/- 0.44 cm(2) (0.96-2.49). The nomogram correlated with planimetry (r = 0.87; P < 0.001), pressure half-time (r = 0.71; P < 0.001) and conventional PISA (r = 0.99; P = 0.000) methods. The nomogram method also correlated with planimetry in patients with atrial fibrillation (r = 0.81; P = 0.026). The echocardiographers found that the nomogram is superior to the planimetry and conventional PISA methods but inferior to the pressure half-time method in terms of simplicity.

CONCLUSION

The new nomogram is potentially helpful in measurement of MVA. It may be used as an additional method in assessing severity of mitral stenosis.

Noninvasive assessment of left-to-right shunting in ventricular septal defects by the proximal isovelocity surface area method on Doppler colour flow mapping

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA), which is the zone of flow convergence appearing on the left ventricular septal surface where flow approaching the defect accelerates, allows quantitative estimation of ventricular septal defect (VSD) flow and defect area on colour Doppler imaging. In the present study, the clinical applicability and reliability of the PISA method in assessing the amount of left-to-right shunting in patients with VSDs were evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients aged 0.25 to 15 years (mean age 4.3+/-4.4 years) with VSDs were prospectively studied. Maximum PISA radius in peak systole (r), peak velocity (V(max)) and velocity time integral (VTI(VSD)) of flow through the VSD were measured. In addition, peak VSD flow (2pir(2) Nyquist limit [NL]), amount of left-to-right shunting (Qp-Qs = heart rate x [2pir(2) x NL x VTI(VSD)]/V(max)) and defect area ([2pir(2) x NL]/V(max)) were calculated.

RESULTS

There were significant positive correlations between Qp-Qs values calculated by PISA and other spectral Doppler methods using the cross-sectional area, as well as the VTI of pulmonary-aortic (r=0.73, P<0.001) or mitral-tricuspid (r=0.58, P<0.001) flows and cardiac catheterization (20 patients, r=0.82, P<0.001). PISA-derived left-to-right-shunting discriminated moderate to large defects from small defects, which were classified according to the catheter-derived Qp/Qs ratio (2 or greater versus less than 2; P=0.001) or clinical evaluation (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that the PISA method is a reliable semiquantitative method to determine the amount of left-to-right shunting of VSDs and to discriminate moderate to large defects from small defects. Consequently, this method may serve as a simple and useful adjunct to conventional spectral Doppler methods in the noninvasive assessment of patients with VSDs.

Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Should Be Routinely Measured in Evaluating Mitral Regurgitation: A Core Review

The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) measurement, also known as the "flow convergence" method, can be used in echocardiography to estimate the area of an orifice through which blood flows. It has many applications, but this review focuses only on its use in the intraoperative evaluation of mitral regurgitation. In that setting, PISA provides a quantitative assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation and it is useful in clinical decision-making in the operating room. In this review, I discuss the physical principles behind the PISA method, along with the various mathematical formulas used to calculate the effective mitral regurgitant orifice area, the regurgitant volume, and the regurgitant fraction. A step-by-step approach is presented and illustrated with graphic and video demonstrations. Finally, I will discuss the various limitations and technical considerations of PISA measurement in the operating room.

Real-time 3-Dimensional Color Doppler Flow of Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation: Feasibility and Initial Quantitative Comparison with 2-Dimensional Methods

BACKGROUND

Visualization of valvular regurgitation using 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has been attempted but not routinely performed to date because of technical limitations. With the recent development of a fully sampled matrix-array probe, real-time color flow imaging allows display and analysis of regurgitant jets. Accordingly, the aim of this study was 2-fold. We: (1) investigated the feasibility of transthoracic, real-time visualization of 3D color flow jets; and (2) compared conventional 2-dimensional (2D) Doppler/color flow methods of quantitation (ie, 2D jet/left atrial [LA] area, flow convergence, and vena contracta [VC]) to 3D-derived measurements (3D jet/LA volume, flow convergence, and VC).

METHOD

In all, 56 patients with good acoustic windows and varying degrees of mitral regurgitation (MR) (n = 32) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (n = 24) scheduled for a routine echocardiogram were studied. Using a broadband transducer, 2D color Doppler imaging of TR and MR jets was performed to obtain jet/atrial area ratio, effective regurgitant orifice area, and VC measurements. Subsequently, real-time 3D echocardiography imaging of these jets was performed and analyzed offline using software, resulting in jet/atrial volume ratio, effective regurgitant orifice area, and VC (major and minor axes).

RESULTS

Of the 56 patients recruited into the study, 86% had sufficient data quality for analysis (87.5% in patients with MR and 83% in patients with TR). Both LA and right atrium were adequately visualized in all patients. Manually traced 3D MR and TR volumes had good agreement when compared with proximal isovelocity surface area-derived volumes (r = 0.7, y = 0.4x + 6.4; and r = 0.8, y = 1.1x + 5.1; respectively) with minimal underestimation and overestimation of volumes for MR and TR (8 and 7 mL, respectively), but with relatively wide limits of agreement for MR (28 mL) versus TR (12 mL). When comparing 3D MR jet/LA volume ratios and TR jet/right atrial volume ratios to 2D MR jet/LA area and 2D TR jet/right atrial area ratios, the former were significantly smaller. The 3D minimum and maximum VC diameter for MR were significantly different compared with those measured with 2D (minimum diameter = 0.7 +/- 0.1 cm, P < .01; maximum diameter = 1.1 +/- 0.5 cm, P < .02 vs 2D = 0.8 +/- 0.3 cm). Conversely, the TR VC minimum diameter was similar but maximum diameter measurements were larger in 3D compared with 2D (3D = 1.3 +/- 0.6 cm vs 2D = 0.7 +/- 0.2 cm, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional echocardiography of color flow Doppler of MR and TR jets was feasible. Quantitative methods using 3D echocardiography such as MR and TR volumes correlated well with 2D flow convergence methods. TR VC has more of an elliptic shape, whereas MR is more circular or oval when visualized in 3D. Regurgitant/atrial volume ratios provide a new method of assessing the severity of regurgitant lesions; however, 3D volume-derived ratios were comparatively smaller than those measured with 2D echocardiography.

The Use of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for the Evaluation of and Treatment of Mitral Stenosis

To date, mitral stenosis has been evaluated by both hemodynamic data derived from catheterization as well as 2D and Doppler echocardiography. However, the advent of real-time 3D echocardiography has allowed more precise measurement of the mitral valve orifice by planimetry. In addition, evaluation of the mitral commissures prior to and after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty is greatly aided by 3D echocardiography. Here we discuss these subjects as well as provide specific clinical trials that support the use of real-time 3D echocardiography for the evaluation and treatment of mitral stenosis.

A simple different method to use proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) for measuring mitral valve area

BACKGROUND

Angle-correction is an important limiting factor for using proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method in measuring mitral valve area (MVA). In this study, we derived a novel formula, which simplifies the angle-correction, and tested its use in patients with mitral stenosis (MS).

METHODS

The study included 30 MS patients without concomitant aortic or mitral regurgitation. We used mathematical equations and established a relation between the angle and its corresponding border, 'a', by using linear regression analysis. It was found that MVA is equal to [(1.11*a2 + 0.95)* r2 (Val/Vmax)]. We compared this formula with plain angle-corrected and solid angle-corrected PISA methods, planimetry (reference method) and pressure-half time method by linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

All methods were in significant relation with the reference method, two-dimensional planimetry. We found that there is a good relation between our method and planimetry (r = 0.79, p < 0.001), pressure half-time method (r = 0.85, p < 0.001), angle-corrected PISA method (r = 0.99, p < 0.001), and solid angle-corrected PISA method (r = 0.88, p < 0.001). The time duration of the new method was shorter (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our method is an easy way for applying angle-corrected PISA method to mitral valve area measurement in patients with mitral stenosis. Absence of the need for estimating the angle is the major advantage.

Comparison of Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Method and Pressure Half Time Method for Evaluation of Mitral Valve Area in Patients Undergoing Balloon Mitral Valvotomy

BACKGROUND

The pressure half time (PHT) method is unreliable for measurement of mitral valve area (MVA) immediately after valvotomy. The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been used to derive mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis. The aim of our study was to compare PISA method and PHT method in patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy (BMV).

METHODS

The PISA was recorded from the apex and MVA was calculated using continuity equation by the formula 2pir(2) Vr/Vm, where 2pir(2) is the hemispheric isovelocity area, Vr is the velocity at the radial distance "r" from the orifice, and Vm is the peak velocity. A plain angle correction factor (theta)/180 was used to correct the inlet angle subtended by leaflet tunnel as a result of leaflet doming.

RESULTS

MVA calculated using PISA method (r = 0.5217, P < 0.0001, SE = 0.016) and PHT (r = 0.6652, P < 0.0001, SE = 0.017) correlated well with 2D method in patients with mitral stenosis before BMV. After BMV, MVA by PISA method correlated well with 2D planimetry (r = 0.5803, P < 0.0001, SE = 0.053) but PHT showed poor correlation (r = 0.1334, P = 0.199, SE = 0.036). The variability of measurement of MVA was most marked with PHT method in the post-BMV period.

CONCLUSION

The PISA method correlates well with 2D planimetry in patients with mitral stenosis before and after BMV and is superior to the PHT method in the post-BMV period where the latter may be unreliable.

A different method for measuring mitral valve area with special emphasis on concomitant aortic regurgitation: A new application of proximal isovelocity surface area method

Measurement of mitral valve area is still a challenge for the echocardiographers. Each method has its own limitations. In this study we assessed a different method and compared it with the other methods. The study included 50 consecutive patients with mitral stenosis. The reference method was planimetry. The suggested method was compared with the pressure half-time method, proximal isovelocity surface area method with and without angular correction, and the continuity method. There was a good correlation between each method and planimetry. The suggested method had the best correlation both for patients with and without aortic regurgitation. The pressure half-time method and continuity method overestimated the mitral valve area for patients with aortic regurgitation, whereas proximal isovelocity surface area method without angular correction overestimated the area in all patients. In conclusion, this method has very good correlation with planimetry. It can be used both in patients with and without aortic regurgitation.

Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for rheumatic mitral valve stenosis evaluation

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to assess which echo-Doppler method has the best agreement with the mitral valve area (MVA) invasively evaluated by the Gorlin's formula. We also evaluated the feasibility and reproducibility of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3D) for the estimation of MVA and the Wilkins score in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMVS).

BACKGROUND

Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography is a novel technique that allows us to visualize the mitral valvular anatomy in any desired plane orientation. The usefulness and accuracy of this technique for evaluating RMVS has not been established.

METHODS

We studied a series of consecutive patients with RMVS from two tertiary care hospitals. Mitral valvular area was determined by conventional echo-Doppler methods and by RT3D, and their results were compared with those obtained invasively. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography planimetry and mitral score were measured by two independent observers and then repeated by one of them.

RESULTS

Eighty patients with RMVS comprised our study group (76 women; 50.6 +/- 13.9 years). Compared with all other echo-Doppler methods, RT3D had the best agreement with the invasively determined MVA (average difference between both methods and limits of agreement: 0.08 cm(2) [-0.48 to 0.6]). Interobserver variability was as good for RT3D (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.90) as for pressure half-time (PHT) (ICC = 0.95). For PHT and RT3D, the intraobserver variability was similar (ICC 0.92 and 0.96, respectively). Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography valvular score evaluation showed a better interobserver agreement with RT3D than with 2D echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography is a feasible, accurate, and highly reproducible technique for assessing MVA in patients with RMVS. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography has the best agreement with invasive methods.

Clinical Applicability for the Assessment of the Valvular Mitral Stenosis Severity with Doppler Echocardiography and the Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area (PISA) Method

Evaluation of the severity of valvular mitral stenosis and measurements of the effective rheumatic mitral valve area by noninvasive echocardiography has been well accepted. The area is measured by the two-dimensional planimetry (PLM) method and the Doppler pressure half-time (PHT) method. Recently, the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) by color Doppler technique has been used as a quantitative measurement for valvular heart disease. However, this method needs more validation. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the clinical applicability of the PISA method in the measurements of effective mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease. Forty-seven patients aged from 23 to 71 years, with a mean age of 53 +/- 13 (25 male and 22 female, 15 with sinus rhythm, mean heart rate of 83 +/- 14 beats per minute, with rheumatic valvular mitral stenosis without hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation) were included in the study. Effective mitral valve area (MVA) derived by the PISA method was calculated as follows: 2 x Pi x (proximal aliasing color zone radius)2x aliasing velocity/peak velocity across mitral orifice. Effective mitral valve areas measured by three different methods (PLM, PHT, and PISA) were compared and correlated with those calculated by the "gold standard" invasive Gorlin's formula. The MVA derived from PHT, PLM, PISA and Gorlin's formula were 1.00 +/- 0.31cm2, 0.99 +/- 0.30 cm2, 0.95 +/- 0.30 cm2 and 0.91 +/- 0.29 cm2, respectively. The correlation coefficients (r value) between PHT, PLM, PISA, and Gorlin's formula, respectively, were 0.66 (P = 0.032, SEE = 0.64), 0.67 (P = 0.25, SEE = 0.72) and 0.80 (P = 0.002, SEE = 0.53). In conclusion, the PISA method is useful clinically in the measurement of effective mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis. The technique is relatively simple, highly feasible and accurate when compared with the PHT, PLM, and Gorlin's formula. Therefore, this method could be a promising supplement to methods already in use.

Accuracy of mitral valve area measurements using transthoracic rapid freehand 3-dimensional scanning: comparison with noninvasive and invasive methods

OBJECTIVE

The feasibility and accuracy of direct transthoracic 3-dimensional (3D) mitral valve area (MVA) measurements obtained using freehand scanning was investigated in patients with mitral stenosis.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients (26 women, 4 men; aged 55 +/- 13 years) underwent a 2-dimensional (2D) and Doppler study 1 hour before percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Transthoracic freehand data were acquired using a magnetic receiver attached to a broadband transducer, gated to electrocardiography and respiration. Volumetric MVA measurements from the left ventricle and left atrium were obtained and compared with MVA measurements derived from 2D planimetry, pressure half-time, and proximal isovelocity surface area. Invasive Gorlin MVA measurements were the gold standard for comparison.

RESULTS

In all, 29 patients (97%) had 3D data allowing MVA measurements. Direct 3D measurements from the left ventricle had the least bias (0.06 +/- 0.19 cm(2)) and tightest limits of agreement (-0.44 to 0.32) compared with left atrium measurements (0.17 +/- 0.25 cm(2) and -0.67 to 0.33, respectively). The proximal isovelocity surface area method (bias: 0.09 +/- 0.34 cm(2)) was the most accurate of all 2D methods followed by pressure half-time (0.17 +/- 0.36 cm(2)) and planimetry (0.21 +/- 0.29 cm(2)).

CONCLUSION

Direct 3D MVA measurements from the left ventricle using transthoracic freehand scanning are more accurate than traditional 2D methods.

What does transesophageal echocardiography add to valvular heart surgery?

No single monitoring tool in the last decade has had more of an effect on intraoperative decision making and surgical management of cardiac valvular pathologies than has TEE. It has become the standard of care for evaluating reparative valvular procedures, thus providing an immediate gauge of the surgical results and helping to avoid suboptimal surgical outcomes. As the technology of TEE and its application advance, so too should the ability to diagnose and manage valvular pathologies, broaden the range of surgical options, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

[Quantification of mitral regurgitation]

The echographic methods of quantification of mitral regurgitation are various. Semiquantitative methods using the color Doppler extension of the regurgitant jet are now replaced by more quantitative methods, including PISA, jet width, and regurgitant fraction. Although sometimes difficult, accurate quantification of mitral regurgitation is now possible in a majority of patients using transthoracic echocardiography.

A new automated method for the quantification of mitral regurgitant volume and dynamic regurgitant orifice area based on a normalized centerline velocity distribution using color M-mode and continuous wave Doppler imaging

Previous echocardiographic techniques for quantifying valvular regurgitation (PISA) are limited by factors including uncertainties in orifice location and hemispheric convergence assumption. Using computational fluid dynamics simulations, we developed a new model for the estimation of orifice diameter and regurgitant volume without the aforementioned assumptions of the PISA technique. Using experimental data obtained from the in vitro flow model we successfully validated our new model. The model output (y) and reference (x) values were in close agreement (y = 0.95x + 0.38, r = 0.96, error = 1.68 +/- 7.54% for the orifice diameter and y = 1.18x - 4.72, r = 0.93, error = 6.48 +/- 16.81% for the regurgitant volume).

Real-time three-dimensional color doppler evaluation of the flow convergence zone for quantification of mitral regurgitation: Validation experimental animal study and initial clinical experience

BACKGROUND

Pitfalls of the flow convergence (FC) method, including 2-dimensional imaging of the 3-dimensional (3D) geometry of the FC surface, can lead to erroneous quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR). This limitation may be mitigated by the use of real-time 3D color Doppler echocardiography (CE). Our objective was to validate a real-time 3D navigation method for MR quantification.

METHODS

In 12 sheep with surgically induced chronic MR, 37 different hemodynamic conditions were studied with real-time 3DCE. Using real-time 3D navigation, the radius of the largest hemispherical FC zone was located and measured. MR volume was quantified according to the FC method after observing the shape of FC in 3D space. Aortic and mitral electromagnetic flow probes and meters were balanced against each other to determine reference MR volume. As an initial clinical application study, 22 patients with chronic MR were also studied with this real-time 3DCE-FC method. Left ventricular (LV) outflow tract automated cardiac flow measurement (Toshiba Corp, Tokyo, Japan) and real-time 3D LV stroke volume were used to quantify the reference MR volume (MR volume = 3DLV stroke volume - automated cardiac flow measurement).

RESULTS

In the sheep model, a good correlation and agreement was seen between MR volume by real-time 3DCE and electromagnetic (y = 0.77x + 1.48, r = 0.87, P <.001, delta = -0.91 +/- 2.65 mL). In patients, real-time 3DCE-derived MR volume also showed a good correlation and agreement with the reference method (y = 0.89x - 0.38, r = 0.93, P <.001, delta = -4.8 +/- 7.6 mL).

CONCLUSIONS

real-time 3DCE can capture the entire FC image, permitting geometrical recognition of the FC zone geometry and reliable MR quantification.

Clinical application in routine practice of the proximal flow convergence method to calculate the mitral surface area in mitral valve stenosis

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography planimetry, the Doppler pression half-time (PHT), and the continuity equation methods were used to estimate mitral valve area (MVA) in patients with mitral stenosis (MS). Recently, the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been shown to be accurate for calculating MVA. The purpose of this study is (1) to compare in a large non-selected population the accuracy of the PISA and planimetry methods for echocardiographic estimation of MVA; (2) to determine the effect of atrial fibrillation (AF), Wilkins score, associated mitral regurgitation (MR), aortic regurgitation (AR), and of commissural calcifications on the accuracy of the PISA method.

METHODS

One hundred and eight consecutive patients with rheumatic MS were studied (76 females and 32 males; mean age: 36 +/- 12 years); 64 were in sinus rhythm; 51 had associated MR and 46 had AR. By the PISA method. MVA was calculated assuming a uniform radius flow convergence region along a hemispherical surface.

RESULTS

The mean value of 2D MVA was 1.32 +/- 0.59 cm2 (0.4-3.1 cm2) and that of PISA MVA 1.33 +/- 0.62 cm2 (0.38-3 cm2). MVA calculated using the PISA method correlated well with 2D MVA (r = 0.93, y = 0.97x + 0.04, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.21 cm2). The correlation was also good in patients with AF (r = 0.93, y = 0.99x + 0.03, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.21 cm2), with MR (r = 0.94, y = 1.0 14x + 0.003, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.19 cm2), with AR (r = 0.93, y = 0.90x + 0.11, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.2 cm2), when Wilkins score was >8 (r = 0.92, = 0.96x + 0.06, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.19 cm2), and in patients with commissural calcifications (r = 0.90, y = 0.88x + 0.009, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.20 cm2).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that in routine practice, MVA calculated by the PISA method correlated well with the area obtained by planimetry even in the presence of commissural calcifications, associated MR, AR, AF and of high Wilkins score. Therefore, the PISA method provides a reliable measurement of the MVA in MS under different anatomic and clinical conditions and may be a useful alternative method for calculating MVA.

Contrasting effect of similar effective regurgitant orifice area in mitral and tricuspid regurgitation: a quantitative Doppler echocardiographic study

We compared the effect of similar effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) areas in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) on hemodynamics and volume overload, and examined the impact on grading of TR and MR severity. In a prospective study, 95 patients with TR in sinus rhythm were compared with 95 patients with MR in sinus rhythm matched for ERO area, age, and body surface area. We found that similar ERO area was associated with decreased volume overload in TR compared with MR. There were more women with TR than with MR, but comparison stratified by sex confirmed that regurgitant volume (RVol) was smaller in TR than in MR for similar ERO area. However, patients with systolic venous flow reversal (hepatic for TR and pulmonary for MR) had lower RVol but similar ERO area in TR compared with MR. Therefore, optimal diagnostic thresholds for severe regurgitation (maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity) in TR and MR were different for RVol (45 and 60 mL/beat, respectively) but similar for ERO area (40 mm(2)). We conclude that similar ERO areas induce less RVol in TR than in MR because of the decreased driving force in TR, but have similar consequences with regard to venous flow reversal. Therefore, a similar ERO area grading scheme can be used, and an ERO area of 40 mm(2) or greater is consistent with severe regurgitation in both TR and MR.

Interaliasing distance of the flow convergence surface for determining mitral regurgitant volume: a validation study in a chronic animal model

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to validate a new flow convergence (FC) method that eliminated the need to locate the regurgitant orifice and that could be performed semiautomatedly.

BACKGROUND

Complex and time-consuming features of previously validated color Doppler methods for determining mitral regurgitant volume (MRV) have prevented their widespread clinical use.

METHODS

Thirty-nine different hemodynamic conditions in 12 sheep with surgically created flail leaflets inducing chronic mitral regurgitation were studied with two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. Color Doppler M-mode images along the centerline of the accelerating flow towards the mitral regurgitation orifice were obtained. The distance between the two first aliasing boundaries (interaliasing distance [IAD]) was measured and the FC radius was mathematically derived according to the continuity equation (R(calc) = IAD/(1 - radicalv(1)/v(2)), v(1) and v(2) being the aliasing velocities). The conventional 2D FC radius was also measured (R(meas)). Mitral regurgitant volume was then calculated according to the FC method using both R(calc) and R(meas). Aortic and mitral electromagnetic (EM) flow probes and meters were balanced against each other to determine the reference standard MRV.

RESULTS

Mitral regurgitant volume calculated from R(calc) and R(meas) correlated well with EM-MRV (y = 0.83x + 5.17, r = 0.90 and y = 1.04x + 0.91, r = 0.91, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). However, both methods resulted in slight overestimation of EM-MRV (Delta was 3.3 +/- 2.1 ml for R(calc) and 1.3 +/- 2.3 ml for R(meas)).

CONCLUSIONS

Good correlation was observed between MRV derived from R(calc) (IAD method) and EM-MRV, similar to that observed with R(meas) (conventional FC method) and EM-MRV. The R(calc) using the IAD method has an advantage over conventional R(meas) in that it does not require spatial localization of the regurgitant orifice and can be performed semiautomatedly.

Transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) evaluation of the mitral and tricuspid valves

In skilled hands, multiplane TEE provides a comprehensive assessment of the anatomy and function of the mitral and tricuspid valves. TEE is uniquely effective in the evaluation of the diverse pathophysiologic processes that cause valvular heart disease.

Quantification of tricuspid regurgitation by measuring the width of the vena contracta with Doppler color flow imaging: a clinical study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the vena contracta width (VCW) measured using color Doppler as an index of severity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

BACKGROUND

The VCW is a reliable measure of mitral and aortic regurgitation, but its value in measuring TR is uncertain.

METHODS

In 71 consecutive patients with TR, the VCW was prospectively measured using color Doppler and compared with the results of the flow convergence method and hepatic venous flow, and its diagnostic value for severe TR was assessed.

RESULTS

The VCW was 6.1+/-3.4 mm and was significantly higher in patients with, than those without, severe TR (9.6+/-2.9 vs. 4.2 +/- 1.6 mm, p<0.0001). The VCW correlated well with the effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) by the flow convergence method (r = 0.90, SEE = 0.17 cm2, p<0.0001), even when restricted to patients with eccentric jets (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). The VCW also showed significant correlations with hepatic venous flow (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001), regurgitant volume (r = 0.77, p<0.0001) and right atrial area (r = 0.46, p< 0.0001). A VCW > or =6.5 mm identified severe TR with 88.5% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity. In comparison with jet area or jet/right atrial area ratio, the VCW showed better correlations with ERO (both p<0.01) and a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.98 vs. 0.88 and 0.85, both p<0.02) for the diagnosis of severe TR.

CONCLUSIONS

The VCW measured by color Doppler correlates closely with severity of TR. This quantitative method is simple, provides a high diagnostic value (superior to that of jet size) for severe TR and represents a useful tool for comprehensive, noninvasive quantitation of TR.

Influence of the orifice inlet angle on the velocity profile across a flow convergence region by color Doppler in vitro

The converging flow field proximal to a leaking valve is determined among other things by the orifice inlet angle formed by the leaflets. Thus, the inlet angle affects the determination of regurgitant flow rate by the flow convergence method. Based on the hypothesis of spheric isovelocity surfaces, others had postulated that a local velocity within the flow convergence should change inversely proportional to changes in the three-dimensional inlet angle. This concept would allow correction of the determination of regurgitant flow for nonplanar orifice inlet angles. We tested this concept in vitro. In a flow model, the flow convergence region proximal to different orifice plates was imaged by color Doppler: funnel-shaped, planar and tip-shaped (inverted funnels) orifice plates, with circular orifices of 2- and 7-mm diameter. Velocity profiles across the flow convergence along the flow centerline were read from the color maps. As predicted, the local velocities were inversely related to the inlet angle, but only at the 2-mm funnel orifices, this effect was inversely proportional to the three-dimensional inlet angle (i.e., in agreement with the mentioned concept). However, for any 7-mm orifice and/or inlet angle of > 180 degrees, the effect of the inlet angle was considerably less than predicted by the aforementioned concept. With increasing orifice diameter and with decreasing distance to the orifice, the effect of the orifice inlet angle was reduced. The effect of the orifice inlet angle on the flow convergence region is modulated by orifice size and the distance to the orifice. Therefore, correction of flow estimates in proportion to the three-dimensional inlet angle will lead to considerable errors in most situations of clinical relevance, namely to massive overcorrection when analyzing velocities located close to wide orifices.

Dual morphology of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) typically has a single morphology originating either in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) or near the posterior fascicle of the left ventricle (LV) in most instances. We present our observations in six patients with idiopathic VT in whom two morphologies were present.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 55 patients with idiopathic VT who underwent radiofrequency (RF) ablation, 44 had LV "fascicular" tachycardia, whereas 11 had RVOT tachycardia. During RF energy delivery, there was a change in VT morphology in two patients with idiopathic LV tachycardia. This second morphology was not ablated initially, recurred at follow-up, and was reablated successfully. In two additional patients with idiopathic LV tachycardia, a second VT was inducible after ablation of the "clinical" VT. This second morphology recurred at follow-up and was ablated successfully in one patient. The site where the second VT was ablated in all the three patients was remote from that of the first VT. In two patients with RVOT tachycardia, a second VT, originating from a different area of the RVOT, was induced after RF ablation of the "clinical" VT. This second VT recurred at follow-up and was reablated successfully in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Idiopathic VT is a more heterogenous entity than hitherto believed. A second VT was seen in 11% of patients during or after RF ablation of the "clinical" VT. The appearance of a second VT suggests either a different exit site of the same circuit or another site of origin.

The Mitral Regurgitation Index: an echocardiographic guide to severity

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to develop a semiquantitative index of mitral regurgitation severity suitable for use in daily clinical practice and research.

BACKGROUND

There is no simple method for quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR). The MR Index is a semiquantitative guide to MR severity. The MR Index is a composite of six echocardiographic variables: color Doppler regurgitant jet penetration and proximal isovelocity surface area, continuous wave Doppler characteristics of the regurgitant jet and tricuspid regurgitant jet-derived pulmonary artery pressure, pulse wave Doppler pulmonary venous flow pattern and two-dimensional echocardiographic estimation of left atrial size.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 103) with varying grades of MR, seen in the Adult Echocardiography Laboratory at UCSF, were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were evaluated for the six variables, each variable being scored on a four point scale from 0 to 3. The reference standards for MR were qualitative echocardiographic evaluation by an expert and quantitation of regurgitant fraction using two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. A subgroup of patients with low ejection fraction (EF < 50%) were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The MR Index increased in proportion to MR severity with a significant difference among the three grades in both normal and low EF groups (F = 130 and F = 42, respectively, p < 0.0001). The MR Index correlated with regurgitant fraction (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001). An MR Index > or =2.2 identified 26/29 patients with severe MR (sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 88%, PPV = 79%). No patient with severe MR had an MR Index <1.8 and no patient with mild MR had an MR Index >1.7.

CONCLUSIONS

The MR Index is a simple semiquantitative estimate of MR severity, which seems to be useful in evaluating MR in patients with a low EF.