Prediction of successful ablation site of concealed posteroseptal accessory pathways by a novel algorithm using baseline electrophysiological parameters: implication for an abbreviated ablation procedure

Preprocedural Discrimination of Posteroseptal Accessory Pathways Ablated from the Right Endocardium from Those Requiring a Left-sided or Epicardial Coronary Venous Approach

The success of radiofrequency catheter ablation of the accessory pathway (AP) depends on the accurate localisation of the bypass tract. In that respect, posteroseptal or inferior paraseptal APs often pose a diagnostic challenge because of the complex anatomy at the crux of the four cardiac chambers. Considering the differences in procedure risks and success rate depending on the need for a left-sided approach or a coronary sinus ablation, an accurate anticipation of the precise location of inferior paraseptal APs is critical to inform the consent process and guide the initial mapping strategy. Here, the preprocedural clues to discriminate APs that can be ablated from the right atrium, from those requiring a left-sided or epicardial coronary venous approach, are reviewed. Both manifest and concealed APs will be considered and, following the diagnostic process made by the operator before interpretation of the intra-cardiac signals, each of the following aspects will be addressed: clinical context and initial probability; and 12-lead ECG analysis during baseline ECG with manifest AP, maximal preexcitation, and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia.

A simple maneuver to determine if septal accessory pathway ablation requires a left atrial approach

INTRODUCTION

Septal accessory pathway (AP) ablation can be challenging due to the complex anatomy of the septal region. The decision to access the left atrium (LA) is often made after failure of ablation from the right. We sought to establish whether the difference between ventriculo-atrial (VA) time during right ventricular (RV) apical pacing versus the VA during tachycardia would help establish the successful site for ablation of septal APs.

METHODS

Intracardiac electrograms of patients with orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) using a septal AP with successful catheter ablation were reviewed. The ∆VA was the difference between the VA interval during RV apical pacing and the VA interval during ORT. The difference in the VA interval during right ventricular entrainment and ORT (StimA-VA) was also measured.

RESULTS

The median ∆VA time was significantly less in patients with a septal AP ablated on the right side compared with patients with a septal AP ablated on the left side (12 ± 19 vs. 56 ± 10 ms, p < .001). The StimA-VA was significantly different between the two groups (22 ± 14 vs. 53 ± 9 ms, p < .001). The ∆VA and StimA-VA were always ≤ 40 ms in patients with non-decremental septal APs ablated from the right side and always greater than 40 ms in those with septal APs ablated from the left.

CONCLUSION

ΔVA and StimA-VA values identified with RV apical pacing in the setting of ORT involving a septal AP predict when left atrial access will be necessary for successful ablation.

Ablation of posteroseptal and left posterior accessory pathways guided by left atrium-coronary sinus musculature activation sequence

INTRODUCTION

While some posteroseptal and left posterior accessory pathways (APs) can be ablated on the tricuspid annulus or within the coronary venous system, others require a left-sided approach. "Fragmented" or double potentials are frequently recorded in the coronary sinus (CS), with a smaller, blunt component from left atrial (LA) myocardium, and a larger, sharp signal from the CS musculature.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty patients with posteroseptal or left posterior AP were included. The LA-CS activation sequence was determined at the earliest site during retrograde AP conduction. Eleven APs (27.5%) were ablated on the tricuspid annulus (right endocardial), 9 (22.5%) inside the coronary venous system (epicardial), and 20 (50%) on the mitral annulus (left endocardial). A "fragmented" or double "atrial" potential was recorded in all patients inside the CS at the earliest site during retrograde AP conduction. Sharp potential from the CS preceded the LA blunt component (sharp/blunt sequence) in all patients with an epicardial AP, and in 10 of 11 (91%) patients with a right endocardial AP. Therefore, 18 of 19 (95%) APs ablated by a right-sided approach produced this pattern. The reverse sequence (blunt/sharp) was recorded in 19 of 20 (95%) patients with a left endocardial AP.

CONCLUSION

During retrograde AP conduction, the sequence of LA-CS musculature activation-as deduced from analysis of electrograms recorded at the earliest site inside the CS-can differentiate posteroseptal and left posterior APs that require left heart catheterization from those that can be eliminated by a totally venous approach.

Electrophysiological characteristics and radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways with slow conductive properties

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular accessory pathways (AP) with unusually long ventriculo-atrial (VA) conduction times are present in a significant subset of patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, not including patients with the permanent form of atrioventricular junctional reciprocating tachycardia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared the electrophysiological characteristics and outcomes after radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 34 patients with the WPW syndrome, a VA interval >80 ms, and paroxysmal tachycardia with an RP/PR ratio <1 (the slow group), vs 80 patients with WPW syndrome and a VA interval <80 ms (the fast group). AP were found in the posteroseptal region significantly more often in the slow than in the fast group. In addition, the decremental conductive properties of the AP were more common in the slow than in the fast group. Catheter ablation of AP was highly successful in both groups, although ablation required a greater number of RF applications and longer procedure times in the slow group, especially for AP with decremental conductive properties.

CONCLUSIONS

A posteroseptal AP location was more common in AP associated with long conduction times than in AP with typical conductive properties. Both types of AP were successfully ablated, although the slow group required longer procedures and more RF energy deliveries.

Algorithm for differentiation of left and right posterior paraseptal accessory pathway

We studied 196 consecutive patients with posterior paraseptal accessory pathway (AP); 124 showed manifest preexcitation and 72 were concealed AP. Successful ablation was obtained from left-sided approach in 134 patients (left posterior pasaseptal [LPS] group) and from right sided approach in 62 patients (right posterior paraseptal [RPS] group). A ventriculo-atrial (VA) interval of <50 ms recorded at LPS region (VA(LPS)) during right ventricular pacing identified 95 of the 134 patients (71%) with LPS AP with 100% specificity and positive predictive value. In the 101 patients with VA(LPS) >/=50 ms, a difference in VA interval of <20 ms recorded at the His bundle region and LPS region, DeltaVA(H-LPS), during right ventricular pacing predicted RPS AP with a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 85% and a positive predictive value of 91%. When these 2 parameters were used together for prediction of LPS or RPS AP, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were 96%, 97%, and 98% for LPS AP, and 97%, 96%, and 91% for RPS AP, respectively. This simple new algorithm using VA(LPS) and DeltaVA (H-LPS) during right ventricular pacing successfully discriminates LPS and RPS AP with high sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value and could facilitate radiofrequency ablation in patients with posterior paraseptal AP.

Prevention of the initiation of atrial fibrillation: mechanism and efficacy of different atrial pacing modes

Several atrial pacing modes have been reported to be effective in the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF); they included biatrial pacing, dual site right atrial pacing, Bachmann's bundle (BB) pacing, and coronary sinus pacing. However, the relative efficacy and electrophysiological mechanisms of these pacing modes in the prevention of AF are not clear. In 15 patients (age 54 +/- 14 years) with paroxysmal AF, P wave duration, effective refractory period, and atrial conduction time were determined with six different atrial drive pacings, that were right atrial appendage (RAA), BB, right posterior interatrial septum (RPS), distal coronary sinus (DCS), RAA plus RPS simultaneously (DSA), and RAA plus DCS simultaneously (BiA). All these patients consistently had AF induced with early RAA extrastimulation coupling to RAA drive pacing. No patient had AF induced with RAA extrastimulation coupled to BB, RPS, or DCS drive pacing, but seven and eight patients had AF induced with RAA extrastimulation coupled to DSA and BiA drive pacing, respectively. The P wave duration was longest during RAA pacing, and became shorter during other atrial pacing modes. Analysis of electrophysiological change showed that early RAA extrastimulation coupled to RAA drive pacing caused the longest atrial conduction delay among these atrial pacing modes; BB, RPS, and DCS drive pacing caused a greater reduction of this conduction delay than DSA and BiA drive pacing. In addition, the effective refractory periods of RAA determined with BB, RPS, and DCS drive pacing were similar and longer than that determined with DSA and BiA drive pacing. In patients with paroxysmal AF, this arrhythmia was readily induced with RAA extrastimuli coupled to RAA drive pacing. BB, RPS, and DCS pacing were similar and more effective than DSA and BiA pacing in preventing AF.

Characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation of septal accessory atrioventricular pathways

Septal accessory AV pathways are located in the complex AV septal space that also contains the specialized conduction system. They have unique electrocardiographical and electrophysiological characteristics to be differentiated from free-wall accessory pathways. Some of the septal pathways have AV nodelike conduction properties and produce a similar activation sequence in the retrograde conduction. Several methods have been developed to distinguish them from AV nodal pathways. Radiofrequency catheter ablation using the titration method and endocardial approach without entrance into the coronary sinus is effective in eliminating most of the septal accessory pathways without impairment of AV conduction. However, some posteroseptal accessory pathways may require energy application inside the coronary sinus, thus information of the coronary sinus anatomy is important for preventing complication.

Role of the surface electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of patients with supraventricular tachycardia

In this era of interventional electrophysiology, the accuracy of the electrocardiogram in diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia could be improved by detailed endocardial mapping and confirmed by results of radiofrequency catheter ablation. This article describes the electrocardiographic characteristics for different types of supraventricular tachycardia: atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia, atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia using an accessory pathway, and atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Several limitations, including the identification of P wave morphologies and polarities and separation between the terminal part of T wave and P wave during tachycardia, should be resolved before an accurate algorithm of the 12-lead surface electrocardiogram is developed for the diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia.