Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction

Index Admission and Thirty-Day Readmission Outcomes of Patients With Cancer Presenting With STEMI

BACKGROUND

National-level data of cancer patients' readmissions after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study was to compare the rates and causes of 30-day readmissions in patients with and without cancer.

METHODS

Among patients admitted with STEMI in the United States National Readmission Database (NRD) from October 2015-December 2017, we identified patients with the diagnosis of active breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer. The primary endpoint was the 30-day unplanned readmission rate. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital outcomes during the index admission and causes of readmissions. A propensity score model was used to compare the outcomes of patients with and without cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 385,522 patients were included in the analysis: 5956 with cancer and 379,566 without cancer. After propensity score matching, 23,880 patients were compared (Cancer = 5949, No Cancer = 17,931). Patients with cancer had higher 30-day readmission rates (19% vs. 14%, p < 0.01). The most common causes for readmission among patients with cancer were cardiac (31%), infectious (21%), oncologic (17%), respiratory (4%), stroke (4%), and renal (3%). During the first readmission, patients with cancer had higher adjusted rates of in-hospital mortality (15% vs. 7%; p < 0.01) and bleeding complications (31% vs. 21%; p < 0.01), compared to the non-cancer group. In addition, cancer (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.6, p < 0.01) was an independent predictor for 30-day readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

About one in five cancer patients presenting with STEMI will be readmitted within 30 days. Cardiac causes predominated the reason for 30-day readmissions in patients with cancer.

Assessment of Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction as a Surrogate for All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Treatment or Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

IMPORTANCE

Although nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with an increased risk of mortality, evidence validating nonfatal MI as a surrogate end point for all-cause or cardiovascular (CV) mortality is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether nonfatal MI may be a surrogate for all-cause or CV mortality in patients with or at risk for coronary artery disease.

DATA SOURCES

In this meta-analysis, PubMed was searched from inception until December 31, 2020, for randomized clinical trials of interventions to treat or prevent coronary artery disease reporting mortality and nonfatal MI published in 3 leading journals.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials including at least 1000 patients with 24 months of follow-up.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Trial-level correlations between nonfatal MI and all-cause or CV mortality were assessed for surrogacy using the coefficient of determination (R2). The criterion for surrogacy was set at 0.8. Subgroup analyses based on study subject (primary prevention, secondary prevention, mixed primary and secondary prevention, and revascularization), era of trial (before 2000, 2000-2009, and 2010 and after), and follow-up duration (2.0-3.9, 4.0-5.9, and ≥6.0 years) were performed.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All-cause or CV mortality and nonfatal MI.

RESULTS

A total of 144 articles randomizing 1 211 897 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Nonfatal MI did not meet the threshold for surrogacy for all-cause (R2 = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00-0.08) or CV (R2 = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.27) mortality. Nonfatal MI was not a surrogate for all-cause mortality in primary (R2 = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.001-0.26), secondary (R2 = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.00-0.20), mixed primary and secondary prevention (R2 = 0.001; 95% CI, 0.00-0.08), or revascularization trials (R2 = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.002-0.50). For trials enrolling patients before 2000 (R2 = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.36), between 2000 and 2009 (R2 = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00-0.17), and from 2010 and after (R2 = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.09), nonfatal MI was not a surrogate for all-cause mortality. Nonfatal MI was not a surrogate for all-cause mortality in randomized clinical trials with 2.0 to 3.9 (R2 = 0.004; 95% CI, 0.00-0.08), 4.0 to 5.9 (R2 = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.001-0.16), or 6.0 or more years of follow-up (R2 = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.01-0.55).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this meta-analysis do not appear to establish nonfatal MI as a surrogate for all-cause or CV mortality in randomized clinical trials of interventions to treat or prevent coronary artery disease.

Microcatheter-Facilitated Primary Angioplasty in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Direct stenting is the best method for achieving reperfusion in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We hypothesized that the use of a microcatheter (MC) during PPCI when Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow ≤ 1 after wire crossing would allow visualization of the downstream artery with an optimal TIMI 3 flow at the end of the procedure.

METHODS

In this pilot study, PPCI patients with TIMI flow ≤ 1 after wire crossing formed the MC group (n = 60); the MC was positioned in the distal part of the culprit artery and a small amount of contrast was injected through it to determine stent size and length to treat the culprit lesion. The MC group was compared with previous consecutive patients treated using standard PPCI (n = 94; similar characteristics except for the rate of previous percutaneous coronary intervention).

RESULTS

In the MC group, downstream arteries were visualized in 98% of cases and direct stenting was achieved in 72% vs 31% (P < 0.0001). Final TIMI 3 flow was similar in both groups (97%). There was less manual thrombectomy (20% vs 63%; P < 0.001) and bailout glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (6.7% vs 29.8%; P < 0.002). The incidence of major adverse events (death, shock, severe arrhythmia) and left ventricular ejection fraction were similar. The peak cardiac enzymes level was significantly lower in the MC group.

CONCLUSIONS

The MC strategy appears feasible and safe. It could allow exploring new strategies on the basis of more systematic direct stenting and prepared reperfusion by injecting drugs through the MC before reperfusion.

The History of Primary Angioplasty and Stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction

The evolution of the management of acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been one of the crowning achievements of modern medicine. At the turn of the twentieth century, MI was an often-fatal condition. Prolonged bed rest served as the principal treatment modality. Over the past century, insights into the pathophysiology of MI revolutionized approaches to management, with the sequential use of surgical coronary artery revascularization, thrombolytic therapy, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with primary coronary angioplasty, and placement of intracoronary stents. The benefits of prompt revascularization inspired systems of care to provide rapid access to PCI. This review provides a historical context for our current approach to primary PCI for acute MI.

Percutaneous Mechanical Reperfusion During Acute Myocardial Infarction

The treatment of acute myocardial infarction has progressed from bedrest to mechanical, catheter-based reperfusion. The authors review the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a primary treatment for acute myocardial infarction and the use of adjunctive agents. The most recent American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the use of PCI in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) advocate the use of PCI as primary therapy at those centers in which the procedure can be performed within accepted standards. Because a majority of hospitals (80%) do not have the capability of performing primary PCI, most patients are treated with thrombolytic therapy. PCI should be considered in those patients treated with thrombolytic therapy who have persistent or recurrent ischemia and/or cardiogenic shock. For patients with non-ST elevation MI, the use of an invasive strategy (early angiography and PCI if needed) has recently shown to be beneficial. Although revascularization is the basis of the acute therapy of MI, additional pharmacologic therapy in the acute setting is now recognized as a key to favorable long-term outcome.

Cardiovascular drug delivery with ultrasound and microbubbles

Microbubbles lower the threshold for cavitation of ultrasound and have multiple potential therapeutic applications in the cardiovascular system. One of the first therapeutic applications to enter into clinical trials has been microbubble-enhanced sonothrombolysis. Trials were conducted in acute ischemic stroke and clinical trials are currently underway for sonothrombolysis in treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Microbubbles can be targeted to epitopes expressed on endothelial cells and thrombi by incorporating targeting ligands onto the surface of the microbubbles. Targeted microbubbles have applications as molecular imaging contrast agents and also for drug and gene delivery. A number of groups have shown that ultrasound with microbubbles can be used for gene delivery yielding robust gene expression in the target tissue. Work has progressed to primate studies showing delivery of therapeutic genes to generate islet cells in the pancreas to potentially cure diabetes. Microbubbles also hold potential as oxygen therapeutics and have shown promising results as a neuroprotectant in an ischemic stroke model. Regulatory considerations impact the successful clinical development of therapeutic applications of microbubbles with ultrasound. This paper briefly reviews the field and suggests avenues for further development.

Drug-eluting stents in patients with anterior STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty: a substudy of the DESERT cooperation

BACKGROUND

Several concerns have emerged on the higher risk of in-stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, especially in the setting of STEMI patients. Few data have even been reported in high-risk patients, such as those with anterior MI. Therefore this represents the aim of the current study.

METHODS

The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL). We examined all completed randomized trials of DES for STEMI. The following key words were used for study selection: randomized trial, myocardial infarction, reperfusion, primary angioplasty, stenting, DES, sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), Cypher, paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), Taxus. No language restrictions were enforced.

RESULTS

Individual patient's data were obtained from 11 out of 13 trials, including a total of 2,782 patients with anterior MI [1,739 or 62.5% randomized to DES and 1,043 or 37.5% randomized to bare-metal stent (BMS)]. At long-term follow-up, no significant benefit was observed with DES as compared to BMS in terms of mortality [9.8 vs 10.9%, HR (95% CI) = 0.81 (0.61, 1.07), p = 0.13, p heterogeneity = 0.18], reinfarction [8.8 vs 6.4%, respectively; HR (95% CI) = 1.14 (0.80, 1.61), p = 0.47, p heterogeneity = 0.82], and stent thrombosis [5.6 vs 5%, OR (95% CI) = 0.88 (0.59, 1.30), p = 0.51, p heterogeneity = 0.65], whereas DES was associated with a significant reduction in terms of target-vessel revascularization (TVR) [13.7 vs 23.4%; OR (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.46, 0.69), p < 0.0001, p het = 0.81] that was observed at both early (within 1 year) [7 vs 14.7%, HR (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.46, 0.69), p < 0.0001, p het = 0.81] and late (>1 year) follow-up [7.2 vs 9%, HR (95% CI) = 0.67 (0.47, 0.96), p = 0.03, p het = 0.96].

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that among patients with anterior STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty, SES and PES, as compared to BMS, are associated with a significant reduction in TVR at long-term follow-up. No concerns were found with the use of first-generation DES in terms of mortality.

Very late hazard with stenting versus balloon angioplasty for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a 16-year single-center experience

OBJECTIVES

This study compares very late outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with stenting versus balloon angioplasty (BA).

BACKGROUND

Stenting compared with BA for STEMI improves outcomes at 6-12 months, but comparisons beyond 6-12 months have not been studied. Recent studies have shown that stent thrombosis (ST) continues to increase beyond 3-5 years and may be higher with drug-eluting stents (DES) than bare metal stents (BMS). We hypothesized that there may be a very late hazard with stenting versus BA due to very late ST.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2010 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with BA (n = 601) or stenting (n = 1,594) were prospectively enrolled in our registry and followed for 1-16 years.

RESULTS

Patients treated with BA were older, were more often female, had more three-vessel disease, and had smaller vessels. Stented patients had trends for less stent/lesion thrombosis (ST/LT) and target vessel (TV) reinfarction at 1 year. In landmark analyses >1 year, stented patients had more very late ST/LT (6.1% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.002) and more TV reinfarction (7.9% vs. 3.1%, P < 0.001) which remained significant after adjusting for baseline risk. The greatest differences in very late outcomes were between DES and BA, but there were also significant differences between BMS and BA.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be a very late hazard with stenting versus BA for STEMI. These data should encourage new strategies for prevention of very late ST with both BMS and DES including the development of bio-absorbable polymers and stent platforms.

Clinical and angiographic outcomes of wingspan stent placement for treatment of symptomatic intracranial stenosis: single center experience with 19 cases

Objective

The limitations of medical management of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (ICS) have prompted development of new strategies, including endovascular treatment. However, stenting of symptomatic ICS remains investigational. Here, we have reported and analyzed a series of 19 endovascular procedures involving placement of a Wingspan stent.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of a series of ICS in which patients were treated with percutaneous transarterial balloon angioplasty and stent placement (PTAS). Patients included in the study were diagnosed as symptomatic ICS between May 2010 and September 2011.

Results

Nineteen patients (median age, 65 years; 12 males, seven women) were treated with the Wingspan stent system for symptomatic ICS ranging from 50% to 99%. The technical success rate was 100%. The location of ICS included the internal carotid (n = 5; 1 petrous, 3 cavernous, and 1 clinoid segments), vertebral (n = 1; V4 segment), basilar (n = 1), and middle cerebral (n = 12; 9 M1, 3 M2) arteries. There was no occurrence of procedure-related mortality. Periprocedural morbidity occurred in two cases (10.5%), including carotid-cavernous fistula (n = 1) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 1). No ipsilateral stroke was recorded beyond 30 days during a mean follow-up period of 13.2 months (range 9-19 months). Restenosis (> 50%) was observed in one patient (6.3%), who was asymptomatic, on follow-up imaging.

Conclusion

Wingspan stent for symptomatic ICS can be performed with a high rate of technical success and acceptable periprocedural morbidity rates. Our initial experience indicates that this procedure represents a viable treatment option for this patient population.

Comparison of rapamycin- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Compared with bare metal stents, sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents (SESs and PESs, respectively) have been shown to improve angiographic and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elective patients and those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of the present study was to compare SESs with PESs in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Patients with STEMI were randomized 1:1 to receive SESs (n = 196) or PESs (n = 201). The primary end point was late lumen loss at 9-month follow-up by quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiac clinical events (death, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization) at 1 month and 9 and 12 months. Three hundred ninety-seven patients with STEMI were randomized. The 2 groups had comparable baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. Mortality was low, 1.5% after 30 days, 2.3% after 9 months, and 3.1% after 1 year. There was no difference in any clinical outcome at any follow-up period between the 2 treatment groups. Follow-up angiography was completed in 272 of 397 patients (69%). Mean +/- SD in-stent late loss was 0.01 +/- 0.42 mm in the SES group versus 0.21 +/- 0.50 mm in the PES group (difference -0.20 mm, p = 0.001). In conclusion, in patients with STEMI, primary PCI with SESs results in less late loss compared with PESs. However, these benefits did not translate into a significant decrease in major adverse cardiac events at 1-year follow-up.

Distal embolic protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: The RUBY study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and feasibility of the GuardWire system as an embolic protection device during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

BACKGROUND

Distal embolization occurs in approximately 15% of patients after primary angioplasty and is associated with reduced myocardial reperfusion, more extensive myocardial damage and a poor prognosis. Distal embolic protection could reduce the rate of embolic complications and improve outcome.

METHODS

329 patients (mean age 60+/-12 years) were included: 278 (84.5%) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 50 (15.2%) with unstable angina/non-STEMI and 1 (0.3%) with post-infarction angina. Primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days. Secondary endpoints were the magnitude of ST-segment resolution at 90 and 180 min post-procedure, myocardial blush grade, and angiographically visible distal emboli.

RESULTS

The GuardWire system was successfully positioned in 99% of patients. Complete ST-elevation resolution (>70%) was observed in 28.5% immediately post-procedure, and in 35.4% and 41.6% at 90 and 180 min post-procedure. TIMI-3 flow grade was achieved by 89.8% of patients after intervention and mean corrected TIMI frame count was 20.2+/-13.2. Grade-3 myocardial blush was seen in 47.7% of patients and distal emboli were angiographically visible in 7.4%. Incidence of MACE at 30 days was 3.3% (death 1.2%; Q-wave MI 0.3%; non-Q-wave MI 0.3%; coronary artery bypass graft 0.6%; repeat PCI 0.9%).

CONCLUSION

The GuardWire system was successfully positioned in nearly all patients without complications. The use of this embolic protection device in ACS patients undergoing PCI was associated with low rates of distal embolization and 30-day MACE.

Plaque prolapse after stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, predictors, and outcome of plaque prolapse (PP) after stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

The imaging characteristics of PP in patients with acute myocardial infarction are not well known.

METHODS

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging was performed in 310 patients immediately following stenting for their first acute myocardial infarction. Multiple clinical, angiographic and IVUS derived variables were compared among patients with and without intrastent PP.

RESULTS

The PP was detected in 27% of the 310 lesions examined. Stent length was longer (31 +/- 13 mm vs. 21 +/- 8 mm, p < 0.001), and positive remodeling (48% vs. 32%, p = 0.008), plaque rupture (51% vs. 31%, p = 0.001), and thrombus (40% vs. 21%, p = 0.001) were significantly more common in PP lesions compared with non-PP lesions. The creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) was significantly greater after stenting in PP lesions compared with non-PP lesions (Delta = +12.3 +/- 32.0 U/l vs. -4.9 +/- 46.1 U/l, p = 0.002). During a 1-month follow-up, the incidence of stent thrombosis was not significantly different between PP and non-PP lesions [2/85 (2.4%) vs. 2/225 (0.9%), p = 0.308]. Multivariate analysis showed that PP (odds ratio [OR]: 7.34, p < 0.001), plaque rupture (OR: 1.95, p = 0.023), and thrombus (OR: 1.84, p = 0.026) were independently associated with post-stenting CK-MB elevation, and stent length (OR: 2.39, p = 0.003), plaque rupture (OR: 1.96, p = 0.015), and positive remodeling (OR: 1.72, p = 0.044) were independently associated with the development of PP.

CONCLUSIONS

PP occurs in one-fourth of infarct-related arteries after stent implantation. Lesion characteristics such as plaque rupture and positive remodeling, together with longer stent predict PP. Although long-term follow-up is pending, PP is associated with more myonecrosis after stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: drug-eluting stents or bare metal stents?

The treatment paradigm for patients with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has shifted greatly in the last 20 years. The use of fibrinolytic agents vastly altered the landscape in treating this entity and was further advanced by the introduction of percutaneous catheter-based methods of therapy. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the preferred method of treatment for patients with this condition when compared with thrombolytic agents as evidenced by a number of positive clinical trials. However, PCI in itself has had several adaptations over the last decade, namely in the shift from a balloon-only approach to the widespread usage of balloon-expandable metallic stents. The use of bare metal stents has proven to be more efficacious in regard to rates of repeat procedures when compared with the balloon-only approach and has become a standard in PCI for STEMI. The composition of the stents themselves had also undergone transformation as evidenced by the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES). Although there have been encouraging data to support the use of DES in the elective setting, the use of these devices in primary PCI has been controversial. The pathologic milieu that is present in the STEMI setting is distinctly different than that seen in the elective, stable atherosclerotic setting and the use of DES has raised concerns over safety issues with their implementation. There have been a host of recent studies dedicated to elucidating the risk of using DES versus bare metal stents in the setting of STEMI and although the results have been generally favorable for the use of DES, this subject remains one that is under significant scrutiny.

Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from seven randomized trials

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The performance of drug-eluting stents (DESs) in high-risk patients with diabetes and acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who have undergone primary angioplasty has not been previously studied. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DESs in diabetic patients with STEMI.

METHODS

We performed a pooled analysis of individual patient data from seven randomized trials that compared DESs (i.e., sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents) with bare-metal stents (BMSs) in patients with STEMI. The analysis involved 389 patients with diabetes mellitus from a total of 2476 patients. The outcomes of interest were target-lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, death and the composite endpoint of death or recurrent myocardial infarction during a follow-up of 12-24 months.

RESULTS

Overall, 206 diabetic patients received a DES and 183, a BMS. The risk of target-lesion revascularization was significantly lower in patients treated with a DES compared to those treated with a BMS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.88; P=.02). There was no significant difference in the risk of stent thrombosis between those treated with a DES or a BMS (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.09-1.13; P=.08). Similarly, the risk of the combined endpoint of death or myocardial infarction was not significantly different between patients treated with a DES or a BMS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.36-1.13; P=.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with BMSs, DES use improved clinical outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing primary angioplasty for STEMI: the need for reintervention was reduced, with no increase in mortality or myocardial infarction.

Impact of plaque components on no-reflow phenomenon after stent deployment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound analysis

Aims

We used virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) to evaluate the relation between coronary plaque characteristics and no-reflow in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.

Methods and results

A total of 190 consecutive ACS patients were imaged using VH-IVUS and analysed retrospectively. Angiographic no-reflow was defined as TIMI flow grade 0, 1, and 2 after stenting. Virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound classified the colour-coded tissue into four major components: fibrotic, fibro-fatty, dense calcium, and necrotic core (NC). Thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) was defined as focal, NC-rich (≥10% of the cross-sectional area) plaques being in contact with the lumen in a plaque burden ≥40%. Of the 190 patients studied at pre-stenting, no-reflow was observed in 24 patients (12.6%) at post-stenting. The absolute and %NC areas at the minimum lumen sites (1.6 ± 1.2 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8 mm², P < 0.001, and 24.5 ± 14.3 vs. 16.1 ± 10.6%, P = 0.001, respectively) and the absolute and %NC volumes (30 ± 24 vs. 16 ± 17 mm³, P = 0.001, and 22 ± 11 vs. 14 ± 8%, P < 0.001, respectively) were significantly greater, and the presence of at least one TCFA and multiple TCFAs within culprit lesions (71 vs. 36%, P = 0.001, and 38 vs. 15%, P = 0.005, respectively) was significantly more common in the no-reflow group compared with the normal-reflow group. In the multivariable analysis, %NC volume was the only independent predictor of no-reflow (odds ratio = 1.126; 95% CI 1.045–1.214, P = 0.002).

Conclusion

In ACS patients, post-stenting no-reflow is associated with plaque components defined by VH-IVUS analysis with larger NC and more TCFAs.

Routine stenting vs. balloon angioplasty in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction due to proximal left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion

BACKGROUND

Primary angioplasty has been shown to improve the outcome in selected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, no data have been reported of patients with proximal left anterior descending artery occlusion. In the Zwolle-6 randomized trial, a total of 1683 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to stenting or balloon angioplasty without any exclusion criteria. The aim of this substudy was to investigate the benefits of coronary stenting as compared to balloon angioplasty in patients with proximal left anterior descending artery occlusion.

METHODS

From April 1997 to October 2001, among a total of 1683 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction randomized to stenting or balloon angioplasty before the initial angiography, a total of 218 patients underwent primary angioplasty of proximal left anterior descending artery occlusion. One-year follow-up data were available from all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were randomized to stent and 111 patients to balloon angioplasty. The cross-over rates from balloon to stent and stent to balloon were 35.1 and 13.1%, respectively (P<0.0001). The groups were comparable in terms of postprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow, myocardial blush grade, distal embolization, and ST-segment resolution. Stenting was associated with benefits in terms of restenosis (27.6 vs. 53.8%, P=0.03) and target vessel revascularization (15.0 vs. 24.3%, P=0.081), whereas no difference was observed in mortality (11.2 vs. 13.5%, P>0.1) and reinfarction (11.2 vs. 8.1%, P>0.1) as compared with balloon angioplasty.

CONCLUSION

As compared with balloon angioplasty, routine stenting does reduce angiographic restenosis, without significant benefits in terms of death and reinfarction among patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction due to proximal left anterior descending artery occlusion.

Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: A meta-regression analysis of randomized trials

INTRODUCTION

Although stenting has been shown to reduce the need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the benefits in terms of mortality and reinfarction are still unclear. Previous meta-analyses have failed to include all currently available randomized trials. The aim of the current study was to perform an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the benefits of coronary stenting for AMI in terms of mortality, reinfarction, and TVR, and whether these benefits correlated with the patient's risk profile.

METHODS

The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL) from January 1990 to September 2006. We examined all completed, published, randomized trials of coronary stenting for AMI. The following key words were used for study selection: randomized trial, myocardial infarction, reperfusion, primary angioplasty, rescue angioplasty, stenting, and balloon angioplasty. Information on study design, type of stent, inclusion and exclusion criteria, primary endpoint, number of patients, angiographic and clinical outcome, were extracted by two investigators. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 13 randomized trials were identified and analyzed involving 6922 patients (3460 or 50% randomized to stent and 3462 or 50% to balloon). Stenting was not associated with a significant reduction in 30-day (2.9% versus 3.0%, p=0.81) and 1-year mortality (5.1% versus 5.2%, p=0.81), as compared to balloon angioplasty. However, a significant relationship was observed between patient's risk profile and mortality benefits from coronary stenting at 30-day (beta -0.63 [-25.4; -2.45], p=0.022) and 1-year follow-up (beta -0.61 [-15.9; -0.76], p=0.034). Stenting was associated with benefits in terms of TVR at both 30-day (3.1% versus 5.1%, p<0.0001) and 6 to 12 months (11.3% versus 18.4%, p<0.0001) follow-up, without any difference in terms of reinfarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Among AMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty, coronary stent implantation, when anatomically and technically feasible, may be considered, in addition to benefits in terms of TVR, to reduce mortality in high-risk patients, who may be identified by the use of validated risk scores.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Recent concerns have emerged on the potential higher risk of stent thrombosis after DES implantation, that might be even more pronounced among STEMI patients. Thus, the aim of the current study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the benefits and safety of DES as compared to BMS in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for STEMI.

METHODS

The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL). We examined all completed randomized trials of DES for STEMI. The following key words were used for study selection: randomized trial, myocardial infarction, reperfusion, primary angioplasty, stenting, DES, sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), Cypher, paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), Taxus. Information on study design, type of stent, inclusion and exclusion criteria, primary endpoint, number of patients, angiographic and clinical outcome, were extracted by two investigators. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 11 trials were included in the meta-analysis, involving 3605 patients (1888 or 52.3% randomized to DES and 1719 or 47.7% randomized to BMS). At 12 months follow-up, no significant difference was observed in mortality (4.1% vs 4.4%, OR [95% CI]=0.91 [0.66-1.27], p=0.59, reinfarction (3.1% vs 3.4%, OR [95% CI]=0.85 [0.58, 1.23], p=0.38 or stent thrombosis (1.6% vs 2.2%, OR [95% CI]=0.76 [0.47, 1.23], p=0.22), whereas DES were associated with a significant reduction in TVR (5.0% vs 12.6%, OR [95% CI]=0.36 [0.28, 0.47], p<0.0001). Safety and efficacy of DES were confirmed at 18 to 24 months follow-up (data available from 4 trials including 1178 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis shows that among selected STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty, SES and PES, as compared to BMS, are safe and associated with a significant reduction in TVR at 1 and 2 years follow-up.

A quantitative estimate of bare-metal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction: angiographic measures in relation to clinical outcome

We performed a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the pre-drug-eluting-stent era comparing bare-metal stenting (BMS) with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) to examine coronary angiographic parameters of infarct-related vessel patency and to relate the angiographic measures to clinical outcome. The search was restricted to published RCTs in humans. 10 RCTs, (6192 patients) were analysed. Compared with balloon angioplasty, BMS was associated with reduced rates of reocclusion (6.7% vs 10.1%, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.96, p = 0.03) and restenosis (23.9% vs 39.3%, OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59, p<0.001), but not with reduced rates of subacute thrombosis (1.7% in both groups). BMS showed a reduction in target vessel revascularisation (TVR; 12.2% vs 19.2%, OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.69, p<0.001), but not in mortality (5.3% vs 5.1%) or reinfarction (3.9% vs 4%). The findings of this study support BMS placement in acute MI. The discrepancy between angiographic and clinical parameters has important implications for future studies investigating further technical improvements in mechanical reperfusion therapy.

Comparison between stenting and balloon in elderly patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Coronary stenting has been shown to improve clinical outcome in comparison with balloon angioplasty in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, few data have been reported so far in the elderly. Thus, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the benefits from routine stenting in this high-risk subset of patients.

METHODS

In the Zwolle-6 randomized trial a total of 1683 consecutive patients with STEMI was randomized to stenting or balloon angioplasty without any exclusion criteria. One year follow-up data were available from all patients.

RESULTS

Among a total of 143 patients older than 75 years, 73 were randomized to stent and 67 to balloon angioplasty. No difference was observed in 1-year mortality (17.1% vs 11.9%, p=NS), reinfarction (9.2% vs 11.9%, p=NS), target vessel revascularization (15.8% vs 14.9%, p=NS) or major adverse cardiac events (28.9% vs 26.9%, p=NS) between the groups at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study showed that as compared to balloon angioplasty, the clinical benefits of routine coronary stenting in the setting of acute myocardial infarction may not be necessarily applicable to elderly patients.

Time to reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. It is time to reduce it!

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Mortality from ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction remains high, with most deaths occurring before hospital admission. Despite effective pre- and in-hospital reperfusion strategies becoming standard over the past 2 decades, time-to-admission and time-to-treatment remain prolonged. We reviewed temporal trends in these times in published clinical trials.

METHODS

All major randomized clinical trials reporting on reperfusion strategies for acute myocardial infarction published between 1993 and 2003 were evaluated. Strategies included pre- and in-hospital thrombolysis, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with or without transfer, and "facilitated" PCI. We generated overall estimates of time-to-admission, time-to-treatment, door-to-balloon (DTB), and door-to-needle (DTN) times and evaluated temporal trends in the length of time-to-admission and time-to-treatment.

RESULTS

In studies that evaluated only in-hospital thrombolysis, the time-to-admission was 149 +/- 45 minutes; the mean time-to-treatment was 181 +/- 29 minutes. In studies that considered only in-hospital pPCI (without transfer), the mean time-to-admission was 153 +/- 41 minutes; the mean time-to-treatment was 234 +/- 43 minutes. In studies that compared in-hospital pPCI with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy, the mean time-to-admission was 155 +/- 47 and 150 +/- 48 minutes, respectively. The DTN time was 65 +/- 10 minutes, whereas DTB time was 81 +/- 39 minutes. In other trials evaluating in-hospital thrombolysis and pPCI with transfer to a referral center, the time-to-admission in subjects treated with thrombolysis (n = 1345) was 127 +/- 32 minutes vs 131 +/- 36 minutes for pPCI (n = 1528). For in-hospital thrombolysis, time-to-treatment was 151 +/- 23 minutes vs 203 +/- 15 minutes for pPCI patients with transfer. The DTN time in the thrombolysis group was 44 +/- 28 minutes as compared with DTB time of 78 +/- 38 minutes in the pPCI group. Throughout the last decade, time-to-admission decreased significantly (P = .02) but time-to-treatment remained unchanged (P = .38) for patients undergoing thrombolysis. In the pPCI arm, time-to-admission remained unchanged (P = .11) but a insignificant trend toward reduction was demonstrated in time-to-treatment (P = .11).

CONCLUSION

Time-to-admission and time-to-treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction are still prolonged. Resources should be directed to early recognition of the acute myocardial infarction, improved utilization of emergency services for transportation, and prehospital diagnosis and triaging. Ambulances equipped with wireless capability to transmit electrocardiograms to the on-call cardiologist seem to be promising tools to achieve earlier diagnosis and triaging with high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.

Effectiveness of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during primary coronary angioplasty: results of propensity analysis using the New York State Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System

Patients undergoing primary angioplasty in clinical practice experience a higher risk for adverse events than those enrolled in clinical trials. Whether glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during primary angioplasty is both safe and effective in real life is unknown. Therefore, we examined the pattern of GP IIb/IIIa use and its effectiveness in a large population-based cohort of 7,321 patients who underwent primary angioplasty in New York State. Propensity analysis was used to account for the nonrandomized use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Overall, 78.5% of patients who underwent primary angioplasty received GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower with GP IIb/IIIa use (3% vs 6.2%, p <0.0001) after adjustment for both propensity score (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.74, p <0.0001) and the combination of propensity score and clinical characteristics (odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.88, p = 0.006). Patients with older age and higher Mayo Clinic Risk Score (MCRS) received GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors less often. However, stratified analysis of patients with low to moderate risk (MCRS <12) versus high risk (>or=12) demonstrated that GP IIb/IIIa use lowered risk of mortality both in low- to moderate-risk (1.39% vs 3.23%, p <0.0001) and high-risk patients (16.15% vs 22.41%, p = 0.03). In conclusion, adjunct GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during primary angioplasty is effective and associated with improved in-hospital survival rates.

Comparison of myocardial perfusion by distal protection before and after primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction: Angiographic and clinical results of a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess the myocardium-reperfusing effect of a distal protection device, GuardWire Plus (GuardWire Plus), in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Distal embolization may result in reduced myocardial perfusion, increasing the risk of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction and death. Distal protection devices may protect the microcirculation from embolic debris, improving short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

From February 2002 to July 2003, a total of 341 AMI patients at 22 institutions in Japan were enrolled in the present, multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Patients experiencing AMI within 12 hr of symptom onset, who were considered treatable by stenting and who met the inclusion criteria, were eligible for randomization. Stenting with and without GuardWire Plus was conducted to examine whether the device provides faster and more complete ST-segment resolution, smaller infarct size, and improved myocardial blush score.

RESULTS

The rates of slow flow and no-reflow immediately after PCI were 5.3 and 11.4% in the GuardWire Plus and control groups, respectively (P = 0.05). Blush score 3 acquisition rates immediately after PCI were 25.2 and 20.3% in the GuardWire Plus and control groups, respectively (P = 0.26), and the rates at 30 days after PCI were 42.9 and 30.4%, respectively (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant difference was found between the GuardWire Plus and control groups with respect to the total incidence of distal embolization, indicating that GuardWire Plus angiographically improved myocardial perfusion without demonstrating the preventive effect of myocardial damage.

External validity of ST elevation myocardial infarction trials: The Zwolle studies

BACKGROUND

Guidelines are mainly based upon results of randomised controlled clinical trials. However, due to low external validity of these trials, their results can not reasonably be applied to all patients in routine practice. In our hospital, all patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are eligible for inclusion in one of our ongoing trials or registries. To asses differences between patients enrolled versus not-enrolled in a trial or registry, we evaluated all patients with a discharge diagnose of STEMI during the study period.

METHODS

Retrospectively, individual patient data from all patients with a discharge diagnosis of STEMI between Jan 2001 and Dec 2001 were evaluated. Follow-up data were obtained until Dec 2004.

RESULTS

A total of 583 patients were discharged with a diagnosis of STEMI. About 455 (78%) patients were enrolled in one of the ongoing clinical trials or registry and 128 were not. Not-enrolled patients were significantly older; more often had a history of previous MI and had higher risk profiles. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher age was the only independent predictor for non enrollment. Not-enrolled patients were more often treated conservatively and had a higher mortality rate (36% vs. 6%, P << 0.001). After multivariate analysis, non-enrollment (OR: 95% CI) 4.02 (1.98-8.16), age 1.07 (1.04-1.12), and diabetes 2.39 (1.17-4.89) were the only independent predictors of long term mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows important differences in baseline characteristics, treatment, and prognosis between patients with STEMI who were enrolled or not in a trial. To better reflect daily clinical practice, guidelines should also consider results of observational studies of unselected patients.

Comparison between stenting and balloon angioplasty in patients undergoing primary angioplasty of small coronary vessels

BACKGROUND

Primary angioplasty has been shown to improve outcomes in selected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, no information has been reported so far in small vessels. In the Zwolle-6 randomized trial, consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to stenting or to balloon angioplasty without any exclusion criterion. In this study, we present data on patients with small vessels (< 3.0 mm).

METHODS

From April 1997 to October 2001, 798 patients randomized to balloon angioplasty or to stenting before their initial angiogram underwent primary angioplasty of small vessels, defined according to a postprocedural reference diameter < or = 3 mm. One-year follow-up data were available from all patients.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-seven patients were randomized to stent, whereas 411 were to balloon. The crossover rates from balloon to stent and from stent to balloon were 28% and 13.9%, respectively (P < .001). The groups were comparable in terms of postprocedural TIMI flow, myocardial blush grade, distal embolization, and ST-segment resolution. No difference was observed in 1-year mortality (7.2% vs 5.8%, P = not significant [NS]), target vessel revascularization (17.8% vs 22.1%, P = NS), and major adverse cardiac events (24.8% vs 29.0%, P = NS) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with balloon angioplasty, routine stenting does not seem to improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary angioplasty of small vessels. Future trials are certainly needed to evaluate the safety and benefits of drug-eluting stents in this high-risk subset of patients.

Predictors and clinical implications of early reinfarction after primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Recurrent infarction after fibrinolytic therapy has been shown to be associated with increased mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze predictors and outcome of reinfarction in a consecutive series of patients undergoing primary angioplasty.

METHODS

Our population is represented by a total of 1955 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty between 1997 to 2002. All clinical, angiographic, and follow-up data were prospectively collected. Early reinfarction was defined when two clinical criteria were satisfied within 30 days after the procedure: (1) recurrent ischemic symptoms for >15 minutes after resolution of symptoms from initial MI; (2) new ST-T-wave changes or new Q waves; (3) reelevation in creatine kinase (CK) or CK-MB to higher levels than normal (or by another 20% if already higher than normal).

RESULTS

Early reinfarction was observed in 75 (3.8%) patients. At multivariate analysis, advanced Killip class (P = .002), poor preprocedural TIMI flow (P = .014), administration of IIb-IIIa inhibitors (P = .02), and diabetes (P = .038) were independent predictors of 30-day reinfarction. A total of 107 (5.6%) patients had died. Early reinfarction was associated with a significantly higher mortality (22.7% vs 4.9%, P < .001), even after adjustment for confounding factors (blood pressure, diabetes, Killip class, preprocedural TIMI flow, coronary stenting, multivessel disease, anterior infarct location, preprocedural stenosis, and administration of IIb-IIIa inhibitors) (HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.88-5.84, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that, among patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, advanced Killip class at presentation, poor preprocedural TIMI flow, the use of IIb-IIIa inhibitors, and diabetes are independently associated with 30-day reinfarction. Early reinfarction is an independent predictor of 1-year mortality.

Impact of routine stenting on myocardial perfusion and the extent of myocardial necrosis in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Primary stenting for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been shown to improve the outcome because of the benefits in terms of restenosis. However, still controversial are the benefits in terms of reperfusion. In the Zwolle-6 randomized trial, a consecutive cohort of patients with STEMI was randomized to balloon angioplasty or stenting, without exclusion criteria. In this study, we analyzed data on myocardial perfusion and the extent of myocardial necrosis.

METHODS

From April 1997 to October 2001, a total of 1683 consecutive patients with STEMI were randomized to stenting or balloon angioplasty. No exclusion criteria were applied. Myocardial perfusion was evaluated by myocardial blush grade and ST-segment resolution. The extent of myocardial necrosis was evaluated by enzymatic infarct size and predischarge ejection fraction. All data were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

A total of 785 patients (92.5%) in the stent group and 763 patients (91.5%) in balloon group underwent primary angioplasty. The 2 groups showed similar baseline characteristics. No difference was observed between stent and balloon in myocardial blush grade, complete ST-segment resolution, distal embolization, enzymatic infarct size, and predischarge ejection fraction at both intention-to-treat and actual treatment analysis, even when restricted to patients with anterior infarction. Time delay to treatment (earlier or later than 6 hours) did not affect the results. No difference was observed in 1-year mortality (6.0% vs 5.9%, P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with balloon angioplasty, routine stenting does not improve myocardial perfusion, the rate of distal embolization, and the extent of myocardial necrosis in a large cohort of unselected patients with STEMI.