Blood pressure response to hyperventilation test reflects daytime pressor profile

Pressor responses to hyperventilation in elderly subjects differentiate essential from secondary hypertension

We evaluated pressor responses to the hyperventilation test in elderly normotensive (n=43, mean age 82 ± 5 years) and elderly hypertensive subjects (n=45 with essential hypertension, mean age 82 ± 2 years, and n=49 with secondary hypertension, mean age 82 ± 3 years). Hyperventilation did not change blood pressure (BP) in normotensive and secondary hypertensive subjects, whereas it decreased BP in essential hypertensives. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on BP responses to hyperventilation disclosed three groups of subjects in each population: group 1 exhibited a reduction in BP (essential hypertensives: 76%), group 2 no change (normotensives: 70%, secondary hypertensives: 76%), and group 3 an increase (normotensives: 19%, essential hypertensives: 13%, secondary hypertensives: 14%). Ambulatory BP monitoring found significant differences in pressor daytime profiles of hypertensive patients according to pressor responses to hyperventilation showing wide fluctuations in group 1 and 3 patients. Interestingly, the peak ambulatory SBP values correlated to the pre-hyperventilation SBP values in group 1, and to the hyperventilation peak SBP values in group 3. In conclusion: 1) Aging decreases reactivity to respiratory alkalosis in elderly normotensives; 2) hyperventilation induces significant pressor changes frequently in essential hypertension, but rarely in secondary hypertension; 3) the significant pressor responses to hyperventilation reflect the daytime pressor profiles predicting the highest daily fluctuations of BP values.

Hyperventilation and amplified blood pressure response: is there a link?

Based on prior studies, the hypothesis that hyperventilation (HV) may have a pressor effect and play a causal role in hypertension has been suggested. The objective of this study was to correlate HV with blood pressure (BP)-change during a postural challenge. Consecutive subjects referred for evaluation of syncope, dizziness, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia, or non-CFS fatigue were assessed with a 10-min supine 30-min head-up tilt test combined with capnography. We selected for analysis the records of patients aged 17-70 years, not taking vasoactive medications, having sitting systolic BP (SBP) < 140 mmHg, sitting diastolic BP (DBP) < 90 mmHg, and who completed 30 min of tilt. HV was diagnosed when end-tidal pressure of CO2 < 30 mmHg was recorded consecutively for > or = 10 min. Postural hypertension (PHT) was diagnosed when DBP on tilt > or = 90 mmHg was recorded consecutively for > or = 10 min. DBP-change was computed as (median DBP on tilt) -(median DBP supine). PHT and DBP-change were correlated with HV. A total of 320 patient charts were reviewed. PHT was present in 30 cases. The mean DBP-change in patients with PHT was +9.9 mmHg (s.d. 5.8), with three patients manifesting HV. Of the remaining 290 patients, 56 had HV, their mean DBP-change was -0.3 mmHg (s.d. 7.2). The other 234 patients without HV had a mean DBP-change +0.95 mmHg (s.d. 5.7), comparable to the DBP-change in patients with HV. In, conclusion, posturally induced HV was not associated with an increase in BP, nor was PHT associated with HV, except in a small minority of cases.

Blood pressure measurement in research and in clinical practice: recent evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For over a century the technique of blood pressure measurement developed by Riva-Rocci and Korotkoff has provided most of the data on hypertension diagnosis and treatment. Its limitations, however, are becoming increasingly evident and therefore alternative solutions are under investigation. This paper is intended to provide an overview of important recent progress in this field, and to highlight future perspectives.

RECENT FINDINGS

A major development in blood pressure measurement is the technical improvement of electronic manometers for use either in the clinic (with the auscultatory approach, as an alternative to use of mercury columns), or in automated oscillometric devices yielding blood pressure measurements devoid of observer-dependency, and allowing long-term blood pressure monitoring. In the latter case, blood pressure measurement is made possible in settings other than the physician's office, either through ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or through self blood pressure measurement at home. These methods are growing in clinical importance, but further studies are needed to define their indications more precisely in the clinical evaluation of hypertensive patients. Recently, important steps towards better standards of blood pressure measurement have been taken, as summarized in the guidelines jointly issued by the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in the 7th Joint National Committee Report and (in even more detail) in the Blood Pressure Measurement Guidelines published by the ESH Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring.

SUMMARY

Blood pressure measurement is a rapidly developing field, the importance of which is increasingly acknowledged in the light of the growing awareness of the impact of hypertension on public health. Despite remarkable progress, many methodological issues still remain to be properly addressed.