Atrial natriuretic peptide is involved in renal actions of moxonidine

Neuronal activation in the central nervous system of rats in the initial stage of chronic kidney disease-modulatory effects of losartan and moxonidine

The effect of mild chronic renal failure (CRF) induced by 4/6-nephrectomy (4/6NX) on central neuronal activations was investigated by c-Fos immunohistochemistry staining and compared to sham-operated rats. In the 4/6 NX rats also the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker, losartan, and the central sympatholyticum moxonidine was studied for two months. In serial brain sections Fos-immunoreactive neurons were localized and classified semiquantitatively. In 37 brain areas/nuclei several neurons with different functional properties were strongly affected in 4/6NX. It elicited a moderate to high Fos-activity in areas responsible for the monoaminergic innervation of the cerebral cortex, the limbic system, the thalamus and hypothalamus (e.g. noradrenergic neurons of the locus coeruleus, serotonergic neurons in dorsal raphe, histaminergic neurons in the tuberomamillary nucleus). Other monoaminergic cell groups (A5 noradrenaline, C1 adrenaline, medullary raphe serotonin neurons) and neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (innervating the sympathetic preganglionic neurons and affecting the peripheral sympathetic outflow) did not show Fos-activity. Stress- and pain-sensitive cortical/subcortical areas, neurons in the limbic system, the hypothalamus and the circumventricular organs were also affected by 4/6NX. Administration of losartan and more strongly moxonidine modulated most effects and particularly inhibited Fos-activity in locus coeruleus neurons. In conclusion, 4/6NX elicits high activity in central sympathetic, stress- and pain-related brain areas as well as in the limbic system, which can be ameliorated by losartan and particularly by moxonidine. These changes indicate a high sensitivity of CNS in initial stages of CKD which could be causative in clinical disturbances.

Functional and molecular effects of imidazoline receptor activation in heart failure

AIMS

Heart failure is a progressive deterioration in heart function associated with overactivity of the sympathetic nervous system. The benefit of inhibition of sympathetic activity by moxonidine, a centrally acting imidazoline receptor agonist, was questioned based on the outcome of a failing clinical trial. The following studies measured cardiac structure and hemodynamics and mechanisms underlying moxonidine-induced changes, in cardiomyopathic hamsters, where the stage of the disease, dose, and compliance were controlled.

MAIN METHODS

Male BIO 14.6 hamsters (6 and 10 months old, with moderate and advanced heart failure, respectively) received moxonidine at 2 concentrations: low (2.4 mg/kg/day) and high (9.6 mg/kg/day), or vehicle, subcutaneously, for 1month. Cardiac function was measured by echocardiography, plasma and hearts were collected for histological determination of fibrosis and apoptosis, as well as for measurement cytokines by Elisa and cardiac proteins by Western blotting.

KEY FINDINGS

Compared to age-matched vehicle-treated BIO 14.6, moxonidine did not reduce blood pressure but significantly reduced heart rate and improved cardiac performance. Moxonidine exerted anti-apoptotic effect with differential inflammatory/anti-inflammatory responses that culminate in attenuated cardiac apoptosis and fibrosis and altered protein expression of collagen types. Some effects were observed regardless of treatment onset, although the changes were more significant in the younger group. Interestingly, moxonidine resulted in upregulation of cardiac imidazoline receptors.

SIGNIFICANCE

These studies imply that in addition to centrally mediated sympathetic inhibition, the effects of moxonidine may, at least in part, be mediated by direct actions on the heart. Further investigation of imidazolines/imidazoline receptors in cardiovascular diseases is warranted.

Comparable renovascular protective effects of moxonidine and simvastatin in rats exposed to cigarette smoke

Renovascular impairment plays a major role in smoking-induced nephrotoxicity. This study investigated the effect of the imidazoline I(1)-receptor/alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist moxonidine, as compared to the lipid lowering drug simvastatin, on abnormalities induced by cigarette smoke (CS) in renovascular reactivity. Six rat groups were used: control, CS (twice a day for 6weeks), simvastatin, moxonidine, CS+simvastatin, and CS+moxonidine. CS exposure increased plasma urea and creatinine and reduced plasma and renal nitrate/nitrite (NOx). In isolated perfused phenylephrine-preconstricted kidneys of CS rats, vasodilator responses to carbachol or isoprenaline, but not papaverine, were attenuated. Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition by N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) reduced carbachol vasodilations in control but not CS kidneys, suggesting the impairment of NOS activity by CS. Simultaneous administration of moxonidine or simvastatin abolished CS-induced abnormalities in indices of renal function, NOx, and vasodilations caused by carbachol or isoprenaline. The possibility whether alterations in antioxidant or lipid profiles contributed to the interaction was investigated. CS increased renal malondialdyde and decreased glutathione, and glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and catalase activities. Further, CS reduced plasma HDL and increased cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL. Simvastatin or moxonidine abolished the deleterious CS effects on antioxidant activity; the lipid profile was normalized by simvastatin only. These findings highlight that renovascular dysfunction caused by CS and the underlying oxidative damage is evenly attenuated by moxonidine and simvastatin.

Antagonistic effects of atipamezole and yohimbine on xylazine-induced diuresis in healthy dogs

The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the antagonistic effects of atipamezole and yohimbine on xylazine-induced diuresis in healthy dogs. Five healthy male beagles were assigned to each of the 8 treatment groups in a randomized design at 1-week intervals in the same dog. One group was not medicated. The dogs in the other groups received 2 mg/kg xylazine intramuscularly (IM) and a treatment of saline (control), 50, 100 or 300 microg/kg of each atipamezole or yohimbine IM 0.5 hr later. Urine and blood samples were collected 11 times over the course of 24 hr. Urine volume, pH, specific gravity and creatinine values; osmolality, electrolyte and arginine vasopressin (AVP) values in both urine and plasma; and plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentration were measured. Both atipamezole and yohimbine antagonized xylazine-induced diuresis. The reversal effect of yohimbine was more potent, but not dose-dependent at the tested doses, in contrast with atipamezole. Both atipamezole and yohimbine exhibited similar potency in reversing the decreases in urine specific gravity, osmolality, creatinine, sodium and chloride concentrations and the increase in the plasma potassium concentration induced by xylazine. Both also inhibited xylazine-induced diuresis without significantly altering the hormonal profile in the dogs. A higher dose of atipamezole tended to increase the plasma ANP concentration. This may not be due only to actions mediated by alpha(2)-adrenoceptors. Both drugs can be used as antagonistic agents against xylazine-induced diuresis in healthy dogs.

Contribution of imidazoline receptors and alpha2-adrenoceptors in the rostral ventrolateral medulla to sympathetic baroreflex inhibition by systemic rilmenidine

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the hypotensive and sympathetic baroreflex inhibition by rilmenidine administered systemically are mediated via imidazoline receptors in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM).

METHODS

Initial dose-response curves to rilmenidine were determined in urethane anaesthetized rabbits. Effects of a single intravenous dose of rilmenidine (445 microg/kg) on the renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) baroreflex were examined before and after microinjection into the RVLM of the mixed imidazoline/alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan and the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist 2-methoxyidazoxan (2-MI).

RESULTS

Intravenous administration of rilmenidine lowered mean arterial pressure and RSNA, inhibited the RSNA baroreflex range by 33% and shifted the baroreflex curve to the left. Idazoxan injected into the RVLM reversed the hypotension and completely restored the baroreflex curve at doses that did not affect the hypotension produced by the selective alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist alpha-methylnoradrenaline. The alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, 2-MI also reversed the rilmenidine sympatho-inhibition suggesting that alpha2-adrenoceptors are activated as well.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study show that the hypotensive and sympatho-inhibitory actions of systemic rilmenidine are primarily mediated via imidazoline receptors in the RVLM. However, alpha2-adrenoceptors are also involved, probably as a direct result of the imidazoline receptor action.

Receptors involved in moxonidine-stimulated atrial natriuretic peptide release from isolated normotensive rat hearts

Imidazoline I1-receptors are present in the heart and may be involved in atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) release. The following studies investigated whether moxonidine (an antihypertensive imidazoline I1-receptor and alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist) acts directly on the heart to stimulate ANP release, and to characterize the receptor type involved in this action. Perfusion of rat (200-225 g) isolated hearts with moxonidine (10(-6) and 10(-5) M), for 30 min, resulted in ANP release (83+/-29 and 277+/-70 ng/30 min, above basal, respectively), significantly (P<0.01) different from perfusion with buffer (-6+/-31 ng/30 min). ANP release stimulated by moxonidine (10(-6) M) was inhibited by co-perfusion with the antagonists, AGN192403 (imidazoline I1-receptor), phenoxybenzamine (alpha2>alpha1-adrenoceptors), and prazosin (alpha1>alpha2-adrenoceptors), but increased by rauwolscine (alpha2-adrenoceptors). Perfusion with 10(-5) M brimonidine (full alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist) inhibited moxonidine-stimulated ANP release. Similarly, moxonidine (10(-6) M) tended to reduce coronary flow, but significantly increased coronary flow in the presence of brimonidine, which was vasoconstrictive when perfused alone. Coronary flow was reduced by 10(-5) M each, brimonidine>clonidine>moxonidine; while similar bradycardia was observed with clonidine and moxonidine, but not with brimonidine. In conclusion, these results argue in favor of moxonidine acting primarily on imidazoline I1-receptors to release ANP, with both alpha2-adrenoceptor and imidazoline I1-receptors exerting inhibitory inter-relation. In contrast, the coronary vasodilatory effect of moxonidine requires full activation of alpha2-adrenoceptor. The sympatholytic and ANP-releasing effects of moxonidine appear to be mediated by cardiac imidazoline receptors that may be differentially localized. Most importantly, moxonidine can stimulate ANP release from the heart without contribution of the central nervous system.

Natriuretic peptides as therapeutic targets

Natriuretic peptides (atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide and C-type natriuretic peptide) are cardiac and vascular peptides with vasodilatory, diuretic, natriuretic, anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic and antimitogenic actions. Natriuretic peptides are implicated in normal pressure and volume homeostasis and in the defence against excessive increases in overload-related factors, vasopressive and cardiotoxic factors and their impact on the heart, blood vessels and brain. Genetic manipulation studies confirmed the importance of natriuretic peptides in these functions. Natriuretic peptides are metabolised by NPR-C (clearance receptors) and by enzymatic degradation by neutral endopeptidase. Natriuretic peptide levels (mainly brain natriuretic peptide) correlate with left ventricular hypertrophy and with the severity of heart failure, and are reduced by effective treatment, thus used as diagnostic and prognostic tools. Based on the multiple protective effects of natriuretic peptides, pharmacological therapy has been approved and includes potentiating natriuretic peptide levels by intravenous infusion or by inhibition of endogenous natriuretic peptide degradation. Because each approach has its limitations, the field remains open for improvement.

Urinary responses to acute moxonidine are inhibited by natriuretic peptide receptor antagonist

We have previously shown that acute intravenous injections of moxonidine and clonidine increase plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), a vasodilator, diuretic and natriuretic hormone. We hypothesized that moxonidine stimulates the release of ANP, which would act on its renal receptors to cause diuresis and natriuresis, and these effects may be altered in hypertension. Moxonidine (0, 10, 50, 100 or 150 microg in 300 microl saline) and clonidine (0, 1, 5 or 10 microg in 300 microl saline) injected intravenously in conscious normally hydrated normotensive Sprague-Dawley rats (SD, approximately 200 g) and 12-14-week-old Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) dose-dependently stimulated diuresis, natriuresis, kaliuresis and cGMP excretion, with these effects being more pronounced during the first hour post-injection. The actions of 5 microg clonidine and 50 microg moxonidine were inhibited by yohimbine, an alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, and efaroxan, an imidazoline I1-receptor antagonist. Moxonidine (100 microg) stimulated (P<0.01) diuresis in SHR (0.21+/-0.04 vs 1.16+/-0.06 ml h(-1) 100 g(-1)), SD (0.42+/-0.06 vs 1.56+/-0.19 ml h(-1) 100 g(-1)) and WKY (0.12+/-0.04 vs 1.44+/-0.21 ml h(-1) 100 g(-1)). Moxonidine-stimulated urine output was lower in SHR than in SD and WKY. Moxonidine-stimulated sodium and potassium excretions were lower in SHR than in SD, but not WKY, demonstrating an influence of strain but not of pressure. Pretreatment with the natriuretic peptide antagonist anantin (5 or 10 microg) resulted in dose-dependent inhibition of moxonidine-stimulated urinary actions. Anantin (10 microg) inhibited (P<0.01) urine output to 0.38+/-0.06, 0.12+/-0.01, and 0.16+/-0.04 ml h(-1) 100 g(-1) in SD, WKY, and SHR, respectively. Moxonidine increased (P<0.01) plasma ANP in SD (417+/-58 vs 1021+/-112 pg ml(-1)) and WKY (309+/-59 vs 1433+/-187 pg ml(-1)), and in SHR (853+/-96 vs 1879+/-229 pg ml(-1)). These results demonstrate that natriuretic peptides mediate the urinary actions of moxonidine through natriuretic peptide receptors.

Imidazoline receptors in the heart: a novel target and a novel mechanism of action that involves atrial natriuretic peptides

Chronic stimulation of sympathetic nervous activity contributes to the development and maintenance of hypertension, leading to left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), arrhythmias and cardiac death. Moxonidine, an imidazoline antihypertensive compound that preferentially activates imidazoline receptors in brainstem rostroventrolateral medulla, suppresses sympathetic activation and reverses LVH. We have identified imidazoline receptors in the heart atria and ventricles, and shown that atrial I1-receptors are up-regulated in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), and ventricular I1-receptors are up-regulated in hamster and human heart failure. Furthermore, cardiac I1-receptor binding decreased after chronic in vivo exposure to moxonidine. These studies implied that cardiac I1-receptors are involved in cardiovascular regulation. The presence of I1-receptors in the heart, the primary site of production of natriuretic peptides, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), cardiac hormones implicated in blood pressure control and cardioprotection, led us to propose that ANP may be involved in the actions of moxonidine. In fact, acute iv administration of moxonidine (50 to 150 microg/rat) dose-dependently decreased blood pressure, stimulated diuresis and natriuresis and increased plasma ANP and its second messenger, cGMP. Chronic SHR treatment with moxonidine (0, 60 and 120 microg kg(-1) h(-1), sc for 4 weeks) dose-dependently decreased blood pressure, resulted in reversal of LVH and decreased ventricular interleukin 1beta concentration after 4 weeks of treatment. These effects were associated with a further increase in already elevated ANP and BNP synthesis and release (after 1 week), and normalization by 4 weeks. In conclusion, cardiac imidazoline receptors and natriuretic peptides may be involved in the acute and chronic effects of moxonidine.

Augmentation of moxonidine-induced increase in ANP release by atrial hypertrophy

Imidazoline receptors are divided into I1 and I2 subtypes. I1-imidazoline receptors are distributed in the heart and are upregulated during hypertension or heart failure. The aim of this study was to define the possible role of I1-imidazoline receptors in the regulation of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) release in hypertrophied atria. Experiments were performed on isolated, perfused, hypertrophied atria from remnant-kidney hypertensive rats. The relatively selective I1-imidazoline receptor agonist moxonidine caused a decrease in pulse pressure. Moxonidine (3, 10, and 30 μmol/l) also caused dose-dependent increases in ANP secretion, but clonidine (an α2-adrenoceptor agonist) did not. Pretreatment with efaroxan (a selective I1-imidazoline receptor antagonist) or rauwolscine (a selective α2-adrenoceptor antagonist) inhibited the moxonidine-induced increases in ANP secretion and interstitial ANP concentration and decrease in pulse pressure. However, the antagonistic effect of efaroxan on moxonidine-induced ANP secretion was greater than that of rauwolscine. Neither efaroxan nor rauwolscine alone has any significant effects on ANP secretion and pulse pressure. In hypertrophied atria, the moxonidine-induced increase in ANP secretion and decrease in pulse pressure were markedly augmented compared with nonhypertrophied atria, and the relative change in ANP secretion by moxonidine was positively correlated to atrial hypertrophy. The accentuation by moxonidine of ANP secretion was attenuated by efaroxan but not by rauwolscine. These results show that moxonidine increases ANP release through (preferentially) the activation of atrial I1-imidazoline receptors and also via different mechanisms from clonidine, and this effect is augmented in hypertrophied atria. Therefore, we suggest that cardiac I1-imidazoline receptors play an important role in the regulation of blood pressure.

Imidazoline Receptors but Not α2-Adrenoceptors Are Regulated in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat Heart by Chronic Moxonidine Treatment

We have recently identified imidazoline I(1)-receptors in the heart. In the present study, we tested regulation of cardiac I(1)-receptors versus alpha(2) -adrenoceptors in response to hypertension and to chronic exposure to agonist. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR, 12-14 weeks old) received moxonidine (10, 60, and 120 microg/kg/h s.c.) for 1 and 4 weeks. Autoradiographic binding of (125)I-paraiodoclonidine (0.5 nM, 1 h, 22 degrees C) and inhibition of binding with epinephrine (10(-10)-10(-5) M) demonstrated the presence of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors in heart atria and ventricles. Immunoblotting and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction identified alpha(2A)-alpha(2B)-, and alpha(2C), and -adrenoceptor proteins and mRNA, respectively. However, compared with normotensive controls, cardiac alpha(2) -adrenoceptor kinetic parameters, receptor proteins, and mRNAs were not altered in SHR with or without moxonidine treatment. In contrast, autoradiography showed that up-regulated atrial I(1)-receptors in SHR are dose-dependently normalized by 1 week, with no additional effect after 4 weeks of treatment. Moxonidine (120 microg/kg/h) decreased B(max) in right (40.0 +/- 2.9-7.0 +/- 0.6 fmol/unit area; p < 0.01) and left (27.7 +/- 2.8-7.1 +/- 0.4 fmol/unit area; p < 0.01) atria, and decreased the 85- and 29-kDa imidazoline receptor protein bands, in right atria, to 51.8 +/- 3.0% (p < 0.01) and 82.7 +/- 5.2% (p < 0.03) of vehicle-treated SHR, respectively. Moxonidine-associated percentage of decrease in B(max) only correlated with the 85-kDa protein (R(2) = 0.57; p < 0.006), suggesting that this protein may represent I(2)-receptors. The weak but significant correlation between the two imidazoline receptor proteins (R(2) = 0.28; p < 0.03) implies that they arise from the same gene. In conclusion, the heart possesses I(1)-receptors and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, but only I(1)-receptors are responsive to hypertension and to chronic in vivo treatment with a selective I(1)-receptor agonist.

Imidazoline receptors in the heart: characterization, distribution, and regulation

Imidazoline receptors were identified in cardiac tissues of various species. Imidazoline receptors were immunolocalized in the rat heart. Membrane binding and autoradiography on frozen heart sections using 0.5 nM para-iodoclonidine (125I-PIC) revealed that binding was equally and concentration-dependently inhibited by epinephrine and imidazole-4-acetic acid (IAA), implying 125I-PIC binding to cardiac alpha2-adrenergic and I1-receptors, respectively. After irreversible blockade of alpha2-adrenergic receptors, binding was inhibited by the selective I1-agonist, moxonidine, and the I1-antagonist, efaroxan, in a concentration-dependent (10-12 to 10-5 M) manner. Calculation of kinetic parameters revealed that in canine left and right atria, I1-receptor Bmax was 13.4 +/- 1.7 and 20.1 +/- 3.0 fmol/mg protein, respectively. Compared to age-matched normotensive Wistar Kyoto rats, I1-receptors were increased in 12-week-old hypertensive rat (SHR) right (22.6 +/- 0.3 to 43.7 +/- 4.4 fmol/unit area, p < 0.01) and left atria (13.3 +/- 0.6 to 30.2 +/- 4.1 fmol/unit area, p < 0.01). Also, compared to corresponding normal controls, Bmax was increased in hearts of hamsters with advanced cardiomyopathy (13.9 +/- 0.4 to. 26.0 +/- 2.3 fmol/unit area, p < 0.01) and in human ventricles with heart failure (12.6 +/- 1.3 to 35.5 +/- 2.9 fmol/mg protein, p < 0.003). These studies demonstrate that the heart possesses imidazoline I1-receptors that are up-regulated in the presence of hypertension or heart failure, which would suggest their involvement in cardiovascular regulation.

Sympathetic modulation of renal blood flow by rilmenidine and captopril: central vs. peripheral effects

Renal blood flow (RBF) is modulated by renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA). However, agents that are supposed to reduce sympathetic tone, such as rilmenidine and captopril, influence RBF also by direct arteriolar effects. The present study was designed to test to what extent the renal nerves contribute to the renal hemodynamic response to rilmenidine and captopril. We used a technique that allows simultaneous recording of RBF and RSNA to the same kidney in conscious rabbits. We compared the dose-dependent effects of rilmenidine (0.01-1 mg/kg) and captopril (0.03-3 mg/kg) on RBF and RSNA in intact and renal denervated (RNX) rabbits. Because rilmenidine and captopril lower blood pressure, studies were also performed in sinoaortically denervated (SAD) rabbits to determine the role of the baroreflex in the renal hemodynamic response. Rilmenidine reduced arterial pressure, RBF, and RSNA dose dependently. In intact rabbits (n = 10), renal conductance (RC) remained unaltered (3 +/- 5%), even after the 1-mg/kg dose, which completely abolished RSNA. In RNX rabbits (n = 6), RC fell by 18 +/- 5%, whereas in SAD rabbits (n = 7) RC increased by 30 +/- 20% after rilmenidine. In intact rabbits, captopril increased RSNA maximally by 64 +/- 8%. RSNA did not rise in SAD rabbits. Despite the differential response or absence of RSNA, captopril increased RC to a comparable degree (maximally 40-50%) in all three groups. Using spectral analysis techniques, we found that in all groups, independently of ongoing RSNA, captopril, but not rilmenidine, attenuated both myogenic (0.07-0.25 Hz) and tubuloglomerular feedback (0.01-0.07 Hz) related fluctuations in RC. We conclude that, in conscious rabbits, the renal vasodilator effect of rilmenidine depends on the level of ongoing RSNA. Its sympatholytic effect is, however, blunted by a direct arteriolar vasoconstrictor effect. In contrast, the renal vasodilator effect of captopril is not modulated by ongoing RSNA and is associated with impairment of autoregulation of RBF.

Moxonidine: some controversy

Initially it was considered that moxonidine, like clonidine, acted at central (2)-adrenoceptors to reduce blood pressure. With the characterisation of imidazoline binding sites distinct from (2)-adrenoceptors, the consensus became that moxonidine was acting predominantly at imidazoline I(1) receptors in the rostral ventrolateral medulla to lower blood pressure. Moxonidine acts at prejunctional (2)-adrenoceptors on sympathetic nerve endings to decrease noradrenaline release and this may contribute to its ability to lower blood pressure. The predominant site of action of moxonidine may also depend on route of administration, with imidazoline I(1) receptors being predominant after central, and (2)-adrenoceptors predominant after systemic administration. The controversy over the mechanism and site of action with moxonidine is ongoing. In animal models, moxonidine lowers blood pressure, reduces cardiac hypertrophy and remodelling, reduces cardiac arrhythmias and increases blood flow in cerebral ischaemia. Moxonidine also has beneficial effects in animal models of diabetes and kidney disease. Moxonidine increases sodium and water excretion in rats, but not humans. Animal studies indicate that moxonidine may be useful in the treatment of glaucoma by reducing intra-ocular pressure. Animal studies show that moxonidine may also be effective in pain and in ethanol withdrawal. In humans, the pharmacokinetics of moxonidine are of the one-compartment model with first-order absorption. Renal elimination is the major route of elimination and individual titration of moxonidine is needed in patients with renal impairment. There is overwhelming evidence that moxonidine is a safe and effective antihypertensive. A large clinical trial of moxonidine in heart failure, MOXCON, was stopped because of excessive deaths in the moxonidine group. Moxonidine should not be used in patients with heart failure, but there are no obvious reasons to stop its use as an antihypertensive, or its development for other clinical uses.