1
|
Pfisterer N, Schwarz M, Schwarz C, Putre F, Ritt L, Riedl F, Hartl L, Jachs M, Mandorfer M, Madl C, Trauner M, Reiberger T. Statins, metformin, and RAS inhibitors did not reduce variceal bleeding risk and mortality in a large, real-life cohort of patients with cirrhosis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302811. [PMID: 38870117 PMCID: PMC11175511 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous experimental and clinical studies suggested a beneficial effect of statins, metformin, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (RASi) on portal hypertension. Still, their effects on hard cirrhosis-related clinical endpoints, such as variceal bleeding and bleeding-related mortality, remain to be investigated. METHODS Thus, we recorded the use of statins, metformin and RASi in a large cohort of cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for primary (PP, n = 440) and secondary bleeding prophylaxis (SP, n = 480) between 01/2000 and 05/2020. Variceal (re-) bleeding and survival rates were compared between patients with vs. without these co-medications. RESULTS A total of 920 cirrhotic patients with varices were included. At first EBL, median MELD was 13 and 515 (56%) patients showed ascites. Statins, metformin and RASi were used by 49 (5.3%), 74 (8%), and 91 (9.9%) patients, respectively. MELD and platelet counts were similar in patients with and without the co-medications of interest. Rates of first variceal bleeding and variceal rebleeding at 2 years were 5.2% and 11.7%, respectively. Neither of the co-medications were associated with decreased first bleeding rates (log-rank tests in PP: statins p = 0.813, metformin p = 0.862, RASi p = 0.919) nor rebleeding rates (log-rank tests in SP: statin p = 0.113, metformin p = 0.348, RASi p = 0.273). Similar mortality rates were documented in patients with and without co-medications for PP (log-rank tests: statins p = 0.630, metformin p = 0.591, RASi p = 0.064) and for SP (statins p = 0.720, metformin p = 0.584, RASi p = 0.118). CONCLUSION In clinical practice, variceal bleeding and mortality rates of cirrhotic patients were not reduced by co-medication with statins, metformin or RASi. Nevertheless, we recommend the use of these co-medications by indication, as they may still exert beneficial effects on non-bleeding complications in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaus Pfisterer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Klinik Landstrasse, 4. Medizinische Abteilung für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Schwarz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Caroline Schwarz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Klinik Ottakring, 4. Medizinische Abteilung für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Wien, Austria
| | - Florian Putre
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lukas Ritt
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Florian Riedl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lukas Hartl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mathias Jachs
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mattias Mandorfer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Madl
- Klinik Landstrasse, 4. Medizinische Abteilung für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Vienna, Austria
- Sigmund Freud University, Private Medical School, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Reiberger
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Christian-Doppler Laboratory for Portal Hypertension and Liver Fibrosis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Prevention of a first stroke is an important strategy to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with cerebrovascular disease. In this discussion, we review challenges to development of clinical trials for prevention of a first stroke. Summary of Review- We discuss prevention of first stroke in the context of clinical trial design in the ARRIVE trial and a primary prevention trial in development for the elderly. CONCLUSIONS Stroke is an important outcome in cerebrovascular disease trials in the elderly, but it may be trumped by coronary heart disease as a more common end point.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip B Gorelick
- Center for Stroke Research, Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, 912 S Wood Street, Room 855N, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of the antihypertensive therapy in preventing vascular cognitive disorders in elderly persons without a history of stroke is a matter of debate. This review focuses on cognitive disorders in elderly hypertensive patients. METHODS Relevant papers were identified by searches in PubMed from 1946 until February 2007 using the keywords 'cerebral blood flow autoregulation', 'vascular cognitive disorders', 'neuroimaging in hypertension', 'antihypertensive treatment' and 'neuroprotection in cerebral ischemia'. RESULTS Excessive blood pressure lowering in patients with long-standing hypertension may increase the risk of cerebral hypoperfusion, white matter lesions and consequent cognitive decline. White matter lesions have been found in the majority of patients with long-standing hypertension. They correlate with vascular cognitive disorders, particularly impairments of attention and executive function, while memory is relatively preserved. Cerebral small vessel disease in elderly patients should be taken into account when antihypertensive treatment is considered. Renin-angiotensin blockade, some calcium channel blockers and statins are thought to possess neuroprotective action. CONCLUSION For prevention of cerebral hypoperfusion in elderly hypertensives blood pressure lowering should be cautiously controlled. The increased risk of white matter lesions is an indication for early neuroprotection. The combination of renin-angiotensin blockade or calcium channel blockers with statins may become a promising preventive strategy against cognitive decline in elderly hypertensives. Cerebral white matter protection is a future challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimiter Hadjiev
- 1University Hospital of Neurology and Psychiatry 'St Naum', Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Petya Mineva
- 2Medical Faculty, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Thracian University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Simvastatin is lipophilic statin with a short half-life that is primarily metabolized by CYP450 3A4. At doses of 5 - 80 mg, simvastatin lowers LDL cholesterol by 25 - 50%. Simvastatin has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease by 35% and overall mortality by up to 30% over 5 years. The recommended starting dose of simvastatin 40 mg is approved as a lipid-lowering agent and for all high-risk patients, including those with cardiovascular disease and diabetes, regardless of the baseline LDL level. Simvastatin dose should be adjusted in those receiving CYP3A4 inhibitors, gemfibrozil, or ciclosporin, amiodarone, or in those with severe renal insufficiency. Coformulation of simvastatin with ezetimibe is now available, and coformulation with extended release niacin is under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer G Robinson
- Lipid Research Clinic, University of Iowa, Department of Epidemiology, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
| |
Collapse
|